Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T14:02:32.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanation in Prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2014

J. C. Harriss
J. C. Harriss
Affiliation:
Pembroke College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Jacquetta Hawkes in a paper called ‘The Proper Study of Mankind’ (Hawkes, 1968) has made an impassioned plea against what she considers to be the ‘dehumanization’ of prehistory at the hands of those who have sought to apply to it numerical methods and the techniques of the natural sciences. There can be few who do not sympathize with her denunciation of aimless manipulation of data and the use of techniques for their own sakes; and many must share Clark's fear that prehistoric archaeology will serve merely ‘… to provide intellectual games for the meritocracy’ (Clark, 1967, 472). But such comments as these only prompt the question ‘what are we studying prehistory for?’ or ‘what is prehistory about?’

The well-being of any academic discipline depends upon the posing of questions like these, for if a subject is to develop at all, it must undergo periods of self-analysis when some of its practitioners take stock of what they themselves and others are doing. The analysis may be concerned with methods and techniques and may either tacitly or openly accept the existing philosophy. Or it may consider the philosophy of the subject directly, by asking if the priorities of a past age are still acceptable or whether in the different climate of thought of the present, they must be changed. Self-analysis of this kind may however produce a state of unease and disquiet.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , July 1971 , pp. 38 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Binford, S. R. and Binford, L. R. (eds.), 1968. New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R., 1968. ‘Post Pleistocene Adaptations’, in Binford and Binford, 1968, 313–41.Google Scholar
Boserup, E., 1965. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. London, George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Braidwood, R. J., 1960. ‘The Agricultural Revolution’, Scientific American, 203, 130–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braidwood, R. J. and Howe, B., 1960. Prehistoric Investigations in Iraqui Kurdistan. Univ. of Chicago Oriental Institute. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization, 31.Google Scholar
Bronowski, J., 1960. The Common Sense of Science. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Caldwell, R., 1958. Trend and Tradition in the Prehistory of the Eastern United States. Memoir No. 88. American Anthropological Association, vol. 60 (6), part 2.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R., 1957. Subsistence and Social Structure; an ecological study of the Kuikuru Indians. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H., 1961. What is History? London, Macmillan. (Penguin Books, 1964.)Google Scholar
SirCarr-Saunders, A. M., 1922. The Population Problem. Oxford, University Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G., 1929. The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford, University Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G., 1951. Man Makes Himself. New York, Mentor Books. First Edition, London, 1936. Fourth Edition, London, Fontana, 1966.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G., 1956. Piecing Together the Past: the interpretation of archaeological data. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. G. D., 1952. Prehistoric Europe: the Economic Basis. Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. G. D., 1961. World Prehistory: An Outline. Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. G. D., 1967. Review of S. Piggott, Ancient Europe, PPS, XXXIII, 472.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. G. D., 1969. World Prehistory: A New Outline. Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D. and Piggott, S., 1965. Prehistoric Societies. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1968. Analytical Archaeology. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1970. Beaker Pottery of Great Britain and Ireland. 2 vols. Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
Coles, J. M. and Higgs, E. S., 1969. The Archaeology of Early Man. London, Faber.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. C., 1946. Plough and Pasture. London, Cobbett Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1950. A Hundred Years of Archaeology. London, Duckworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1962. The Idea of Prehistory. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1967. The Origins and Growth of Archaeology. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R., 1969. The Practice of History. London, Fontana.Google Scholar
Firth, R. W., 1951. Elements of Social Organization. London, Watts.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V., 1969. ‘Origins and Ecological Effects of Early Domestication in Iran and the Near East’, in Ucko, P. J. and Dimbleby, G. W. (eds.), The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, 73–100. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
SirFox, Cyril, 1938. The Personality of Britain. Cardiff, National Museum of Wales.Google Scholar
Gould, P. R., 1963. ‘Man Against his environment: a game theoretic framework’, AAAG, 53, 290–7.Google Scholar
Haggett, P., 1965. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
Harris, D. R., 1969. ‘Agricultural Systems, ecosystems and the origins of agriculture’, in Ucko, P. J. and Dimbleby, G. W. (eds.), The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, 3–16. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. W., 1969. Explanation in Geography. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J., 1968. ‘The Proper Study of Mankind’, Antiquity, XLII, 255–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, E. S., 1967. Article in The Listener, 77, 425–7.Google Scholar
Higgs, E. S. and Jarman, M. R., 1969. ‘The Origins of Agriculture: a Reconsideration’, Antiquity. XLIII, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SirHuxley, Julian, 1953. Evolution in Action. London, Chatto and Windus (Penguin Books, 1963).Google Scholar
Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I. (eds.), 1968. Man the Hunter. Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. Z., 1966. On aggression. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
McEvedy, C., 1967. The Penguin Atlas of Ancient History. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1965. Ancient Europe: from the beginnings of Agriculture to Classical Antiquity. Edinburgh, University Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C., 1969. Review of P. Haggett, Locational Analysis in Human Geography, Antiquity. XLIII, 74.Google Scholar
Simmons, I. G., 1969. ‘Environment and Early Man on Dartmoor …’, PPS, XXXV, 203.Google Scholar
Slicher von Bath, B. H., 1963. The Agrarian History of Western Europe, A.D. 500 to 1850. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G., 1968. Beyond History: the Methods of Prehistory. New York.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G., 1970. ‘Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology’, Antiquity, XLIV, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C. and Higgs, E. S., 1970. ‘Prehistoric Economy in the Mount Carmel Area of Palestine: Site Catchment Analysis’, PPS, XXXVI, 1–37.Google Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V. C., 1962. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. Edinburgh and London, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E., 1963. A History of the Domesticated Animals. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar