Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:52:34.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excavations in the Acheulean Levels at the Earlier Stone Age Site of Canteen Koppie, Northern Province, South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2013

John McNabb
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Avenue Campus, Highfield Southampton SO17 1BF
Peter Beaumont
Affiliation:
c/o McGregor Museum, PO Box 316, Kimberley, 8300, Northern Cape, Republic of South Africa

Abstract

The fluvial gravels of the river Vaal in South Africa have long been known as a source for Earlier Stone Age (ESA) artefacts. Most were discovered through the open cast mining for diamonds that has left very little in situ fluvial sediment remaining today. The site of Canteen Koppie is an internationally famous location with a reputation for prolific Acheulean artefacts, especially handaxes and the enigmatic prepared core and Levallois-like technology known as Victoria West. Our understanding of this site, and most other Vaal locations, is almost solely based on highly selected artefact collections. Here, we report on the first controlled excavations ever to be conducted at Canteen Koppie. The deposits are likely to date to the Early and Middle Pleistocene, and our excavations sample the full depth of the stratigraphic sequence. The lower units, first identified in these excavations, add a considerable time depth to the Acheulean occupation of the site, making this the longest chrono-stratigraphic sequence in South Africa to our knowledge. Given the current international interest in the origins of Levallois/prepared core technology (PCT), its occurrence in Unit 2b Upper, and its presence alongside Victoria West technology in Unit 2a has significant implications for debates on the role of Victoria West in the origins of PCT. From the Canteen Koppie evidence, Levallois and Victoria West are clearly rooted in the Acheulean.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ashton, N., Dean, P. & McNabb, J. 1991. Flaked flakes: what, where, when and why? Lithics 12, 111Google Scholar
Barham, L. 2010. A technological fix for ‘Dunbar's dilemma’? In Dunbar, R., Gamble, C. & Gowlett, J. (eds), Social Brain, Distributed Mind, 367–89. Oxford: University PressGoogle Scholar
Barkai, R. 2009. Comment on Sharon. Current Anthropology 50, 356–7Google Scholar
Beaumont, P. 1990. Canteen Koppie. In Beaumont, & Morris, (eds) 1990, 14–7Google Scholar
Beaumont, P. 1999a. Canteen Koppie, Barkly West. In Beaumont, (ed.) 1999b, pages un-numberedGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, P. (ed.). 1999b. Inqua xv International Conference Field Guide: Northern Cape. Pretoria: Institute of GeosciencesGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, P. 2004. Canteen Kopje. In Morris, & Beaumont, (eds) 2004, 2630Google Scholar
Beaumont, P. & Morris, D. (eds). 1990. Guide to the Archaeological Sites in the Northern Cape. Excursion Guide to the South African Association of Archaeologists, September 1990. Kimberley: McGregor MuseumGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, P. & Vogel, J. C. 2006. On a timescale for the past million years of human history in central South Africa. South African Journal of Science 102, 217–28Google Scholar
Boëda, E. 1995. Levallois: A volumetric construction, methods, a technique. In Dibble, H. L. & Bar-Yosef, O. (eds), The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, 4168. Madison, Wisconsin: Prehistory PressGoogle Scholar
Clark, J.D. 2001. Kalambo FallsPrehistoric Site. Volume 3: the earlier cultures: Middle and Earlier Stone Age. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Foley, R.A. & Lahr, M.M. 1997. Mode 3 technologies and the evolution of modern humans. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7, 336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forssman, T.R., Kuman, K., Leader, G.M. & Gibbon, R.J. 2010. A Later Stone Age assemblage from Canteen Kopje, Northern Cape. South African Archaeological Bulletin 65, 204–14Google Scholar
Gibbon, R.J., Granger, D.E., Kuman, K. & Partridge, T.C. 2009. Early Acheulean technology in the Vaal river gravels, South Africa, dated with cosmogenic nuclides. Journal of Human Evolution 56, 152–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, J. H. 1929. Part iii. The Victoria West industry. In Goodwin, & Lowe, Van Riet (eds) 1929, 5371Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. H. 1934. Some developments in technique during the Earlier Stone Age. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 21, 109–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, J. H. & Van Riet Lowe, C. 1929. The Stone Age cultures of South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 27, 1289Google Scholar
Harris, J.W.K., Braun, D.R. & Pante, M. 2007. 2.7 myr–300,000 years ago in Africa. In Elias, S.A. (ed), Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science, volume 1, 6372. London: ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgren, D.M. 1978. Acheulean settlement along the lower Vaal river, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science 5, 3960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgren, D.M. 1979. River of Diamonds: an alluvial history of the lower Vaal basin, South Africa. University of Chicago; Department of Geography Research Paper 185Google Scholar
Jansen, F.J. 1926. A new type of stone implement from Victoria West. South African Journal of Science 23, 818–25Google Scholar
Kuman, K. 1996. The Oldowan industry from Sterkfontein: raw materials and core forms. In Pwiti, G. & Soper, R. (eds), Aspects of African Archaeology. Papers from the 10th Congress of the Pan-African Association for Prehistory and Related Studies, 139–46. Harare: University of Zimbabwe PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Kuman, K. 2001. An Acheulean factory site with prepared core technology near Taung, South Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin 56, 822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuman, K. 2007. The Earlier Stone Age in southern Africa: Site context and the influence of cave studies. In Pickering, T., Schick, K. & Toth, N. (eds), Breathing Life into Fossils. Taphonomic Studies in Honour of C.K. (Bob) Brain, 181–98. Bloomington, Indianna: Stone Age Institute PressGoogle Scholar
Leakey, M.D. 1971. Olduvai Gorge: Excavations in Beds i and ii 1960–1963. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Lycett, S.J. 2009. Are Victoria West cores ‘proto-Levallois’? A phylogenetic assessment. Journal of Human Evolution 56, 175–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycett, S.J. 2010. A comparative 3D geometric morphometric analysis of the Victoria West cores: implications for the origins of Levallois technology. Journal of Archaeological Science 37, 1110–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, A. & Mithen, S. 2004. Reply to McNabb et al. Current Anthropology 45, 668–9Google Scholar
Mason, R.J. 1959. Statistical analysis of South African later Chelles-Acheul and earlier Fauresmith cultures. Nature 183, 377–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R.J. 1962. Prehistory of the Transvaal. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University PressGoogle Scholar
Mason, R.J. 1988. Cave of Hearths, Makapansgat, Transvaal. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Archaeological Research Unit Occasional Paper 21Google Scholar
McBrearty, S. & Brooks, A. 2000. The revolution that wasn't: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behaviour. Journal of Human Evolution 39, 453563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNabb, J. 2001. The shape of things to come. A speculative essay on the role of the Victoria West phenomenon at Canteen Koppie, during the South African Earlier Stone Age. In Milliken, S., & Cook, J. (eds), A very Remote Period Indeed. Papers on the Palaeolithic Presented to Derek Roe, 3746. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
McNabb, J. 2009. The ESA stone tool assemblage from the Cave of Hearths, Beds 1–3. In McNabb, & Sinclair, (eds) 2009, 7594Google Scholar
McNabb, J. & Beaumont, P. 2011. A Report on the Archaeological Assemblages from Excavations by Peter Beaumont at Canteen Koppie, Northern Cape, South Africa. Oxford: Archaeopress/University of Southampton Series in Archaeology 4Google Scholar
McNabb, J., Binyon, F. & Hazelwood, L. 2004. The large cutting tools from the South African Acheulean and the question of social traditions. Current Anthropology 45, 653–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNabb, J. & Sinclair, A. (eds). 2009. The Cave of Hearths: Makapan Middle Pleistocene Research Project: field research by Anthony Sinclair and Patrick Quinney 1996–2001. Oxford: Archaeopress/University of Southampton Series in Archaeology 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D. & Beaumont, P. (eds). 2004. Archaeology in the Northern Cape: some key sites. Guidebook Prepared for the Southern African Association of Archaeologists Post-Conference Excursion, 8–10 April 2004. Kimberley: McGregor MuseumGoogle Scholar
Partridge, T.C. & Brink, A.B.A. 1967. Gravels and terraces of the lower Vaal river basin. South African Geographical Journal 49, 2338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolland, N. 1986. Recent findings from La Micoque and other sites in south-western and Mediterranean France: their bearing on the ‘Tyacian’ problem and Middle Palaeolithic emergence. In Bailey, G.N. & Callow, P. (eds), Stone Age Prehistory, 121–51. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Rolland, N. 1995. Levallois technique emergence; single or multiple? A review of the Euro-African record. In Dibble, H. L. & Bar-Yosef, O. (eds), The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, 333–59. Madison, Wisconsin: Prehistory PressGoogle Scholar
Semaw, S., Rogers, M. & Stout, D. 2009. The Oldowan-Acheulean transition: Is there a ‘Developed Oldowan’ artefact tradition? In Camps, M. & Chauhan, P. R. (eds), Sourcebook of Paleolithic Transitions, 172–93. London: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Sharon, G. 2007. Acheulean Large Flake Industries. Technology, Chronology, and Significance. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S1701Google Scholar
Sharon, G. 2008. The impact of raw material on Acheulean large flake production. Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 1329–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharon, G. 2009. Acheulean giant-core technology. Current Anthropology 50, 335–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharon, G. & Beaumont, P. 2006. Victoria West: A highly standardized prepared core technology. In Goren-Inbar, N. & Sharon, G. (eds), Axe Age. Acheulian Tool Making from Quarry to Discard, 181–99. London: EquinoxGoogle Scholar
Söhnge, P.G., Visser, D.J.L. & Van Riet Lowe, C. (eds). 1937. The Geology and Archaeology of the Vaal River Basin. Cape Town: Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
Thornes, J. 1979. River Channels. London: Macmillan EducationGoogle Scholar
Tryon, C.A. & McBrearty, S. 2002. Tephrostratigraphy and the Acheulean to Middle Stone Age transition in the Kapthurin Formation, Baringo, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution 42, 211–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, P., Fullagar, R., Stokes, S., Bailey, R.M., Moeyersons, J., Steenhoudt, F., Geerts, A., Vanderbeken, T., De Dapper, M. & Geus, F. 2003. The Early to Middle Stone Age transition and the emergence of modern human behaviour at site 8-b-11, Sai island, Sudan. Journal of Human Evolution 45, 187–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Riet Lowe, C. 1935. Implementiferous gravels of the Vaal river at Riverview estates. Nature 136, 53–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Riet Lowe, C. 1937. Part ii. The archaeology of the Vaal river basin. In Sohnge, et al. (eds) 1937, 61131Google Scholar
Van Riet Lowe, C. 1945. The evolution of the Levallois technique in South Africa. Man 45, 4959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Riet Lowe, C. 1952. The Vaal river chronology. South African Archaeological Bulletin 7, 135–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Riet Lowe, C. 1954. A note on Prehistoric classification. Man 54, 83–4Google Scholar
Wadley, L. & McNabb, J. 2009. Introduction. In McNabb, & Sinclair, (eds) 2009, 111Google Scholar
White, M.J. & Ashton, N. 2003. Lower Palaeolithic core technology and the origins of the Levallois method in north-western Europe. Current Anthropology 44, 598609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wit, M.C.J. de 2008. Canteen Koppie at Barkly West: South Africa's first diamond mine. South African Journal of Geology 111, 5366CrossRefGoogle Scholar