Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:20:05.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations at the Neolithic Enclosure on Bury Hill, Houghton, W. Sussex 1979

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Owen Bedwin ,
P. L. Drewett ,
K. D. Thomas  and
C. Cartwright
Owen Bedwin
Affiliation:
Sussex Archaeological Field Unit, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Summary. Excavations at Bury Hill dated a small, continuously-ditched enclosure to the early Neolithic. The interior of the enclosure, c. 1 ha in extent, was sampled by two trial cuttings, 9 m wide, running across the enclosure at right angles to one another. No Neolithic features were found. Sampling the ditch produced early Neolithic pottery, flintwork and animal bone. Though continuous, the ditch had a ‘beaded’ appearance, with a single entrance. No corresponding bank survived, though aerial photographs indicated its existence on the inside of the ditch.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 47 , December 1981 , pp. 69 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, G. and Webley, D., 1978. ‘Causewayed camps and early Neolithic economies in central southern England’, PPS, 44, 161–186.Google Scholar
Bohmers, A., 1956. ‘Statistics and graphs in the study of flint assemblages’, Palaeohistoria, 5, 1–5.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., Higgs, E. S. and Longworth, I., 1960. ‘Excavations at the Neolithic site of Hurst Fen, Mildenhall, Suffolk’, PPS, 26, 202–45.Google Scholar
Clipson, J. (forthcoming). ‘The excavation of a Neolithic causewayed enclosure on Barkhale Down, Bignor Hill, West Sussex.’Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W., 1974. Iron Age Communities in Britain. London.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. and Curwen, E. C., 1918. ‘Covered Ways on the Sussex Downs’, Sussex Archaeological Collections, 59, 35–75.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. C., ‘Excavations in the Trundle, Goodwood, 1928’, Sussex Archaeological Collections, 70, 33–85.Google Scholar
Drewett, P. L., 1977. ‘The excavation of a Neolithic causewayed enclosure on Offham Hill, East Sussex, 1976’, PPS, 43, 201–41.Google Scholar
Drewett, P. L. (forthcoming). ‘Neolithic pottery in Sussex’, in Freke, D. J. (ed.), The Archaeology of Sussex pottery.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G., 1966. ‘Land mollusca from the Neolithic enclosure on Windmill Hill’, Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 60, 91–2.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G., 1972. Land Snails in Archaeology. London.Google Scholar
Mercer, R., 1979. ‘Excavations at Hambledon Hill 1979’, Interim report.Google Scholar
Philp, B. J., 1973. Excavations in West Kent, 1960–70. Kent Archaeological Research Report No. 2.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F., 1965. Windmill Hill and Avebury: Excavations by Alexander Keiller, 1925–1939. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sparks, B. W. 1965, in Connah, G., ‘Excavations at Knap Hill, Alton Priors, 1961’, Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 60, 1–23.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. D., 1977. ‘The land mollusca from the enclosure on Offham Hill’, in Drewett, P., ‘The excavation of a Neolithic causewayed enclosure on Offham Hill, West Sussex, 1976’, PPS, 43, 201–41.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. D. (forthcoming). ‘Mollusc analysis of samples from the ditch fill of the Barkhale causewayed enclosure, West Sussex’, in Clipson, J., ’The excavation of a Neolithic causewayed enclosure on Barkhale Down, Bignor Hill, West Sussex’.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J., 1972. ‘The excavation of a Neolithic settlement on Broome Heath, Ditchingham, Norfolk, England’, PPS, 38, 1–97.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., 1977. The earlier Neolithic in S. England and its continental background. B.A.R. Supplementary Series no. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar