Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T13:37:07.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations at Little Woodbury, Wiltshire (1938–39)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

John Brailsford  and
J. Wilfrid Jackson
John Brailsford
Affiliation:
Dept. British and Medieval Antiquities, British Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The excavations of the Iron Age site at Little Woodbury were carried out by the Prehistoric Society in 1938–39 under the direction of Dr Gerhard Bersu. The first part of the report, published in Proc. Prehist. Soc. VI (1940), 30–111, was Dr Bersu's account of the structures revealed by excavation. This second part deals with the pottery, by far the most abundant material recovered, and discusses its significance for the history of the site and its relation to other Iron Age settlements in Wessex. The general conclusions are given first, and the detailed evidence on which they are based follows, with a catalogue of the pottery and two appendices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 14 , 1948 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 Hawkes, C. F. C., ‘Excavations at Quarley Hill’, Proc. Hants. Field Club, vol. XIV, pt. 2, p. 129 Google Scholar.

page 2 note 1 Hawkes, C. F. C., ‘The Excavations at Bury Hill, 1939’, Proc. Hants. Field Club, vol. XIV, pt. 3, p. 291 Google Scholar.

page 2 note 2 The evidence of the section cut by Mr Phillips through the ditch of Great Woodbury, or Woodbury proper, should be remembered at this point (Bersu, pp. 107–10), since our site and this closely neighbouring plateau-fort must have been intimately related. Great Woodbury seems to have been fortified about, perhaps at, the same time as Little Woodbury, but the work was completed, and apparently stood throughout the rest of the occupation of the smaller site. Great Woodbury continued to be inhabited in Romano-British times.

page 3 note 1 Bersu, G., ‘Excavations at Little Woodbury, Wiltshire, Part 1, P.P.S. (N.S.), vol. VI (1940), p. 30 Google Scholar.

page 3 note 2 G. Bersu, loc. cit., p. 54 (Pits 131 and 96).

page 19 note 1 Cunnington, M. E., All Cannings Cross (1924), 43–50 Google Scholar.

page 19 note 2 Wilts. Arch. and Nat. Hist. Mag., XLII (1924), 492–3Google Scholar.

page 19 note 3 Ibid., XLIII (1925), 90–3.

page 19 note 4 Ibid., XLVI (1934), 619–24.

page 19 note 5 Proc. Hants. F. C. and Arch. Soc., XII (1933), 156–7Google Scholar, and ibid. XIII (1935), 39–42.

page 19 note 6 Ibid., XIV (1939), 191–2.

page 19 note 7 Ibid., XV (1940), 48–9.

page 19 note 8 Bulleid, A. and Gray, H. St. G., The Glastonbury Lake Village, II (1917), 648–72Google Scholar, pl. XCVII.

page 19 note 9 Unpublished.

page 19 note 10 Unpublished.

page 20 note 1 Op. cit., 654, and Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1915, 291–5Google Scholar.

page 20 note 2 Arch. Aeliana, 3rd ser., VII (1911), 103–5Google Scholar.

page 20 note 3 C. F. C. Hawkes and M. R. Hull, Camulodunum. First Report on the Excavations at Colchester, 1930–39, (1947). 350–4 (Report by J. W. Jackson).

page 20 note 4 Wheeler, R. E. M., Maiden Castle, Dorset (1943), 369–72Google Scholar (Report by J. W. Jackson).

page 21 note 1 Antiquity, XXX (1947), 122–36Google Scholar.