Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:10:15.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Esoteric Knowledge? Ancient Bronze Artefacts from Iron Age Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Richard Hingley
Richard Hingley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Esoteric knowledge is knowledge of the unusual, the exceptional, the extraordinary; knowledge of things that in some way lie beyond the familiar everyday world’ (Helms 1988, 13)

This paper explores the ways in which Bronze Age bronze artefacts may, on occasions, have been used in the commemoration of place during the southern British Iron Age. The chronologically-based typological systems adopted by archaeologists indicate that these artefacts occur out of their time as they were already several centuries old when they were buried, but it should not be supposed that Iron Age societies necessarily viewed these items entirely in terms of a linear sequence of time. While broadly similar in form and material to items in the cultural repertoire of contemporary society, the bronzes were also quite distinct in the particular forms that they adopted. That these items often appear to have been deposited at sites with a pre-existing monumentality may suggest that objects and places were felt to share ‘otherworldliness’. These items and places may have been used to construct esoteric knowledge through reference to spirits but it is also likely that particular acts of curation and deposition created genealogical associations, incorporating ideas of the mythical past into the context of the present. Drawing on the evidence for the form and contexts of depositions of these objects, this paper addresses the connected topics of what Iron Age society did to objects and sites derived from its own past and what we, in turn, do to (and can do with) the information derived from the Iron Age.

Résumé

Cette étude explore la façon dont des objets en bronze de l'âge du bronze ont pu, à l'occasion, être utilisés dans la commémoration d'un lieu pendant l'âge du fer du sud de la Grande-Bretagne. Les systèmes typologiques reposant sur la chronologie que les archéologues ont adoptés confirment la présence de ces objets en dehors de leur période car ils avaient déjà plusieurs siècles d'âge quand ils ont été enterrés, mais on aurait tort de supposer que les sociétés de l'âge du fer considéraient nécessairement ces articles uniquement en termes de séquence temporelle linéaire. Alors qu'en gros, ils étaient similaires par leur forme et leur matière aux objets du répertoire culturel de la société contemporaine, les bronzes étaient aussi assez distincts de par les formes particulières qu'ils adoptaient. Que souvent ces articles paraissent avoir été déposés sur des sites jouissant d'une monumentalité pré-existante pourrait donner à penser qu'objets et lieux étaient ressentis comme partageant cette ‘appartenance à un autre monde’. Ces objets et lieux pourraient avoir été utilisés pour créer une connaissance ésotérique à travers une référence à des esprits, mais il est également probable que des actes particuliers de guérison et de dépôt aient créé des associations généalogiques, incorporant des idées d'un passé mythique dans le contexte du présent. S'appuyant sur les témoignages de la forme et des contextes des dépôts de ces objets, cette étude examine les sujets en rapport avec ce que la société de l'âge du fer faisait aux objets et sites issus de son propre passé et ce que nous, à notre tour, faisons à (et pouvons faire avec) les renseignements issus de l'âge du fer.

Résumen

Este trabajo explora los modos en los que artefactos de la Edad del Bronce pudieron, ocasionalmente, haber sido usados en la conmemoración del lugar durante la Edad del Hierro del sur de Gran Bretaña. Los sistemas tipológicos de base cronológica que han sido adoptados por los arqueólogos indican que estos artefactos aparecen fuera de su marco temporal y que contaban con varios siglos de antigüedad cuando fueron enterrados, pero no se debe suponer que las sociedades de la Edad del Hierro necesariamente consideraran estos objetos enteramente en términos de una secuencia lineal de tiempo. Mientras que, en líneas generales, eran similares en forma y material a artículos del repertorio cultural de la sociedad contemporánea, los bronces también presentaban diferencias importantes en las formas particulares que adoptaron. El que estos objetos aparezcan a menudo en yacimientos con una historia de monumentalidad parece sugerir que los objetos y los lugares eran percibidos como posesores de una cierta “ultramundanidad”. Estos objetos y lugares pueden haber sido utilizados para construir conocimiento esotérico a través de la referencia a espíritus, aunque también es probable que acciones curativas específicas y deposiciones hayan creado asociaciones genealógicas, incorporando ideas acerca del pasado mítico al contexto del presente. Apoyándonos en la evidencia de la forma y los contextos de deposición de estos objetos, este trabajo trata los temas relacionados de lo que la sociedad de la Edad del Hierro hizo a los objetos y sitios derivados de su propio pasado, y de lo que nosotros, a nuestra vez, hacemos a (y podemos hacer con) la información derivada de la Edad del Hierro.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel untersucht wie bronzezeitliche Artefakte in der Eisenzeit unter Umständen als Erinnerung an einen bestimmten Platz in Südbritannien benutzt worden sein könnten. Die von Archäologen benutzten chrono-typologischen Systeme zeigen, dass diese Artefakte außerhalb ihrem Zeithorizont auftauchen, und als sie vergraben wurden bereits mehrere Jahrhunderte alt waren. Das heißt jedoch nicht, dass die eisenzeitlichen Gesellschaften diese Gegenstände im Sinne linearer Zeit verstanden. Während die Bronzen in Form und Material durchaus mit den Gegenständen aus dem kulturellen Repertoire gleichzeitlicher Gesellschaften vergleichbar waren, sind unterscheiden sie sich aber auch, indem sie unterschiedliche Formen nachahmen. Da sie zudem oft an Fundstellen deponiert wurden, die mit einer dort schon zeitlich früher bestandenen Monumentalität in Verbindung gestanden zu haben scheinen, könnte dies darauf hindeuten, dass sowohl die Bronzen als auch die Orte, an denen sie deponiert wurden mit einer ‘Jenseitigkeit’ in Verbindung gebracht werden könnten. Diese Gegenstände könnten dazu benutzt worden sein esoterisches Wissen zu konstruieren. Dies könnte durch einen Bezug zu Geistern oder auch zu bestimmten Handlungen, die mit Pflege und Niederlegung zusammenhängen und genealogische Assoziationen kreieren, geschehen sein, indem sie Ideen einer mythischen Vergangenheit in den Kontext der Gegenwart einbinden. Bezüglich der Form und Kontexte der Deponierung dieser Objekte, diskutiert der Artikel auf der einen Seite die eisenzeitliche Nutzung dieser Objekte und Plätze, die aus der eigenen Vergangenheit stammen, und auf der anderen Seite, was wir mit dem Informationsgewinn aus der Erforschung der Eisenzeit tun können.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 75 , 2009 , pp. 143 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aldhouse-Green, M. 2002. Any Old Iron! Symbolism and ironworking in Iron Age Europe. In Aldhouse-Green, M. & Webster, P. (eds), Artefacts and Archaeology: aspects of the Celtic and Roman world, 8–19. Cardiff: University of Wales PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. (ed.). 1986. The Social Life of Things: commodities in cultural perspectives. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, M. 2003. Bronze and the Bronze Age: metalworking and society in Britain c. 2500–800 BC. Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Barber, M. 2005. A note on the history of the palstave. In Bishop, & Bagwell, 2005, 51–3Google Scholar
Barrett, J. 1999. The mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age. In Ashmore, W. & Knapp, A.B. (eds), Archaeologies of Landscape: contemporary perspectives, 253–65. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A. & Hey, G. forthcoming. Absolute chronology, in Hey & Timby forthcomingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. 1999. Unearthing the Past: archaeology and aesthetics in the making of Renaissance culture. London: YaleGoogle Scholar
Bishop, B. & Bagwell, M. 2005. Iwade: occupation of a North Kent village from the Mesolithic to the medieval period. London: Pre-Construct Archaeology, Monograph 3Google Scholar
Blake, E. 2003. The familiar honeycomb: Byzantine era reuse of Sicily's prehistoric rock-cut tombs. In van Dyke, & Alcock, (eds) 2003, 203–20Google Scholar
Bowden, M. & McOmish, D. 1987. The required barrier. Scottish Archaeological Review 4, 76–84Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1998. The Passage of Arms: an archaeological analysis of prehistoric hoards and votive deposits, 2 edn. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2002. The Past in Prehistoric Societies. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2005. Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2007. The Prehistory of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. & Sheridan, A. 2005. Croft Moraig and the chronology of stone circles. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 269–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgford, S. 1997. Mightier than the pen? An edgewise look at Irish Bronze Age swords. In Carman, J. (ed.), Material Harm: archaeological studies of war and violence, 95–115. Glasgow: Cruithne PressGoogle Scholar
British Archaeology, 2007. Ancient trading power near Inverness. British Archaeology January–February 2007, 6Google Scholar
Britton, D., O'Connor, B. & Cunliffe, B. 1984. The Late Bronze Age hoard. In Cunliffe, B, Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire, Vol. 2 The excavations 1969–1978: The finds, 335–40. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 52Google Scholar
Brown, L., Lewis, J. & Smith, A. (eds). 2006. Landscape Evolution in the Middle Thames Valley, Heathrow Terminal 5 Excavations Volume 1, Perry Oaks. Oxford/Salisbury: Framework Archaeology Monograph 1Google Scholar
Budd, P. & Taylor, T. 1995. The faerie smith meets the bronze industry: magic verses science in the interpretation of prehistoric metalworking. World Archaeology 27, 133–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C., Coombs, D. & Davies, G.G. 1972. The Broadwood Complex and barbed spearheads. In Lynch, F. & Burgess, C. (eds), Prehistoric Man in Wales and the West, 211–83. Bath: Adam & DartGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C. & Coombs, D. (eds). 1979. Bronze Age Hoards: some finds old and new. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 67Google Scholar
Bushe-Fox, J. 1915. Excavations at Hengistbury Head, Hampshire in 1911–12. Oxford: Report of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Collard, M., Darvill, T. & Watts, M. 2006. Ironworking in the Bronze Age? Evidence for a 10th century BC settlement at Hartshill Copse, Upper Bucklebury, West Berkshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 72, 367–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, D.A. 1991. Bronze objects. In Musson, 1991 132–41Google Scholar
Creighton, J. 2000. Coins and Power in Late Iron Age Britain. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creighton, J. 2006. Britannia: the creation of a Roman province. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W. 1978. Hengistbury Head. London: Paul ElekGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W. 1983. Danebury: Anatomy of an Iron Age Hillfort. London: BatsfordGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W. 1987. Hengistbury Head, Dorset: Volume 1: the prehistoric and Roman settlement, 3500 BC–AD 500. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 13Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W. 1991. Iron Age Communities in Britain. 3rd edn. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W & O'Connor, B. 1979. The Late Bronze Age hoard from Danebury, Hants. In Burgess, & Coombs, (eds) 1979, 135–44Google Scholar
Dalwood, H. 1987. An assemblage of Bronze artefacts from Ivinghoe, Buckinghamshire. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 6, 29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvill, T. 2006. Beyond Hartshill Copse: early ironworking in Britain and its wider context. In Collard, et al. 2006, 388–98Google Scholar
Daston, L. 2004. Speechless. In Daston, L. (ed.), Things that Talk: object lessons from art and science, 9–16. New York: ZoneGoogle Scholar
Dennis, C., Hey, G. & Northover, P. forthcoming. Neolithic and Bronze Age. In Hey, & Timby, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
Dyke, R.M. van & Alcock, S. (eds) 2003. Archaeologies of Memory. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, N. & Parker Pearson, M. 2003. Fiskerton: an Iron Age timber causeway with Iron Age and Roman votive offerings. Oxford: OxbowCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A. 1997a. Outside in: the structure of an early Iron Age house at Dunston Park, Thatcham, Berkshire. In Fitzpatrick, A.P. & Morris, E.L. (eds), The Iron Age in Wessex: recent work, 68–72. Salisbury: Wessex ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A. 1997b. Everyday life in Iron Age Wessex. In Gwilt, & Haselgrove, (eds) 1997, 73–86Google Scholar
Forcey, C. 1998. Whatever happened to the heroes? Ancestral cults and the enigma of Romano-Celtic temples. In Forcey, C., Hawthorne, J. & Witcher, R. (eds), TRAC97: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Nottingham 1997, 87–98. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Foster, J. 1986. The Lexden Tumulus: a re-appraisal of an Iron Age burial from Colchester, Essex. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 156Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1989. An Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by Smith, A.M. Sheridan (first published 1969). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Franks, A.J. 1865. Additions made to the collections of British antiquities at the British Museum during the year 1864. Antiquaries Journal 3, 83–94Google Scholar
Gardiner, J. 1987. The barrow cemetery. In Cunliffe, 1987, 47–60Google Scholar
Giles, M. 2007a. Refiguring rights in the Early Iron Age landscapes of East Yorkshire. In Haselgrove, & Pope, (eds) 2007, 103–18Google Scholar
Giles, M. 2007b. Good fences make good neighbours? Exploring the ladder enclosures of Late Iron Age East Yorkshire. In Haselgrove, C. & Moore, T. (eds), The Later Iron Age in Britain and Beyond, 235–49. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Gosden, C. 2005. What do objects want? Journal of Archaeological Method & Theory 12, 193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosden, C. & Lock, G. 1999. Prehistoric histories. World Archaeology 30, 2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greatorex, C. 2003. Living on the margins? The Late Bronze Age landscape of the Willingdon Levels. In Rudling, D. (ed.), The Archaeology of Sussex to AD 2000, 89–100. Brighton: University of SussexGoogle Scholar
Greenwell, W. 1906. Early Iron Age burials in Yorkshire. Archaeologia 60, 251–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwilt, A. & Haselgrove, C. (eds). 1997. Reconstructing Iron Age Societies: new approaches to the British Iron Age, 9–20. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Harding, D. 1972. The Iron Age in the Upper Thames Basin. Oxford: University PressGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R.P. 2003. The Dominion of the Dead. London: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselgrove, C. & Hingley., R. 2006. Iron deposition and its significance in Iron Age Britain. In Bataille, G. & Guillaumet, J.-P. (eds), Les dépôts métalliques au second âge du Fer en Europe tempérée, Actes de la table rounde de Bibracte, 13–14 octobre 2004, 147–64. Collection Bibracte 11Google Scholar
Haselgrove, C. & Pope, R. (eds). 2007. The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the near Continent. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C. 1995. Camuldounum. In Hawkes, C.F.C. & Crummy, P., Colchester Archaeological Report 2, 3–69. Colchester: Colchester Archaeological TrustGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C. & Smith, M.A. 1957. On some buckets and cauldrons of the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age. Antiquaries Journal 37, 131–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, M.W. 1988. Ulysses' Sail: an ethnographic odyssey of power, knowledge and geographical distance. New Jersey: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, G. 2007. Unraveling the Iron Age landscape of the Upper Thames Valley. In Haselgrove, C. & Moore, T. (eds). The Later Iron Age in Britain and Beyond, 156–72. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Hey, G. & Timby, J. forthcoming. Yarnton: Iron Age and Romano-British settlement and landscape. Results of excavation 1990–8. Oxford: Thames Valley Landscape MonographGoogle Scholar
Hill, J.D. 1989. Re-thinking the Iron Age. Scottish Archaeological Review 6, 16–23Google Scholar
Hill, J.D. 1995 Rituals and Rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 242Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 1990. Iron Age ‘currency bars’: the archaeological and social context. Archaeological Journal 147, 91–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 1996. Ancestors and identity in the later prehistory of Atlantic Scotland: the reuse and reinvention of Neolithic monuments and material culture. World Archaeology 28, 231–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 1997. Iron, ironworking and regeneration: a study of the symbolic meaning of ironworking in Iron Age Britain. In Gwilt, & Haselgrove, (eds) 1997, 9–20Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 1999. The creation of later prehistoric landscapes and the context of the reuse of Neolithic and Earlier Bronze Ages monuments in Britain and Ireland. In Bevan, B. (ed.), Northern Exposure: interpretative devolution and the Iron Ages in Britain, 233–51. Leicester: Leicester Archaeological Monograph 4Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 2005. Iron Age ‘currency bars’ in Britain: items of exchange in liminal contexts? In Haselgrove, C. and Wigg-Wolf, D. (eds), Iron Age Coinage and Ritual Practice, 183–206, Studien zu Fundmünzen der Antike, Band 20Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 2006. The deposition of iron objects in Britain during the later prehistoric and Roman periods: contextual analysis and the significance of iron. Britannia 37, 213–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2006. Landscape, myth and time. Journal of Material Culture 11, 151–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. & Stewart, C. 2005. Introduction: ethnographies of historicity. History and Anthropology 16.3, 261–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. & Soffe, G. 1998. Internal organisation and deposition at the Iron Age temple on Hayling Island. Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club & Archaeological Society 53, 35–47Google Scholar
King, E. 1812. A description of antiquities discovered on Hagbourn-Hill. Archaeologia 16, 348–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillios, K.T. 1999. Objects of memory: the ethnography and archaeology of heirlooms. Journal of Archaeological Method & Theory 6, 235–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillios, K.T. 2003. Creating memory in prehistory: the engraved slate plaques of southwest Iberia. In van Dyke, & Alcock, (eds) 2003, 129–50Google Scholar
Lucas, G. 2005. The Archaeology of Time. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G. & Northover, P. 2003. The excavation and metallographic analysis of a Bronze Age sword recovered from Ivinghoe Beacon. Records of Buckinghamshire 43, 27–37Google Scholar
Moore, T. 2007. Perceiving communities: exchange, landscapes and social networks in the later Iron Age of western Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 26(1), 79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, M.A. 2005. How the Celts came to Britain: Druids, ancient skulls and the birth of archaeology. Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Musson, C.R. 1991. The Breiddin Hillfort: a later prehistoric settlement in the Welsh Marches. York: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 76Google Scholar
Needham, S. 1996. Chronology and periodisation in the British Bronze Age. In Randsborg, K. (ed.), Absolute Chronology, Archaeological Europe 2500–500 BC, 121–40. Acta Archaeologica 67Google Scholar
Needham, S. 2001. When expediency broaches ritual intention: the flow of material between systemic and buried domains. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7, 275–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S. 2007. 800BC, The Great Divide. In Haselgrove, & Pope, (eds) 2007, 39–63Google Scholar
Needham, S., Bronk Ramsey, C., Coombs, D., Cartwright, C. and Pettitt, P. 1997. An independent chronology for British Bronze Age metalwork: the results of the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Programme. Archaeological Journal 154, 53–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northover, P. 1987. Non-ferrous metallurgy. In Cunliffe, 1987, 186–95Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. 2007. Llyn Fawr metalwork in Britain: a review. In Haselgrove, & Pope, (eds) 2007, 64–79Google Scholar
Oswald, A. 1969. Excavations for the Avon/Severn Research Committee at Barford, Warwickshire. Transactions of the Birmingham & Warwickshire Archaeological Society 83 (1966–1969), 1–64Google Scholar
Oswald, A. 1997. A doorway on the past: practical and mystical concerns in the orientation of roundhouse doorways. In Gwilt, & Haselgrove, (eds) 1997, 87–95Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 1996. Food, fertility and front doors in the first millennium BC. In Champion, T.C. & Collis, J.R. (eds), The Iron Age in Britain and Ireland: recent trends, 117–32Google Scholar
Pearce, S.M. 1983. The Bronze Age Metalwork of South Western Britain. Oxford, British Archaeological Report 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, T., Hampshire-Monk, I. & Abramson, P. 2006. The excavation and reconstruction of the recumbent stone circle at Strichen, Aberdeenshire, 1979–82. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 136, 111–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, R. 2007. Ritual and the roundhouse: a critique of recent ideas on the use of domestic space in British later prehistory. In Haselgrove, & Pope, (eds) 2007, 204–28Google Scholar
Pryor, F. 2001. The Flag Fen Basin: archaeology and environment of a fenland landscape. Swindon: English HeritageGoogle Scholar
Pryor, F. 2005. Flag Fen: life and death of a prehistoric landscape. Stroud, TempusGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. 1995. Miniature socketed bronze axes from Wiltshire. Wiltshire Archaeological & Natural History Magazine 88, 60–8Google Scholar
Rohl, B. & Needham, S. 1998. The Circulation of Metal in the British Bronze Age: the application of lead isotope analysis. London: British Museum Occasional Paper 102Google Scholar
Saunders, C. 1991. Iron objects. In Musson, 1991, 141–7.Google Scholar
Savory, H.N. 1937. An Early Iron Age site at Long Wittenham, Berks. Oxoniensia 2, 1–11Google Scholar
Sharples, N. 2006. The first (permanent) houses: an interpretation of the monumental domestic architecture of Iron Age Orkney. In Jorges, V. Olivera (ed.), Approaching ‘Prehistoric and Protohistoric Architectures’ of Europe from a ‘Dwelling Perspective’, 281–306. Porto: ADECAPGoogle Scholar
Smith, I. 1969. Pottery and flints from sites A, B, C, D and M. In Oswald, 1969, 33–7Google Scholar
Stead, I.M. 1965. The La Tène Cultures of Eastern Yorkshire. York: Yorkshire Philosophical SocietyGoogle Scholar
Stead, I.M. 1979. The Arras Culture. York: Yorkshire Philosophical SocietyGoogle Scholar
Stead, I.M. 1998. The Salisbury Hoard. Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Stoertz, C. 1997. Ancient Landscapes of the Yorkshire Wolds. Swindon: Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of EnglandGoogle Scholar
Struck, M. 2000. High Status burials in Roman Britain (1st–3rd centuries AD) – potential of interpretation. In Pearce, J., Millett, M. & Struck, M. (eds), Burial, Society and Context in the Roman World, 85–96. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Suetonius, . The Twelve Caesars. Translated by Graves, R., 2000. London: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Thomas, N. 1969. A Late Bronze Age socketed chisel from Barford. In Oswald, 1969, 38–41Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. 1971. Death and Burial in the Roman World. London: Johns HopkinsGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, R. & Alcock, S. 2003. Archaeologies of memory: an introduction. In van Dyke, & Alcock, (eds) 2003, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whimster, R. 1981. Burial Practices in Iron Age Britain: a discussion and gazetteer of the evidence c. 700 B. C. – A. D. 43. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 90Google Scholar
Whitley, J. 2002. Too many ancestors. Antiquity 76, 119–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. 2002. Beads and Beakers: heirlooms and relics in the British Early Bronze Age. Antiquity 76: 1040–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar