No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Early Development of Agriculture in Britain
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2014
Extract
The discovery of agriculture marks the greatest advance in the history of mankind— comparable only to that which has followed the discovery of electricity and the invention of steam and internal combustion engines. It is now well recognised that without agriculture man was a food-gatherer, dependent on nature's supplies in hunting, fishing and gathering wild plants, whereas with agriculture he has become a food -producer, able to augment nature's fitful supply in both animal and vegetable kingdoms.
In modern speech the term ‘agriculture’ is often used to cover stock-raising as well as corn-growing; in the present paper, however, it will be used in its literal sense of the tilling of fields, and more particularly the cultivation of corn. This art appears to have been developed before that of stock-raising, and though both the cultivation of corn and the domestication of certain animals are among the elements that led to the first rise of civilization in the Near East, yet there may have existed at first a certain antipathy between the nomad herdsman and the settled farmer. This line of cleavage is well exemplified in the story of Cain and Abel, and the continuation of the story shows very well how it was the settled farmers, represented by Cain's descendants, who built the first cities and developed the working of metal and the arts of music, while the herdsman remained nomadic.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1938
References
page 27 note 1 Genesis, IV, 2, 17, 22. Cf. also XLVI, 34.
page 27 note 2 See especially Peake, Harold, The Origins of Agriculture (Benn, 1928)Google Scholar.
page 27 note 3 Antiquity, I (1927), p. 262Google Scholar.
page 27 note 4 Antiquity, VIII (1934), p. 136 and pl. IIGoogle Scholar; IX (1935), pp. 62–3. See also Prof.Schaeffer, Claude F. A.'s opinion on this subject in Revue Archéologique, 1935, pp. 111–3Google Scholar.
page 28 note 1 Genesis, 1, 11, 12, 29; III, 18, 19.
page 28 note 2 Vavilov, working on botanical lines would assign to Abyssinia the centre of diffusion of those wheats (e.g., Trit. dicoccum) which were earliest cultivated in the Near East (Antiquity, VII, p. 73Google Scholar), but in the present state of our knowledge this conclusion seems to be outweighed by the archaeological evidence in favour of Palestine or Syria.
page 28 note 3 Genesis, XXVI, 12, 17.
page 29 note 1 Proc. Devon. Arch. Explor. Soc., 1932, p. 180Google Scholar; ProfessorPercival, J., Wheat in Great Britain (1934), p. 10Google Scholar.
page 29 note 2 Proc. Devon Arch. Explor. Soc., II (1937)Google Scholar.
page 29 note 3 Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXIII (1929), pp. 33–4Google Scholar; Antiquity, I (1927), p. 263Google Scholar. Preserved in the Rothesay Museum.
page 29 note 4 Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., XLII, pp. 288–9Google Scholar.
page 29 note 5 Mortimer, J. R., Forty Years' Researches, pp. 111–2Google Scholar.
page 29 note 6 J. Percival, op. cit., p. 11.
page 29 note 7 Unpublished; information and copy of chemical report by courtesy of Mr Stuart M. K. Henderson of the Kelvingrove Museum, Glasgow. The statement in Museums Journal, Oct., 1928, p. 121Google Scholar, that oats were found in this food-vessel is clearly not justified.
page 29 note 8 Information by courtesy of Mr W. F. Grimes, per the Editor.
page 29 note 9 J. Percival, op. cit., pp. 11–2.
page 29 note 10 Ibid., p. 12; Antiquity, I (1927), p. 263Google Scholar.
page 31 note 1 René Neuville, summarised with references in Antiquity, IX (1935). PP. 62–6Google Scholar. Duncan, Garrow (Digging up Biblical History (1931) II, p. 191Google Scholar, says that the use of flint sickles was not entirely discontinued in Palestine until about 400 B.C. Petrie, (Gerar, 1928, p. 5)Google Scholar, found their greatest concentration there about the 15th cent. B.C.
page 31 note 2 de Pradenne, André Vayson, summarised with references in Antiquity, IV (1930), pp. 179–86Google Scholar.
page 31 note 3 Antiquity, I, p. 336 (photo)Google Scholar.
page 31 note 4 Antiquity, IV, p. 181, no. 10Google Scholar.
page 31 note 5 Ibid., pp. 179 ff.
page 31 note 6 For recent experimental evidence see Antiquity, IX (1935), pp. 64–5Google Scholar. Other yielding substances containing silica include grass, leaves and sand.
page 31 note 7 Concrete evidence in favour of this view is supplied by the survival of the resin mountant along the convex edge of certain Swedish specimens (Oldeberg, Andreas in Acta Archaeologica, III (1932), p. 212)Google Scholar.
page 31 note 8 For the crescentic type cf. Munro, Lake-Dwellings of Europe, fig. 34, no. 20; fig. 38, nos. 2–4; fig. 95, nos. 11, 12; also Keller, , Lake-Dwellings, p. 104, and pl. XXVIII, 32Google Scholar.
page 31 note 9 Blinkenberg, Chr., Mém. de la Soc. des Ant. du Nord, 1896–1901, pp. 183–98Google Scholar; photograph in Antiquity, XII (June 1938), pl. 11, facing p. 152Google Scholar.
page 32 note 1 P.P.S.E.A., VII (1932), pp. 67–81Google Scholar.
page 32 note 2 P.P.S., II (1936), pp. 206–8Google Scholar.
page 32 note 3 See photo in P.P.S.E.A., VII, plate IX, facing p. 70Google Scholar.
page 32 note 4 Lancing; Ant. J., XVI (1936), p. 88 (Worthing Museum)Google Scholar; Cissbury, , Arch., XLII (1869), p. 66Google Scholar and pl. VIII, 20 (Pitt Rivers Museum, Oxford); Fulking Hill (Brighton Museum), not yet published.
page 32 note 5 P.P.S., II (1936), p. 204 and plate XLIIGoogle Scholar.
page 32 note 6 Reading Museum; I am indebted to Mr W. A. Smallcombe, B.Sc., for kindly allowing me to examine and describe this specimen.
page 33 note 1 Ant. J., XIV (1934), pp. 389–92Google Scholar; XVI (1936), pp. 86–7, 89–90.
page 34 note 1 A similar specimen, but without gloss, was found in the causewayed camp (Neo. A2) at Whitehawk, Brighton (Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXI (1930), pp. 72–3, No. 5)Google Scholar.
page 34 note 2 For the type see Evans, , Bronze Implements, pp. 197–8Google Scholar.
page 35 note 1 Antiquity, XI (1937), pp. 134–5Google Scholar.
page 35 note 2 Ant. J., XIII (1933), pp. 27, 29Google Scholar.
page 35 note 3 Elgee, F., Early Man in N.E. Yorkshire (1930), pp. 134, 140Google Scholar.
page 35 note 4 Antiquity, X (1936), p. 274Google Scholar.
page 35 note 5 Antiquity, I (1927), pp. 281–4Google Scholar.
page 35 note 6 E. C. Curwen, Air-photography and Economic History: the Evolution of the Corn-field (Econ. Hist. Soc., Pamphlet No. 2).
page 37 note 1 Curwen, E. C., The Archaeology of Sussex (1937), p. 141Google Scholar.
page 37 note 2 Beth-Pelet II (Brit. Sch. Archaeology in Egypt, 1932), p. 11Google Scholar, and plates XII–XIV, XIX.
page 37 note 3 Trans. Devon Assoc., XXVIII, pp. 174–99Google Scholar; V.C.H. Devon, I, p. 353Google Scholar.
page 37 note 4 This site should be visited before April as it is obscured by a dense growth of bracken during the summer. The same may apply to other sites on the moors.
page 37 note 5 Trans. Devon. Assoc., XXVIII, p. 183Google Scholar; XXXIV, pp. 160–5; V.C.H. Devon, I, p. 355Google Scholar.
page 38 note 1 Archaeology of Sussex (1937), pp. 97–8Google Scholar.
page 38 note 2 For a study of the habits of modern nomads see Nat. Geograph. Mag. (U.S.A.), LXIX (Jan., 1936), pp. 1–57Google Scholar.
page 38 note 3 Elgee, F., Early Man in N.E. Yorkshire (1930), pp. 129–60Google Scholar.
page 39 note 1 Ant. J., XVI (1936), p. 31, fig. 1Google Scholar.
page 39 note 2 Curwen, E. C., Arch. of Sussex (1937), chap. XGoogle Scholar.
page 39 note 3 See also DrBishop, C. W., ‘Origin and Early Diffusion of the Traction-plough,’ Antiquity, X (1936), pp. 261–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; esp. p. 274, and plate II, fol. p. 264.
page 39 note 4 E. C. Curwen, Air-Photography and Economic History: the Evolution of the Corn-Field (Econ. Hist. Soc., Pamphlet No. 2). Also Congress of Arch. Socs.' ‘Report on Lynchets’ (1931).
page 40 note 1 Antiquity, IX (1935), PP. 443–454Google Scholar.
page 40 note 2 Antiquity, II (1928), pp. 85–7 (Drvan Giffen, )Google Scholar.
page 40 note 3 Acta Archaeologica, II, pt. 2, pp. 117–58Google Scholar (Prof. Hatt); Antiquity, XII (June 1938), p. 149 and pl. IIIGoogle Scholar.
page 40 note 4 Antiquity, VI (1932), pp. 398–402Google Scholar.
page 40 note 5 Reading Museum; information by courtesy of Mrs Stuart Piggott.
page 41 note 1 Encycl. Brit., s.v. OATS.
page 41 note 2 Antiquity, I (1927), p. 264Google Scholar.
page 41 note 3 For the type see Evans, , Bronze Implements, pp. 198–203Google Scholar.
page 41 note 4 Ant. J., XIV (1934), pp. 389–92Google Scholar.
page 41 note 5 Archaeological Survey of Farnham and District, 1938.
page 41 note 6 Ant. J., XVI (1936), pp. 89–90Google Scholar.
page 41 note 7 Antiquity, IX (1935), p. 66Google Scholar.
page 41 note 8 Catalogue of Bronze Implements, British Museum.
page 41 note 9 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXVIII (1927), pp. 10, 11 (fig. 13)Google Scholar; Arch., XLVI (1881), pp. 468, 491Google Scholar, and pl. XXIV, 10.
page 41 note 10 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXII (1931), pp. 140–1, fig. 28Google Scholar.
page 41 note 11 Bulleid, and Gray, St. George, Glastonbury Lake Village, II, pl. LX, 1, 48Google Scholar.
page 41 note 12 Arch. J., XCIII (1936), p. 66Google Scholar.
page 41 note 13 Arch. J., LIX (1902), p. 214, and fig. 3, aGoogle Scholar.
page 41 note 14 Kendrick, and Hawkes, , Arch. in England and Wales (1932), pp. 137–8, and pl. xvGoogle Scholar; Arch., LXXI (1921), p. 133 ffGoogle Scholar; Wheeler, , Preh. and Rom. Wales (1925), pp. 202–3Google Scholar.
page 41 note 15 All Cannings Cross, p. 125, and pl. 20, 3. A list of other examples of iron sickles is given in Glastonbury Lake Village, II, p. 369Google Scholar.
page 41 note 16 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXV (1934), p. 167Google Scholar.
page 42 note 1 Antiquity, XI (1937), p. 136, and pl. II, 2Google Scholar.
page 42 note 2 Antiquity, XI (1937), pp. 140–2Google Scholar.
page 42 note 3 Ant. J., XII (1932), p. 290Google Scholar.
page 42 note 4 There is one exception to this statement, in the shape of a completely perforated lower stone from Glastonbury (Glastonbury Museum)—the earliest example known to the writer.
page 42 note 5 Two socketed bronze points in the Hull and Maidstone Museums are certainly not ploughshares, though sometimes considered to be such.
page 42 note 6 Acta Archaeologica (Copenhagen), VII (1936), p. 258Google Scholar; Antiquity, XII (June, 1938) p. 146 and pl. 1Google Scholar.
page 43 note 1 P.P.S., I (1935), PP. 16 ff.Google Scholar
page 44 note 1 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXV (1934), pp. 137–170Google Scholar.
page 44 note 2 Arch., LXXVI (1927), pp. 1 ff.Google Scholar; Curwen, E. C., Arch. of Sussex (1937), pp. 186–8, 227–9, 304–5Google Scholar.
page 44 note 3 Arch., XLVI (1881), pl. XXIV, 4, 5 (?), and p. 491Google Scholar; Sussex Arch. Coll., LXVIII (1927), pp. 10, 12, fig. 15Google Scholar.
page 44 note 4 Arch. J., XCIII (1936), p. 66Google Scholar.
page 44 note 5 Müller, Sophus, Mém. de la Soc. Roy. des Antiq. du Nord, 1902–1907, pp. 20–41Google Scholar; Bragger, A. W., Sigd, Ijaa og snidill av det norske jordbruks ophav (Oslo, 1933), p. 12, fig. 2Google Scholar.
page 45 note 1 Cf. Brow, Park, Sussex, Antiq. Journ., IV, pp. 347–59Google Scholar; Arch., LXXVI, pp. 1–40Google Scholar; Brow, Charleston, Sussex, Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXIV, pp. 164–80Google Scholar.
page 45 note 2 Elgee, , Arch. of Yorkshire (1933), p. 115Google Scholar; Early Man in N.E. Yorkshire (1930), pp. 214–9Google Scholar.
page 45 note 3 Glastonbury Lake Village, II, pp. 369, 384 and pl. LXIGoogle Scholar.
page 45 note 4 Arch. J., XCIII (1936), p. 67Google Scholar.
page 45 note 5 E. C. Curwen, Air-Photography and Econ. History: the Evolution of the Corn-field (Econ. Hist. Soc. Pamphlet No. 2).
page 45 note 6 Ant. J., XIII (1933). PP. 455–63Google Scholar.
page 46 note 1 Georg., I, 169–75Google Scholar.
page 46 note 2 Nat. Hist., XVIII, 48Google Scholar.
page 46 note 3 Arch. J., LIX (1902), pp. 214–5 and pl. II, fig. 4Google Scholar; other ploughshares in the Maidstone Museum.
page 46 note 4 Proc. Hants F.C., XIII (1936), pp. 190, 205Google Scholar.
page 46 note 5 Ibid., pp. 188–91.
page 46 note 6 Acta Archaeologica, VII (1936), pp. 252–5Google Scholar; Aarboger, 1936, pp. 130–144Google Scholar; Hatt, G., Landbrug i Danmarks Oldtid (Copenhagen, 1937), pp. 60–2Google Scholar; Antiquity, XII (June, 1938), pp. 145–6Google Scholar.
page 46 note 7 Curwen, E. C., Arch. of Sussex (1937), pp. 299–304Google Scholar.
page 46 note 8 Antiquity, IX (1935), pp. 443–54Google Scholar.
page 47 note 1 Antiquity, IX (1935), pp. 339–41Google Scholar.
page 47 note 2 Catalogue of the Devizes Museum, p. 59, no. 494a, and plate XXXIII, 1.
page 47 note 3 Ant. J., XIII (1933), plate LXXVIII, 1 (Reading Museum)Google Scholar; Arch., LII, p. 742Google Scholar.
page 47 note 4 Ibid., p. 455; Arch. J., XIII, p. 6 and pl. II, 18Google Scholar.
page 47 note 5 Antiquity, XI (1937), pp. 142 ff.Google Scholar
page 49 note 1 Antiquity, IX (1935), PP. 335–9Google Scholar.
page 49 note 2 Antiquity, X (1936), p. 93Google Scholar.
page 49 note 3 Arch. J., XIII (1856), pp. 10–1, and pl. III, 29Google Scholar. For the significance of scythes in relation to agriculture see Antiquity, VIII (1934), pp. 237–9Google Scholar.
page 49 note 4 Most of the villas had been destroyed by raiders in the year 367—fully a century before the Saxons came to settle; see Antiquity, III (1929), pp. 271–2Google Scholar.
page 49 note 5 Seebohm, F., The English Village Community, p. 385Google Scholar.
page 49 note 6 See Curwen, E. C., Air-Photography and Economic History (Econ. Hist. Soc.), pp. 24–7Google Scholar.
page 49 note 7 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXV (1934), pl. facing p. 139Google Scholar; Curwen, E. C., Arch. of Sussex, p. 196Google Scholar.
page 50 note 1 Crawford, O. G. S., Air Survey and Archaeology (O.S. Prof. Papers, N.S., No. 7, 1924), p. 22, and pl. VGoogle Scholar.
page 50 note 2 Crawford, and Keiller, , Wessex from the Air (1928), pp. 140–1, and pl. XXIIGoogle Scholar.
page 50 note 3 Ibid., p. 128 and pl. XX.
page 50 note 4 Ibid., pp. 124–5 and pl. XIX.
page 50 note 5 Ibid., pp. 131–7, and pl. XXI b.
page 50 note 6 Ibid., pp. 132–7.
page 50 note 7 Plan and dimensions in Sussex Arch. Coll., LXIV (1923), pp. 49, 51Google Scholar; air-photograph in Antiquity, I (1927), pl. V facing p. 281Google Scholar.
page 51 note 1 Antiquity, I (1927), p. 269Google Scholar; Sussex Arch. Coll., LXIV (1923), pp. 6, 7Google Scholar.
page 51 note 2 Antiquity, I, pp. 270–1Google Scholar; Probert, , Ancient Laws of Cambria, p. 396Google Scholar, Triad No. 56.
page 51 note 3 Antiquity, I, p. 270Google Scholar; VIII (1934), p. 204 and plate.
page 51 note 4 Barley found only at Coity (Glam.) in this stage (see p. 29).
page 51 note 5 Rye found at Hunsbury only (see p. 40).