No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Contributions to a Study of the Belgae
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2014
Extract
The Belgae have, in the last generation, played an increasingly important part in the archaeology of Britain in the pre-Roman Iron Age. In general the term has been confined to the two groups of invaders, who practised cremation and whose cemeteries have been traced over a wide area in the south-east and south of England. Beyond this area Belgic influence, in various forms, has been postulated in a number of districts. The Belgic origin of the invaders who practised cremation is not in doubt and it would be superfluous at this stage to argue the case once more. The nature of the Belgic influences traced beyond the area of the cremation cemeteries is more debatable, but the present essay is not intended to enter into that question. It is concerned with an earlier period and earlier invasions, which also have a right to be termed Belgic. The ultimate origin of the Continental Belgae will not be discussed, nor do the invasions considered necessarily cover all those settlements to which the term Belgic should be applied. As will be seen the traditional Irish accounts appear to demand a Belgic settlement in Britain at a date earlier than the oldest groups now identified. This is a question that can hardly be discussed to full advantage until a far wider conspectus of archaeological material is available both on the Continent and in these islands. In the meantime the question of a Belgic invasion of Britain in the Late Bronze Age is one that must remain open.
- Type
- Iron Age
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1956
References
page 249 note 1 O'Rahilly, T. F., Early Irish History and Mythology (cited as O'Rahilly), 16 and 52–4Google Scholar.
page 250 note 1 Arch. J., XCVIII, 36–61Google Scholar.
page 250 note 2 Caesaris de bello gallico (cited as Caesar), I, 1Google Scholar.
page 250 note 3 Caesar, II, 4.
page 250 note 4 Dionysios of Halicarnassos, , Roman Antiquities, XIV, 1Google Scholar; cf. Feist in Ebert, , Reallexikon der Vorgeschichte, IV, 273–4Google Scholar and O'Rahilly, 456–9.
page 251 note 1 The best account of these cemeteries is that by Hawkes, and Dunning, (Arch. J., LXXXVII, 183–240)Google Scholar.
page 251 note 2 Proc. Preh. Soc., XX, 2–4Google Scholar.
page 251 note 3 Oudheidkundige Mededeelingen Leiden (cited as OML.) n.r., XXIII, 48–77; unless otherwise stated the Dutch evidence is drawn from this source. In the course of the article the author points out that the distribution of the Harpstedt urns (kartelrandurnen) is southern and they cannot be used as evidence of a Germanic intrusion (ibid., 72).
page 251 note 4 Arch., LXXVII, 179–200Google Scholar, especially 190–2.
page 251 note 5 Mariën, Oud Belgie, figs. 291, 302 and 308–9; cf. also Proc. Preh. Soc., XX, 20Google Scholar.
page 251 note 6 OML., n.r., XV, 39–53.
page 251 note 7 Holwerda, , Nederlands Vroegste Geschiedenis, 104Google Scholar.
page 251 note 8 OML., n.r., V, 69–76; cf. Bursch's group E.
page 251 note 9 Catalogue des Musées royaux du Cinquantenaire, II, 199Google Scholar.
page 252 note 1 For a convenient map see Arch. J., LXXXVII, 230Google Scholar.
page 252 note 2 Caesar, IV, 4.
page 252 note 3 Caesar, II, 4, and V, 24.
page 252 note 4 Strabonis Geographica, IV, I, 1Google Scholar.
page 252 note 5 Avieni Ora maritima, ll. 129–35 and Schulten's commentary.
page 252 note 6 Arch. J., C, 188–223Google Scholar, especially 219.
page 253 note 1 Proc. Preh. Soc., XIX, 1–40Google Scholar.
page 253 note 2 Ipswich Museum.
page 253 note 3 C. Fox, Archaeology of Cambridge Region, pl. XI and XVI.
page 253 note 4 Arch. J., XCVI, 19 and 36Google Scholar.
page 253 note 5 Ipswich Museum.
page 253 note 6 Fox, op. cit., 79–80.
page 253 note 7 Proc. Preh. Soc., XX, 18–19Google Scholar.
page 253 note 8 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXX, 217–62 and 269–92Google Scholar; for the affinities of the A ware see especially 223–7.
page 253 note 9 ibid., 206 and 219; East Sussex lies outside the cremation area of the later Belgic invasions (Proc. Preh. Soc., XX, 12Google Scholar).
page 253 note 10 Curwen, E.C., The Archaeology of Sussex, 268Google Scholar; Ant. J., XI, 71Google Scholar.
page 254 note 1 Arch., LXXVII, 179–200Google Scholar; compare ibid., no. 29/30 with OML., n.r. XXXII, 40, fig. 5, 7 and 43, fig. 6, 4 and no. 24 with fig. 6, 9.
page 254 note 2 Arch. J., C, 219Google Scholar.
page 254 note 3 For distribution see F. Elgee, Early Man in North-east Yorkshire, fig. 60.
page 254 note 4 Ptolemaei Geographiae, II, 3, 16 and 20Google Scholar.
page 254 note 5 Arch., XC, 41Google Scholar.
page 254 note 6 Collingwood, R. G., and Myres, J. N. L., Roman Britain, 411–15Google Scholar; Stenton, F. M., Anglo-Saxon England, 44–9Google Scholar.
page 254 note 7 Richmond, I. A. in Wheeler, R. E. M., The Stanwick Fortifications, 61–2Google Scholar; Birley, E. B., in Dumfriesshire and Galloway Trans., III, XXIX, 46–65Google Scholar.
page 254 note 8 Wheeler, op. cit., 38–44.
page 255 note 1 ibid., 62.
page 255 note 2 Childe, V. G., The Prehistory of Scotland, 254Google Scholar.
page 255 note 3 Proc. Soc. Ant. Scotland, LXXXIV, 129–35Google Scholar.
page 255 note 4 Arch., XCIII, 27Google Scholar.
page 255 note 5 Ptolemaei Geographiae, II, III, 5Google Scholar.
page 255 note 6 Proc. Preh. Soc., XX, 4–10Google Scholar.
page 255 note 7 O'Rahilly, 15–6.
page 256 note 1 O'Rahilly, 40.
page 256 note 2 O'Rahilly, 37 and 81.
page 256 note 3 Avieni Ora maritima, ll. 108–12. The sacram insulam of the Latin text probably comes from Ἱερὰ Νῆσος of the Greek, which may go back to an original Ἱέρνη.
page 256 note 4 O'Rahilly, 39–42 and 83–4.
page 256 note 5 O'Rahilly, 141–6.