Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:56:38.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Collection of Early Upper Palaeolithic Artefacts from Beedings, near Pulborough, West Sussex, and the Context of Similar Finds from the British Isles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Roger Jacobi ,
Nick Debenham  and
John Catt
Roger Jacobi
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
Nick Debenham
Affiliation:
Quaternary TL Surveys, 19 Leonard Avenue, Nottingham NG5 2LW, UK
John Catt
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University College London, Pearson Building, Gower Street, London WCIE 6BT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides a first formal description of a collection of lithic artefacts unearthed during the building of a house called Beedings on a scarp crest near Pulborough in West Sussex.The discovery was probably made in 1900. The collection is very obviously multi-period, but it includes the largest group of Early Upper Palaeolithic artefacts from south-eastern England. Attributed to this time are leaf-points, end-scrapers, and burins. While recent selection has much reduced the collection it also appears to contain contemporary cores and debitage and evidence for the production of bladelets. In a British context this find is unique and in a European perspective it is one of the richest assemblages attributable to the Lincombian–Ranisian–Jerzmanowician technocomplex. The age of this technocomplex is poorly constrained, but in this paper it is argued to belong to the earliest part of the Upper Palaeolithic, starting earlier than the local Aurignacian. The Upper Palaeolithic material from Beedings is interpreted as having come from a hunting camp situated so as to exploit the extensive views across the western Weald.

Résumé

Cette étude apporte une première description magistrale d'une collection d'objets manufacturés lithiques mis au jour au cours de la construction d'une maison appelée Beedings sur la crête d'un escarpement près de Pulborough dans le West Sussex. La découverte date probablement de 1900. La collection couvre, de toute évidence, plusieurs périodes mais elle comprend le plus important ensemble d'objets manufacturés du paléolithique supérieur du sud-est de l'Angleterre. On a attribué à cette époque les pointes foliacées, les grattoirs en bout de lame et les burins. Tandis qu'une récente opération de sélection a beaucoup réduit la collection, elle semble aussi contenir des noyaux et du débitage contemporains et des témoignages de production de lamelles datant de la même époque. Dans un contexte britannique, cette trouvaille est unique et dans une perspective européenne elle constitue l'un des plus riches assemblages attribuables au complexe technologique Lincombien-Ranisien-Jerzmanowicien. L'âge de ce complexe technologique est mal déterminé, mais on argumente dans cette étude qu'il appartient à la plus ancienne partie du paléolithique supérieur, il aurait précédé l'Aurignacien local. On a interprété le matériel du paléolithique supérieur de Beedings comme provenant d'un campement de chasseurs situé de manière à exploiter le vaste panorama sur le Weald à l'ouest.

Résumen

Este artículo proporciona la primera descripción formal de una colección de instrumentos líticos descubierta durante la construcción de una casa llamada Beedings en una cresta cerca de Pulborough en West Sussex. El descubrimiento data probablemente al 1900. La colección pertenece obviamente a muchos periodos, pero incluye el grupo más numeroso de instrumentos del Primer Paleolítico Superior del sureste de Inglaterra. Atribuidas a este periodo son las puntas lanceoladas, rascadores y buriles. Mientras que una selección reciente ha reducido mucho la colección, también parece que contiene muchos núcleos contemporáneos y material de desecho, y evidencia de la producción de bladelets. En un contexto británico este hallazgo es único, y dentro de una perspectiva europea es uno de los hallazgos más ricos atribuible al tecno-complejo Lincombiano-Ranisiano-Jerzmanowiciano. La edad de este tecno-complejo está poco definida, pero este estudio sostiene que pertenece a la primerísima parte del Paleolítico Superior comenzando antes del Auriñaciense local. El material del Paleolítico Superior encontrado en Beedings es interpretado como procedente de un campamento de caza situado en ese emplazamiento para explotar al máximo la amplia vista del Weald oeste.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel liefert eine erste formale Beschreibung einer Steinartefaktansammlung, die beim Bau eines Hauses mit dem Namen Beedings im oberen Bereich einer Böschung bei Pulborough in West Sussex wahrscheinlich um 1900 zum Vorschein kamen. Die Sammlung ist offenkundig chronologisch nicht homogen, stellt aber die größte Gruppe Jungpaläolithischer Artefakte aus Südost-England dar. Typisch für diese Zeitperiode sind Blattspitzen, Kratzer, und Stichel. Obwohl eine neuerliche Untersuchung und Selektion die Sammlung stark reduziert hat, scheint sie Nachweise für gleichzeitige Kerne und Abschläge und für eine Herstellung von Lamellen zu liefern. Dieser Fund ist in Großbritannien einmalig und gehört auch auf Europäischer Ebene zu den reichsten Inventaren, die dem Lincombian-Ranisian-Jerzmanowician Techno-Komplex zugerechnet werden können. Obwohl sich das Alter dieses Techno-Komplexes schlecht einschränken lässt, wird im Artikel die These aufgestellt, dass es ins früheste Jungpaläolithikum datiert und deshalb dem lokalen Aurignacien vorangeht. Es wird weiterhin argumentiert, dass das jungpaläolithische Material aus Beedings von einem Jagdlager stammt, das wegen der weiten Aussicht über den westlichen Weald dort angelegt wurde.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 73 , 2007 , pp. 229 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldhouse-Green, S. 1998. The archaeology of distance: perspectives from the Welsh Palaeolithic. In Ashton, et al. (eds) 1998. 137–45Google Scholar
Aldhouse-Green, S. 2004. The Palaeolithic. In Aldhouse-Green, M. & Howell, R. (eds), The Gwent County History. Volume I. Gwent in Prehistory and Early History, 1–28. Cardiff: University of Wales PressGoogle Scholar
Aldhouse-Green, S. & Pettitt, P. 1998. Paviland Cave: contextualising the ‘Red Lady’. Antiquity 72(278), 756–72Google Scholar
Aldsworth, F.G. 1984. An Iron Age coin from ‘Beedings’, Pulborough. Sussex Archaeological Collections 122, 217.Google Scholar
Allsworth-Jones, P. 1986. The Szeletian and the Transition from Middle to Upper Palaeolithic in Central Europe. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Allsworth-Jones, P. 1990. The Szeletian and the stratigraphic succession in Central Europe and adjacent areas: main trends, recent results, and problems for resolution. In Mellars, P.A. (ed.), The Emergence of Modern Humans. An Archaeological Perspective, 160–242. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1827. Discovery of fossil hyaenas in Kent. The Philosophical Magazine & Annals of Philosophy New Series, 2(7), 73–4Google Scholar
Ap Simon, A.M. 1986. Picken's Hole, Compton Bishop, Somerset; Early Devensian bear and wolf den, and Middle Devensian hyaena den and Palaeolithic site. In Collcutt, (ed.) 1986. 55–6Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.L. 1926. Excavations at Creswell Crags, Derbyshire. 1924–1926. Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 3(2), 116–22Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.L. 1932. Excavations in the Pin Hole Cave, Creswell Crags, Derbyshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, 6(4), 330–4Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.L. 1939. Palaeolithic Man in the North Midlands. Memoirs & Proceedings of the Manchester Literary & Philosophical Society 83, 87–116Google Scholar
Ashton, N., Healy, F. & Pettitt, P. (eds). 1998. Stone Age Archaeology. Essays in honour of John Wymer. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 102 & Lithic Studies Society Occasional Paper 6Google Scholar
Ashworth, H.W.W. 1971. Fourteen years at Badger Hole. From the Diaries of H.E. Balch, M.A., F.S.A. (1938–1952). Wells: Wells Natural History & Archaeological SocietyGoogle Scholar
Baales, M. 1996. Umwelt and Jagdökonomie der Ahrensburger Rentierjäger im Mittelgebirge. Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Forschungsinstitut für Vor-und FrühgeschichteGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S.E. & Hublin, J.-J. 2005. Who made the early Aurignacian? A reconsideration of the Brassempouy dental remains. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris 17(1–2), 115–21Google Scholar
Bailey, S.E. & Hublin, J.-J. 2006. Dental remains from the Grotte du Renne at Arcy-sur-Cure (Yonne). Journal of Human Evolution 50(5), 485–508Google Scholar
Balch, H.E. 1928. Excavations at Wookey Hole and other Mendip caves. Antiquaries Journal 8(2), 193–210Google Scholar
Balch, H.E. 1930a. Wells museum report. 42nd Annual Report of the Wells Natural History & Archaeological Society together with the twenty-third Annual Report of the Mendip Nature Research Committee, 9–11Google Scholar
Balch, H.E. 1930b. Mendip Nature Research Committee. Report for 1930. 42nd Annual Report of the Wells Natural History & Archaeological Society together with the twenty-third Annual Report of the Mendip Nature Research Committee, 37–9Google Scholar
Barker, H., Burleigh, R. & Meeks, N. 1971. British Museum Natural Radiocarbon Measurements 7. Radiocarbon 13(2), 157–88Google Scholar
Barton, R.N.E. 1986. Experiments with long blades from Sproughton, near Ipswich, Suffolk. In Roe, D.A. (ed.), Studies in the Upper Palaeolithic of Britain & Northwest Europe, 129–41. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S296Google Scholar
Barton, R.N.E. 1998. Long blade technology and the question of British Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene lithic assemblages. In Ashton, et al. (eds) 1998, 158–64Google Scholar
Barton, R.N.E. & Bergman, C.A. 1982. Hunters at Hengistbury: some evidence from experimental archaeology. World Archaeology 14(2), 237–48Google Scholar
Barton, R.N.E. & Roberts, A.J. 1996. Reviewing the British Late Upper Palaeolithic: new evidence for chronological patterning in the Lateglacial record. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 15(3), 245–65Google Scholar
Bergman, C.A. & Newcomer, M.H. 1983. Flint arrowhead breakage: examples from Ksar Akil, Lebanon. Journal of Field Archaeology 10. 238–43Google Scholar
Beynon, F., Dowie, H.G. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1929. Report on the excavations in Kent's Cavern, 1926–9. Transactions & Proceedings of the Torquay Natural History Society, 5(3), 237–42Google Scholar
Bocquet-Appel, J.-P. & Demars, P.Y. 2000. Neanderthal contraction and modern human colonization of Europe. Antiquity 74(285), 544–52Google Scholar
Bohmers, A. 1951. Die Höhlen von Mauern. Teil I. Kulturgeschichte der altsteinzeitlichen Besiedlung. Palaeohistoria 1. 1–107Google Scholar
Boismier, W.A. 2003. A Middle Palaeolithic site at Lynford Quarry, Mundford, Norfolk: interim statement. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 69, 315–24Google Scholar
Bolton, H. 1900a. Caves at Uphill. – Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor C. Lloyd Morgan (Chairman), Professor W. Boyd Dawkins, Mr. W.R. Barker, Mr. T.H. Reynolds, Mr. E.T. Newton and Mr. H. Bolton (Secretary), appointed to excavate the Ossiferous Caves at Uphill, near Weston-super-Mare. Report of the Sixty-ninth Meeting of the British Association for the Advacement of Science (Dover, 1899), 402.Google Scholar
Bolton, H. 1900b. Ossiferous Caves at Uphill. – Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Lloyd Morgan (Chairman), H. Bolton (Secretary), Professor W. Boyd Dawkins, Professor S.H. Reynolds, and E.T. Newton. Report of the Seventieth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Bradford, 1900), 342–3Google Scholar
Bolton, H. 1901. Ossiferous Caves at Uphill. – Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor C. Lloyd Morgan (Chairman), Mr. H. Bolton (Secretary), Professor W. Boyd Dawkins, Mr. W.R. Barker, Mr. S.H. Reynolds, and Mr. E.T Newton, appointed for the purpose of excavating the Ossiferous Caves at Uphill, near Weston-super-Mare. Report of the Seventy-first Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Glasgow, 1901), 352.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1961. Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen. Publications de l'Institut de Préhistoire de l'Université de Bordeaux, Mémoire 1. Bordeaux: Imprimeries DelmasGoogle Scholar
Bordes, F. 1967. Considérations sur la typologie et les techniques dans le Paléolithique. Quartär 18. 25–55Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1968. Le Paléolithique dans le Monde. Paris: HachetteGoogle Scholar
Bordes, F. 1969. Bruised blades and flakes in the Upper Perigordian at Corbiac, Dordogne, France. In Ghosh, A.K. (ed.), Perspectives in Palaeoanthropology, 135–8. CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
Bordes, F. 1970. Observations typologiques et techniques sur le Périgordien supérieur de Corbiac (Dordogne). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 67(4), 105–13Google Scholar
Bordes, F. & Sonneville-Bordes, D. de. 1979. L'Azilianisation dans la vallée de la Dordogne. Les données de la Gare de Couze (Dordogne) et de l'Abri Morin (Gironde). In Sonneville-Bordes, D. de (ed.), La Fin des Temps Glaciaires en Europe. Chronostratigraphie et écologie des cultures du Paléolithique final, 449–59. Paris: Colloques internationaux du CNRS 271.Google Scholar
Boulton, G.S., Jones, A.S., Clayton, K.M. & Kenning, M.J. 1977. A British ice-sheet model and patterns of glacial erosion and deposition in Britain. In Shottton, F.W. (ed.), British Quaternary Studies: recent advances, 231–46 Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Bowen, D.Q., Pettitt, P.B., Richards, M., Sykes, B.C., Ivanovich, M., Latham, A. & Debenham, N. 2000. Radiometric dating, stable isotopes & DNA. In Aldhouse-Green, S. (ed.), Paviland Cave & the Red Lady: a definitive report, 61–80. Bristol: Western Academic & Specialist Press LimitedGoogle Scholar
Bowman, S.G.E., Ambers, J.C. & Leese, M.N. 1990. Reevaluation of British Museum radiocarbon dates issued between 1980 and 1984. Radiocarbon 32(1), 59–79Google Scholar
Brézillon, M.N. 1977. La Dénomination des Objets de Pierre Taillée. IVe Supplément à Gallia Préhistoire. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C., Higham, T.F.G., Bowles, A., & Hedges, R. 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1), 155–63Google Scholar
Burleigh, R., Hewson, A. & Meeks, N. 1976. British Museum Natural Radiocarbon Measurements 8. Radiocarbon 18(1), 16–42Google Scholar
Butler, C. 2003. An Archaeological Watching Brief at Beedings House, Nutbourne Lane, Pulborough (phase2). Project 1535 (Archaeology South East). West Sussex Sites and Monuments Record No. 6691 TQO2 SE 34. Horsham DistrictGoogle Scholar
Callahan, E. 1994. A mammoth undertaking. Bulletin of Primitive Technology 1, 23–39Google Scholar
Callow, P. 1986. The flint tools. In Callow, P. & Cornford, J.M. (eds), La Cotte de St. Brelade 1961–1978: excavations by C.B.M. McBurney, 251–314. Norwich: Geo BooksGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.B. 1970. Excavations at Creswell Crags: preliminary report. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal, 89, 47–58Google Scholar
Campbell, J.B. 1971. The Upper Palaeolithic of Britain: a study of British Upper Palaeolithic cultural material and its relation to environmental and chronological evidence. D.Phil Dissertation: Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.B. 1977. The Upper Palaeolithic of Britain: a study of man and nature in the Late Ice Age. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.B. 1980. Les problèmes des subdivisions du Paléolithique supérieur britannique dans son cadre européen. Bulletin de la Société Royale Belge d'Anthropologie et de Préhistoire 91, 39–77Google Scholar
Campbell, J.B. 1986. Hiatus and continuity in the British Upper Palaeolithic: a view from the Antipodes. In Roe, D.A. (ed.), Studies in the Upper Palaeolithic of Britain and Northwest Europe, 7–42. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S296Google Scholar
Campbell, J.B. 1988. Thakeham, Pulborough, West Sussex, Royaume-Uni. In Leroi-Gourhan, A. (ed.), Dictionnaire de la Préhistoire, 1042. Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar
Catt, J.A., Corbett, W.M., Hodge, C.A.H., Madgett, P.A., Tatler, W. & Weir, A.H. 1971. Loess in the soils of north Norfolk. Journal of Soil Science 22, 444–52Google Scholar
Catt, J.A., Weir, A.H., & Madgett, P.A. 1974. The loess of eastern Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 40, 23–39Google Scholar
Cattelain, P. 1989. Un crochet de propulseur de la grotte de Combe Saunière I (Dordogne). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 86(7), 213–6Google Scholar
Challinor, J. 1973. A Dictionary of Geology (4th edition). Cardiff: University of Wales PressGoogle Scholar
Charles, R. & Jacobi, R.M. 1994. The Lateglacial fauna from the Robin Hood Cave, Creswell Crags: a reassessment. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 13(1), 1–32Google Scholar
Chmielewski, W. 1961. Civilisation de Jerzmanowice. Wroclaw, Warsaw, Cracow: Instytut Historii Kultury Materialnej Polskiej Akademii NaukGoogle Scholar
Christenson, A.L. 1986. Projectile point size and projectile aerodynamics: an exploratory study. Plains Anthropologist 31, 109–28Google Scholar
Collcutt, S.N. (ed.). 1986. The Palaeolithic of Britain and its Nearest Neighbours: recent trends. Sheffield: University of Sheffield Department of Archaeology & Prehistory/John R. CollisGoogle Scholar
Collcutt, S.N. 2001. The Sackung Hypothesis: a challenge for Palaeolithic prospection. In Milliken, S. & Cook, J. (eds), A Very Remote Period Indeed. Papers on the Palaeolithic Presented to Derek Roe, 223–33. Oxford: Oxbow booksGoogle Scholar
Conard, N.J. & Bolus, M. 2003. Radiocarbon dating the appearance of modern humans and timing of cultural innovations in Europe: new results and new challenges. Journal of Human Evolution 44(3), 331–71Google Scholar
Cook, J. & Jacobi, R.M. 1998. Discoidal core technology in the Palaeolithic at Oldbury, Kent. In Ashton, et al. (eds) 1998, 124–36Google Scholar
Cooper, L. 2004. The hunter-gatherers of Leicestershire and Rutland. In Bowman, P. & Liddle, P. (eds), Leicestershire Landscapes, 12–29. Leicester: Leicestershire Museums Archaeological Fieldwork Group Monograph 1Google Scholar
Crabtree, D.E. 1977. The obtuse angle as a functional edge. In Ingersoll, D., Yellen, J.E. & Macdonald, W. (eds), Experimental Archeology, 38–51. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Currant, A.P. 1987. Late Pleistocene saiga Saiga tatarica on Mendip. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 18(1), 74–80Google Scholar
Currant, A.P. & Jacobi, R.M. 2001. A formal mammalian biostratigraphy for the Late Pleistocene of Britain. Quaternary Science Reviews 20(16–17), 1707–16Google Scholar
Curwen, E. 1932. Some noteworthy flints from Sussex. Sussex Archaeological Collections 73, 197–200Google Scholar
Curwen, E. 1949. A flint dagger factory near Pulborough, Sussex. Antiquaries Journal 29 (3–4), 192–3Google Scholar
Curwen, E.C. 1954. The Archaeology of Sussex (2nd edition revised). London: MethuenGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. 2001. A very model of a Modern Human industry: new perspectives on the origins and spread of the Aurignacian in Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 67, 195–217Google Scholar
Dawkins, W.B. 1862. On a Hyaena-den at Wookey-Hole, near Wells. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 18(1), 115–25Google Scholar
Dawkins, W.B. 1863a. Wookey Hole Hyena Den. Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archaeological & Natural History Society 11(2), 197–219Google Scholar
Dawkins, W.B. 1863b. On a Hyaena-den at Wookey Hole, near Wells. No. 2. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 19(1), 260–74Google Scholar
Dawkins, W.B. 1869. On the distribution of the British Postglacial mammals. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 25(2), 192–217Google Scholar
Dawkins, W.B. 1874. Cave Hunting, Researches on the Evidence of Caves Respecting the Early Inhabitants of Europe. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, W.B. 1876. On the mammalia and traces of man found in the Robin-Hood Cave. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 32(3), 245–58Google Scholar
Dawkins, W.B. 1877. On the mammal-fauna of the caves of Creswell Crags. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 33(3), 589–612Google Scholar
Dawkins, W.B. 1906. Early Man. In Page, W. (ed.), The Victoria History of the County of Somerset: Volume 1. 167–204. London: James StreetGoogle Scholar
Debénath, A. & Dibble, H.L. 1994. Handbook of Paleolithic Typology. Volume One: Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania MuseumGoogle Scholar
Delagnes, A. 1992. Éclats à troncature inverse et enlèvements postérieurs: réflexions nouvelles autour d'un vieux débat. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 89(9), 274–7Google Scholar
Demars, P.-Y. & Laurent, P. 1992. Types d'outils lithiques du Paléolithique supérieur en Europe. Paris: Presses du CNRSGoogle Scholar
Dennell, R.W. 1983. European Economic Prehistory. A New Approach. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Desbrosse, R. & Kozlowski, J. 1988. Hommes et climats à l'âge du mammouth: le Paléolithique supérieur d'Eurasie centrale. Paris: MassonGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H.L. & McPherron, S.P. 2006. The missing Mousterian. Current Anthropology 47(5), 777–803Google Scholar
Dowie, H.G. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1927. Kent's Cavern, Torquay – Report of Committee appointed to co-operate with the Torquay Natural History Society in investigating Kent's Cavern. (Sir A. Keith, Chairman; Prof. J.L Myres, Secretary; Mr. G.A. Garfitt, Prof. W. J. Sollas, Mr. Mark L. Sykes). Report of the Ninety-fifth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Leeds, 1927), 303–6Google Scholar
Escutenaire, C. 1997. Les ‘couteaux de Kostienki’ dans les collections du Paléolithique ancien de Belgique. Notae Praehistoricae 17, 21–4Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1872. The Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain. London: LongmansGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. 1897. The Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons and Ornaments, of Great Britain. 2nd edition revised. London: LongmansGoogle Scholar
Fagnart, J.-P. & Plisson, H. 1997. Fonction des pièces mâchurées du Paléolithique final du Bassin de la Somme: caractères tracéologiques et données contextuelles. In Fagnart, J.-P. & Thévenin, A. (eds), Le Tardiglaciaire en Europe du Nord-Ouest, 95–106. Actes du 119. Congrès national des Sociétés historiques et scientifiques, Amiens, 1994. Paris: Editions CTHSGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A., Hansen, P.V. & Rasmussen, P. 1984. Macro and micro wear traces on lithic projectile points. Journal of Danish Archaeology 3, 19–46Google Scholar
Flas, D. 2001. Étude de la continuité entre le Lincombien–Ranisien–Jerzmanowicien et le Gravettien aux pointes pédonculées septentrional. Préhistoire Européenne 16–17, 163–89Google Scholar
Flas, D. 2002. Les débuts du paléolithique supérieur dans le Nord-Ouest de l'Europe: le Lincombien –Ranisien– Jerzmanowicien. Anthropologica et Praehistorica 113. 25–49Google Scholar
Flas, D. 2006. La Transition du Paléolithique moyen au supérieur dans la Plaine septentrionale de l'Europe. Les problématiques du Lincombien– Ranisien– Jerzmanowicien. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of LiègeGoogle Scholar
Fonton, M., Lhomme, V. & Christensen, M. 1991. Un cas de ‘réduction’ et de ‘transformation’ d'outil au Paléolithique moyen. Un racloir déjeté de la grotte du Coustal à Noailles (Corrèze). Paléo 3, 43–7Google Scholar
Froom, R. 2005. Late Glacial Long Blade Sites in the Kennet Valley. Excavations and Fieldwork at Avington VI, Wawcott XII and Crown Acres. London: British Museum Research Publication 153.Google Scholar
Gallois, R.W. 1965. British Regional Geology. The Wealden District. (4th edition). Natural Environment Research Council. Institute of Geological Sciences. London: Her Majesty's Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Garrod, D.A.E. 1926. The Upper Palaeolithic Age in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Gaussen, J. 1986. La Croix de Fer. Patines et âge. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 83(1), 7–9Google Scholar
Geneste, J.-M. & Plisson, H. 1990. Technologie fonctionelle des pointes à cran solutréennes: l'apport des nouvelles données de la Grotte de Combe Saunière (Dordogne). In Kozlowski, J.K. (ed.), Feuilles de Pierre. Les Industries à Pointes foliacées du Paléolithique supérieur européen, 293–320. Actes du Colloque de Cracovie, 1989. Liège: Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège (ERAUL) 4.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R., Gowlett, J.A.J., Hall, E.T., Hedges, R.E.M. & Perry, C. 1985. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 2. Archaeometry 27(2), 237–46Google Scholar
Gouedo, J.-M. 1988. Étude préliminaire de la technologie de l'industrie de Champlost: exemples de la chaîne opératoire Levallois et des racloirs à retouches bifaces. In Tuffreau, A. (ed.), Cultures et Industries lithiques en milieu loessique, 149–55. Actes du Colloque international, Amiens (9–11 Décembre 1986). Revue Archéologique de Picardie 1–2 (numéro spécial)Google Scholar
Gowlett, J.A.J., Hedges, R.E.M., Law, I.A. & Perry, C. 1986. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 4. Archaeometry 28(2), 206–21Google Scholar
Gramly, R.M. 1981. Eleven thousand years in Maine. Archaeology 34(6), 32–9Google Scholar
Griffin, N. 2002. An Archaeological Watching Brief at Beedings House, Nutbourne Lane, Pulborough, West Sussex (TQ 07562 20245). (Archaeology South East). West Sussex Sites and Monuments RecordGoogle Scholar
Grünberg, J.M. 2006. New AMS dates for Palaeolithic and Mesolithic camp sites and single finds in Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia (Germany). Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 72, 95–112Google Scholar
Haesaerts, P. & Damblon, F. 2004. Les dates radiocarbone de Maisières-Canal. In Miller, R., Haesaerts, P. & Otte, M. (eds), L'atelier de taille aurignacien de Maisières-Canal (Belgique), 27–8. Liège: Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège (ERAUL), 110.Google Scholar
Hahn, J. 1988. Die Geissenklösterle-Höhle im Achtal bei Blaubeuren I: Fundhorizontbildung und Besiedlung im Mittelpaläolithikum und im Aurignacien. Stuttgart: Kommissionsverlag. Konrad Theiss VerlagGoogle Scholar
Hammen, T. van der. 1995. The Dinkel Valley revisited: Pleniglacial stratigraphy of the eastern Netherlands and global climatic change. In Herngreen, G.F.W. & van der Valk, L. (eds), Neogene and Quaternary Geology of North-West Europe, 343–55. Haarlem: Mededelingen-Rijks Geologische Dienst 5.Google Scholar
Harley, J. 1900. An early burial place at Pulborough. Sussex Archaeological Collections 43, 84–7Google Scholar
Harrison, B. 1892. Report of the committee appointed to carry on excavations at Oldbury Hill near Ightham. Report of the Sixty-first Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, (Cardiff 1891), 353–4Google Scholar
Harrison, C.J.O. 1988. Bird bones from Soldier's Hole, Cheddar, Somerset. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 18(2), 258–64Google Scholar
Harrison, D.L. 1996. Systematic status of Kennard's shrew (Sorex kennardi Hinton, 1911. Insectivora: Soricidae): a study based on British and Polish material. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 39(1), 201–12Google Scholar
Harrod, T.R., Catt, J.A. & Weir, A.H. 1973. Loess in Devon. Proceedings of the Ussher Society 2, 554–64Google Scholar
Heath, T. 1879. An Abstract Description and History of the Bone Caves of Creswell Crags. Derby: Wilkins & EllisGoogle Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Housley, R.A., Law, I.A., Bronk, C.R. 1989. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 9. Archaeometry 31(2), 207–234Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Housley, R.A., Bronk, C.R. & Klinken, G.J. van. 1991a. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 12. Archaeometry, 33(1), 121–34Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Housley, R.A., Bronk, C.R. & Klinken, G.J. van. 1991b. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 13. Archaeometry 33(2), 279–96Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Housley, R.A., Bronk Ramsey, C. & Klinken, G.J. van. 1994. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 18. Archaeometry 36(2), 337–74Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Pettitt, P.B., Bronk Ramsey, C. & Klinken, G.J. van. 1996.Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 22. Archaeometry 38(2), 391–415Google Scholar
Heinzelin, J. de. 1973. L'industrie du Site Paléolithique de Maisières – Canal. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique Mémoire 17.Google Scholar
Hicks, H. 1886. Results of recent researches in some bonecaves in North Wales (Ffynnon Beuno and Cae Gwyn). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 42(1), 3–17Google Scholar
Higham, T.F.G., Jacobi, R.M. & Bronk Ramsey, C. 2006. AMS radiocarbon dating of bone from the European Palaeolithic using ultrafiltration. Radiocarbon 48(2), 179–95Google Scholar
Hollingworth, S.E., Taylor, J.H. & Kellaway, G.A. 1944. Large-scale superficial structures in the Northampton Ironstone Field. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 100(1–2), 1–44Google Scholar
Hughen, K., Southon, J., Lehman, S., Bertrand, C. & Turnbull, J. 2006. Marine-derived 14C calibration and activity record for the past 50,000 years updated from the Cariaco Basin. Quaternary Science Reviews 25, 3216–27Google Scholar
Hülle, W.M. 1977. Die Ilsenhöhle unter Burg Ranis/Thüringen: Eine paläolithische Jägerstation. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer VerlagGoogle Scholar
Huxtable, J. & Jacobi, R. M. 1982. Thermoluminescence dating of burned flints from a British Mesolithic site: Longmoor Inclosure, East Hampshire. Archaeometry 24(2), 164–9Google Scholar
Jackson, J.W. 1967. The Creswell caves. Journal of the British Speleological Association 6(41), 8–23Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1980. The Upper Palaeolithic of Britain with special reference to Wales. In Taylor, J.A. (ed.), Culture & Environment in Prehistoric Wales, 15–100. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 7.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1986. The contents of Dr. Harley's show case. In Collcutt, (ed.) 1986. 62–8Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1990. Leaf-points & the British Early Upper Palaeolithic. In Kozlowski, J.K. (ed.), Feuilles de Pierre. Les Industries à Pointes foliacées du Paléolithique supérieur européen, 271–89. Actes du Colloque de Cracovie, 1989. Liège: Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège (ERAUL) 42Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1994. Mesolithic radiocarbon dates: a first review of some recent dates. In Ashton, N. & David, A. (eds), Stories in Stone, 192–8. Proceedings of Anniversary Conference at St Hilda's College, Oxford, April 1993. London: Lithic Studies Society Occasional Paper 4Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1999. Some observations on the British earlier Upper Palaeolithic. In Davies, W. & Charles, R. (eds), Dorothy Garrod and the Progress of the Palaeolithic. Studies in the Prehistoric Archaeology of the Near East and Europe, 35–40. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 2000. The Late Pleistocene archaeology of Somerset. In Webster, C.J. (ed.), Somerset Archaeology. Papers to mark 150 years of the Somerset Archaeological & Natural History Society, 45–52. Taunton: Somerset County CouncilGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 2004. The Late Upper Palaeolithic lithic collection from Gough's Cave, Cheddar, Somerset and human use of the cave. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 70, 1–92Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 2006a. Creswell Crags and the sabre-toothed cat. Studies in Speleology 14, 33–8Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 2006b. Some observations on the non-flint lithics from Creswell Crags. Lithics 25 (for 2004), 39–64Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M., Higham, T.F.G. & Bronk Ramsey, C. 2006. AMS radiocarbon dating of Middle and Upper Palaeolithic bone in the British Isles: improved reliability using ultrafiltration. Journal of Quaternary Science 21(5), 557–73Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. & Pettitt, P.B. 2000. An Aurignacian point from Uphill Quarry (Somerset) and the earliest settlement of Britain by Homo sapiens sapiens. Antiquity 74(285), 513–8Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M., Rowe, P.J., Gilmour, M.A., Grün, R. & Atkinson, T.C. 1998. Radiometric dating of the Middle Palaeolithic tool industry and associated fauna of Pin Hole Cave, Creswell Crags, England. Journal of Quaternary Science 13(1), 29–42Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. & Tebbutt, C.F. 1981. A Late Mesolithic rock-shelter site at High Hurstwood, Sussex. Sussex Archaeological Collections 119, 1–36Google Scholar
Jelgersma, S. 1979. Sea-level changes in the North Sea basin. In Oele, E., Schuttenhelm, R.T.E. & Wiggers, A.J. (eds), The Quaternary History of the North Sea, 233–48Google Scholar
Jenkinson, R.D.S. 1984. Creswell Crags. Late Pleistocene Sites in the East Midlands. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 12.Google Scholar
Johansen, L. 2000. The Late Palaeolithic in Denmark. In Valentin, B., Bodu, P. & Christensen, M. (eds), L'Europe Centrale et Septentrionale au Tardiglaciaire, 197–215. Actes de la Table-ronde internationale de Nemours (14–16 Mai 1997). Mémoires du Musée de Préhistoire d'Île-de-France 7Google Scholar
Jones, D.K.C. 1981. Southeast and Southern England. London: MethuenGoogle Scholar
Judson, S. 1947. Large-scale superficial structures – a discussion. The Journal of Geology 55(3.1), 168–75Google Scholar
Keef, P.A.M., Wymer, J.J. & Dimbleby, G.W. 1965. A Mesolithic site on Iping Common, Sussex, England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 31. 85–92Google Scholar
Keeley, L.H. 1982. Hafting and retooling: effects on the archaeological record. American Antiquity 47(4), 798–809Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1927. Report on a fragment of a human jaw. Transactions & Proceedings of the Torquay Natural History Society 5(1), 1–2Google Scholar
Kellaway, G.A. & Taylor, J.H. 1953. Early stages in the physiographic evolution of a portion of the East Midlands. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 108(4), 343–66Google Scholar
Kennard, A.S. 1945. The early digs in Kent's Hole, Torquay, and Mrs Cazalet. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 56(3–4), 156–213Google Scholar
Klaric, L. 2000. Note sur la présence de lames aménagées par technique de Kostienki dans les couches gravettiennes du Blot (Cerzat, Haute-Loire). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 97(4), 625–36Google Scholar
Koenigswald, W. von., Müller-Beck, H.J. & Pressmar, E. 1974. Die Archäologie und Paläontologie in den Weinberghöhlen bei Mauern (Bayern). Grabungen 1937–1967. Tübingen: Archaeologica Venatoria 3Google Scholar
Kowalski, K. 1961. Plejstoceńskie gryzonie jaskini Nietoperzowej w Polsce (Pleistocene rodents from Nietoperzowa Cave in Poland). Folia Quaternaria 5, 1–19Google Scholar
Kozlowski, J.K. 1983. Le Paléolithique supérieur en Pologne. L'Anthropologie 87(1), 49–82Google Scholar
Kozlowski, J.K. 1984. Les lames aménagées par la ‘technique de Kostenski’ dans le Périgordien supérieur de Corbiac. In Szelag, T. (ed.), Advances in Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Archaeology, 31–78. Archeologia Interregionalis. Warsaw: Warsaw UniversityGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, J.K. 1990. Certains aspects technomorphologiques des pointes foliacées de la fin du Paléolithique moyen et du début du Paléolithique supérieur en Europe centrale. In Farizy, C. (ed.), Paléolithique moyen récent et Paléolithique supérieur ancien en Europe. Ruptures et transitions: examen critique des documents archéologiques, 125–33. Actes du Colloque international de Nemours (9–11 Mai 1988). Mémoires du Musée de Préhistoire d'Île-de-France 3Google Scholar
Kozlowski, J.K. 2002. La grande plaine de l'Europe avant le Tardiglaciaire. In Otte, M. & Kozlowski, J.K. (eds), Préhistoire de la Grande Plaine du Nord de l'Europe. Les échanges entre l'Est et l'Ouest dans les sociétés préhistoriques, 53–65. Actes du Colloque Chaire Francqui interuniversitaire au titre étranger, Université de Liège, le 26 juin 2001. Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège (ERAUL) 9.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, J.K. & Kozlowski, S.K. 1996. Le Paléolithique en Pologne. Grenoble, Jérôme MillonGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, J.K. & Otte, M. 2000. The formation of the Aurignacian in Europe. Journal of Anthropological Research 56(4), 513–34Google Scholar
Laplace-Jauretche, G. 1957. Typologie analytique. Application d'une nouvelle méthode d'étude, des formes et des structures aux industries à lames et lamelles. Quaternaria 4, 133–64Google Scholar
Leakey, L.S.B. 1931. The Stone Age Cultures of Kenya Colony. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Lévêque, F. & Vandermeersch, B. 1980. Découverte de restes humains dans un niveau castelperronien à Saint-Césaire (Charente-Maritime). Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 291, 187–9Google Scholar
Lister, A. 1987. Giant deer and giant red deer from Kent's Cavern and the status of Strongyloceros spelaeus Owen. Transactions & Proceedings of the Torquay Natural History Society 19(4), 189–98Google Scholar
Lloyd, D.J. 1977. Country Grammar School. A History of Ludlow Grammar School through Eight Centuries against its Local Background. Birmingham: Studio PressGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, D.J. 1983. The History of Ludlow Museum 1833–1983. Ludlow: Ludlow Historical Research GroupGoogle Scholar
Lwoff, S. 1967. Ciseaux à facettes et ciseau à chanfrein de la grotte de la Marche, Lussac-les-Châteaux (Vienne). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 64, Comptes rendus des séances mensuelles 3. LXXV–LXXVIIGoogle Scholar
Madeyska, T. 1981a. Środowisko naturalne c owieka w Środkowym i górnym plejstocenie na ziemiach polskich w Świetle badań geologicznych. Studia Geologica Polonica 69, 7–125Google Scholar
Madeyska, T. 1981b. Environmental conditions during the interpleniglacial time in the territory of Poland. In Bánesz, L. & Kozlowski, J.K. (eds), L'Aurignacien et le Gravettien (Périgordien) dans leur Cadre écologique, 45–56. Colloque international Cracow-Nitra (14–21 September 1980)Google Scholar
McBurney, C.B.M. 1959. Report on the first season's fieldwork on British Upper Palaeolithic cave deposits. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 25, 260–9Google Scholar
McBurney, C.B.M. 1961. Two soundings in the Badger Hole near Wookey Hole, in 1958, and their bearing on the palaeolithic finds of the late H.E. Balch. 71st & 72nd Annual Reports of the Wells Natural History & Archaeological Society, 19–27Google Scholar
McBurney, C.B.M. 1965. The Old Stone Age in Wales. In Foster, I. Ll. & Daniel, G. (eds), Prehistoric and Early Wales, 17–34. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, D.A. & Lundberg, J. 2005. The 19th century excavation of Kent's Cavern, England. Journal of Cave & Karst Studies 67(1), 39–47Google Scholar
Mellars, P.A. 2004a. Stage 3 climate and the Upper Palaeolithic revolution in Europe: evolutionary perspectives. In Cherry, J., Scarre, C. & Shennan, S. (eds), Explaining Social Change: Studies in Honour of Colin Renfrew, 27–43. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological ResearchGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P.A. 2004b. Neanderthals and the modern human colonization of Europe. Nature 432, 461–5Google Scholar
Mellars, P.A. 2006. A new radiocarbon revolution and the dispersal of modern humans in Eurasia. Nature 439. 931–5Google Scholar
Mello, J.M. 1875. On some bone-caves in Creswell Crags. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 31(4), 679–91Google Scholar
Mello, J.M. 1876. The bone-caves of Creswell Crags. – 2nd paper. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 32(3), 240–4Google Scholar
Mello, J.M. 1877. The bone-caves of Creswell Crags. – 3rd paper. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 33(3), 579–88Google Scholar
Moir, J.R. 1922. Four Suffolk flint implements. Antiquaries Journal 2(2), 114–7Google Scholar
Moir, J.R. 1923. A series of Solutré blades from Suffolk and Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia 4(1), 71–81Google Scholar
Moir, J.R. 1931. Ancient man in the Gipping-Orwell Valley, Suffolk. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia 6(3), 182–221Google Scholar
Moir, J.R. 1932. Further Solutré implements from Suffolk. Antiquaries Journal 12(3), 257–61Google Scholar
Moir, J.R. 1938. Four flint implements. Antiquaries Journal 18(3), 258–61Google Scholar
Mulloy, W. 1959. The James Allen site, near Laramie, Wyoming. American Antiquity 25(1), 112–6Google Scholar
Nairn, I. & Pevsner, N. 1965. The Buildings of England: Sussex. PenguinGoogle Scholar
Newcomer, M.H. 1969. The chamfered pieces from Ksar Akil (Lebanon). Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology London 8–9 (for 1966–1969), 177–91Google Scholar
Newcomer, M.H. 1976. Spontaneous retouch. In Engelen, F.H.G. (ed.), Second International Symposium on Flint, 62–4. Maastricht: Nederlandse Geologische Vereiniging. Staringia 3Google Scholar
Newcomer, M.H. & Hivernel-Guerre, F. 1974. Nucléus sur éclat: technologie et utilisation par différentes cultures préhistoriques. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 71(4), 119–28Google Scholar
Oakley, K.P., Campbell, B.G. & Molleson, T.I. 1971. Catalogue of Fossil Hominids. Part II: Europe. London: British Museum (Natural History)Google Scholar
Ohnuma, K. & Bergman, C. 1982. Experimental studies in the determination of flaking mode. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology, London 19, 161–70Google Scholar
Otte, M. 1974. Les pointes à retouches plates du paléolithique supérieur initial de Belgique. Liège: Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège (ERAUL), Série A, 2Google Scholar
Otte, M. 1979. Le paléolithique supérieur ancien en Belgique. Brussels: Musées royaux d'Art et d'Histoire, Monographies d'Archéologie Nationale 5Google Scholar
Otte, M. 1980. Le ‘couteau de Kostienki’. Helinium 20, 54–8Google Scholar
Otte, M. 1981. Le Gravettien en Europe Centrale. Dissertationes Archaeologicæ Gandenses 20. Bruges: De TempelGoogle Scholar
Otte, M. 1990. Les industries aux pointes foliacées du Nordouest européen. In Kozlowski, J.K. (ed.), Feuilles de Pierre. Les Industries à Pointes foliacées du Paléolithique supérieur européen, 247–69. Actes du Colloque de Cracovie, 1989. Liège: Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège (ERAUL) 4.Google Scholar
Parry, R.F. 1931. Excavations at Cheddar. Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archaeological & Natural History Society 76(2), 46–62Google Scholar
Parsons, F.G. 1936. The History of St.Thomas's Hospital. 3 Vols. London: MethuenGoogle Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1861. On a second new bone cavern recently discovered at Brixham, Devonshire. The Geologist 4(46), 456–60Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1862. On a new bone-cave at Brixham. Report of the 31st Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Manchester, 1861), 123–4Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1864. The introduction of cavern accumulations. Report & Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, Literature & Art 1(3), 31–41Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1867. Second report of the committee for exploring Kent's Cavern, Devonshire. The committee consisting of Sir Charles Lyell, Bart., Professor Phillips, Sir John Lubbock, Bart., Mr John Evans, Mr Edward Vivian, and Mr William Pengelly (Reporter). Report of the 36th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Nottingham, 1866), 1–11Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1869. Fourth report of the committee for exploring Kent's Cavern, Devonshire. The committee consisting of Sir Charles Lyell, Bart., Professor Phillips, Sir John Lubbock, Bart., Mr John Evans, Mr Edward Vivian, Mr George Busk, and Mr William Pengelly (Reporter). Report of the 38th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Norwich, 1868), 45–58Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1870a. Fifth report of the committee for exploring Kent's Cavern, Devonshire. The committee consisting of Sir Charles Lyell, Bart., F.R.S., Professor Phillips, F.R.S., Sir John Lubbock, Bart,. F.R.S., John Evans, F.R.S., E. Vivian, George Busk, F.R.S., William Boyd Dawkins, F.R.S., and William Pengelly, F.R.S. (Reporter). Report of the 39th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Exeter, 1869), 189–208Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1870b. The Ash Hole and Bench bone-caverns at Brixham, South Devon. Report & Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, Literature & Art 4(1), 73–80Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1871. Sixth report of the committee for exploring Kent's Cavern, Devonshire – the committee consisting of Sir Charles Lyell, Bart., F.R.S., Professor Phillips, F.R.S., Sir John Lubbock, Bart., F.R.S., John Evans, F.R.S., E. Vivian, George Busk, F.R.S., William Boyd Dawkins, F.R.S., Ayshford Sanford, F.G.S., and William Penegelly, F.R.S. (Reporter). Report of the 40th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Liverpool, 1870), 16–29Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1875. The flint and chert implements found in Kent's Cavern, Torquay. Annual Report & Transactions of the Plymouth Institution & Devon & Cornwall Natural History Society 5(2), 341–75Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1888a. Recent researches in Bench Cavern, Brixham, Devon. Report of the 57th meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Manchester, 1887), 710–1Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1888b. Recent researches in Bench Cavern, Brixham, Devon. Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society 54(4), 507–12Google Scholar
Plicht, J. van der, Beck, J.W., Bard, E., Baillie, M.G.L., Blackwell, P.G., Buck, C.E., Friedrich, M., Guilderson, T.P., Hughen, K.A., McCormac, F.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Reimer, P.J., Reimer, R.W., Remmele, S., Richards, D.A., Southon, J.R., Stuiver, M. & Wehenmeyer, C.E. 2004. NOTCAL04 – Comparison/calibration 14C records 26–50 KYR BP. Radiocarbon 46(3), 1225–38Google Scholar
Pokines, J.T. 1998. Experimental replication and use of Cantabrian Lower Magdalenian antler projectile points. Journal of Archaeological Science 25(9), 875–86Google Scholar
Proctor, C.J., Berridge, P.J., Bishop, M.J., Richards, D.A. & Smart, P.L. 2005. Age of Middle Pleistocene fauna and Lower Palaeolithic industries from Kent's Cavern, Devon. Quaternary Science Reviews 24(10–11), 1243–52Google Scholar
Proctor, C.J. & Smart, P.L. 1989. A new survey of Kent's Cavern, Devon. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 18(3), 422–9Google Scholar
Rankine, W.F. 1952. A Mesolithic chipping floor at the Warren, Oakhanger, Selborne, Hants. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 18(1), 21–35Google Scholar
Rankine, W.F., Rankine, W.M. & Dimbleby, G.W. 1960. Further excavations at a Mesolithic site at Oakhanger, Selborne, Hants. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 26, 246–62Google Scholar
Reid, C. 1903. The Geology of the Country Near Chichester (Explanation of Sheet 317). Memoirs of the Geological Survey of England & Wales. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Reynier, M.J. 2002. Kettlebury 103: a Mesolithic ‘Horsham’ type stone assemblage from Hankley Common, Elstead. Surrey Archaeological Collections 89, 211–31Google Scholar
Reynolds, P.J. & Fisher, G.C. 1985. Loessic soils near Hook, south-east Hampshire. Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club & Archaeological Society 41, 51–62Google Scholar
Rice, R.G. 1900. Report as Local Secretary for Sussex. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London, 2nd Series 18(1), 21–32Google Scholar
Rice, R.G. 1901. Report as Local Secretary for Sussex. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London, 2nd Series 18(2), 294–303Google Scholar
Rice, R.G. 1920. On an unusual Palaeolithic implement and an unfinished Neolith found at West Chiltington (Sussex). Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London, 2nd Series 32, 79–81Google Scholar
Rigaud, A. 1977. Analyses typologique et technologique des grattoirs magdaléniens de la Garenne à Saint-Marcel (Indre). Gallia Préhistoire 20(1), 1–43Google Scholar
Roe, D.A. 1968. A Gazetteer of British Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Sites. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 8Google Scholar
Roe, D.A. 1974. A Palaeolithic handaxe from Hassocks. Sussex Archaeological Collections 112, 7–8Google Scholar
Rogachev, A.N. 1957. The multilevel sites of the Kostenki-Borshevo region on the Don and the problem of the development of culture in the Upper Palaeolithic epoch on the Russian plain (in Russian). Materialy i issledovaniya po arkheologii. SSSR, 59, 9–134Google Scholar
Semenov, S.A. 1964. Prehistoric Technology. London: Cory, Adams & MackayGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.E.L. 1966. Le Solutréen en France. Bordeaux: Imprimeries DelmasGoogle Scholar
Sonneville-Bordes, D. de & Perrot, J. 1953. Essai d'adaptation des méthodes statistiques au Paléolithique supérieur. Premiers résultats. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 50(6), 323–33Google Scholar
Sonneville-Bordes, D. de & Perrot, J. 1954. Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. Outillage lithique: I Grattoirs – II Outils solutréens. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 51(7), 327–35Google Scholar
Sonneville-Bordes, D. de & Perrot, J. 1955. Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. Outillage lithique – III Outils composites – Perçoirs. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 52(2), 76–9Google Scholar
Sonneville-Bordes, D. de & Perrot, J. 1956a. Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. Outillage lithique – IV Burins. Bulletin de la Société Préhistoirique Française 53(7–8), 408–12Google Scholar
Sonneville-Bordes, D. de & Perrot, J. 1956b. Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. Outillage lithique (suite et fin). V Outillage à bord abattu – VI Pièces tronquées. VII Lames retouchées – VIII Pièces variées. IX Outillage lamellaire. Pointe azilienne. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 53(9), 547–59Google Scholar
Stapert, D. 1979. Zwei Fundplätze vom Übergang zwischen Paläolithikum und Mesolithikum in Holland. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 9(2), 159–66Google Scholar
Stapert, D., SchlÜter, D. & Johansen, L. 2005. Het driehoekige vuistbijltje van Hengelo (Ov.). Paleo-Aktueel 16, 16–21Google Scholar
Straw, A. 1995. Kent's Cavern – whence and whither. Transactions and Proceedings of the Torquay Natural History Society 21(4), 198–211Google Scholar
Straw, A. 1996. The Quaternary record of Kent's Cavern – a brief reminder and update. Quaternary Newsletter 80, 17–25Google Scholar
Straw, A. 1997. Kent's Cavern – whence and whither? Cave and Karst Science 24(1), 35–40Google Scholar
Stringer, C.B. 1986a. The British fossil hominid record. In Collcutt, (ed.) 1986, 59–61Google Scholar
Stringer, C.B. 1986b. Direct dates for the fossil hominid record. In Gowlett, J.A.J. & Hedges, R.E.M. (eds), Archaeological Results from Accelerator Dating, 45–50. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 11Google Scholar
Svoboda, J. 1990. The Bohunician. In Kozlowski, J.K. (ed.), Feuilles de Pierre. Les Industries à Pointes foliacées du Paléolithique supérieur européen, 199–211. Actes du colloque de Cracovie, 1989. Liège: Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège (ERAUL) 42Google Scholar
Swainston, S. 1999. Unlocking the inhospitable. In Davies, W. & Charles, R. (eds), Dorothy Garrod and the Progress of the Palaeolithic. Studies in the Prehistoric Archaeology of the Near East and Europe, 41–56. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Swainston, S. 2000. The lithic artefacts from Paviland. In Aldhouse-Green, S. (ed.), Paviland Cave and the Red Lady: a definitive report, 95–113. Bristol: Western Academic & Specialist PressGoogle Scholar
Taute, W. 1968. Die Stielspitzen-Gruppen im nördlichen Mitteleuropa. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der späten Altsteinzeit. Köln, Böhlau Verlag: Fundamenta Reihe A, Band 5Google Scholar
Teyssandier, N. & Liolios, D. 2003. Defining the earliest Aurignacian in the Swabian Alp: the relevance of the technological study of the Geissenklösterle (Baden-WÜrttemberg, Germany) lithic and organic productions. In Zilhão, J. & d'Errico, F. (eds), The Chronology of the Aurignacian and of the Transitional Technocomplexes. Dating, Stratigraphies, Cultural Implications, 179–96. Proceedings of Symposium 6.1 of the 14th Congress of the UISPP (University of Liège, Belgium, September 2–8, 2001) Lisbon: Instituto Português de Arqueologia. Trabalhos de Arqueologia 33Google Scholar
Thomas, J. & Jacobi, R.M. 2001. Glaston, Current Archaeology 173, 180–4Google Scholar
Topley, W. 1875. The Geology of the Weald. Memoirs of the Geological Survey, England & Wales. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Toussaint, M. & Pirson, S. 2006. Neandertal studies in Belgium, 2000–2005. Periodicum Biologorum, 108(3), 373–87Google Scholar
Tratman, E.K. 1964. Picken's Hole, Crook Peak, Somerset. A Pleistocene site. Preliminary note. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 10(2), 112–5Google Scholar
Turq, A. & Marcillaud, J.-G. 1976. Les racloirs à amincissement de type ‘Kostienki de la Plane commune de Mazeyrolles (Dordogne). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 73(3), 75–9Google Scholar
Tyldesley, J.A. 1987. The Bout Coupé Handaxe. A Typological Problem. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 170Google Scholar
M., Ulrix-Closset,Otte, M. & Cattelain, P. 1988. Le ‘trou de l'Abîme’ à Couvin (Province de Namur, Belgique). In Kozlowski, J.K. (ed.), L'homme de Néandertal. 8. La Mutation, 225–39. Actes du Colloque international de Liège (4–7 Décembre 1986). Liège: Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège (ERAUL) 35Google Scholar
Vivian, E. 1859. Cavern Researches, or, discoveries of organic remains, and of British and Roman reliques, in the caves of Kent's Hole, Anstis Cove, Chudleigh, and Berry Head: by the late Rev. J. MacEnery, F.G.S., Hon. Member of the Yorkshire, Bristol, &c. &c. Phil. s. s. Edited from the original manuscript notes. London: Simpkin MarshallGoogle Scholar
Warren, C.N. & Rose, S. 1994. William Pengelly's Spits, Yards and Prisms: the forerunners of modern excavation methods and techniques inarchaeology. Torquay: Torquay Natural History SocietyGoogle Scholar
West, R.G. 1977. Early and Middle Devensian flora and vegetation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B280, 229–46Google Scholar
Wilmsen, E.N. 1970. Lithic Analysis and Cultural Inference: a Paleo-Indian case. Tucson: Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona 16Google Scholar
Wilson, E. 1899. On the exploration of two caves at Uphill, Weston-super-Mare, containing remains of Pleistocene mammalia. Report of the 68th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Bristol, 1898), 867Google Scholar
Wilson, E. & Reynolds, S.H. 1902. Uphill bone-caves. Proceedings of the Bristol Naturalists' Society, New Series 9(3) (for 1900), 152–60Google Scholar
Wintle, A.G. 1981. Thermoluminescence dating of late Devensian loesses in southern England. Nature 289, 479–80Google Scholar
Woodcock, A.G. 1978. The Palaeolithic in Sussex. In Drewett, P.L. (ed.), Archaeology in Sussex to AD 1500, 8–14. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 29Google Scholar
Woodcock, A.G. 1981. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Periods in Sussex. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 94Google Scholar
Woodcock, A.G. 1986. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic in Sussex: a summary of current knowledge, present research and future objectives. In Collcutt, (ed.) 1986, 31–5Google Scholar
Woodman, P.C. 1998. Pushing out the boat for an Irish Palaeolithic. In Ashton, et al. (eds) 1998, 146–57Google Scholar
Worssam, B.C. 1963. Geology of the Country around Maidstone. Natural Environment Research Council. British Geological Survey. London: Her Majesty's Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Worssam, B.C. 1981. Pleistocene deposits and superficial structures, Allington Quarry, Maidstone, Kent. In Neale, J. & Flenley, J. (eds), The Quaternary in Britain, 20–31. Oxford: PergamonGoogle Scholar
Young, B. & Morgan, D.J. 1981. The Aptian Lower Greesand fuller's earth beds of Bognor Common, West Sussex. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 92(1), 33–7Google Scholar
Zilhão, J. 2006a. Genes, fossils, and culture. An overview of the evidence for Neanderthal-Modern Human interaction and admixture. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 72, 1–20Google Scholar
Zilhão, J. 2006b. Neanderthal and Modern mixed, and it matters. Evolutionary Anthropology 15, 183–95Google Scholar
Zotz, L.F. 1955. Das Paläolithikum in den Weinberghöhlen bei Mauern. Bonn: Quartär-Bibliothek 2Google Scholar