Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:47:33.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cemeteries and Settlement Patterns of the Iron Age on the Yorkshire Wolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

John S. Dent
John S. Dent*
Affiliation:
Humberside Archaeological Unit, Leisure Services Department, Humberside County Council
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Yorkshire Wolds hold an air of mystery for students of the Iron Age. As is well known these chalk hills lie at the heart of the largest group of Early Iron Age burials in Britain, the ‘Arras Culture’, so-called after the first and richest cemetery to be excavated (fig. 1; Stead 1979). Although these burials are often quoted in general discussions and formed an important piece of evidence in the ‘invasion controversy’, it is only in the last few years that up to date illustrations of the material have begun to appear in textbooks (Cunliffe 1978; Champion 1979) following the publication of interim excavation reports (Brewster 1976; Stead 1977). Little is known of the settlements which these cemeteries served and even less is published. The present paper is an attempt to trace settlement patterns by an examination of the funerary material in conjunction with the domestic evidence which was found in the very large-scale excavations in Garton and Wetwang Slacks (Brewster 1981; Dent 1982).

A heavy funerary bias in the material is further exaggerated because the distinctive square-plan barrows of the ‘Arras Culture’ are readily identifiable from the air whereas settlement can rarely be dated without excavation. Many hundreds of barrows are now known in this way (Ramm 1973; 1974; Loughlin and Miller 1979) and all but the most recently excavated have been catalogued (Stead 1979). An essential requirement for a discussion of these is the ability to date the material involved, either in absolute or in relative terms. It would be useful if distinctive groups could be recognized among the pottery from these sites since the metalwork is rare in domestic contexts, whereas even poor sites usually produce some sherds. Unfortunately there is virtually no decorated pottery and the plain jars which are found in graves cannot at present be used as a basis for a chronology. It is the metalwork which presents the best opportunity for such a classification.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , 1982 , pp. 437 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Brewster, T. C. M., 1976. ‘Garton Slack’, Current Archaeol. 51, 104–16.Google Scholar
Brewster, T. C. M., 1981. The excavation of Garton and Wetwang Slacks (National Monuments Record).Google Scholar
Champion, S., 1976. ‘Coral in Europe: commerce and Celtic ornament’, in Duval, P.-M. and Hawkes, C. F. C. (eds), Celtic art in ancient Europe (London).Google Scholar
Champion, T. C., 1979. ‘The Iron Age’, in Megaw, J. V. S. and Simpson, D. D. A. (eds), Introduction to British prehistory (Leicester).Google Scholar
Childe, V. G., 1940. Prehistoric communities of the British Isles (London).Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B., 1978. Iron Age communities in Britain, Second edition (London).Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. and Rowley, T. (eds), 1978. Lowland Iron Age communities in Europe, British Archaeological Reports (Supplementary) number 48 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dent, J. S., 1978. ‘Wetwang Slack’, Current Archaeol. 61, 46–50.Google Scholar
Dent, J. S., 1982. ‘A summary of the excavations carried out in Garton Slack and Wetwang Slack, 1964–1980’, East Riding Archaeologist 7.Google Scholar
Drury, P., 1978. ‘Little Waltham and pre-Belgic Iron Age settlement in Essex’, in Cunliffe, and Rowley, 1978.Google Scholar
Dudley, D. and Jope, E. M., 1965. ‘An Iron Age cist burial with two brooches from Trevone, North Cornwall’, Cornish Archaeology 4, 18–23.Google Scholar
Dunning, G. C., 1934. ‘The swan's-neck and ring-headed pin of the Early Iron Age in Britain, Archaeol. J. 91, 269–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feacham, R. W., 1951. ‘Dragonesque Fibulae’, Antiquaries J. 31, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feacham, R. W., Note on Dragonesque Fibulae, Antiquaries J. 48, 100–02.Google Scholar
Fowler, E., 1960. ‘The origins and development of the penannular brooch in Europe’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 26, 149–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, M. J., 1954. ‘The typology of brooches of the Iron Age in Wessex’, Archaeol. J. 110, 88–105.Google Scholar
Fox, C. F., 1927. ‘A La Tène I brooch from Wales: with notes on the typology and distribution of these brooches in Britain’, Archaeol. Cambrensis 82, 67–112.Google Scholar
Greenwell, W., 1877. British Barrows (Oxford).Google Scholar
Guido, M., 1978. The glass beads of the prehistoric and Roman periods in Britain and Ireland. Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, xxxv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haevernick, T. E., 1974. ‘Die Glasfunde aus den Gräbern vom Dürrnberg” in Moosleitner, F., Pauli, L., and Penninger, E., Der Dürmberg bei Hallein II (Munich).Google Scholar
Harding, D. W., 1972. The Iron Age in the Upper Thames Basin (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C. and Hull, M. R., 1947. Camulodunum (Oxford).Google Scholar
Henderson, J., 1981. ‘A report on the glass excavated from Meare Village West 1979’, Somerset Levels Papers 7, 55–60 (Hertford).Google Scholar
Hodson, F. R., 1964a. ‘La Tène chronology, continental and British’, Bull. Inst. Archaeol. London 4, 123–41.Google Scholar
Hodson, F. R., 1964b. ‘Cultural grouping within the British pre-Roman Iron Age’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 30, 99–110.Google Scholar
Hodson, F. R., 1968. The La Tène cemetery at Münsingen-Rain, Acta Bernensia V.Google Scholar
Jones, M. U., 1974, ‘Excavations at Mucking, Essex: a second interim report’, Antiquaries J. 54, 183–99.Google Scholar
Lambrick, G., 1978. ‘Iron Age settlement in the Upper Thames Valley’, in Cunliffe, and Rowley, 1978.Google Scholar
Loughlin, N., and Miller, K., 1979. A survey of archaeological sites in Humberside (Hull).Google Scholar
Manby, T. G., 1980. ‘Bronze Age settlement in eastern Yorkshire’, in Barrett, J. and Bradley, R. (eds), Settlement and society in the British Later Bronze Age, British Arch. Reports No. 83 (Oxford).Google Scholar
May, J., 1970. ‘An Iron Age square enclosure at Aston-upon-Trent, Derbyshire: a report on excavations in 1967’, Derbys. Archaeol. 90, 10–21.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J. R., 1905. Forty years researches in British and Saxon burial mounds of East Yorkshire (London).Google Scholar
Ramm, H. G., 1973. ‘Aerial reconnaissance and interpretation’, Yorks. Archaeol. J. 45, 208–10.Google Scholar
Ramm, H. G., 1974. ‘Aerial reconnaissance and interpretation’, Yorks. Archaeol. J. 46, 151–53.Google Scholar
Ramm, H. G., 1980. ‘Native settlement east of the Pennines’, in Brannigan, K. (ed.), Rome and the Brigantes (Sheffield).Google Scholar
Rybová, A. and Soudský, B., 1962. Libenice, keltská svatyně středních Čechách.Google Scholar
St Joseph, J. K., 1978. ‘Aerial reconnaissance: recent results, 45’, Antiquity 52, 137–40.Google Scholar
Sheppard, T., 1939. ‘Excavations at Eastburn, East Yorkshire’, Yorks. Archaeol. J. 34, 35–47.Google Scholar
Smith, C., 1978. ‘The landscape and natural history of Iron Age settlements on the Trent gravels’, in Cunliffe, and Rowley, 1978.Google Scholar
Stanford, S. C., 1974. Croft Ambrey (Hereford).Google Scholar
Stead, I. M., 1971. ‘Yorkshire before the Romans: some recent discoveries’, in Butler, R. M. (ed.), Soldier and civilian in Roman Yorkshire (Leicester).Google Scholar
Stead, I. M., 1977. ‘La Tène burials between Burton Fleming and Rudston, North Humberside’, Antiquaries J. 56, 217–26.Google Scholar
Stead, I. M., 1979. The Arras Culture (York).Google Scholar
Stead, I. M., 1981. The Gauls: Celtic antiquities from France (British Museum).Google Scholar
Tischer, O., 1885. ‘Die Gewandnadeln oder Fibeln’, in Meyer, A. B., Gurina im Obergailthal (Kärnthen), Dresden.Google Scholar
Viollier, D., 1916. Les sepultures du Second Age du Fer sur le plateau Suisse.Google Scholar