Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:02:23.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Investigation of Prehistoric Diet and Economy on a Coastal Site at Galatea Bay, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Wilfred Shawcross
Wilfred Shawcross
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The importance of attempting to reconstruct diet from a study of biological data from archaeological sites has been stressed by earlier workers, both in Britain and the United States. The present study is based on materials recovered from the excavation of a midden deposit at Galatea Bay, on an offshore island of the North Island of New Zealand, by Mr J. E. Terrell, whose complete report (No. 1) is to appear in the Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand. The site overlooks a sheltered area of sea from the mouth of a small and now dry valley (see pl. IX) and the excavation revealed an initial, specialized cooking area which was replaced by dumps of food waste and then abandoned. The most characteristic elements of the midden were marine shellfish valves and a much smaller quantity of vertebrate bones. However, the apparent frequency of the shellfish could not be taken as a sure guide to their importance over the vertebrate animals because the nature of the animals and their surviving evidence makes it impossible to directly compare them. Shellfish, though individually small, are found in large numbers and are thus best studied by means of estimating populations derived from samples. Vertebrate populations on the other hand can be measured by more direct means, though it must be recognized, as Mr Terrell points out, that such an excavation is itself only a sample. In his report Mr Terrell examined the effects of dehydration, size and sifting upon the shell samples and then compared the archaeological population with those of living shellfish, so enabling him to demonstrate the relative influence of natural and cultural causes on the archaeological population. These findings provide basic evidence which will be referred to during the course of the present paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 33 , February 1968 , pp. 107 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ascher, R., 1959. ‘A Prehistoric Population Estimate, Using Midden Analysis, and Two Population Models’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, vol. 15, 168–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, R. K., and others, 1956. ‘Functional and Evolutionary Implications of Community Patterning’, American Antiquity, vol. 22, no. 2, part 2, 131–57.Google Scholar
Best, E., 1925. Maori Agriculture, Dominion Museum Bulletin No. 9, Wellington.Google Scholar
Best, E., 1929. Fishing Methods and Devices of the Maori, Dominion Museum Bulletin No. 12. Wellington.Google Scholar
Best, E., 1942. Forest Lore of the Maori, Dominion Museum Bulletin No. 14. Wellington.Google Scholar
Buist, A. G., 1964. Archaeology In North Taranaki, New Zealand, N.Z. Arhaeological Association Monograph No. 3. Wellington.Google Scholar
Cassie, R. M., 1956. ‘Age and Growth of the Snapper, Chrysophrys auratus Forster, in the Hauraki Gulf’, Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, vol. 84, part 2, 329–39.Google Scholar
Cassie, R. M., 1957. ‘Condition Factor of Snapper, Chrysophrys auratus Forster, in Hauraki Gulf’, New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology, section B, vol. 38, no. 4, 375–388.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1954. Excavations at Star Carr. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, J., 1961. The Journals of Captain James Cook on his Voyages of Discovery, II. The Voyageof the Resolution and Adventure 1772–1775, edited by Beaglehole, J. C., Hakluyt Society, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., 1963. ‘Site Survey: Ponui Island’. N.Z. Archaelogical Association Newsletter, vol. 6, no. 1, 36–46.Google Scholar
Firth, R., 1959. Economics of the New Zealand Maori. Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
Fuller, A. S., 1953. ‘Seasonal Variation in the Plankton and Salinity of the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand’, Nature, vol. 171, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, D. H., 1953. A Treasury of New Zealand Fishes, A. H. and A. W. Reed, Wellington.Google Scholar
Green, R. C., 1963. A Review of the Prehistoric Sequence of the Auckland Province, Publication of the Auckland University Archaeological Society, No. 1.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., 1908. Fishing and Sea Foods of the Ancient Maori, Dominion Museum Bulletin No. 2, Wellington.Google Scholar
Higgs, E. S., 1962. ‘A Metrical Analysis of Some Prehistoric Domesticated Animal Bones from Cyrenaican Libya’, Man, vol. 62, shorter notes no. 200, 119–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S. F., 1956. ‘Some Aspects of the Quantitative Approach in Archaeology’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, vol. 12, 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockerbie, L., 1959. ‘From Moa-Hunter to Classic Maori in Southern New Zealand’, in Anthropology in the South Seas. Edited by Freeman, J. D. and Geddes, W. R., New Plymouth, pp. 75–110.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A. and Widdowson, E. M., 1960. The Composition of Foods. Medical Research Council Special Report Series No. 297. H.M.S.O. London.Google Scholar
McNab, R., 1908–1914. Historical Records of New Zealand, 2 vols. Wellington.Google Scholar
Moroney, M. J., 1964. Facts From Figures. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Mummery, J. H., 1924. The Microscopic and General Anatomy of the Teeth. 2nd Edition. OxfordUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Nicholls, M. P., 1964. ‘Excavations on Ponui Island’, Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum, vol. 6, no. 1, 23–38.Google Scholar
Osmond, A. and Wilson, W., 1961. Tables of Composition of Australian Foods. Commonwealth Department of Health, Canberra.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B., 1937. ‘Animal Communities of the Sea-bottom in Auckland and Manukau Harbours’. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, vol. 66, 354–401.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B., 1958. Shells of New Zealand, Whitcombe and Tombs, Christchurch.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L., 1963. ‘Remains of Fishes and Other Aquatic Animals’, in Science in Archaeology, Edited by Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E., Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Shawcross, W. and Roe, N., 1966. ‘A Note on the Houhora Excavations’, N.Z. Archaeological Association Newsletter, in press.Google Scholar
Spencer, R. F., Jennings, J. D. and others, 1965. The Native Americans, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Terrell, J., n.d. ‘Galatea Bay’, to be published in the Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Uvarov, E. B., Chapman, D. R. and Isaacs, A., 1964. A Dictionary of Science. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
White, T. E., 1953. ‘A Method of Calculating the Dietary Percentage of Various Food Animals Utilized by Aboriginal Peoples, American Antiquity, vol. 18, 396–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeuner, F. E., 1958. Dating the Past (4th edn.). Methuen, London.Google Scholar