Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:55:44.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transforming Identities – New Approaches to Bronze Age Deposition in Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2013

Katharina Becker
Katharina Becker*
Affiliation:
AGES, University of Bradford, BD7 1DP, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the interpretation of the deposition of artefacts in Ireland from c. 2500 to c. 800 bc, combining a contextual analysis with post-processual ideas about materiality, artefacts, and their biographies. Hoards, single and burial finds are shown to be complementary strands of the depositional record and the result of deliberate deposition. It is argued that both the symbolic value of these items as well as economic and practical rationales determine the depositional mode. The paper attempts to infer social practices and rules that determined the differential treatment of materials and object types. The main structuring factor in the depositional record is the type-specific meanings of individual artefacts, which embody social identities beyond the utilitarian function of the object. The act of deposition facilitates and legitimates the literal and symbolic transformation of artefacts and the concepts they embody. The need for a separation between ritual and profane interpretation is removed, as deposition is understood as the reflection of prehistoric concepts rather than labelled according to modern notions of functionality. It is also argued that both dry and wet places are meaningful contexts and that different forms of wet landscapes were conceptualised differently

Résumé

Changements d'identités – nouvelles approches des dépôts de l’âge du bronze en Irlande, de Katharina Becker

Cet article explore l'interprétation des dépôts d'objets en Irlande d'environ 2500 à 800 av.J.-C., combinant une analyse contextuelle avec des idées post-processuelles sur la matérialité, les objets et leurs biographies. On montre que trésors et trouvailles individuelles ou sépultures sont des facettes complémentaires des vestiges de dépôts et le résultat d'une déposition intentionnelle. On argumente que ce sont aussi bien la valeur symbolique de ces trouvailles qu'un rationnel économique et pratique qui déterminent le mode de déposition. L'article tente d'en déduire les pratiques et règles sociales qui déterminèrent le traitement différent apporté à certains types de matériaux et d'objets. Le principal facteur structurant dans les vestiges de dépôts sont les significations attachées à un type pécifique d'objets individuels, qui incarnent des identités sociales dépassant la fonction utilitaire de l'objet. L'acte de déposition facilite et légitime la transformation littérale et symbolique des objets et des concepts qu'ils incarnent. Le besoin de séparer interprétation rituelle et profane disparait car la déposition est comprise comme le reflet de concepts préhistoriques plutôt que cataloguée selon les notions modernes de fonctionnalité. On argumente aussi qu'endroits secs et humides étaient tous deux des contextes riches en signification et que différentes formes de paysages humides étaient conceptualisées différemment

Zussamenfassung

Identitäten Transformieren – Neue Ansätze zur Interpretation bronzezeitlicher Deponierungen in Irland, von Katharina Becker

Dieser Beitrag widmet sich der Interpretation von Artefaktdeponierungen in Irland aus der Zeit von ca. 2500 bis ca. 800 bc; zu diesem Zweck wird eine kontextuelle Analyse mit postprozessualen Ideen zu Materialität, Artefakten und deren Biographien kombiniert. Horte, Einzelfunde und Grabfunde werden als sich ergänzende Stränge der Gesamtheit von Deponierungen und als das Resultat gezielter Niederlegungen präsentiert. Es wird argumentiert, dass die Art und Weise der Niederlegung sowohl durch den symbolischen Wert der niedergelegten Objekte bestimmt wird als auch durch ökonomische und pragmatische Überlegungen. Der Artikel zielt darauf ab, soziale Praktiken und Regeln, die den unterschiedlichen Umgang mit Materialien und Objekttypen bestimmen, zu erschließen. Der wichtigste strukturierende Faktor für alle Niederlegungen ist die jeweils typenspezifische Bedeutung individueller Artefakte, welche auch soziale Identitäten jenseits der utilitaristischen Funktion des Objekts umfassen. Der Akt der Niederlegung selbst ermöglicht und legitimiert die tatsächliche und symbolische Transformation der Artefakte wie auch der Konzepte, die sie inkorporieren. Die scheinbare Notwendigkeit einer Trennung zwischen ritueller und profaner Interpretation wird überwunden, da die Niederlegung als Widerspiegelung prähistorischer Konzepte verstanden wird und nicht anhand moderner Vorstellungen von Funktionalität angesprochen wird. Es wird auch argumentiert, dass sowohl trockene als auch feuchte Niederlegungsorte bedeutungsvolle Kontexte waren, und dass unterschiedliche Formen von Feuchtbodenlandschaften unterschiedlich aufgefasst wurden

Resumen

Transformando identidades- nuevas aproximaciones a los depósitos de la Edad del Bronce en Irlanda, por Katharina Becker

Este artículo analiza la interpretación de los depósitos de artefactos en Irlanda entre c. 2500 al c. 800 bc, combinando el análisis contextual con las ideas post-procesuales sobre la materialidad, los artefactos y sus biografías. Depósitos, hallazgos aislados y enterramientos se presentan como partes complementarias del registro depositado y como el resultado de una acción deliberada. Se argumenta que tanto el valor simbólico de estos objetos, como razones económicas y prácticas determinan la forma de deposición. El artículo trata de inferir las prácticas sociales y las reglas que determinan el tratamiento diferencial de materiales y tipos de objetos. El principal factor estructurador de los registros de depósito es el significado específico de los artefactos individuales, que encarna identidades sociales más allá de la función utilitaria del objeto. El acto de depósito facilita y legitima la transformación literal y simbólica de los objetos y los conceptos que representan. Se elimina la necesidad de una separación entre la interpretación ritual y profana, ya que el depósito se entiende como el reflejo de conceptos prehistóricos en lugar de una clasificación acorde con las nociones modernas de funcionalidad. También se argumenta que tanto los emplazamientos terrestres como los humedales son contextos de gran significado, y que las distintas formas de paisaje fueron concebidas de modo diferente

Keywords

Depositionhoardssingle findsIrelandEarly Bronze AgeMiddle Bronze AgeLate Bronze Ageidentitiestransformation
Type
Articles
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 79 , December 2013 , pp. 225 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aner, E. 1955. Grab und Hort. Ein Beitrag zur Deutung der altbronzezeitlichen Hortsitte. Offa 14, 31–42Google Scholar
Armbruster, B. 2010. L'orfèvrerie dans le monde atlantique des origines à l’âge du Fer. Une approche technologique. Unpublished Habilitation, Université de Bourgogne, DijonGoogle Scholar
Armit, I. 2003. The palstave axe. 77–8, in I. Suddaby, The excavation of two Late Bronze Age roundhouses at Ballyprior Beg, Island Magee, County Antrim. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 62, 45–91Google Scholar
Armstrong, E.C.R. 1933. Guide to the Collection of Irish Antiquities. Catalogue of Irish Gold Ornaments in the Collection of the Royal Irish Academy. Dublin: Royal Irish AcademyGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. 1985. Hoards and related metalwork. In D.V. Clarke, T. Cowie & A. Foxon (eds), Symbols of Power at the Age of Stonehenge. Edinburgh: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 95–106Google Scholar
Barrett, J., Needham, S.P. 1989. Production, circulation and exchange: problems in the interpretation of Bronze Age Bronzework. In J. Barrett & I.A. Kinnes (eds), The Archaeology of Context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: recent trends, 127–140. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology & PrehistoryGoogle Scholar
Becker, K. 2006. Hoards and Deposition in Bronze Age Ireland. Unpublished PhD thesis, University College DublinGoogle Scholar
Becker, K. 2008. Left but not lost. Archaeology Ireland 22(1), 12–15Google Scholar
Becker, K. 2011. The Irish Iron Age: continuity, change and identity. In T. Moore & X. Armada (eds), Atlantic Europe in the First Millennium BC, 449–467. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Binchy, E. 1967. Irish razors and razor-knives. North Munster Studies, 43–60Google Scholar
Bourke, L. 2001. Crossing the Rubicon. Bronze Age metalwork from Irish rivers. Galway: Department of Archaeology National University of Ireland/Bronze Age Studies 5Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1982. The destruction of wealth in later prehistory. Man 17(1), 108–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1985. Exchange and social distance – the structure of bronze artefact distributions. Man 20(4), 692–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1988. Hoarding, recycling and the consumption of prehistoric metalwork: technological change in Western Europe. World Archaeology 20(2), 249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1998. The Passage of Arms. An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoards and Votive Deposits. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2000. An Archaeology of Natural Places. London & New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2005. Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe. London & New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bridgford, S. 2000. Weapons, Warfare and Society in Britain 1270–750 bc. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C.S. 1997. The discovery and origins of some Bronze Age amber beads from Ballycurrin Demesne, Co. Mayo. Journal of the Galway Archaeological & Historical Society 49, 104–121Google Scholar
Brindley, A. 2001. Tomorrow is another day: some radiocarbon dates for Irish bronze artefacts. In W. H. Metz, B. L. Van Beek & H. Streegstra (eds), Patina. Essays Presented to Jay Jordan Butler on the Occasion of his 80th birthday 145–160. Groningen: privately publishedGoogle Scholar
Brindley, A.L. 2007. The Dating of Food Vessels and Urns in Ireland. Galway: Galway University Press/Bronze Age Studies 7Google Scholar
British Museum 1904. A Guide to the Antiquities of the Bronze Age in the Department of British and Medieval Antiquities. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Brück, J. 1999. Ritual and rationality: some problems of interpretation in European archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology 2(3), 313–344Google Scholar
Brück, J. 2001. Body metaphors and technologies of transformation in the English Middle and Late Bronze Age. In J. Brück (ed.) Bronze Age Landscapes. Tradition and Transformation, 149–160. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Brück, J. 2004. Material metaphors. The relational construction of identity in Early Bronze Age burials in Ireland and Britain. Journal of Social Archaeology 4, 307–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brück, J. 2006. Fragmentation, personhood and the social construction of technology in Middle and Late Bronze Age Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16(2), 297–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunn, W.A. von 1980. Eine Deutung spätbronzezeitlicher Hortfunde zwischen Elbe und Weichsel. Berichte der Römisch Germanischen Kommission 61, 91–150Google Scholar
Budd, P., Taylor, T. 1995. The faerie smith meets the bronze industry: magic versus science in the interpretation of prehistoric metal-making. World Archaeology 27(1), 133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C., Gerloff, S. 1981. The Dirks and Rapiers of Great Britain and Ireland. München: Prähistorische Bronzefunde IV(7)Google Scholar
Cahill, M. 1983. Irish prehistoric gold-working. In M. Ryan (ed.) Treasures of Ireland.Irish Art 3000 B.C.–1500 A.D, 8–23. Dublin: Royal Irish AcademyGoogle Scholar
Cahill, M. 1994. Mr. Anthony's Bog oak case of gold antiquities. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 94C(3), 53–109Google Scholar
Cahill, M. 1995. Later Bronze Age goldwork from Ireland – form, function and formality. In J. Waddell & E. Shee Twohig (eds), Ireland in the Bronze Age. Dublin: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Cahill, M. 1998. Mooghaun bracelet re-discovered. Archaeology Ireland 12(1,43), 8–10Google Scholar
Cahill, M. 2001. Unspooling the mystery. Archaeology Ireland 15, 8–15Google Scholar
Cahill, M. 2002. Before the Celts: treasures in gold and bronze. In P. F. Wallace & R. Ó Floinn (eds), Treasures of the National Museum of Ireland. Irish Antiquities, 86–124. Dublin: Gill & MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Cahill, M. 2005. Roll your own lunula. In T. Condit, C. Corlett & P. Wallace (eds) Above and Beyond: essays in memory of Leo Swan, 67–75. Dublin: WordwellGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology. people, places and broken objects in the prehistory of South Eastern Europe. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Coghlan, H.H., Raftery, J. 1961. Irish Prehistoric casting moulds. Sibrium 6, 223–244Google Scholar
Coles, J.M. 1962. European Bronze Age Shields. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 28, 156–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J.M. 1963. Irish Bronze Age horns and their relations with northern Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 11, 326–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J.M. 1971a. Bronze Age spearheads with gold decoration. Antiquaries Journal 51, 94–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J.M. 1971b. Dowris and the Late Bronze Age of Ireland: a footnote. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 101, 164–165Google Scholar
Collins, A.E.P. 1970. Bronze Age moulds in Ulster. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 33, 23–36Google Scholar
Dowd, M., Corlett, C. 2001. Brothers in caves – lost archives of subterranean Waterford rediscovered. Archaeology Ireland 16, 8–10Google Scholar
Eogan, G. 1962. Some observations on the Middle Bronze Age in Ireland. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 92, 268–351Google Scholar
Eogan, G. 1964. The Later Bronze Age in Ireland in the light of recent research. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 30, 268–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eogan, G. 1969. ‘Lock-rings’ of the Late Bronze Age. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 67C, 93–148Google Scholar
Eogan, G. 1974. Pins of the Irish Late Bronze Age. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 104, 74–119Google Scholar
Eogan, G. 1981. Gold discs of the late Bronze Age. In D. Ó Corráin, (ed.) Irish Antiquity. Essays and Studies Presented to Professor M.J. O'Kelly, 147–162. Cork: Four Courts PressGoogle Scholar
Eogan, G. 1983. The Hoards of the Irish Later Bronze Age. Dublin: University College DublinGoogle Scholar
Eogan, G. 1994. An Accomplished Art. Gold and Gold-working in Britain and Ireland during the Bronze Age (c. 2300–650 BC). Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Eogan, G. 1997. ‘Hair-rings’ and European Late Bronze Age society. Antiquity 71, 308–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eogan, G. 2000. The Socketed Bronze Axes in Ireland. Stuttgart: Prähistorische Bronzefunde 9(22)Google Scholar
Eogan, G. 2001. A composite Late Bronze Age chain object from Roscommon, Ireland. In W. H. Metz, B. L. Van Beek & H. Steegstra. Patina. Essays presented to Jay Jordan Butler on the occasion of his 80th birthday, 231–240. Groningen: privately printedGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. 1881. The Ancient Bronze Implements, Weapons and Ornaments of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Longmans, Green & CoGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, F. 1997. Eine Katastrophen-Theorie zum Beginn der Urnenfelderkultur. In C. Becker, M.-L. Dunckelmann, C. Methner-Nebelsick, H. Peterröcher, M. Roeder & B. Terzan (eds), Xonos, 549–561. Espelkamp: Marie LeidorfGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, L.N.W. 1959. Department of Antiquities, Belfast Museum and Art Gallery Archaeological Acquisitions of Irish origin for the Year 1958. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 22, 43–52Google Scholar
Flanagan, L.N.W. 1961. Wessex and Ireland in the Early and Middle Bronze Ages. In G. Bersu (ed.), Bericht über den V. Internationalen Kongress für Vor- und Frühgeschichte Hamburg vom 24. bis 30. August 1958, 284–291. Berlin: Gebr. MannGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, L.N.W. 1964a. Gold ear-ring, Mountstewart, Co. Down. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 27, 92–93Google Scholar
Flanagan, L.N.W. 1964b. Leaf-shaped spearhead, Clonglash, Co. Donegal. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 27, 93–95Google Scholar
Flanagan, L.N.W. 1979. Industrial resources, production and distribution in earlier Bronze Age Ireland. In M. Ryan (ed.) The Origins of Metallurgy in Atlantic Europe. Proceedings of the Fifth Atlantic Colloquium, 145–161. Dublin: Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, L.N.W. 1980. Recent Bronze Age finds from the North of Ireland. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 43, 21–27Google Scholar
Fontijn, D.R. 2002. Sacrificial Landscapes: cultural biographies of persons, objects and ‘natural’ places in the Bronze Age of the Netherlands c. 2300–600 BC. Leiden: Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 33Google Scholar
Fontijn, D. 2008. Traders’ hoards. Reviewing the relationship between trade and permanent deposition: The case of the Dutch Voorhout hoard. In C. Hamon & B. Quilliec (eds), Hoards from the Neolithic to the Metal Ages. Technical and Codified Practices, 5–17. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S1758Google Scholar
Fox, C. 1939. The socketed bronze sickles of the British Isles with special reference to an unpublished specimen from Norwich. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 11, 222–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geißlinger, H. 1984. Depotfund, Hortfund. In J. Hoops (ed.), Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde 5, 320–338. Berlin: Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Gerloff, S. 2004. Hallstatt fascination: ‘Hallstatt’ buckets, swords and chapes from Britain and Ireland. In Roche et al. (eds) 2004, 124–54Google Scholar
Gerloff, S. 2010. Atlantic Cauldrons and Buckets of the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Ages in Western Europe. Stuttgart. Prähistorische Bronzefunde 2(18)Google Scholar
Green, H.S. 1980. The Flint Arrowheads of the British Isles. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 75Google Scholar
Gregory, C. 1980. Gifts to men and gifts to gods: gift exchange and capital accumulation in contemporary Papua. Man 15, 626–652Google Scholar
Grogan, E. 2012. Moulds. In V. Ginn & S. Rathbone (eds), Corrstown. A coastal community. Excavations of a Bronze Age village in Northern Ireland, 190–194. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Halpin, A. 1984. Catalogue of Finds from Irish bogs. Dublin: unpublished report for the Office of Public WorksGoogle Scholar
Hänsel, B. 1997. Gaben an die Götter – Schätze der Bronzezeit Europas – eine Einführung. In B. Hänsel (ed.), Gaben an die Götter – Schätze der Bronzezeit Europas, 11–22. Berlin: Seminar für Ur- und Frühgeschichte der Freien Universität Museum für Vor und FrühgeschichteGoogle Scholar
Hansen, S. 1991. Studien zu den Metalldeponierungen während der Urnenfelderziet im Rhein-Main-Gebiet. Bonn: Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 5Google Scholar
Hansen, S. 1994. Studien zu den Metalldeponierungen während der älteren Urnenfelderzeit zwischen Rhonetal und Karpatenbecken. Bonn: Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 21Google Scholar
Harbison, P. 1964. The Copper and Bronze Finds of the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age in Ireland. Unpublished Travelling Studentship thesis, National University of IrelandGoogle Scholar
Harbison, P. 1967. Some minor metal products of the Early Bronze Age in Ireland. Journal of the Cork Historical and Archaeological Society 72, 93–100Google Scholar
Harbison, P. 1968. Catalogue of Irish Early Bronze Age associated finds containing copper or bronze. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 67C, 35–91Google Scholar
Harbison, P. 1969a. The Aaxes of the Early Bronze Age in Ireland. München: Prähistorische Bronzefunde 9(1)Google Scholar
Harbison, P. 1969b. The Daggers and Halberds of the Early Bronze Age in Ireland. München: Prähistorische Bronzefunde 6(1)Google Scholar
Harbison, P. 1976. Bracers and V-perforated Buttons in the Beaker and Food Vessel Cultures of Ireland. Bad Bramstedt: Archaeologia Atlantica Research Report IGoogle Scholar
Harbison, P. 1978. A flat tanged dagger from Co. Tyrone now in the Monaghan County Museum. Clogher Record 9, 333–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbison, P. 2004. Three midland megaliths as drawn and described in 1786 by J. Brownrigg, Surveyor. In In Roche et al. (eds) 2004, 247–53Google Scholar
Harding, A.F. 1993. British amber spacer -plate necklaces and their relatives in gold and stone. In C. Beck & J. Bouzek (eds), Amber in Archaeology, 53–58. Prague: Institute of Archaeology, Czech Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C. 1961. Gold ear-rings of the Bronze Age, east and west. Folklore 72, 438–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C., Smyth, M.A. 1957. On some buckets and cauldrons of the Bronze and Early Iron Ages. Antiquaries Journal 37, 131–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herity, M. 1969. Early finds of Irish Antiquities. Antiquaries Journal 49, 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, H. 1954. Studies in the Late Bronze Age in Ireland 1. Stone and clay moulds and wooden models for bronze implements. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 17, 62–80Google Scholar
Hodges, H. 1956. Studies in the Late Bronze Age in Ireland 2. The typology and distribution of bronze implements. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 19, 29–56Google Scholar
Holste, F. 1937. Zwei Sammelfunde der Urnenfelderzeit aus Bayerisch-Schwaben. Germania 21, 10–17Google Scholar
Hundt, H.-J. 1955. Versuch zur Deutung der Depotfunde der nordischen Jüngeren Bronzezeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung Mecklenburgs. Jahrbuch der Römisch Germanischen Kommission 2, 95–140Google Scholar
Hurl, D. 1995. Killymoon – New light on the Bronze Age. Archaeology Ireland 34(9), 4, 24–8Google Scholar
Huth, C. 1997. Westeuropäische Horte der Spätbronzezeit. Fundbild und Funktion. Regensburg: Universitätsverlag RegensburgGoogle Scholar
Ireland, A. 2003. The Scotstown, Co. Monaghan hoard: a re-examination of the evidence. In J. Fenwick (ed.), Lost and Found. Discovering Ireland's past, 111–121. Dublin: WordwellGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. 1972. Ein neues Hallstattschwert aus Dänemark. Beitrag zur Problematik der jungbronzezeitlichen Votivfunde. Acta Archaeologica 43, 115–164Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A. 1980. Die Rasiermesser in Westeuropa. München: Prähistorische Bronzefunde 8(3)Google Scholar
Jope, E.M. 1951. A crescentic jet necklace from Rasharkin, Co. Antrim. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 14, 61Google Scholar
Jope, E.M. 1953. Three Late Bronze Age swords from Ballycroghan, near Bangor, Co. Down. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 16, 37–40Google Scholar
Kavanagh, R. 1991. A reconsideration of razors in the Irish Earlier Bronze Age. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 4, 34–38Google Scholar
Keeley, V.J. 1982. Rounded Scrapers of the Neolithic and Earlier Bronze Age in Ireland. Unpublished MA thesis, University College DublinGoogle Scholar
Kilfeather, A. 1991. Patterns in Early Bronze Age Society. A Study of Aceramic Grave Goods in Ireland. Unpublished MA thesis, University College DublinGoogle Scholar
Knapp, A.B., Ashmore, W. 1999. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualized, ideational. In W. Ashmore & A.B. Knapp (eds), Archaeologies of Landscape: contemporary perspectives, 1–32. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1979. The consumption of wealth in Bronze Age Denmark. A study in the dynamics of economic processes in tribal societies. In K. Kristiansen & C. Paludan-Müller, (eds), New Directions in Scandinavian Archaeology, 158–190. Kopenhagen: Studies in Scandinavian Prehistory and Early History 1Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1989. Value, ranking and consumption in the Bronze Age. In H.-A. Nordström & A. Knape (eds), Bronze Age Studies. Transactions of the British-Scandinavian Colloquium in Stockholm, May 10–11, 1985, 21–24. Stockholm: National Museum of Antiquities Studies 6Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1996. Die Hortfunde der jüngeren Bronzezeit Dänemarks. Fundumstände, Funktion und historische Entwicklung. In P. Schauer (ed.), Archäologische Forschungen zum Kultgeschehen in der jüngeren Bronzezeit und frühen Eisenzeit Alteuropas. Regensburg: Dr. Rudolf HabeltGoogle Scholar
Levy, J.E. 1982. Social and Religious Organization in Bronze Age Denmark. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S124Google Scholar
MacWhite, E. 1954. Irish Bronze Age Trumpets. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 29, 85–106Google Scholar
McEvoy, J. 1997. A Late Bronze Age Collar and Similar Ornament from Ireland. Unpublished MA thesis, National University of IrelandGoogle Scholar
Maraszek, R. 1998. Spätbronzezeitliche Hortfunde entlang der Oder. Bonn: Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 49Google Scholar
Maraszek, R. 2000. Spätbronzezeitliche Hortlandschaften in atlantischer und nordischer Metalltradition. Unpublished PhD thesis, Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
Maraszek, R. 2006. Spätbronzezeitliche Hortfundlandschaften in atlantischer und nordischer Metalltradition. Halle: Landesamt f. Denkmalpflege u. Archäologie Sachsen-AnhaltGoogle Scholar
Mauss, M. 1990. The Gift. The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies (reprint). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G.F., O'Leary, M., Raftery, J. 1941. On a bronze halberd from Co. Mayo and a bronze spearhead from Co. Westmeath. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 46C, 287–298Google Scholar
Mordant, C., Pernot, M., Rychner, V. (eds). 1998, L'Atelier du Bronzier en Europe du xxe au VIIIe siècle avant notre ère III. Paris. Comitè des travaux historiques et scientifiques et du Centre de recherches sur les techniques grèco-romaines de l'universitè de BourgogneGoogle Scholar
Mozsolics, A. 1987. Verwahr- oder Opferfunde? Acta Archaeologica Scientiarum Hungaricae 39, 93–98Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K. 1981. Middle Bronze Age trade between Britain and Europe: a maritime perspective. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 47, 275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, S. 1898. Nordische Altertumskunde nach Funden und Denkmälern aus Dänemark und Schleswig. Strassburg: TrübnerGoogle Scholar
Needham, S.P. 1988. Selective deposition in the British Early Bronze Age. World Archaeology 20, 229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S.P. 1990. The Penard-Wilburton Succession: New metalwork finds from Croxton (Norfolk) and Thirsk (Yorkshire). Antiquaries Journal 70(2), 253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S.P. 1996. Chronology and periodisation in the British Bronze Age. Acta Archaeologica 67, 121–140Google Scholar
Needham, S.P. 2000. The development of embossed goldwork in Bronze Age Europe. Antiquaries Journal 80, 27–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S.P. 2001. When expediency broaches ritual intention: the flow of metal between systemic and buried domains. Royal Anthropological Institute 7(2), 275–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S.P. 2005. Migdale-Marnoch: sunburst of Scottish metallurgy. In I.A. Shepherd & G.J. Barclay (eds), Scotland in Ancient Europe. The Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Scotland in their European Context, 217–246. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Needham, S.P., Bronk Ramsey, C., Cartwright, C., Pettitt, P. 1997. An independent chronology for British Bronze Age metalwork: the results of the Oxford radiocarbon Accelerator Programme. Archaeological Journal 154, 55–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S.P., Burgess, C. 1980. The later Bronze Age in the lower Thames Valley: the metalwork evidence. In J. Barrett & R. Bradley (eds), Settlement and Society in the British Late Bronze Age, 437–471. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 83Google Scholar
Northover, J.P. 2000. Ring money: the problem child of Bronze Age gold. In L. Hecht & R. Freiberger (eds), Beiträge aus der Mineralogie, Geochemie, Lagerstättenforschung, Archäometrie, Archäologie und Denkmalpflege. Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Professor Dr.-Ing. Giulio Morteani, 299–304. München: Münchener Geologische Hefte A 28Google Scholar
O'Brien, W. 2004. Ross Island. Mining, Metal and Society in Early Ireland. Galway: Bronze Age Studies 6Google Scholar
O'Brien, W. 2012. The Chalcolithic in Ireland: a chronological and cultural framework. In M.J Allen, J. Gardiner & A. Sheridan (eds), Is there a British Chalcolithic? People, Place and Polity in the Later 3rd Millennium, 211–225. Oxford: Oxbow Books & Prehistoric Society Research Paper 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, W., Northover, J.P., Cameron, E. 1990. An Early Bronze Age metal hoard from a wedge tomb at Toormore, Co. Cork. Journal of Irish Archaeology 5, 9–18Google Scholar
O'Carroll, F., Ryan, M. 1992. A Late Bronze Age hoard from Enagh East, Co. Clare. North Munster Antiquarian Journal 34, 3–12Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. 1975. Six prehistoric phalerae in the London Museum and a discussion of other phalerae from the British Isles. Antiquaries Journal 55(2), 216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, N. 1983. Stone battle axe head, Clonmore, Co. Carlow. In Ryan, M. (ed.), Treasures of Ireland, 76. Dublin: Royal Irish AcademyGoogle Scholar
O'Flaherty, R. 1995. An analysis of Irish Early Bronze Age hoards containing copper or bronze objects. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 125, 10–45Google Scholar
O'Flaherty, R. 2002. A Consideration of the Early Bronze Age Halberd in Ireland. Unpublished PhD thesis, University College DublinGoogle Scholar
O'Kelly, M.J. 1969. A stone mould for axeheads from Doonour, Co. Cork. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 75, 117–124Google Scholar
O'Kelly, M.J. 1970. An axe mould from Lyre, Co. Cork. Journal of the Cork Historical & Archaeological Society 75, 25–28Google Scholar
Ó Néill, J., Macdonald, P. 2004. Excavation at Tamlaght, Co. Armagh 2004. Datastructure report: No. 25 Belfast: Queen's University BelfastGoogle Scholar
Ó Ríordáin, S.P. 1954. Lough Gur Excavations: Neolithic and Bronze Age houses on Knockadoon. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 56 C, 297–459Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, M. 2005. Duma Na NGiall. The Mound of the Hostages, Tara. Bray: WordwellGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, E. 1960. Amber necklace from Co. Galway. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 90, 61–66Google Scholar
Proudfoot, V.B. 1955. The Downpatrick gold find. Belfast: Archaeological Research Publications (N. Ireland) 3Google Scholar
Proudfoot, V.B. 1956. Excavations at Cathedra Hill, Downpatrick, Co. Down. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 19, 57–72Google Scholar
Raftery, B. 1973. Rathgall: a Late Bronze Age burial in Ireland. Antiquity 47, 293–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftery, B. 2004. Pit 119: Rathgall, Co. Wicklow. In Roche et al. (eds) 2004, 83–91Google Scholar
Ramsey, G. 1989. Middle Bronze Age Weapons in Ireland. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queen's University BelfastGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, G. 1991–2 An Early Bronze Age Dagger from Duckingstool Point, Co. Tyrone. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 54–55, 161Google Scholar
Ramsey, G. 1995. Middle Bronze Age metalwork: are artefact studies dead and buried?. In J. Waddell & E. Shee Twohig (eds), Ireland in the Bronze Age, 49–63. Dublin: Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, G., Simpson, D.D.A. 1990. A collection of prehistoric bronzes from Ballymoney, Co. Antrim. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 53, 3–7Google Scholar
Reid, A., Maclean, R. 1995. Symbolism and the social contexts of iron production in Karagwe. World Archaeology 27(1), 144–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittershofer, K.-F. 1984. Der Hortfund von Bühl und seine Beziehungen. Berichte der Römisch Germanischen Kommission 64, 141–306Google Scholar
Roche, H., Grogan, E., Bradley, J., Coles, J., Raftery, B. (eds) 2004. From Megaliths to Metal. Essays in Honour of George Eogan. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Roe, F. 1968. Stone mace-heads and the latest Neolithic cultures of the British Isles. In J.A. Coles & D.D.A. Simpson (eds) Studies in Ancient Europe, 145–173. Leicester: Leicester University PressGoogle Scholar
Roth, H. 1974. Ein Ledermesser der Atlantischen Bronzezeit aus Mittelfranken. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 4, 37–47Google Scholar
Rowlands, M., Warnier, J.-P. 1993. The magical production of iron in the Cameroon Grassfields. In P.J.J. Shaw, B. Sinclair, B. Andah, & A. Okpoko (eds), The Archaeology of Africa: food, metals and towns, 512–550. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Rynne, E. 1962. Late Bronze Age rattle-pendants from Ireland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 28, 383–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynne, E. 1972. Tanged dagger from Derrynamanagh. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 102, 240–243Google Scholar
Shell, C.A., Taylor, J.J., Warner, R.B., Watling, R.J. 1998. LA-ICP-MS analysis and the study of the compositional integrity of the two gold hoards from Downpatrick Northern Ireland. In Mordant et al. (eds) 1998, 247–58Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 1982. Ideology, change and the European Early Bronze Age. In C. Renfrew & S. Shennan (eds), Ranking, Resource and Exchange: aspects of the archaeology of early European society, 33–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, A., Northover, J.P. 1993. A Beaker period copper dagger blade from the Sillees river near Ross Lough, Co. Fermanagh. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 56, 61–69Google Scholar
Simpson, D.D.A. 1986. A Late Bronze Age sword from Island MacHugh, Co. Tyrone. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 49, 103–104Google Scholar
Simpson, D.D.A. 1988. The stone maceheads of Ireland. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 118, 27–52Google Scholar
Simpson, D.D.A. 1989. The stone maceheads of Ireland, Part II. Journal of the RoyalSociety of Antiquaries of Ireland 119, 113–126Google Scholar
Simpson, D.D.A. 1990. The stone battle axes of Ireland. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 120, 50–56Google Scholar
Simpson, D.D.A. 1996. Irish perforated stone implements in context. Journal of Irish Archaeology 7, 65–75Google Scholar
Sproule, A.M.N. 1968. Flint artifacts from Bronze Age Contexts in Ireland. Unpublished MA thesis, National University of IrelandGoogle Scholar
Stein, F. 1976. Bronzezeitliche Hortfunde in Südeutschland. Beiträge zur Interpretation einer Quellengattung. Bonn: Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 23Google Scholar
Stuart, J. 1819. Historical Memoirs of the City of Armagh. Dublin: M. H. Gill & SonGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.J. 1970. Lunulae reconsidered. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 36, 38–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.J. 1980. Bronze Age Goldwork of the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.J. 1993. Hoards of the Bronze Age in southern Britain: analysis and interpretation. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 228Google Scholar
Taylor, J.J. 1994. The first golden age of Europe was in Ireland and Britain (circa 2400–1400 BC). Ulster Journal of Archaeology 57, 37–60Google Scholar
Torbrügge, W. 1970–1Vor- und Frühgeschichtliche Flussfunde. Zur Ordnung und Bestimmung einer Denkmälergruppe. Berichte der Römisch Germanischen Kommission 51–2, 1–146Google Scholar
Torbrügge, W. 1985. Über Horte und Hortdeutung. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 15, 17–23Google Scholar
Turner, C.E.L. 1998. A Re-interpretation of the Late Bronze Age Metalwork Hoards of Essex and Kent. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of GlasgowGoogle Scholar
Vandkilde, H. 1996. From Stone to Bronze: the metalwork of the late Neolithic and earliest Bronze Age in Denmark. Aarhus: Jutland Archaeological Society Publication 32Google Scholar
Vandkilde, H. 1998. Metalwork, depositional structure and social practice in the Danish Late Neolithic and earliest Bronze Age. In Mordant et al. (eds) 1998, 243–57Google Scholar
Verlaeckt, K. 1998. Metalwork consumption in Late Bronze Age Denmark: depositional dynamics in Northern Hoards. In Mordant et al. (eds) 1998, 259–71Google Scholar
Waddell, J. 1990. The Bronze Age Burials of Ireland. Galway: Galway University PressGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. 2004. Irish gold artefacts: observations from Hartmann's analytical data. In Roche et al. (eds) 2004, 72–83Google Scholar
Weatherup, D.R.M. 1975. Armagh County Museum, Archaeological Acquisitions, 1960–1974. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 105, 5–20Google Scholar
Whitfield, N. 1992. Of bees and bracelets from the Banagher area. Archaeology Ireland 6(4), 22, 28–30Google Scholar
Whitfield, N. 1993. A massive marker for the Banagher Hoard. Archaeology Ireland 7, 9–11Google Scholar
Wilde, W.R. 1857. Catalogue of the Antiquities of Animal Materials and Bronze in the Museum of the Royal Irish Academy. Dublin: Royal Irish AcademyGoogle Scholar
Wilde, W.R. 1862. Catalogue of the Antiquities of Gold in the Museum of the Royal Irish Academy. Dublin: Hodges, Smith & CoGoogle Scholar
Williams, B.B. 1980. Bronze Age stone moulds from Sultan, Co. Tyrone. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 43, 102–103Google Scholar
Williams, B.B., Gormley, S. 2002. Archaeological Objects from County Fermanagh. Belfast: Northern Ireland Archaeological Monograph 5Google Scholar
Williams, B.B., Wilkinson, J.L., Magee, R.W. 1992. Bronze Age burials at Kilcroagh, County Antrim, and Faience beads in Ireland. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 54–5, 48–60Google Scholar
Willroth, K.-H. 1985. Die Hortfunde der älteren Bronzezeit in Südschweden und auf den dänischen Inseln. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz VerlagGoogle Scholar
Worsaae, J.J.A. 1866. Om nogle mosefund fra Bronzealderen. Aarbøger for nordisk oldkyndighed og historie 14, 313–326Google Scholar
Yates, D., Bradley, R. 2010. Still water, hidden depths: the deposition of Bronze Age metalwork in the English Fenland. Antiquity 84, 405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar