Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2014
The purpose of this brief article is to review the evidence concerning stone ‘maceheads’ with hour-glass perforation found in apparently Mesolithic associations in south-eastern England.
page 70 note 1 Reid, Clement, Memoir 315Google Scholar. The Geology of the Country around Southampton. Geological Survey (1902); See Shore, T., Proc. Hants. F.C., 1889, pp. 43–50Google Scholar, and 1893, pp. 181–200; Smith, R. A., P.P.S.E.A., Vol. III (1919), p. 17Google Scholar.
page 70 note 2 ‘Submerged Peat at Southampton,’ H. and Godwin, M. E., New Phytologist, Vol. XXXIX, no. 3 (Aug. 1940)Google Scholar.
page 70 note 3 Identified by Dr K. P. Oakley as typical sarsen-stone, i.e. a fine quartzitic sandstone, presumably of Eocene origin.
page 70 note 4 Coghlan, H. H., P.P.S.E.A., Vol. III, Pt. IV, 499–507Google Scholar and Trans. Newbury Field Club, Vol. VIII, no. 4 (1946), p. 282Google Scholar; Peake, , Arch. of Berks. (1931), 24–7Google Scholar.
page 70 note 5 Clark, Mes. Age in Brit., Fig. 33, 3, 4, after Burchell, , P.P.S.E.A., Vol. VGoogle Scholar.
page 72 note 1 South-Eastern Naturalist (1904), p. 55Google Scholar.
page 74 note 1 I am indebted to Mr E. G. Tucker and Dr Rolston, both of Haslemere, for this information.
page 74 note 2 See Arch. J., XC, 52–77Google Scholar.
page 74 note 3 The petrological report reads as follows: A mosaic of quartz with very little cement. Mica, zircon tourmaline are present. Quartzite.
page 76 note 1 See Clark, J. G. D., The Mesolithic Settlement of Northern Europe, p. 105Google Scholar and fig. 38. no. 5; also p. 145 and fig. 53, no. 2.
page 76 note 2 British Barrows, p. 248.
page 76 note 3 Arch. J., XXVI, p. 190Google Scholar.
page 76 note 4 Arch., XLVI, 492Google Scholar, pl. XIV, 22.