Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:51:06.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Aspects of the Physiography of the Thames Valley in Relation to the Ice Age and Early Man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

S. W. Wooldridge
S. W. Wooldridge
Affiliation:
King's College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The physiographic approach to the problems of Pleistocene chronology has often been under-rated and sometimes completely ignored.

It will be well to begin this paper with a quite general statement of the basis on which this approach depends. In simplest terms it rests on the fact that the deposits with which we are concerned and to which it is sought to apply the method of palaeontological or archaeological dating were all accumulated on land-surfaces. These surfaces are themselves a proper subject of study by geomorphologists. The deposits are an integral part of the developing surface of the land. Any conclusions concerning their age and origin must be consistent with the general physiographic sequence. Physiographic considerations do not in themselves provide a very close or detailed chronology, but their indications are evidently worthy of consideration in any general purview of the difficult chronological problems concerned. Your ‘geo-chronologist’ needs to be, to this extent, a geomorphologist, as well as a palaeontologist or typologist. River-gravels and glacial ‘Deckenschotter’ mark, in general, old valley-floors and the movement of ice, in part at least, is controlled by the form of the underlying surface, subject to the evident fact that ice can, in some circumstances, move uphill.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 23 , January 1958 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arkell, W. J. 1943. ‘The Pleistocene Rocks at Trebetherick Point’. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 54., 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baden-Powell, D. F. W. 1948. ‘The Chalky Boulder Clays of Norfolk and Suffolk’. Geol. Mag., 85, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baden-Powell, D. F. W. 1951. ‘The Age of the Interglacial Deposits at Swanscombe’. Geol. Mag., 88, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, G. 1919. ‘Some future work for the Geologists' Association’. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 30, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, A. J. 1942. ‘Pleistocene Chronology’. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 53, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, J. K. 1957. ‘The Quaternary Era’. London, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Clayton, K. M. 1957. ‘Some Aspects of the Glacial Deposits of Essex’. Proc. Geol. Assoc. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Cornwall, J. W. 1948. ‘Humanly struck flakes fron Gravels in Hertfordshire’, 4th Ann. Rep. Univ. of Lond. Inst. of Arch (1947), 39–45.Google Scholar
Hare, F. K. 1947. ‘The Geomorphology of part of the Middle Thames’. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 43, 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, H. L. 1923. ‘Excursion to Goring Gap’. Proc Geol. Assoc., 34, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, T. V. 1892. ‘The New Railway from Grays Thurrock to Romford. Sections between Upminster and Romford’. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 48, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, T. V. 1894. ‘Further Notes on some Sections on the New Railway from Romford to Upminster, and on the Relations of the Thames Valley Beds to the Boulder Clay’. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 50, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, H. G. O. 1917. ‘Chipped Flints from below the Boulder Clay at Hertford’. Proc Prehist. Soc. E. Anglia, 2, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. B. R. 1955. ‘The Pleistocene Epoch in England’. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 111, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. B. R. and Oakley, K. P. 1936. ‘The Pleistocene Succession in the Lower parts of the Thames Valley’. Proc. Prehist. Soc., I, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, T. I. 1903. ‘On the drifts of the Thames Valley near London’. Sum. Proc. Geol. Surv. for 1902, 203.Google Scholar
Sherlock, R. F. 1924. ‘The Superficial Deposits of South Hertfordshire and South Buckinghamshire’. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 35, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, J. D. 1932. ‘The Glacial Succession on the North Norfolk Coast’. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 43, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, J. D. 1935. ‘The Westleton Series of East Anglia’. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 91, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, M. S., Arkell, W. J. and Oakley, K. P. 1948. ‘On the Ancient Channel between Caversham and Henley and its contained Flint Implements’. Proc. Prehist. Soc., 14, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, S. H. 1942. ‘The Drift of South-Western Essex’. Essex Nat., 27, 173.Google Scholar
West, R. G. 1955. ‘The Glaciations and Interglacials of East Anglia’. Quaternaria (Roma), 2, 45.Google Scholar
West, R. G. and Donner, J. J. 1956. ‘The Glaciations of East Anglia’. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 112, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, W. 1889. ‘The Geology of London’. Mem. Geol. Surv. 1.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. 1927. ‘The Pliocene History of the London Basin’. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 38, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. 1928. ‘The Two Hundred Foot Platform in the London Basin’. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 38, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. 1938. ‘The Glaciation of the London Basin’. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 94, 628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. and Linton, D. L. 1955. ‘Structure, Surface and Drainage in South East England“. London.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. and Henderson, H. C. K. 1955. ‘Some Aspects of the Physiography of the Eastern part of the London Basin’, Inst. Brit. Geog., Pub. No. 21, 19.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E. 1945. ‘The Pleistocene Period’. Ray Soc., London,Google Scholar