Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T03:30:16.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Palaeoenvironment of Some Archaeological Sites in Greece: The Influence of Accumulated Uplift in a Seismically Active Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Geoffrey King  and
Geoffrey Bailey
Geoffrey King
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Downing Street, Cambridge CB1 3DZ
Geoffrey Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observations made soon after recent major earthquakes in Algeria, California and Japan have shown that repeated motions on buried fault planes in seismically active areas cause incremental folding of the overlying rocks and sediments. The deformation causes characteristic changes to river profiles and is therefore a factor which must be considered when applying techniques of site catchment analysis in areas of tectonic uplift. Here we examine the relationship between tectonic uplift and the palaeoenvironments of palaeolithic sites in North-west Greece, which is one of the most seismically active areas of Europe. Uplift can substantially alter local topography and sediment distributions and therefore undermine the economic viability of human settlements. Paradoxically uplift can also create stable conditions highly favourable to long-term habitation in two ways: by maintaining well-watered sediment traps which provide a climatically insensitive environment; by accentuating enclosed topography, which facilitates the control of mobile prey species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , December 1985 , pp. 273 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bailey, G. N. and Davidson, I. 1983. ‘Site exploitation territories and topography: two case studies from palaeolithic Spain’, Journal of Archaeological Science 7, 325–44.Google Scholar
Bailey, G., Carter, P., Gamble, C. and Higgs, H., 1983a. ‘Epirus revisited: seasonality and inter-site variation in the upper palaeolithic of north-west Greece’, in Bailey, G. (ed.), Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory, 64–78. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, G. N., Carter, P. L., Gamble, C. S. and Higgs, H. P., 1983b. ‘Asprochaliko and Kastritsa: Further investigations of Palaeolithic settlement and economy in Epirus (North-west Greece)’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 49, 15–42.Google Scholar
Bailey, G. N., Carter, P. L., Gamble, C. S., Higgs, H. P. and Roubet, C., 1984, ‘Palaeolithic investigations in Epirus: the results of the first season's excavations in Klithi, 1983’, Annual of the British School at Athens 79, 7–22.Google Scholar
Cisternas, A., Dorel, J. and Gaulon, R., 1982. ‘Models of the complex source of the El Asnam earthquake’, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 2245–66.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. F. and Bishop, D. G., 1979. ‘Uplift rates and high level marine platforms associated with the Alpine fault at Okuru river, South Westland’, Bull. Roy. Soc. New Zealand 18, 35–43.Google Scholar
Dakaris, S. I., Higgs, E. S. and Hey, R. W. 1964. ‘The climate, environment and industries of stone age Greece: part 1’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 33, 1–35.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. F. and Celal Sengor, A. M., 1979. ‘Aegean and surrounding regions: complex multiplate and continuum tectonics in a convergent zone’, Geol Soc. Am. Bull. 90, 84–92.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, N. C., 1978. ‘Holocene eustatic changes and coastal tectonics in the northeast Mediterranean: implications for models of crustal consumption’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 289, 405–58.Google Scholar
Higgs, E. S. and Vita-Finzi, C., 1966. ‘The climate, environment and industries of stone age Greece: part II’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 32, 1–29.Google Scholar
Higgs, E. S., Vita-Finzi, C., Harris, D. R. and Fagg, A. E., 1967. ‘The climate, environment and industries of stone age Greece: part III’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 33, 1–35.Google Scholar
IGR-IFP, 1966. Étude Géologique de l'Épire (Grèce Nord-Occidentale) L'Institut de Géologie et Recherches du sous-sol-Athènes et l'Institut François du Pétrole-mission Grèce.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. A., Gagnepain, J., Houseman, G., King, G. C. P., Papadimitriou, P., Soufleris, C. and Virieux, J., 1982. ‘Seismicity, normal faulting and the geomorphological development of the Gulf of Corinth (Greece): the Corinth earthquakes of February and March 1981’, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 57, 377–97.Google Scholar
Kamasumi, H., 1973. General Report on the Niigata earthquake of 1964. Tokyo Electrical Engineering College Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
King, G. C. P. and Vita-Finzi, C., 1981. ‘Active folding in the Algerian earthquake of 10 October 1980’, Nature 292 (5818), 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G. C. P. and Stein, R., 1983. ‘Surface folding, river terrace deformation rate and earthquake repeat time in a reverse faulting environment: the Coalinga, California, earthquake of May 1983’, in The 1983 Coalinga, California, Earthquake. Calif. Div. Mines and Geol. Spec. Pub. 66 Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
King, G. C. P., Tselentis, A., Gomberg, J., Molnar, P., Roecker, S. W., Sinvhal, H., Soufleris, C. and Stock, J. M., 1983. ‘Micro-earthquake seismicity and active tectonics of northwestern Greece’, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 66, 279–88.Google Scholar
King, G. and Yielding, G., 1984. ‘The evolution of a thrust system: processes of rupture initiation, propagation and termination in the 1980 El Asnam (Algeria) earthquake’, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 77, 915–33.Google Scholar
Le Pichon, X. and Angelier, J., 1979. ‘The Hellenic arc and trench system: a key to the neotectonic evolution of the eastern Mediterranean area’, Tectonophysics 60, 1–42.Google Scholar
Lyon-Caen, H. and Molnar, P., 1983. ‘Constraints on the structure of the Himalayas from an analysis of gravity anomalies’ J.G.R. 88, 8171–91.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. P., 1978. ‘Active tectonics of the Alpine–Himalayan belt: the Aegean Sea and surrounding regions’, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 55, 217–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariolakis, I., Papanikolaou, D., Symeonidis, N., Lekkas, S., Zarotsieris, Z. and Sideris, Ch., 1982. ‘The deformation of the area around the eastern Korinthian Gulf, affected by the earthquakes of February-March 1981’, Proc. Int. Symp. Hellenic Arc and Trench, Athens, 1, 400–19.Google Scholar
Papazachos, B. C., 1973. ‘Distribution of seismic foci in the Mediterranean and surrounding area and its tectonic implications’, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 33, 421–30.Google Scholar
Philip, H. and Meghraoui, M., 1983. ‘Structural analysis and interpretation of the Surface Deformation of the El Asnam earthquake of October 10, 1980’, Tectonics 1, 17–49.Google Scholar
Ruegg, J. C., Kasser, M., Tarantola, A., Lepine, J. C. and Chouikrat, B., 1982. ‘Deformations associated with the El Asnam earthquake of 10 October 1980: geodetic determination of vertical and horizontal movements’, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 2227–44.Google Scholar
Schumm, S. A., 1977. The Fluvial System. New York, J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Shackleton, J. C., van Andel, T. H. and Runnels, C. N., 1984. ‘Coastal Paleogeography of the Central and Western Mediterranean during the last 125,000 years and its archaeological implications’, J. Field Archaeol. 11, 307–14.Google Scholar
Stein, R. and Thatcher, W., 1981. ‘Seismic and aseismic deformation associated with the 1952 Kern County, California, earthquake and relationship to the quaternary history of the White Wolf fault’, J. Geophys. Res. 86, 4913–28.Google Scholar
Stein, R. and King, G. C. P., 1984. ‘Seismic potential revealed by surface folding: the 1983, Coalinga, California, earthquake’, Science 224, 869–72.Google Scholar
Sturdy, D. A., 1975. ‘Some reindeer economies in prehistoric Europe’, in Higgs, E. S. (ed.), Palaeoeconomy, 55–95. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thommeret, Y., King, G. C. P. and Vita-Finzi, C., 1983. ‘Chronology and development of the 1980 earthquake at El Asnam (Algeria): a postscript’, Earth Planet. Sci Lett. 57, 377–97.Google Scholar
van Andel, T. H. and Shackleton, J. C., 1982. ‘Late Paleolithic and Mesolithic coastlines of Greece and the Aegena’, J. Field Archaeol. 9, 445–54.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C. and Higgs, E. S., 1970. ‘Prehistoric economy of the Mount Carmel area of Palestine: site catchment analysis’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 36, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C., 1978. Archaeological sites in their setting. London, Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C. and King, G. C. P., 1985. ‘The seismicity, geomorphology and structural evolution of the Corinth area of Greece’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. (in press).Google Scholar
Yielding, G., Jackson, J. A., King, G. C. P., Sinvhal, H., Vita-Finzi, C. and Wood, R. M., 1981. ‘Relations between surface deformation, fault geometry, seismicity and rupture characteristics during the El Asnam (Algeria) earthquake of 10 October 1980’, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 56, 287–304.Google Scholar
Yielding, G., 1984. ‘Control of rupture by fault geometry during the 1980 El Asnam (Algeria) earthquake’, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. Lond. (Submitted).Google Scholar