Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2014
The origin and the development of the Series II tools is one of those problems of Indian prehistoric archaeology which has evaded solution so far. This culture is comprised of scrapers of all sorts—side, hollow, endpoints, borers and burins (very rare) generally made on jasper, agate, chert and sometimes chalcedony also. The position of this culture in relation to other prehistoric cultures remains confused since its stratigraphical position has still to be worked out. And it awaits dating like other lithic industries because one has yet to find out the tools in association with fossils in situ in the horizons which are likely to yield them.
In the following pages, is presented the data, collected from the Narmada and its tributary valleys, which tends to throw light on this culture and an attempt is made to ‘fix’ this culture in the stratigraphy and to date it with the help of fossils, which were found along with it in plenty in this area. These observations were made by the writer when he was conducting the fieldwork in the Hoshangabad-Narsinghpur region of the Narmada river in Central India, in search of Fossil Man, under the auspices of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Govt. of India. This Narmada data, apart from ‘fixing’ it in its proper context, illustrates also its relationship with the Handaxe-cleaver complex on one hand and the Microlithic industry on the other.
page 191 note 1 Khatri, A. P. (1960), ‘The Research on the Remains of Early Man in India’, Proceedings of the Indian Science Congress (1960)Google Scholar, Anthropology and Archaeology Section.
page 191 note 2 De Terra, H. and Paterson, T. T. (1939), Studies on the Ice Age and Associated Human Cultures (Washington), p. 320Google Scholar.
page 191 note 3 Sankalia, H. D. (1945), ‘Studies in Prehistory of the Deccan (Maharashtra)’, Bull. Deccan Coll. Res. Ins., VI, no. 3, pp. 131–7Google Scholar.
page 191 note 4 Sankalia, H. D. (1956), ‘Animal Fossils and Palaeolithic Industries from the Pravara Basin at Nevasa, Dist. Ahmednagar’, Ancient India, no. 12, pp. 35–52Google Scholar.
page 193 note 1 Khatri, A. P. (1958), Stone Age Cultures of Malwa, a Ph.D. thesis submitted to Poona UniversityGoogle Scholar.
page 193 note 2 Sankalia, H. D. and Khatri, A. P. (1957), ‘Stone Age Cultures of Malwa’, Jour. Pal. Soc. India, Wadia No., vol. 2, pp. 183–9Google Scholar.
page 193 note 3 Khatri, A. P., ‘Exploration in Malwa and Neighbourhood’, Indian Archaeology, a review, pp. 9–11Google Scholar.
page 193 note 4 Khatri, A. P., ‘Koregaon—the Mid–Palaeolithic-cum-Chalcolithic site on river Bhima (Maharashtra)’, Anthropologist, IV, nos. 1 and 2, pp. 14–19Google Scholar.
page 193 note 5 Archaeology in India, a review (1957), p. 11Google Scholar.
page 193 note 6 ibid. (1959), pp. 28–9.
page 193 note 7 ibid. (1958), p. 26.
page 194 note 1 Archaeology in India, a review (1959), p. 37Google Scholar.
page 194 note 2 ibid. (1959), p. 42.
page 194 note 3 ibid. (1959), p. 10.
page 194 note 4 Subba Rao, B. (1958), ‘The Personality of India’, M.S. Univ. Arch., Series no. 3, p. 62Google Scholar.
page 194 note 5 Wheeler, M. (1959), Early India and Pakistan (Thames & Hudson, London), p. 64Google Scholar.
page 194 note 6 For detailed stratigraphical enquiries in the Narmada, see Khatri, A. P. (1961), ‘Stone Age and Pleistocene Chronology of the Narmada Valley’, Anthropos, Vol. 56, pp. 519–530Google Scholar.
page 203 note 1 Khatri, A. P. (1957), ‘Palaeolithic Industry of river Shivna’, Bull. Deccan Coll. Res. Inst., XVIII, pp. 160–9Google Scholar.
page 203 note 2 Zeuner, F. E. (1950), ‘Stone Age and Pleistocene Chronology in Gujarat’, Deccan Coll. Monograph, Series 6, p. 44Google Scholar.