Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:28:27.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neolithic/Early Bronze Age Pit Circles and their Environs at Oakham, Rutland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Patrick Clay ,
Clive R. Jones ,
Elaine L. Jones ,
Gary Haley ,
Elizabeth Healey ,
Alex Gibson ,
Ann Stirland ,
Anthony J. Gouldwell  and
Angela Monckton
Patrick Clay
Affiliation:
University of Leicester Archaeological Services, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fieldwork east of Oakham, Rutland has located evidence of prehistoric settlement, land use patterns, and ceremonial monuments. Part of this included the excavation of a cropmark site which has revealed an unusual sequence of Neolithic/Early Bronze Age pit circles and a burial area. This is complemented by a fieldwalking survey of the surrounding areas, allowing consideration of the relationship of juxtaposed flint scatters and the excavated ceremonial area.

Résumé

Des travaux sur le terrain à l'est d'Oakham (Rutland) ont identifié des preuves d'habitation préhistorique, des tendances d'exploitation du terrain et des sites cérémoniaux. Une partie de ces travaux consistait de fouilles sur un site possédant des marques de culture qui ont exposé une série inhabituelle de cercles de fosses et une sépulture du Néolithique de l'âge du bronze ancien. A cela on a ajouté l'arpentage à pied des alentours qui a permis une considération des relations des dispersions de silex juxtaposées et du lieu cérémonial fouillé.

Zusammenfassung

Arbeit im Gelände östlich von Oakham, Rutland hat Beweismaterial prähistorischer Niederlassungen, Modelle für die Ausbeutung des Landes und zeremonielle Denkmäler zu Tage gebracht. Ein Teil dieser Funde war auch die Ausgrabung eines Getreidegeländes, welches eine ungewöhnliche Reihenfolge von Grubenkreisen und einer Beerdigunsstätte aus der neolithisch/ Frühbronzezeit enthüllten. Ergänzt wurde diese Arbeit mit einer Vermessung mittels eines Rundgangs der Umgebung. Dabei wurden Uberprüfungen des Verhältnisses zwischen nebeneinandergestellten Feuersteinsplinter und der ausgegraben Zeremoniestätte ermöglicht.

Résumen

Trabajos de campo al este de Oakham, Rutland, han localizado evidencia de poblados prehistóricos, modos de uso del terreno y monumentos ceremoniales. Parte de este estudio incluyó la excavación de un yacimiento evidenciado en un campo en cultivo, que reveló una secuencia poco usual de círculos de pozos y zona de enterramiento del Neolítico al Bronce Antiguo. Ello, complementado por el reconocimiento sobre el terreno de las áreas próximas, ha permitido el estudio de la relación entre yustaposiciones en la dispersión de sílex y la zona ceremonial excavada.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 64 , January 1998 , pp. 293 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Atkinson, R.J.C., 1951. The Henge monuments of Great Britain. In Atkinson, R.J.C., Piggott, S. & Sanders, N.K., Excavations at Dorchester, Oxon. 81–107. Oxford: Ashmolean Museum.Google Scholar
Bamford, H., 1982. Beaker Domestic sites in the Fen Edge and East Anglia. Gressenhall: East Anglian Archaeology 16.Google Scholar
Bamford, H., 1985. Briar Hill Excavation 1974–1978 Northampton: Development Corporation Archaeological Monograph 3.Google Scholar
Barclay, G.J., 1989. Henge monuments: reappraisal or reductionism. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 55, 260–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.C., 1994. Fragments from Antiquity: the archaeology of social life in Britain 2900–1200BC. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1984. The Social Foundations of British Prehistory: themes and variations in the archaeology of power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., & Holgate, R., 1984. The Neolithic sequence in the Upper Thames Valley. In Bradley, R. & Gardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic Studies. A Review of Some Current Research, 107–34. Oxford: Reading Studies in Archaeology 1. British Archaeological Report 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., Cleal, R., Gardiner, J. & Bowden, M., 1984. The Neolithic sequence in Cranborne Chase. In Bradley, R. & Gardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic Studies. A Review of Some Current Research, 87–105. Oxford: Reading Studies in Archaeology 1. British Archaeological Report 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., 1991. Structured deposition and technological change among the flaked stone artefacts from Cranborne Chase. In Barrett, J.C., Bradley, R. & Hall, M., Papers on the Prehistoric Archaeology of Cranborne Chase, 101–33. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 11.Google Scholar
Clare, T., 1986. Towards a reappraisal of henge monuments. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52, 281–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, T., 1987. Towards a reappraisal of henge monuments; origins, evolution and hierarchies. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 53, 457–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, P., 1989. Out of the unknown. Approaches to the Prehistory of Leicestershire. In Gibson, A.M. (ed), Midlands Prehistory, 111–21. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 200.Google Scholar
Clay, P., 1994. What to do with lithic scatters. In Pearson, M. Parker & Schadla-Hall, R.T. (eds), Looking at the Land. Archaeological Landscapes in Eastern England. Recent Work and Future Directions, 55. Leicester: Leicestershire Museums, Art Galleries & Records Service.Google Scholar
Clay, P., 1996. The Exploitation of the East Midlands Claylands in Later Prehistory. Aspects of Settlement and Land-use from the Mesolithic to the Iron Age in Central England. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Cleal, H., 1984. The Later Neolithic in Eastern England. In Bradley, R. & Gardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic Studies. A Review of Some Current Research, 135–58. Oxford: Reading Studies in Archaeology 1. British Archaeological Report 133.Google Scholar
Chowne, P., 1988. Aspects of Later Prehistoric Settlement in Lincolnshire: a study of the western fen margin and Bain Valley. Unpubl. Ph.D thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Evans, J.G., 1972. Land Snails in Archaeology. London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J.G. & Jones, H., 1973. Subfossil and modern land snail faunas from rock-rubble habitats. Journal of Conchology 28, 103–29.Google Scholar
Ford, S., 1987. Chronological and functional aspects of flint assemblages. In Brown, A.G. & Edmonds, M.R. (eds), Lithic Analysis and Later British Prehistory. Some Problems and Approaches, 107–34. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 162.Google Scholar
Ford, S., 1991. An Early Bronze Age pit circle from Charnham Lane, Hungerford, Berkshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 57(2), 179–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garton, D., Philips, P. & Henson, D., 1989. Newton Cliffs; a flint working and settlement site in the Trent Valley. In Philips, P. (ed.), Archaeology and Landscape Studies, 81–180. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 208.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A.L., 1989. Sex, Gender and Material Culture Patterning in Late Neolithic and Earlier Bronze Age England. Unpubl. Ph.D thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibson, A.M., 1982. Beaker Domestic Sites. A Study of the Domestic Pottery of the late 3rd and Early 2nd Millennium BC in the British Isles. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 107.Google Scholar
Gibson, A.M., 1994. Excavations at Sarn-y-bryn-caled Cursus Complex, Welshpool, Powys and the timber circles of Great Britain and Ireland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60, 143–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A.M. & McCormick, A., 1985. Archaeology at Grendon Quarry, Northamptonshire Part 1: Neolithic and Bronze Age Sites excavated in 1974–1975. Northamptonshire Archaeology 20, 23–66.Google Scholar
Green, H.S., 1976. The excavation of a late Neolithic settlement at Stacey Bushes, Milton Keynes and its significance. In Burgess, C. and Miket, R. (eds), Settlement and Economy in the Third and Second Millennia BC, 11–28. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 33.Google Scholar
Green, H.S., 1980. The Flint Arrowheads of the British Isles. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 80.Google Scholar
Gurney, N., 1985. Phosphate and magnetic susceptibility survey. In Pryor, F.M.M., French, C.I.A., Crowther, D., Gurney, D., Simpson, G.. & Taylor, M., The Fenland Project No.1 Archaeology and Environment in the Lower Wetland Valley, 38–40. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology 27.Google Scholar
Harding, A.F. (with Lee, G.E.), 1987. Henge Monuments and Related Sites of Great Britain. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 175.Google Scholar
Healey, E., 1982. The lithic industries. In Ehrenberg, M., Price, J. & Vale, V., The excavation of two Bronze Age Round Barrows at Welsh St, Donats, South Glamorgan. Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 29, 795–811.Google Scholar
Healey, E., 1992. Stone Tools. A glossary of post-glacial lithics. The Lithics Society Occasional papers No. 4 (unpublished draft).Google Scholar
Healey, E. & Robertson-Mackay, R., 1983. The lithic industries from Staines causewayed enclosure and their relationship to other Earlier Neolithic Industries in Southern Britain. Lithics 4, 1–27.Google Scholar
Healy, F., 1983. Are first impressions only topsoil deep? The evidence from Tattershall Thorpe, Lincolnshire. Lithics 4, 28–33.Google Scholar
Healy, F., 1987. Prediction or prejudice? The relationship between Field Survey and Excavation. In Brown, A.G. & Edmonds, M.R. (eds), Lithic Analysis and Later British Prehistory. Some Problems and Approaches, 9–18. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 162.Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Housley, R.A., Bronk, C.R. and Klinken, G.J. van, 1992. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 14. Archaeometry 34, 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holgate, R., 1988. Neolithic Settlement in the Thames Basin. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlder, C., 1968. The henge monuments at Llandegai. Antiquity 42, 216–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D.A., 1976. The excavation of Neolithic and Bronze Age sites at Aldwincle, Northants 1967–71, Northamptonshire Archaeology 11, 12–70.Google Scholar
Jackson, D.A., 1984. The excavation of a Bronze Age barrow at Earls Barton, Northants. Northamptonshire Archaeology 19, 3–30.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M., 1976. Britain inside and outside Mesolithic Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 42, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, J.W., 1875. The Geology of Rutland and Parts of Lincoln, Leicester, Huntingdon and Cambridge. London: Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain.Google Scholar
Kerney, M.P. and Cameron, R.A.D., 1979. A Field Guide to the Land Snails of Britain and North-West Europe. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Kinnes, I., 1979. Round Barrows and Ring Ditches in the British Neolithic. London: British Museum Occasional Paper 7.Google Scholar
Kinnes, I., 1985. Pottery. In Pryor, F.M.M., French, C.I.A., Crowther, D., Gurney, D., Simpson, G.. & Taylor, M., The Fenland Project No.l Archaeology and Environment in the Lower Welland Valley, 295–7. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology 27.Google Scholar
Loveday, R., 1989. The Barford ritual complex: further excavations (1972) and a regional perspective. In Gibson, A.M. (ed), Midlands Prehistory, 51–84. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 200.Google Scholar
Miket, R., 1985. Ritual enclosures at Whitton Hill, Northumberland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 51, 137–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffett, L., Robinson, M.A. & Straker, V., 1989. Cereals, fruits and nuts: Charred plant remains from Neolithic sites in England and Wales and the Neolithic economy. In Milles, A., Williams, D. & Gardner, N. (eds), The Beginnings of Agriculture, 243–64. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S496.Google Scholar
Moore, W.R.G. & Williams, J.H., 1975. A late Neolithic site at Ecton, Northampton. Northamptonshire Archaeology 10, 3–30.Google Scholar
Oswald, A., 1969. Excavations for the Avon-Severn Research Committee at Barford, Warwickshire. Birmingham Archaeological Society Transactions & Proceedings 83, 1–64.Google Scholar
Ohnama, K. & Bergman, C., 1982. Experimental studies in the determination of flaking mode. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 19, 161–70.Google Scholar
Parry, S.J., 1994. The Raunds Area Project Survey. In Pearson, M. Parker & Schadla-Hall, R.T. (eds), Looking at the Land. Archaeological Landscapes in Eastern England. Recent Work and Future Directions, 36–42. Leicester: Leicestershire Museums, Art Galleries & Records Service.Google Scholar
Parry, S.J., forthcoming. The Raunds Area Survey. An Archaeological Study of the Landscape of Raunds, Northamptonshire 1985–92. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Pickering, J. & Hartley, R.F., 1985. Past Worlds in a Landscape. Leicester: Leicestershire, Museums, Art Galleries & Records Service.Google Scholar
Pierpoint, S., 1980. Social Patterns in Yorkshire Prehistory 3500–750 BC. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S., 1948. The excavation at Cairnpapple Hill, West Lothian 1947–48. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 82, 68–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, M.W. & Jacobi, R.M., 1979. Some aspects of change in flaked stone industries of the Mesolithic and Neolithic in southern Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 6, 163–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M., 1978. Excavation at Fengate, Peterborough, England: The Second Report. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum Archaeology Monograph 5.Google Scholar
Reaney, D., 1968. Beaker burials in south Derbyshire. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 99, 58–220.Google Scholar
Richards, J., 1990. The Stonehenge Environs Project. London: Historic Buildings & Monuments Commission Archaeological Report 16.Google Scholar
Saville, A., 1981. Grimes Graves, Norfolk. Excavations 1971–72. Volume II. The Flint Assemblage London: Department of the Environment Archaeological Report 11.Google Scholar
Schofield, A.J., 1987. Putting lithics to the test: non-site analysis and the Neolithic settlement of southern England. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 6, 269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, A.J., 1991. Artefact distributions as activity areas: examples from south eastern England. In Schofield, A J (ed), Interpreting Artefact Scatters. Contributions to Ploughzone Archaeology, 117–28. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 4.Google Scholar
Schwarz, G.T., 1967. A simplified chemical test for archaeological field work. Archaeometry 10, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, W.G., 1985. Excavations at Maxey, Bardyke Field, 1962–63. In Pryor, F.M.M., French, C.I.A., Crowther, D., Gurney, D., Simpson, G.. & Taylor, M., The Fenland Project No.l Archaeology and Environment in the Lower Welland Valley, 245–64. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology 27.Google Scholar
St. Joseph, J.K., 1980. Air reconnaissance: recent results. Antiquity 56, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P.J., 1993. Extended C14 data base and revised Calib 3.0 C14 Calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1), 215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G.J., 1972. The excavation of a Neolithic settlement on Broome Heath, Ditchingham, Norfolk, England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 38, 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, H., 1979. Excavations at Willington, Derbyshire. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 99, 58–220.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., Atkinson, R.J.C., Chambers, R. & Thomas, N., 1992. Excavations in the Neolithic and Bronze Age complex at Dorchester-on-Thames, Oxfordshire 1947–52 and 1981. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 143–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windell, D., 1989. A late neolithic ‘Ritual Focus’ at West Cotton, Northamptonshire. In Gibson, A.M. (ed), Midlands Prehistory, 85–94. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 200.Google Scholar