Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:08:03.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Neolithic Downland Monument in its Environment: Excavations at the Easton Down Long Barrow, Bishops Cannings, North Wiltshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

A. Whittle ,
A. J. Rouse ,
J. G. Evans ,
C. Barker ,
C. Cartwright ,
G. Cruse ,
I. Dennis ,
A. S. Fairbairn ,
M. Hamilton  and
R. I. Macphail
...Show all authors
A. Whittle
Affiliation:
School of History and Archaeology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3XU
A. J. Rouse
Affiliation:
School of History and Archaeology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3XU
J. G. Evans
Affiliation:
School of History and Archaeology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3XU
C. Barker
Affiliation:
9 Stonebyres, Kirkfieldbank, Lanark, Strathclyde ML11 9UW
C. Cartwright
Affiliation:
Department of Scientific Research, British Museum, London WC1B 3DG
G. Cruse
Affiliation:
Geography Department, City and Guildhall University, Old Castle Street, London E1 7NT
I. Dennis
Affiliation:
School of History and Archaeology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3XU
A. S. Fairbairn
Affiliation:
45 Riverside Avenue, Guide Post, Choppington, Northumberland NE62 5PP
M. Hamilton
Affiliation:
School of History and Archaeology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3XU
R. I. Macphail
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H OPY
B. Noddle
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3YF
J. Pollard
Affiliation:
School of History and Archaeology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3XU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Excavations at the Easton Down long barrow were part of a wider programme of research into the Neolithic sequence and context of the Avebury area in north Wiltshire. The short barrow, on high chalk downland to the south-west of Avebury and the upper Kennet valley, and containing only a few inhumations according to Thurnam's 19th-century investigation, dates to the later 4th millennium BC. Test pits around the barrow produced very little struck flint, and virtually no colluvium in the adjacent dry valley to the west. The mound covered a thin calcareous turfline above a rubbly soil, probably formerly cultivated. The pre-barrow molluscan fauna, soil micromorphology and other environmental data indicate a clearance adjacent to woodland. In the secondary fill of the flanking ditches there is a succession from renewed woodland to open conditions in the Late Neolithic.

The Easton Down monument falls relatively late in the regional sequence of long barrow construction. Its setting was probably one of scattered, non-permanent clearances in woodland. Woodland was still widespread on the higher downland of the region in the middle of the Neolithic. Renewed and bigger-scale clearance towards the end of the Neolithic may be connected with the construction of very large monuments elsewhere in the region. The later prehistoric landscape became both more open and less diverse.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , 1993 , pp. 197 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, M. J. in press. The early Post-glacial and Flandrian history of Balksbury camp: the molluscan evidence. In Donaldson, P. (ed.), Further. Excavations at Balksbury Camp, Andover, Hants. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Annable, F. K. & Simpson, D. D. A. 1964. Guide Catalogue of the Neolithic and Bronze Age Collections in Devizes Museum. Devizes: Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society.Google Scholar
Ashbee, P., Smith, I. F. & Evans, J.G. 1979. Excavation of three long barrows near Avebury, Wiltshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 45, 207–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, B. W. 1990. Soils of the British Isles. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Barker, C. 1985. The long mounds of the Avebury area. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 79, 7–38.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., Bradley, R. & Green, M. 1991. Landscape, Monuments and Society. The Prehistory of Cranborne Chase. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, R. N. E. & Bergman, C. A. 1982. Hunters at Hengistbury: some evidence from experimental archaeology. World Archaeology 14, 237–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. 1990. Sedimentation rates in the primary fills of chalk-cut features. In Robinson, D.E. (ed.), Experiment and Reconstruction in Environmental Archaeology, 237–48. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. C. & Fowler, P.J. 1965. A Bronze Age pit near Jenner's Firs, Upavon. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 60, 127–29.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1992. The excavation of an oval barrow beside the Abingdon causewayed enclosure, Oxfordshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, P., Federoff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G. & Tursina, T. 1985. Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description. Wolverhampton: Waine Research Publications.Google Scholar
Bush, M. B. 1988. Early Mesolithic disturbance: a force on the landscape. Journal of Archaeological Science 15, 453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, M. B. 1989. On the antiquity of British chalk grasslands: a response to Thomas. Journal of Archaeological Science 16, 555–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, M. B. & Flenley, J. R. 1987. The age of the British chalk grassland. Nature 329, 434–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, A. J. 1971. Colour and banding morphs in subfossil samples of the snail Cepaea. In Creed, E. R. (ed.), Ecological Genetics and Evolution, 65–92. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, A. J. & Sheppard, P. M. 1950. Selection in the polymorphic land snail Cepaea nemoralis . Heredity 4, 275–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, S. P. 1990. The stratification and taphonomy of shells in calcareous soils: implications for land snail analysis in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 17, 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V. G. & Smith, I. F. 1954. The excavation of a Neolithic barrow on Whiteleaf Hill, Bucks. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 20, 212–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleal, R. 1991. Cranborne Chase — the Earlier Neolithic pottery. In Barrett, J., Bradley, R. & Green, M. (eds), Papers on the Prehistoric Archaeology of Cranborne Chase, 134–200. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Cleal, R. 1992. The Neolithic and Bronze Age pottery. In Gingell, C., The Marlborough Downs: A Later Bronze Age Landscape and its Origins, 61–70. Devizes: Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society.Google Scholar
Connah, G. 1965. Excavations at Knap Hill, Alton Priors, 1961. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 60, 1–23.Google Scholar
Corbet, G.B. & Southern, H. N. 1977. The Handbook of British Mammals (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Courty, M. A., Goldberg, P. & Macphail, R. I. 1989. Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cunnington, M. E. 1909. Notes on barrows on King's Play Down, Heddington. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine 36, 311–17.Google Scholar
Currey, J. D. & Cain, A.J. 1968. Studies on Cepaea. IV. Climate and selection of banding morphs in Cepaea from the climatic optimum to the present day. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 253, 483–98.Google Scholar
Dimbleby, G.W. 1985. The Palynology of Archaeological Sites. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dimbleby, G.W. & Evans, J. G. 1974. Pollen and land-snail analysis of calcareous soils. Journal of Archaeological Science 1, 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewett, P. 1975. The excavation of an oval burial mound of the 3rd millennium BC at Alfriston, East Sussex, 1974. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 41, 119–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewett, P. 1986. The excavation of a Neolithic oval barrow at North Marden, West Sussex, 1982. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52, 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. G. 1966. Late-glacial and Post-glacial subaerial deposits at Pitstone, Buckinghamshire. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 77, 347–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. G. 1971. Habitat change on the calcareous soils of Britain: the impact of Neolithic man. In Simpson, D.D. A. (ed.), Economy and Settlement in Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Britain and Europe, 27–73. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J.G. 1972. Land Snails in Archaeology. London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G. 1990. Notes on some Late Neolithic and Bronze Age events in long barrow ditches in southern and eastern England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 56, 111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.G. 1991. An approach to the interpretation of dry-ground and wet-ground molluscan taxocenes from central-southern england. In Harris, D. R. & Thomas, K. D. (eds), Modelling Ecological Change: Perspectives from Neoecology, Palaeoecology and Environmental Archaeology. 75–89. London: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G. 1993. The impact of human communities on the English chalklands from the Mesolithic to the Iron Age: a review of the molluscan evidence. In Chambers, F. M. (ed.), Climatic Change and Human Impact on the Landscape, 147–56. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G. & Hewitt, T. 1991. Land snail analysis. In Cunliffe, B. W. & Poole, C., Danebury: An Iron Age Hillfort in Hampshire, vol. 5, 432–39. London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Evans, J.G. & Jones, H. 1973. Subfossil and modern landsnail faunas from rock-rubble habitats. Journal of Conchology 28, 103–29.Google Scholar
Evans, J.G. & Jones, H. 1981. Subfossil land-snail faunas from Grimes Graves and other Neolithic flint mines. In Mercer, R. J., Grimes Graves, Norfolk: Excavations 1971–71. vol. 1, 104–11. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G., Limbrey, S., Máté, I. & Mount, R. J. 1988. Environmental change and land-use history in a Wiltshire river valley in the last 14,000 years. In Barrett, J. C. & Kinnes, I. (eds), The Archaeology of Context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: Recent Trends, 104–11. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G., Limbrey, S., Máté, I. & Mount, R. 1993. An environmental history of the upper Kennet valley, Wiltshire, for the last 10,000 years. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 59, 139–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. G., Pitts, M. W. & Williams, D. 1985. An excavation at Avebury, Wiltshire, 1981. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 51, 305–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. G. & Rouse, A.J. 1990. Small-vertebrate and molluscan analysis from the same site. Circaea 8, 75–84.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G. & Simpson, D.D.A. 1991. Giants' Hills 2 long barrow, Skendleby, Lincolnshire. Archaeologia 109, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. G. & Smith, I.E. 1983. Excavations at Cherhill, north Wiltshire, 1967. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 49, 43–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. G. & Williams, D. 1991. Land Mollusca from the M3 archaeological sites — a review. In Fasham, P.J. & Whinney, R. J. B., Archaeology and the M3, 113–42. Winchester: The Hampshire Field Club.Google Scholar
Fisher, P.J. & Macphail, R.I. 1985. Studies of archaeological soils and deposits by micromorphological techniques. In Feiller, N., Gilbertson, D. D. & Ralph, N. G. A. (eds), Palaeoenvironmental Investigations: Research Design, Methods and Data Analysis, 93–112. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Fishpool, M. 1992. Investigation of the Responses of Land Snails and Carabid Beetles to Vegetation Boundaries, with Reference to the Interpretation of Subfossil Assemblages. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales College of Cardiff.Google Scholar
Ford, S., Bradley, R., Hawkes, J. & Fisher, P. 1984. Flintworking in the Metal Age. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 3, 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde-Johnston, J. 1958. The excavation of two barrows at Frampton in Dorset. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeology Society 80, 111–32.Google Scholar
Gardner, N. P. 1991. Small Scale Distributions of Two Modern Land Snail Faunas: Islands and Boundaries of Relevance to the Interpretation of Subfossil Assemblages. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales College of Cardiff.Google Scholar
Gingell, C. 1992. The Marlborough Downs: A Later Bronze Age Landscape and its Origins. Devizes: Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society.Google Scholar
Greive, I. C. 1980. Some contrasts in soil development between grassland and deciduous woodland sites. Journal of Soil Science 31, 137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, P. 1992. The Flint. In Gingell, C., The Marlborough Downs: A Later Bronze Age Landscape and its Origins, 122–33. Devizes: Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society.Google Scholar
Havinga, A. J. 1964. Investigation into the differential corrosion susceptibility of pollen and spores. Pollen et Spores 6, 621–35.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991. The Domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holgate, R. 1987. Neolithic settlement patterns at Avebury, Wiltshire. Antiquity 61, 259–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holgate, R. 1988. Neolithic Settlement of the Thames Basin. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imeson, A. C., Kwaad, F. J. P. & Mücher, H. J. 1980. Hillslope processes and deposits in forested areas of Luxembourg. In Cullingford, R. A., Davidson, D. A. & Lewin, J. (eds), Timescales in Geomorphology, 31–42. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. 1976. The excavation of Neolithic and Bronze Age sites at Aldwincle, Northants. Northamptonshire Archaeology 11, 12–70.Google Scholar
Kerney, M. P., Brown, E. H. & Chandler, T. J. 1964. The Late-glacial and Post-glacial history of the Chalk escarpment near Brook, Kent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 248, 135–204.Google Scholar
Kerney, M. P., Preece, R. C. & Turner, C. 1980. Molluscan and plant bio-stratigraphy of some Late Devensian and Flandrian deposits in Kent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 291, 1–43.Google Scholar
Kinnes, I. 1992. Non-megalithic Long Barrows and Allied Structures in the British Neolithic. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1976. Culture and Communication. The Logic by which Symbols are Connected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitan, B.M., Audsley, A., Hawkes, C.J., Moody, A., Moody, P., Smart, P. L. & Thomas, J.S. 1988. Charter-house Warren Farm Swallet, Mendip, Somerset. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 18, 171–239.Google Scholar
Longworth, I. H. 1984. Collared Urns of the Bronze Age in Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macphail, R. I. 1991. The archaeological soils and sediments. In Sharpies, N. M., Maiden Castle, Excavations and Field Survey 1985–86, 106–18. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Macphail, R.I. 1992. Soil micromorphological evidence of ancient soil erosion. In Boardman, J. & Bell, M. (eds), Past and Present Soil Erosion, 197–215. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Macphail, R. I., Courty, M. A. & Gebhardt, A. 1990. Soil micromorphological evidence of early agriculture in north-west Europe. World Archaeology 22, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macphail, R. I. & Goldberg, P. 1990. The micromorphology of tree subsoil hollows: their significance to soil science and archaeology. In Douglas, L. A. (ed.), Soil Micromorphology, 425–29. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Macphail, R. I. & Goldberg, P. in press. Recent advances in micromorphological interpretation of soils and sediments from archaeological sites. In Barham, J. & Macphail, R. I. (eds), Archaeological Sediments and Soils. London: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Moore, P. D. & Webb, J. A. 1978. An Illustrated Guide to Pollen Analysis. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Morgan, F. de M. 1959. The excavation of a long barrow at Nutbane, Hampshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 25, 15–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, R. 1991. An Environmental History of the Upper Kennet Valley and Some Implications for Human Communities. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales College of Cardiff.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. P. 1986. Thin Section Preparation of Soils and Sediments. Berkhamsted: AB Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Page, C. N. 1982. The Ferns of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Passmore, A. D. 1923. Chambered long barrow in West Woods. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine 42, 366–67.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1962. The West Kennet Long Barrow. Excavations 1955–56. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Preece, R. C. 1980. The biostratigraphy and dating of the tufa deposit at the Mesolithic site at Blashenwell, Dorset, England. Journal of Archaeological Science 7, 345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudfoot, E. V. W. 1963. Report of the excavation of a bell barrow in the parish of Edmonsham, Dorset, England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 29, 395–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson-Mackay, M. E. 1980. A ‘head and hoofs’ burial beneath a round barrow, with other Neolithic and Bronze Age sites, on Hemp Knoll, near Avebury, Wiltshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 46, 123–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodwell, J. S. (ed.) 1991. British Plant Communities. Volume 1. Woodlands and Scrub. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodwell, J. S. (ed.) 1992. British Plant Communities. Volume 3. Grasslands and Montane Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saville, A. 1980. Five flint assemblages from excavated sites in Wiltshire. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 72/73, 1–27.Google Scholar
Saville, A. 1990. Hazleton North. Gloucestershire. 1979–82: The Excavation of a Neolithic Long Cairn of the Cotswold-Severn Group. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Scaife, R. G. 1990. Pollen analysis. In Saville, A. (ed.), Hazleton North. The Excavation of a Neolithic Long Cairn of the Cotswold-Severn Group. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Sharpies, N. M. 1991. Maiden Castle: Excavations and Field Survey 1985–86. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Sharpies, N. 1992. Aspects of regionalisation in the Scottish Neolithic. In Sharpies, N. & Sheridan, A. (eds), Vessels for the Ancestors, 322–31. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. 1965a. Windmill Hill and Avebury. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. 1965b. Excavation of a bell barrow, Avebury G. 55. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 60, 24–46.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. 1971. Causewayed enclosures. In Simpson, D. D. A. (ed.), Economy and Settlement in Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Britain and Europe, 89–112. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. 1951. The British Amphibians and Reptiles. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1984. The ecology of Neolithic farming systems as exemplified by the Avebury region of Wiltshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 50, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stace, C. 1991. New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, E. P. 1956. The uprooting of trees: a forest process. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 20, 113–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P. J. 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calibration. Radiocarbon 28, 1022–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. D. 1982. Neolithic enclosures and woodland habitats on the South Downs in Sussex, England. In Bell, M. & Limbrey, S. (eds), Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology, 147–70. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. D. 1985. Land snail analysis in theory and practice. In Fieller, N.R.J., Gilbertson, D. D. & Ralph, N. G. A. (eds), Palaeobiological Investigations: Research Design, Methods and Data Analysis, 131–56. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. D. 1989. Vegetation of the British chalklands in the Flandrian period: a response to Bush. Journal of Archaeological Science 16, 549–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorley, A. J. 1981. Pollen analytical evidence relating to the vegetational history of the Chalk. Journal of Biogeography 8, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurnam, J. 1860. Barrows on the north Wiltshire downs. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine 6, 317–36.Google Scholar
Thurnam, J. 1871. On ancient British barrows, especially those of Wiltshire and the adjoining counties (Part II. Round barrows). Archaeologia 43, 285–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Village, A. 1982. The diet of kestrels in relation to vole abundance. Bird Study 29, 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Village, A. 1990. The Kestrel. London: T. & A. D. Poyser.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J. 1979. Mount Pleasant. Dorset: Excavations 1970–1971. London: Society of Antiquaries.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G. J. & Longworth, I. H. 1971. Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966–1968. London: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
WANHM 1965. Excavation and fieldwork in Wiltshire 1964. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 60, 132–39.Google Scholar
Waton, P. V. 1982. Man's impact on the chalklands: some new pollen evidence. In Bell, M. & Limbrey, S. (eds), Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology, 75–91. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Waton, P. V. 1986. Palynological evidence for early and permanent woodland clearance on the chalk of central Hampshire. In de G. Sieveking, G. & Hart, M. B. (eds), The Scientific Study of Flint and Chert, 169–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. 1977. The Earlier Neolithic of Southern England and its Continental Background. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. 1990. A model for the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in the upper Kennet valley, north Wiltshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 56, 101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. 1991a. Wayland‘s Smithy, Oxfordshire: excavations at the Neolithic tomb in 1962–63 by R. J. C. Atkinson and S. Piggott. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 57(2), 61–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. 1991b. A Late Neolithic complex at West Kennet, Wiltshire, England. Antiquity 65, 256–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. 1993. The Neolithic of the Avebury area: sequence, environment, settlement and monuments. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 12, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. forthcoming. Excavations at Millbarrow chambered tomb, Winterbourne Monkton, north Wiltshire. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society 87 (1994)Google Scholar
Williams, D. 1976. A Neolithic moss flora from Silbury Hill, Yalden, D. W. & Yalden, P. E. 1985. An experimental Wiltshire. Journal of Archaeological Science 3, 267–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalden, D. W. & Morris, P. A. 1990. The Analysis of Owl Pellets. London: Mammal Society.Google Scholar
Yalden, D. W. & Warburton, A. B. 1979. The diet of the kestrel in the Lake District. Bird Study 26, 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalden, D. W. & Yalden, P. E. 1985. An experimental investigation of examining kestrel diet by pellet analysis. Bird Study 32, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar