Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:48:10.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Metropolitan’ and ‘Parochial’/‘Core’ and ‘Periphery’: a Historiography of the Neolithic of Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Gordon J. Barclay
Gordon J. Barclay
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Error is an occupational hazard of the literary life. As soon as a man sets pen to paper he sets himself open to two sorts of error: one, his own, which is bad enough; and, two, the misunderstanding of those who read him, which is infinite. (Allan 1952, ix)

This paper explores some of the ways in which the cultural and political history of the United Kingdom has affected writing about the Neolithic in what is now Scotland. It uses the terms ‘core’ and ‘periphery’ as they have been applied by historiographers writing about the operation of the cultural and political relations within the United Kingdom in the last three centuries. The paper is in two parts. The first part presents a summary of relevant literature generated by 20 years of debate about Scottish and ‘British’ identity, history, literature, and culture. The second part considers the ways in which the general issues have affected the writing of Scottish prehistory, concentrating on the Neolithic of lowland Scotland and examining in particular the writings and influence of Fox, Childe, Piggott, and Atkinson.

Résumé

Cette étude s'évertue à explorer quelques unes des manières dont l'histoire culturelle et politique du Royaume-Uni a influé sur les écrits relatifs au Néolithique dans ce qui constitue maintenant l'Ecosse. On y utilise les termes ‘noyau’ et ‘périphérie’ dans le sens où ils ont été appliqués par les historiographes qui se sont intéressés au fonctionnement des relations culturelles et politiques à l'intérieur du Royaume-Uni au cours des trois derniers siècles. Cette étude est divisée en deux parties. La première présente un résumé de la littérature pertinente, résultat de 20 ans de débats sur l'identité, l'histoire, la littérature et la culture écossaises et ‘britanniques’. La seconde examine les diverses manières dont des questions d'ordre général ont affecté les écrits sur la préhistoire écossaise en se concentrant sur le Néolithique des basses terres d'Ecosse et en examinant en particulier les écrits et l'influence de Fox, Childe, Piggott et Atkinson.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Art und Weise, wie die kulturelle und politische Geschichte des Vereinigten Königreiches das Schrifttum zum Neolithikum des heutigen Schottland beeinflusst hat. Der Artikel benutzt dabei die Begriffe „Kern‟ und „Peripherie‟ in Anlehnung an deren Verwendung bei Geschichtsschreibern, die über die kulturellen und politischen Verbindungen im Vereinigten Königreiches während der letzten drei Jahrhunderten geschrieben haben. Der Artikel besteht aus zwei Teilen: im ersten Teil wird die relevante Literatur zusammengefaßt, die aus der zwanzigjährigen Debatte über die schottische und „britische‟ Identität, Geschichte, Literatur und Kultur hervorgegangen ist. Der zweite Teil untersucht, wie die generellen Streitpunkte das Verfassen der schottischen Vorgeschichte beeinflusst haben. Dabei wird sich auf das Neolithikum des schottischen Tieflandes konzentriert, und besonders das Schrifttum und der Einfluss von Fox, Childe, Piggott und Atkinson untersucht.

Resúmen

Este trabajo se propone una exploración de algunos de los modos en los que la historia política y cultural del Reino Unido ha afectado la investigación del neolítico en lo que ahora es Escocia. Se utilizan los conceptos “Centro” y “Periferia” en el modo en el que han sido aplicados por los historiadores al escribir acerca de la operación de las relaciones culturales y políticas dentro del Reino Unido en los tres últimos siglos. El trabajo se divide en dos partes. En la primera se presenta un resumen de toda la literatura de interés generada en los últimos 20 años de debate sobre la identidad, historia, literatura y culturas escocesa y británica. En la segunda parte se consideran los diversos modos en los que estas tendencias generales han afectado lo escrito sobre la prehistoria escocesa, concentrándose en el neolítico del sur de Escocia. Se examinan de modo particular los escritos y la influencia de Fox, Childe, Piggott, y Atkinson.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 67 , 2001 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allan, J.R. 1952. North-east Lowlands of Scotland. London: Robert HaleGoogle Scholar
Armit, I. & Finlayson, W. 1992. Hunter-gatherers transformed: the transition to agriculture in northern and western Europe. Antiquity 66, 664–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, B. & Hassmann, H. 1995. Archaeology and Nazi Germany: the legacy of the Faustian bargain. In Kohl, & Fawcett, (eds) 1995, 70–81.Google Scholar
Ash, M. 1980. The Strange Death of Scottish History. Edinburgh: Ramsay Head PressGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R.J.C. 1962. Fishermen and farmers. In Piggott, S. (ed.), The Prehistoric Peoples of Scotland, 1–38. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J.A. 1996. National identity and material culture: decoding the Highland myth. In Atkinson, et al. (eds), 1996, 59–66Google Scholar
Atkinson, J.A., Banks, I. & O'Sullivan, J. 1996. Nationalism and Archaeology. Glasgow: CruithneGoogle Scholar
Banks, I. 1996. Archaeology, nationalism and ethnicity. In Atkinson, et al. (eds), 1996, 1–11Google Scholar
Barclay, G.J. 1996. Neolithic buildings in Scotland. In Darvill, T. & Thomas, J. (eds), Neolithic Houses in Northwest Europe and Beyond, 61–75. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Barclay, G.J. 1997. The Neolithic. In Edwards, K. & Ralston, I.B.M. (eds), Scotland: environment and archaeology 8000 BC–AD 1000, 127–49. Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
Barclay, G.J. 2000. Between Orkney and Wessex: the search for the regional Neolithics of Britain. In Ritchie, A. (ed.), Neolithic Orkney in its European Context, 275–85. Cambridge: McDonald InstituteGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, C. & Turnbull, R. 1989. The Eclipse of Scottish Culture. Edinburgh: PolygonGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, C. & Turnbull, R. 1997. Scotland After Enlightenment: image and tradition in modern Scottish culture. Edinburgh: PolygonGoogle Scholar
Billcliffe, R. 1987. James Mclntosh Patrick. London: The Fine Art SocietyGoogle Scholar
Boardman, J. 1974. Athenian Black Figure Vases: a handbook. London: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1984. The Social Foundations of Prehistoric Britain. Harlow: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1993. Altering the Earth. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2000. The Good Stones: a new investigation of the Clava Cairns. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Brophy, K. 1999. The cursus monuments of Scotland. In Barclay, A. & Harding, J (eds), Pathways and Ceremonies: the cursus monuments of Britain and Ireland, 119–29. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Burl, H.A.W. 2000. The Stone Circles of Britain, Ireland and Brittany. London: YaleGoogle Scholar
Calder, C.S.T. 1950. Report on the excavation of a Neolithic temple at Staneydale in the parish of Sandsting, Shetland. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 84, 185–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, C.S.T. 1956. Report on the discovery of numerous Stone Age house-sites in Shetland. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 89, 340–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, C.S.T. 1961. Excavations in Whalsay, Shetland, 1954–5. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 94, 28–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, T. 1989. Introduction. In Champion, T. (ed.), Centre and Periphery: comparative studies in archaeology, 1–21. London: Unwin HymanGoogle Scholar
Champion, T. 1996. Three nations or one? Britain and the national use of the past. In Diaz-Andreu, M. & Champion, T (eds) 1996, 119–45Google Scholar
Chapman, M. 1978. The Gaelic Vision in Scottish Culture. London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1935. The Prehistory of Scotland. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & TrubnerGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1940. Prehistoric Communities of the British Isles. Edinburgh: ChambersGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1946. Scotland Before the Scots. London: MethuenGoogle Scholar
Colley, L. 1992. Britons: forging the nation, 1707–1837. London: YaleGoogle Scholar
Colls, R. 1986. Englishness and the political culture. In Colls, R. & Dodd, P. (eds), 1986, 29–61Google Scholar
Colls, R. & Dodd, P. 1986. Englishness: politics and culture 1880–1920. London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Cooney, G. 1997. Images of settlement and the landscape in the Neolithic. In Topping, P. (ed.), Neolithic Landscapes, 23–31. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Cowie, T. & MacSween, A. 1999. Grooved Ware from Scotland: a review. In Cleal, R. & MacSween, A. (eds), Grooved Ware in Britain and Ireland, 48–56. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Craig, C. 1996. Out of History: narrative paradigms in Scottish and English culture. Edinburgh: PolygonGoogle Scholar
Daniel, G.E. 1962. The megalith builders. In Piggott, S (ed.), The Prehistoric Peoples of Scotland, 39–72. London. Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Daniel, G.E. 1963. The personality of Wales. In Foster, I.L. & Alcock, L. (eds), Culture and Environment: essays in honour of Sir Cyril Fox, 7–23. London. Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Davidson, N. 2000. The Origins of Scottish Nationhood. London: PlutoGoogle Scholar
Dennell, R. 1996. Nationalism and identity in Britain and Europe. In Atkinson, et al. (eds), 1996, 22–34Google Scholar
Diaz-Andreu, M. 1995. Archaeology and nationalism in Spain. In Kohl, & Fawcett, (eds), 1995, 39–56Google Scholar
Diaz-Andreu, M. & Champion, T. 1996. Nationalism and archaeology in Europe: an introduction. In Diaz-Andreu, M. & Champion, T. (eds), Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe, 1–23. London: UCL PressGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, H.T. & Lynch, M. 2000. The challenge to Westminster: sovereignty, devolution and independence. East Linton: TuckwellGoogle Scholar
Dodd, P. 1986. Englishness and the national culture. In Colls, & Dodd, (eds), 1986, 1–28Google Scholar
Donnachie, I. & Whatley, C. 1992. The Manufacture of Scottish History. Edinburgh: PolygonGoogle Scholar
Dyer, J. 1990. Ancient Britain. London: BatsfordGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, M. 1995. Stone Tools and Society. London: BatsfordGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, M. 1999. Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscapes, monuments and memory. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, H. 1954. The geography of Scotland in prehistoric times. Transactions of the Glasgow Archaeological Society ns 13, 1–16Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. 1998. The Identity of the Scottish Nation. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Finlay, R.J. 1998. Caledonia or North Britain: Scottish identity in the eighteenth century. In Broun, D., Finlay, R.J. & Lynch, M. (eds), Image and Identity: the making and re-making of Scotland through the ages, 143–56. Edinburgh: John DonaldGoogle Scholar
Fox, A. 2000. Aileen – a pioneering archaeologist. Leominster: GracewingGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. 1932. The Personality of Britain. (1st edn) Cardiff: National Museum of WalesGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. 1938. The Personality of Britain. (3rd edn) Cardiff: National Museum of WalesGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. 1943. The Personality of Britain. (4th edn) Cardiff: National Museum of WalesGoogle Scholar
Frodsham, P. 1996. Neolithic Studies in No-man's Land. Northern Archaeology 13/14. Newcastle: Northern Archaeology GroupGoogle Scholar
Fry, M. 1992. The Whig interpretation of history. In Donnachie, & Whatley, (eds), 1992, 72–89Google Scholar
Garton, D. 1987. Lismore Fields, Buxton, Derbyshire: 1987 Summary Report. Trent & Peak Archaeological TrustGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A. 1992. Approaches to the later Neolithic and Bronze Age settlement of Britain. In Colloque international de Lons-le-Saumier, 16–19 mai 1990, 41–8Google Scholar
Graham, A. 1981. In piam veterum memoriam. In Bell, A.S. (ed.), The Scottish Antiquarian Tradition, 212–26. Edinburgh: John DonaldGoogle Scholar
Harding, J. 1995. Social histories and regional perspectives in the Neolithic of lowland Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61, 117–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J. 1997. Interpreting the Neolithic: the monuments of North Yorkshire, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16.3, 279–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J. 2000. Enclosing the cosmos: some thoughts on the chronological origins of henge construction. Paper given at the Neolithic Studies Group meeting, November 2000Google Scholar
Harding, J., Frodsham, P. & Durden, T. 1996. Towards an agenda for Neolithic studies in northern England. In Frodsham, (ed.), 1996, 189–201Google Scholar
Hawkes, J. 1945. Early Britain. London: CollinsGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, J. 1951. A Land. London: David & CharlesGoogle Scholar
Howkins, A. 1986. The discovery of rural England. In Colls, & Dodd, (eds), 1986, 62–88Google Scholar
James, S. 1999. The Ancient Celts: ancient people or modern invention? Edinburgh: PolygonGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. 2000. ‘A poisonous lowland pox on our nation’ reprinted from The Spectator in The Sunday Herald 3 December 2000Google Scholar
Jope, E.M. 1981 Cyril Fox. Dictionary of National Biography 1961–1970. Oxford: University PressGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, A.B. 1998. The Land of Prehistory: a critical history of American archaeology. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Kidd, C. 1993. Subverting Scotland's past: Scottish Whig historians and the creation of an Anglo-British identity, 1689–C.1830. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, C. 1995. Teutonist ethnology and Scottish Nationalist inhibition 1780–1880, Scottish Historical Review 74.1, 45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnes, I. 1985. Circumstance not context: the Neolithic of Scotland as seen from the outside, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 115, 15–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, W. 1957. The primary agricultural colonisation of Scotland. Scottish Geographical Magazine 73, 65–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, P.L. & Fawcett, C. 1995. Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Leavis, F.R. 1948. The Great Tradition. Harmondsworth: PelicanGoogle Scholar
Lillios, K.T. 1995. Nationalism and Copper Age research during the Salazar regime (1932–1974). In Kohl, & Fawcett, (eds), 1995, 57–69Google Scholar
Longworth, I. & Cherry, J. 1986. Archaeology in Britain since 1945. London: British Museum PressGoogle Scholar
MacDougall, H. 1982. Racial Myth in English History. London: Harvest HouseGoogle Scholar
MacKie, E. 1997. Maeshowe and the winter solstice: ceremonial aspects of the Orkney Grooved Ware culture. Antiquity 71, 338–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinder, H. 1902. The British and the British Seas. LondonGoogle Scholar
Mathieson, W.L. 1916. Church and Reform in Scotland: a history from 1797 to 1843. GlasgowGoogle Scholar
McCrone, D. 1992. Understanding Scotland: the sociology of a stateless nation. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Morton, G. 1998. What if?: The significance of Scotland's missing nationalism in the nineteenth century. In Broun, D., Finlay, R.J. & Lynch, M. (eds), Image and Identity: the making and re-making of Scotland through the ages, 157–76. Edinburgh: John DonaldGoogle Scholar
Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000. White Horse Stone: a Neolithic Longhouse, Current Archaeology 14, 450–3Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 1993. Bronze Age Britain. London: Batsford/English HeritageGoogle Scholar
Paxman, J. 1998. The English. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Peate, I. 1961. Review of Barley, M.W. The English Farmhouse and Cottage. Antiquity 35, 249–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S. 1954. The Neolithic Cultures of the British Isles Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S. 1983. The national Museum of Antiquities and Archaeological Research. In O'Connor, A. & Clarke, D.V. (eds), From the Stone Age to the ‘Forty-Five, 4–8. Edinburgh: John DonaldGoogle Scholar
Pittock, M. 1991. The Invention of Scotland: the Stuart myth and the Scottish identity, 1638 to the present. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Pittock, M. 1995. The Myth of the Jacobite Clans. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar
Pittock, M. 1999. Celtic Identity and the British Image. Manchester: University PressGoogle Scholar
Pottle, F.A. 1950. Boswell's London Journal 1762–1763. London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
Pringle, T.R. 1988. The privation of history: Landseer, Victoria and the Highland myth. In Cosgrove, D. & Daniels, S. (eds), The Iconography of Landscape, 142–61. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
RCAHMS 1994. South East Perth: an archaeological landscape. Edinburgh: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, A. (ed.). 2000. Neolithic Orkney in its European Context. Cambridge: McDonald InstituteGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J.C. 1866. History of the Christian church… A.D. 1–1303. LondonGoogle Scholar
Robbins, K. 1998. Great Britain: identities, institutions and the idea of Britishness. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Schama, S. 2000. History of Britain. London: BBCGoogle Scholar
Scott, L. 1951. Review of Daniels The Prehistoric Chamber Tombs of England and Wales. Antiquity 25, 37–9Google Scholar
Sharples, N. 1992. Aspects of regionalisation in the Scottish Neolithic. In Sharples, N. & Sheridan, A. (eds), Vessels for the Ancestors, 322–31. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Sharples, N. 1996. Nationalism or internationalism: the problematic Scottish experience. In Atkinson, et al. (eds), 1996, 77–88Google Scholar
Smith, I.F. 1974. The Neolithic. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), British Prehistory: a New Outline, 100–36. London. DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, J.B. 1975. Survival and discovery. In Evans, J.G., Limbrey, S. & Cleere, H. (eds), The Effect of Man on the Landscape: the Highland Zone, 104–8. London: Council for British ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Summerson, J. 1969 (5th edn). Architecture in Britain: 1530–1830. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1998a. Review of Neolithic Landscapes. Antiquity 72, 455–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1998b. Pict's Knowe, Holywood, and Holm. Current Archaeology 14, 149–54Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1999. Understanding the Neolithic. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Trevor-Roper, H. 1967. The Scottish Enlightenment. Studies in Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, LVIIIGoogle Scholar
Trevor-Roper, H. 1983. The Highland tradition of Scotland. In Hobsbawm, E. & Ranger, T. (eds), The Invention of Tradition, 15–41. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1994. Childe's relevance to the 1990s. In Harris, D.R. (ed.), The Archaeology of V Gordon Childe, 9–34. London: UCL PressGoogle Scholar
Ucko, P.J. 1989. Foreword. In Gathercole, P. & Lowenthal, D. (eds), The Politics of the Past, ix–xxi. London: Unwin HymanGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G.J. 1989. The Henge Monuments. London: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A., Keith-Lucas, M., Milles, A., Noddle, B., Rees, S. & Romans, J.C.C. 1986. Scord of Brouster: an early agricultural settlement on Shetland, Oxford: Oxford University Committee for ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Whyte, I. 1979. Agriculture and Society in Seventeenth Century Scotland. Edinburgh: John DonaldGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. 1963. Culture and Society 1780–1950. Harmondsworth: PelicanGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. 1851. The Archaeology and Prehistoric Annals of Scotland Edinburgh: Shetland & KnoxGoogle Scholar
Withers, C. 1992. The historical creation of The Scottish Highlands. In Donnachie, & Whatley, (eds), 1992, 143–56Google Scholar
Womack, P. 1989. Improvement and Romance: constructing the myth of the Highlands. Basingstoke: MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormald, J. 1985. Review of The Invention of Tradition, Scottish Historic Review 64, 204–5Google Scholar