Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-pdxrj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T11:22:22.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life by the River: a Prehistoric Landscape at Grendon, Northamptonshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Jonathan Last ,
Ian Baxter ,
Tony Brown ,
Nina Crummy ,
Natasha Dodwell ,
Val Fryer ,
Rowena Gale ,
Rhodri Gardner ,
Jackie Hatton  and
Kathren Henry
...Show all authors
Jonathan Last
Affiliation:
English Heritage, Fort Cumberland, Eastney, Portsmouth, PO4 9LD. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a prehistoric landscape by the river Nene at Grendon Lakes, partly revealed in the 1970s and partly during excavations in 1998 and 2001, which are reported in full. Two major phases of archaeological activity are evident, one interpreted as Neolithic–Early Bronze Age, the other as Iron Age. The gap between these is bridged by an environmental sequence reconstructed with the aid of a pollen core from an adjacent palaeochannel, which shows that human activity continued in the intervening period. The landscape is comparable in form, though not in scale, with that investigated 13 km downstream at Raunds, and helps shed light on the distinctive features of Midlands river valleys like the Nene in prehistory. In conclusion it is suggested that the different characters of the Neolithic and Iron Age features at Grendon mask some underlying similarities in the way they structured people's movements and encounters.

Résumé

Cet article décrit le développement d'un paysage préhistorique près de la rivière Nene à Grendon Lakes, en partie révélé dans les années 1970 et en partie pendant les fouilles de 1998 et 2001, dont on offre ici un compte-rendu complet. Deux phases majeures d'activité archéologique sont évidentes, l'une a été interprétée comme néolithique–début de l'âge du bronze, l'autre comme âge du fer. L'intervalle entre les deux est comblé par une séquence environnementale reconstruite à l'aide d'un carottage pollinique d'un paléochenal adjacent, qui démontre que l'activité humaine a continué pendant la période intermédiaire. Le paysage est comparable par sa forme, bien que pas par son échelle, aux 13 km étudiés en aval à Raunds, et a contribué à éclairer les traits distinctifs des vallées fluviales des Midlands, telles que celle de la Nene, pendant la préhistoire. En conclusion, on suggère que les particularités disparates des vestiges du néolithique et de l'âge du fer à Grendon masquent certaines similarités sousjacentes dans la manière dont elles ont modelé les mouvements et les rencontres entre les populations.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Entwicklung einer prähistorischen Landschaft am Fluss Nene bei den Grendon Lakes, die teilweise in den 70ger Jahren und teilweise durch Ausgrabungen 1998 und 2001 freigelegt wurde. Diese Arbeiten werden hier umfassend beschrieben. Zwei Hauptphasen können klar herausgearbeitet: eine Phase kann als Neolithisch – Frühbronzezeitlich, und die Andere als Eisenzeitlich interpretiert werden. Die Lücke zwischen den beiden Phasen wird durch eine Umweltsequenz überbrückt, die mit Hilfe eines Pollenkerns aus einem angrenzenden Paläokanal rekonstruiert werden kann und zeigt, dass auch während dieser Zwischenphase menschliche Aktivitäten nachgewiesen werden können. Man kann die Landschaft in ihrer Form, jedoch nicht in ihrem Ausmaß mit der bereits untersuchten Landschaft bei Raunds vergleichen, die 13 km flussabwärts zu finden ist. Die Untersuchungen liefern zum einen neue Erkenntnisse zu den Besonderheiten der Midlands Flusstäler, und zum anderen für die vorgeschichtliche Entwicklung der Nene. In der Zusammenfassung wird darauf hingewiesen, dass die unterschiedlichen Merkmale der Neolithischen und Eisenzeitlichen Befunde in Grendon einige grundlegende Gemeinsamkeiten verbergen: die Art und Weise, wie sie die Aktivitäten und Begegnungen der Menschen strukturierten.

Résumen

Este trabajo describe el desarrollo de un paisaje prehistórico a orillas del río Nene en Grendon Lakes, que fue descubierto parcialmente en los años 1970 y después durante excavaciones en 1998 y 2001, descritas aquí en detalle. Se evidenciaron dos fases principales de actividad arqueológica, una interpretada como del Neolítico–Primera Edad del Bronce, y la otra como de la Edad del Hierro. El hiato entre las dos fases está enlazado por una secuencia medioambiental reconstruida con la ayuda de un testigo de polen extraído de un paleo-canal adyacente, que indica que la actividad humana continuó durante el periodo intermedio. El paisaje es comparable en forma, aunque no en tamaño, al investigado 13 km rio abajo en Raunds, y ayuda a elucidar los rasgos distintivos de valles fluviales de las Midlands como el del Nene en la prehistoria. Para concluir, se sugiere que el distinto carácter de los elementos del Neolítico y de la Edad del Hierro en Grendon oculta algunas de las similitudes subyacentes entre ellos en lo que se refiere al modo en que se estructuraron los movimientos y encuentros entre la gente.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 71 , 2005 , pp. 333 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bamford, H. 1985. Briar Hill: Excavation 1974–1978. Northampton: Northampton Development Corporation Archaeological Monograph 3Google Scholar
Barclay, A. & Halpin, C. 1999. Excavations at Barrow Hills, Radley, Oxfordshire. Volume I: the Neolithic and Bronze Age monument complex. Oxford: Oxford Archaeological Unit, Thames Valley Landscapes 11Google Scholar
Baxter, I.L. n.d. Assessment Report on the Animal Bone from Babraham Road, Cambridge (CAM BAB 98). Archive report for Cambridgeshire CC Archaeological Field UnitGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.G. 1984. The Flandrian vegetation history of Hartlebury Common, Worcestershire. Proceedings of the Birmingham Natural History Society 25, 89–98Google Scholar
Brown, A.G. 2000. Floodplain vegetation history: clearings as potential ritual spaces? In Fairbairn, A.S. (ed.), Plants in Neolithic Britain and Beyond, 49–62. Oxford: Oxbow/Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Paper 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.G. forthcoming. The environment of the Raunds area. In Parry, S., Raunds Area Survey. An Archaeological Study of the Landscape of Raunds, Northamptonshire 1985–92. Swindon: English Heritage Archaeological ReportGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.G. & Meadows, I. 1997. Environmental analysis of a Neolithic/Early Bronze Age palaeochannel of the river Nene at Turnells Mill Lane, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire. Northamptonshire Archaeology 27, 185–91Google Scholar
Campbell, G. & Robinson, M. forthcoming. Environment and land use in the valley bottom. In Harding, & Healy, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, J. & Burleigh, R. 1983. Some archaeological applications of the dating of animal bone by radiocarbon with particular reference to post-Pleistocene extinctions. In Mook, W.G. & Waterbolk, H.T. (eds), Proceedings of the First International Symposium 14C and Archaeology, 409–19. Strasbourg: Council of Europe PACT 8Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1991. Iron Age Communities in Britain (3rd edn). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Dawson, M. 1996. Plantation Quarry, Willington: excavations 1988–1991. Bedfordshire Archaeology 22, 2–49Google Scholar
Dawson, M. 2000. The Iron Age and Romano-British period – a landscape in transition. In Dawson, M. (ed.), Prehistoric and Roman Landscapes of the Great Ouse Valley, 107–30. York: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 119Google Scholar
Drury, P.J. 1978. Excavations at Little Waltham. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 26Google Scholar
Ellis, C. 2004. A Prehistoric Ritual Complex at Eynesbury, Cambridgeshire. Salisbury: East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper 17Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1997. Hydraulic communities: Iron Age enclosure in the East Anglia fenlands. In Gwilt, A. & Haselgrove, C. (eds), Reconstructing Iron Age Societies: new approachex to the British Iron Age, 216–27. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 71Google Scholar
Fearn, K. 1993. Excavation of two pits of an alignment at Moor Lane, Long Bennington, Lincolnshire. Lincolnshire History & Archaeology 28, 5–8Google Scholar
Garwood, P. 1999. Grooved Ware in southern Britain: chronology and intepretation. In Cleal, R. & MacSween, A. (eds), Grooved Ware in Britain and Ireland, 145–76. Oxford: Oxbow, Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Paper 3Google Scholar
Gibson, A. & McCormick, A. 1985. Archaeology at Grendon Quarry, Northamptonshire Part 1: Neolithic and Bronze Age sites excavated in 1974–75. Northamptonshire Archaeology 20, 23–66Google Scholar
Godwin, H. 1975. The History of the British Flora. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, D.N. & Nickerson, N. 1969. Iron Age pottery from north Bedfordshire and south Northamptonshire. Bedfordshire Archaeological Journal 4, 1–12Google Scholar
Harding, J. & Healy, F. forthcoming. Raunds Area Project: the Neolithic and Bronze Age landscapes of West Cotton, Stanwick and Irthlingborough, Northamptonshire. Swindon: English Heritage Archaeological ReportGoogle Scholar
Healy, F., Harding, J. & Bayliss, A. forthcoming. The development of the monuments. In Harding, & Healy, forthcomingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D.A. 1974. Two new pit alignments and a hoard of currency bars from Northamptonshire. Northamptonshire Archaeology 9, 13–45Google Scholar
Jackson, D.A. 1975. An Iron Age site at Twywell, Northants. Northamptonshire Archaeology 10, 31–93Google Scholar
Jackson, D.A. 1976. The excavation of Neolithic and Bronze Age sites at Aldwincle, Northamptonshire, 1967–71. Northamptonshire Archaeology 11, 12–70Google Scholar
Jackson, D.A. 1978. A Late Bronze–Early Iron Age vessel from a pit alignment at Ringstead, Northants. Northamptonshire Archaeology 13, 168Google Scholar
Jackson, D.A. 1991. An archaeological evaluation at Wollaston. Northamptonshire Archaeology 23, 82–5Google Scholar
Jackson, D.A. 1995. Archaeology at Grendon Quarry, Northamptonshire. Part 2: Other prehistoric, Iron Age and later sites excavated in 1974–75 and further observations between 1976–80. Northamptonshire Archaeology 26, 3–32Google Scholar
Kidd, A. 1999. East Midlands Regional Research Frameworks. Northamptonshire: the first millennium BC. A resource assessment. Unpublished draft (http://www.le.ac.uk/ar/east_midlands_research_framework.htm)Google Scholar
Knight, D. 1984. Late Bronze Age and Iron Age settlement in the Nene and Great Ouse Basins. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 130Google Scholar
Last, J. 1999. Out of line: cursuses and monument typology in eastern England. In Barclay, A. & Harding, J. (eds), Pathways and Ceremonies: the cursus monuments of Britain and Ireland, 86–97. Oxford: Oxbow, Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Paper 4Google Scholar
Longworth, I.H., Wainwright, G.J. & Wilson, K.E. 1971. The Grooved Ware site at Lion Point, Clacton. In Sieveking, G.de G. (ed.), Prehistoric and Roman Studies, 93–124. London: British MuseumGoogle Scholar
Loveday, R. 1999. Dorchester-on-Thames – ritual complex or ritual landscape? In Barclay, A. & Harding, J. (eds.), Pathways and Ceremonies: the cursus monuments of Britain and Ireland, 49–63. Oxford: Oxbow, Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Paper 4Google Scholar
Macphail, R.I. & Goldberg, P. 1990. The micromorphology of tree subsoil hollows: their significance to soil science and archaeology. In Douglas, L.A. (ed.), Soil Micromorphology, 425–9. Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Malim, T. 2000. The ritual landscape of the Neolithic and Bronze Age along the middle and lower Ouse valley. In Dawson, M. (ed.), Prehistoric and Roman Landscapes of the Great Ouse Valley, 57–88. York: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 119Google Scholar
Meadows, I. 1995. Wollaston. South Midlands Archaeology 25, 41–5Google Scholar
Pollard, J. 1996. Iron Age riverside pit alignments at St Ives, Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 62, 93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M. 1988. Earlier Neolithic organised landscapes and ceremonial in lowland Britain. In. Barrett, J.C. & Kinnes, I. (eds.), The Archaeology of Context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: recent trends, 63–72. Sheffield: Department of Prehistory & Archaeology, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M., French, C.A.I., Crowther, D.R., Gurney, D.A., Simpson, W.G. & Taylor, M. 1985. The Fenland Project Number 1: Archaeology and environment in the Lower Welland Valley, Volume 2. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology 27Google Scholar
RCHME (Royal Commission on Historical Monuments of England). 1979. An Inventory of the Historical Monuments in the County of Northampton. Vol. II: Archaeological Sites in Central Northamptonshire. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Simpson, W.G., Gurney, D.A., Neve, J. & Pryor, F.M.M. 1993. The Fenland Project Number 7: Excavations in Peterborough and the Lower Welland Valley 1960–1969. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology 61Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P.J. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35, 215–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Beck, J.W., Burr, G.S., Hughen, K.A., Kromer, B., McCormac, F.G., Plicht, J. van der & Spurk, M. 1998. INTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40, 1041–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. 1997. Space and place: some thoughts on Iron Age and Romano-British landscapes. In Gwilt, A. & Haselgrove, C. (eds), Reconstructing Iron Age Societies: new approaches to the British Iron Age, 192–204. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 71Google Scholar
Taylor, M. n.d. Grendon HAT 217, Area A, assessment of the wood. Unpublished report for HATGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. 1978. Pit alignments: distribution and function. In Bowen, H.C. & Fowler, P. (eds), Early Land Allotment, 3–5. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 48Google Scholar
Windell, D. 1980. Clay Lane 1980: interim report. An Iron Age and Roman rural settlement at Clay Lane, Earls Barton. Northamptonshire Archaeology 18, 33–4Google Scholar