Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:00:37.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Handaxe Assemblages from the Didwana region, Thar Desert, India: A Metrical Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

C. Gaillard ,
D. R. Raju ,
V. N. Misra  and
S. N. Rajaguru
S. N. Rajaguru
Affiliation:
Deccan College Research Institute, Poona, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Didwana region has preserved lower palaeolithic artefacts in primary and semi-primary contexts. On the basis of geological stratigraphy of aeolian and playa sediments, artefacts occurring in a stratified context have been dated to the Middle Pleistocene. In order to work out technological evolutionary trends of the acheulian culture in this region, 301 handaxes from 10 localities have been studied following Roe's methodology, with some additional attributes. Some differences in size, shape and refinement are apparent between the collections. Statistics, diagrams, factor and cluster analyses suggest a technological evolution within the assemblages and therefore indicate the chronology of the sites. Compared with those of other known Indian sites, these handaxes may correspond to cultural stages ranging between early acheulian and very late acheulian or even early middle palaeolithic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , 1986 , pp. 189 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Armand, J., 1983. Archaeological excavation in Durkadi nala, an early palaeolithic pebble tool workshop in Central India. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Private Limited.Google Scholar
Banerjee, K. D., 1964. ‘Excavation at Gudiyam, district Chingleput (Tamil Nadu)’, Indian Archaeology — A review 63–64, 19.Google Scholar
Banerjee, K. D., 1965. ‘Excavation at Attirambakkam, district Chingleput (Tamil Nadu)’, Indian Archaeology — A review 64–65, 20.Google Scholar
Bhaskaran, M., Marathe, A. R., Rajaguru, S. N. and Somayajulu, B. L. K., 1986. ‘Geoarchaeology of palaeolithic cultures in the Hiran Valley, Saurashtra, India’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 13, 505–14.Google Scholar
Corvinus, G., 1967. ‘Acheulian occupation floor at Chirkion-Pravara in India’, Current Anthropol. 9, 216–18.Google Scholar
Corvinus, G., 1969. ‘Stratigraphy and geological background of an acheulian site at Chirki-on-Pravara, India’, Anthropos 64, 921–40.Google Scholar
Corvinus, G., 1970. ‘The acheulian workshop at Chirki-on-Pravara, Maharashtra’, Indian Antiquary 4 (1–4), 3–22.Google Scholar
Corvinus, G., 1973. ‘Excavation at an acheulian site at Chirki-on-Pravara, India’, in Hammond, N. (ed.), South asian archaeology, 13–28. New Jersey: Noyes Press.Google Scholar
Corvinus, G., 1983. A survey of the Pravara River system in western Maharashtra, India. Vol. 2: The excavations of the acheulean site of Chirki-on-Pravara, India. Tübingen: Verlag Archaeologica Venatoria, Institut für Urgeschichte der Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Djindjian, F. and de Croisset, E., 1976. ‘Étude typométrique d'une série de 200 bifaces moustériens de Tabarie (Dordogne) par l'analyse des données’, IXème Congrès de l'UISPP, Nice 1976, Thèmes Spècialisés, 38–52.Google Scholar
Doran, J. E. and Hodson, F. R., 1975. Mathematics and computers in archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gaillard, C., Raju, D. R., Misra, V. N. and Rajaguru, S. N., 1983. ‘Acheulian occupation at Singi-Talav in the Thar desert: a preliminary report on 1982 excavation’, Man and Environment 7, 112–31.Google Scholar
Gaillard, C., Misra, V. N., Rajaguru, S. N., Raju, D. R. and Raghavan, H., 1985 ‘Acheulian industry from Singi-Talav excavation in the Thar desert, India’, Bulletin of the Deccon College Research Institute 44, 141–52.Google Scholar
Joshi, R. V., 1978. Stone age cultures of Central India: Report of the excavations of rockshelters at Adamgarh, Madhya Pradesh. Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
Joshi, R. V. and Marathe, A. R., 1976. ‘Metrical analysis of handaxes from Chirki-on-Pravara (western Maharashtra)’, Puratattva 8, 3–12.Google Scholar
Joshi, R. V. and Marathe, A. R., 1977. ‘Correlation analysis of handaxes and cleavers and the functional interpretation’, Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute 37, 48–60.Google Scholar
Misra, V. N., 1967. Prehistory and protohistory of the Berach basin, south Rajasthan. Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
Misra, V. N., 1978. ‘The acheulian industry of rockshelter III F-23 at Bhimbetka, Central India: A preliminary survey’, Puratattva 8, 13–36.Google Scholar
Misra, V. N., Rajaguru, S. N., Raju, D. R., Raghavan, H. and Gaillard, C., 1982. ‘Acheulian occupation and evolving landscape around Didwana in the Thar desert, India’, Man and Environment 8, 72–86.Google Scholar
Paddayya, K., 1982. The acheulian culture of the Hunsgi valley (Peninsular India): A settlement system perspective. Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
Pappu, R. S., 1974. Pleistocene studies in the upper Krishna basin. Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
Raghavan, H., 1987. Quaternary geology of Nagaur District, Rajasthan. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to Poona University, Deccan College Library, Poona.Google Scholar
Raju, D. R., 1981. Early settlement patterns in Cuddapah district, Andhra Pradesh: A palaeoanthropological study. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to Poona University, Deccan College library, Poona.Google Scholar
Raju, D. R., 1986. ‘Handaxe assemblages from the Gunjana Valley, Andhra-Pradesh: a metrical analysis’, Bull. Indo-Pacific Prehist. Assoc. 6, 10–26.Google Scholar
Rao, V. V. M., 1979. Stone age cultures of Prakasham district, Andhra Pradesh. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to Andhra University (Waltair).Google Scholar
Reddy, K. T., 1968. The prehistory of Cuddapah district. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the University of Saugar, Deccan College library, Poona.Google Scholar
Roe, D. A., 1964. ‘The British lower and middle palaeolithic: some problems, methods of study and preliminary results’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 30, 245–67.Google Scholar
Roe, D. A., 1968. ‘British lower and middle palaeolithic handaxe groups’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 34, 1–82.Google Scholar
Roe, D. A., 1976. The Kalambo Falls large cutting tools: A metrical analysis, (manuscript).Google Scholar
Roe, D. A., 1982. The lower and middle Palaeolithic period in Britain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Roux, M., 1983. Datavision (Correspondance analysis and cluster analysis: Software for microcomputer Apple II). Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
Sankalia, H. D., 1974. Prehistory and protohistory of India and Pakistan. Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
Semans, C. A., 1981. ‘Analysis of an acheulian collection from Peera Nullah, Narmada valley, India’, Man and Environment 5, 13–31.Google Scholar
Singh, R., 1965. Palaeolithic industries of northern Bundelkhand. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to Poona University, Deccan College library, Poona.Google Scholar
Somayajulu, B. L. K., Baskaran, M., Marathe, A. R. and Rajaguru, S. N., 1983. ‘Dating Hiran valley mihohtes by U/Th: Implications to geoarchaeology’, International conference on Recent advances in Indian archaeology, Deccan College Research Institute, Poona, December 1983.Google Scholar
Supekar, S. G., 1968. Pleistocene stratigraphy and prehistoric archaeology of the central Narmada basin. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to Poona University, Deccan College Library, Poona Google Scholar