Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:12:42.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Earlier Neolithic Enclosures in North-West Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Alasdair Whittle
Alasdair Whittle
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Beaumont Street, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Enclosures with ditches and banks were a feature of Neolithic cultures in western Europe from the end of the Linear Pottery culture onwards, and seem to have served a wide variety of purposes within the settlement patterns and economic strategies based on mixed farming such as prevailed in the fourth and third millennia be (on the uncorrected radiocarbon chronology, used throughout). The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to draw attention to the earliest known examples in western Europe, belonging to the late Linear Pottery culture and to its immediate successors in what may be called the Linear Pottery culture tradition, to outline the variety of possible functions which these may have had, and to suggest that they are ancestral to subsequent enclosures in other parts of western Europe and particularly in southern England; second, to show that the enclosures of the earlier Neolithic of southern England may also, like their continental predecessors, have had varied roles, such that the hypothesis of ritual function is inadequate and even the label ‘causewayed camp’, like ‘henge’ or ‘hillfort’, cannot denote more than common constructional techniques.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 43 , December 1977 , pp. 329 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agache, R., 1971. ‘Camp néolithique à acces multiples découvert à L'Etoile (Somme)’, B.S.P.F., 68, 195–6.Google Scholar
Agache, R. 1974. ‘Informations archéologiques. Circonscription de Nord et Picardie’, Gallia Préhist., 17, 425–63.Google Scholar
Andersen, N. H., 1975. ‘Die neolithische Befestigungsanlage in Sarup auf Fünen (Dänemark)’, Archäol. Korrespond., 5, 11–14.Google Scholar
Ashbee, P., 1966. ‘The Fussell's Lodge Long Barrow Excavations 1957’, Arch., 100, 1–80.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. J. C., 1957. ‘Worms and Weathering’, Antiquity, 31, 219–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, M., Case, H. and Whittle, A., forthcoming, ‘Excavations at the Neolithic causewayed camp, Abingdon, Oxon., 1963–4’.Google Scholar
Bailloud, G., 1964. Le Néolithique dans le Bassin Parisien. Paris.Google Scholar
Blanchet, J.-C., 1974. ‘Datations radiocarbone du NÉOlithique chasseén du Bassin Parisien de Jonquiéres (Oise)’, B.S.P.F., 71, 107–9.Google Scholar
Blanchet, J.-C., and Petit, M., 1972. ‘L'habitat néolithique de Jonquières (Oise): premiers résultats’, B.S.P.F., 69, 389–407.Google Scholar
Brandt, K., 1960. ‘Einzaunungen an bandkeramischen und Altrössener Bauten’, Germania, 38, 418–23.Google Scholar
Brandt, K., 1967. Neolithische Siedlungspldtze im Stadtgebiet von Bochum. Quellenschriften zur westdeutschen Vor- und Frühgeschichte, Band 8, Bonn.Google Scholar
Brandt, K., and Beck, H., 1954. ‘Ein Grosshaus mit Rössener Keramik in Bochum-Hiltrop’, Germania, 32, 260–9.Google Scholar
Bremer, W., 1927. ‘Monsheim’, in Reallexicon der Vorgeschichte, 8, 284. Berlin.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D. R., 1961. ‘Cannibalism in Early Britain’. Antiquity, 31, 304–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnez, C., 1971. ‘L'origine et developpement du NÉOlithique dans le centre-ouest de la France’, In Lüning, J. (ed.), Die Anfdnge des Neolithikums vom Orient bis Nordeuropa, teil VI, 166–77. Köln-Vienna.Google Scholar
Burnez, C. and Case, H., 1966. ‘Les camps NÉOlithiques des Matignons à Juillac-le-Coq (Charente)’, Gallia Préhist., 9, 131–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttler, W. and Haberey, G., 1936. Die Bandkeramische Ansiedlung bei Köln-Lindenthal. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Calder, C. S. T., 1965. ‘Cairns, Neolithic Houses and Burnt Mounds in Shetland’, P.S.A.S., 96, 1962–1933, 37–86.Google Scholar
Case, H., 1956. ‘The Neolithic causewayed camp at Abingdon, Berks’, Ant. J., 36, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, H., 1969. ‘Settlement patterns in the North Irish Neolithic’, U.J.A., 32, 3–27.Google Scholar
Case, H., 1973. ‘A ritual site in North-East Ireland’. In Daniel, G. and Kjaerum, P. (ed.), Megalithic Graves and Ritual, 173–96. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications II, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Case, H., 1976. ‘Acculturation and the earlier Neolithic in western Europe’. In Laet, S. J. de (ed), Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe, 45–58. Dissertationes Archaeologicae Gandenses 16, Brugge.Google Scholar
Case, H. et al. , 1964/1965. ‘Excavations at City Farm, Hanborough, Oxon’, Oxon., 29/30, 1–98.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., Higgs, E. S. and Longworth, I. H., 1960. ‘Excavations at the Neolithic site at Hurst Fen, Mildenhall, Suffolk, 1954, 1957 and 1958’, PPS, 26, 202–45.Google Scholar
Cobbett, W., 1967. Rural Rides (1830). Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
Coles, J. M., Hibbert, F. A. and Orme, B. J., 1973. ‘Prehistoric Roads and Tracks in Somerset: 3. The Sweet Track’, PPS, 39, 256–93.Google Scholar
Colt Hoare, R., 1812. The Ancient History of South Wiltshire. London.Google Scholar
Colt Hoare, R., 1819. The Ancient History of North Wiltshire. London.Google Scholar
Connah, G., 1965. ‘Excavations at Knap Hill, Alton Priors, 1961’, Wilts. Arch. Nat. Hist. Mag., 60, 1–23.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. C., 1929. ‘Excavations in The Trundle, Goodwood, 1928’. Sussex Arch. Coll., 60, 33–85.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. C., 1931. ‘Excavations in The Trundle 1930’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 12, 100–49.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. C., 1934. ‘Excavations in Whitehawk Neolithic camp, Brighton 1932–3’, Ant. J., 14, 99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curwen, E. C., 1936. ‘Excavations in Whitehawk Camp, Brighton, third season 1935’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 77, 60–92.Google Scholar
Dimbleby, G. W., 1965. ‘The Buried Soil under Outer Bank V and Pollen Analysis’. In Smith, I. F., Windmill Hill and Avebury, 34–8. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dimbleby, G. W. and Evans, J. G., 1974. ‘Pollen and Land Snail Analysis of Calcareous Soils’, J. Arch. Set., 1. 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. W., 1971. Crickley Hill Third Report. Gloucestershire College of Art, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. W., 1972. ‘Crickley Hill 1969–71’, Antiquity, 46, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, J., 1971. ‘Neue Untersuchungen im Michelsberger Erdwerk von Mayen’, Archäol. Korrespond., I, 97–100.Google Scholar
Eckert, J., Ihmig, M., Kuper, R., Löhr, R. and Lüning, J., 1972. ‘Untersuchungen zur neolithischen Besiedlung der Aldenhovener Platte’, Bonn, Jahrb., 171, 558–664.Google Scholar
Evans, E. E., 1953. Lyles Hill. A Late Neolithic site in Co. Antrim. Belfast.Google Scholar
Evans, E. E., 1957. Irish Folk Ways. London.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G., 1972. Land Snails in Archaeology. London.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G. and Limbrey, S., 1974. ‘The experimental earthwork on Morden Bog, Wareham, Dorset, England, 1963 to 1972’, PPS, 40, 170–202.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G. and Smith, I. F., 1967. ‘Cherhill’, C.B.A. Group 12 and 13 Arch. Rev., 2, 8–9.Google Scholar
Farruggia, J. P., Kuper, R., Lüning, J. and Stehli, P., 1973. ‘Untersuchungen zur neolithischen Besiedlung der Aldenhovener Platte’, Bonn, Jahrb., 173, 226–56.Google Scholar
Günther, K., 1973a. ‘Eine neue Variante des mittelneolithischen Trapezhauses’, Germania, 51, 41–53.Google Scholar
Günther, K., 1973b. ‘Die Abschlussuntersuchung am Neolithischen Grabenring von Bochum-Hiltrop’, Archäol. Korrespond., 3, 181–6.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J., 1935. ‘The place of origin of the Windmill Hill Culture’, PPS, I, 127–9.Google Scholar
Hingst, H., 1971. ‘Ein befestigtes Dorf aus der Jungsteinzeit in Budelsdorf (Holstein)’, Archäol. Korrespond., 1, 191–4.Google Scholar
Holden, E. W., 1973. ‘The possible remains of a Neolithic causewayed camp on Offham Hill, Hamsey, near Lewes’, Sussex Arch. Coll., III, 109–110.Google Scholar
Houlder, C. H., 1963. ‘A Neolithic Settlement on Hazard Hill, Tomes’, Trans. Dev. Arch. Explor. Soc., 21, 2–31.Google Scholar
Hubert, F., 1971a. ‘Fossès NÉOlithiques à Spiennes’, Arch. Belg., 136.Google Scholar
Hubert, F., 1971b. ‘Neue Ausgrabungen im Michelsberger Erdwerk in Boitsfort (Belgien)’, Germania, 49, 214–8.Google Scholar
Ihmig, M., Kuper, R. and Schröter, I., 1971. ‘Ein grossgartacher Erdwerk in Langweiler, Kr. Jülich’, Germania, 49, 193–6.Google Scholar
Jarvis, M. G., 1973. Soils of the Wantage and Abingdon District. Memoirs of the Soil Survey of Great Britain, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Jewell, P. A., 1963. The Experimental Earthwork on Overton Down, Wilts, 1960. British Association for the Advancement of Science, London.Google Scholar
Jewell, P. A. and Dimbleby, D. W., 1966. ‘The experimental earthwork on Overton Down, Wiltshire, England: The First Four Years’, PPS, 32, 313–42.Google Scholar
Joffroy, R., ‘Informations archeologiques. Circonscription de Champagne-Ardenne’, Gallia Préhist., 15, 399–411.Google Scholar
Kuper, R. and Piepers, W., 1966. ‘Ein Siedlung der Rossener Kultur in Inden und Lamersdorf’, Bonn. Jahrb., 166, 370–6.Google Scholar
Kuper, R., Löhr, H., Lüning, J. and Stehli, P., 1974. ‘Untersuchungen zur neolithischen Besiedlung der Aldenhovener Platte 4’, Bonn. Jahrb., 174, 424–508.Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., 1927. ‘A Neolithic site at Abingdon, Berkshire’, Ant. J., 7, 438–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, E. T. 1928, ‘A Neolithic site at Abingdon, Berkshire’, Ant. J., 8, 461–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, H., 1912. ‘Prähistorische Ansiedlungen bei Plaidt an der Nette’, Bonn. Jahrb., 112, 271–310.Google Scholar
Liddell, D. M., 1931. ‘Report on the Excavations at Hembury Fort, Devon (second season, 1931)’, Proc. Dev. Arch. Explor. Soc., 1, 90–119.Google Scholar
Liddell, D. M., 1932. ‘Report on the Excavations at Hembury Fort, Devon (third season 1932)’, Proc. Dev. Arch. Explor. Soc., 1, 162–90.Google Scholar
Liddell, D. M., 1934–1935. ‘Report on the Excavations at Hembury Fort, Devon (fourth and fifth seasons 1934 and 1935)’, Proc. Dev. Arch. Explor. Soc., 2, 135–75.Google Scholar
Limbrey, S., 1975. Soil Science and Archaeology. London.Google Scholar
Lüning, J., 1967. ‘Die Michelsberger Kultur, ihre Funde in Zeitlicher und Raumlicher Gliederung’, Ber. Rom-Germ. Komm., 48, 1–350.Google Scholar
Lüning, J., 1971. ‘Das Experiment im Michelsberger Erdwerk in Mayen’, Archäol. Korrespond., 1, 95–6.Google Scholar
Lüning, J., 1974. ‘Das Experiment im Michelsberger Erdwerk in Mayen’, Archäol. Korrespond., 4, 125–131.Google Scholar
Maier, R. A., 1962. ‘Fragen zur neolithischen Erdwerken Sudbayerns’, Jahresbericht der Bayerischen Bodendenkmalpflege, 5–21.Google Scholar
Manby, T. G., 1963. ‘Excavation of the Willerby Wold long barrow’, PPS, 29, 173–205.Google Scholar
Manby, T. G., 1970. ‘Longbarrows of northern England. Structural and Dating Evidence’, S.A.F., 2, 1–27.Google Scholar
Mercer, R., 1974. ‘Cam Brea’, Curr. Arch., 4, 360–5.Google Scholar
Mercer, R., 1975. ‘Hambledon Hill’, Curr. Arch., 5, 16–18.Google Scholar
Modderman, P. J. R., 1970. ‘Linearbandkeramik aus Elsloo und Stein’, Analecta Leidensia Praehist., 3.Google Scholar
Modderman, P. J. R., 1976. ‘The Aveburys and their continental counterparts’. In Megaw, J. V. S. (ed.), To Illustrate The Monuments; Essays on Archaeology presented to Stuart Piggott, London, 99–106.Google Scholar
Mordant, C. and D., 1972. ‘L'enceinte néolithique de Noyen-sur-Seine (Seine-et-Marne)’, B.S.P.F., 69, 554–69.Google Scholar
Musson, R., 1950. ‘An Excavation at Combe Hill camp near Eastbourne 1949’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 89, 105–16,Google Scholar
O'Kelly, M. J., 1972. ‘Further Radiocarbon Dates from Newgrange, Co. Meath, Ireland’, Antiquity, 46 226–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Riordain, S. P., 1954. ‘Lough Gur excavations. Neolithic and Bronze Age houses on Knockadoon’, P.R.I.A., 56, C, 297–459.Google Scholar
Palmer, R., 1976. ‘Interrupted ditch enclosures in Britain: the use of aerial photography for comparative studies’, PPS, 42, 161–86.Google Scholar
Petréquin, P., 1970. La Grotte de la Baume de Gonvillars. Paris.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. W., 1934. ‘The excavation of the Giants' Hills long barrow, Skendleby, Lines’, Arch., 85, 37–106.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. W., 1935. ‘A Reexamination of the Therfield Heath long barrow, Royston, Herts’, PPS, 1, 101–7.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1937. ‘Excavation of a long barrow in Holdenhurst Parish, near Christchurch, Hants’, PPS, 3, 1–14.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1952. ‘The Neolithic camp on Whitesheet Hill, Kilmington Parish’. Wilts. Arch. Nat. Hist. Mag., 54. 404–10.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1954. The Neolithic Cultures of the British Isles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1962. The West Kennet Long Barrow: Excavations 1955–6. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1972. ‘The beginning of the Neolithic in the British Isles’. In Lüning, J., (ed)., Die Anfänge des Neolithikums vom Orient bis Nordeuropa, teil 7, 217–32. Köln-Vienna.Google Scholar
Pryor, F., 1974. Excavation at Fengate, Peterborough, England. The First Report. Royal Ontario Museum Archaeology Monograph 3.Google Scholar
Robertson-Mackay, R., 1965. ‘The Primary Neolithic Settlement in southern England: some new aspects’. In Atti del 6 Congresso Internazionale delle Scienze Prehistoriche e Protohiststoriche, 319–23. Rome.Google Scholar
Ross Williamson, R. P., 1930. ‘Excavations in Whitehawk Neolithic Camp near Brighton’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 71, 57–96.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England), 1970, Inventory of Historical Monuments in the County of Dorset: Central Dorset, vol. 3, pt. 1. H.M.S.O., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
St Joseph, J. K., 1973. ‘Air reconnaissance: recent results, 31’, Antiquity, 47, 236–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, I. F., 1959. ‘Excavations at Windmill Hill, Avebury, Wilts, 1957–8’, Wilts. Arch. Nat. Hist. Mag., 57, 149–62.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F., 1965. Windmill Hill and Avebury. Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F., 1966. ‘Windmill Hill and its implications’, Palaeohistoria, 12, 469–81.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F., 1971. ‘Causewayed enclosures’. In Simpson, D. D. A., (ed.), Economy and Settlement in Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Britain and Europe, 89–112. Leicester.Google Scholar
Tackenberg, K., 1951. Die Beusterburg. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Thomas, N., 1964. ‘The Neolithic causewayed camp at Robin Hood's Ball, Shrewton’, Wilts. Arch. Nat. Hist. Mag., 59, 1–27.Google Scholar
Wagner, F., 1928. ‘Prehistoric fortifications in Bavaria’, Antiquity, 2, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G. J., 1972. ‘The Excavation of a Neolithic settlement on Broome Heath, Ditchingham, Norfolk, England’, PPS, 38, 1–97.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J., 1973. ‘The excavation of Prehistoric and Romano-British settlements at Eaton Heath, Norwich’, Arch. J., 130, 1–43.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J. and Donaldson, P., 1972. ‘Ritual shafts and wells: a Neolithic settlement near Norwich’, Antiquity, 46, 231–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R. E. M., 1943. Maiden Castle, Dorset. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. W. R., 1976. The Earlier Neolithic of southern England and its continental contacts. Unpublished D.Phil, thesis, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., 1953. ‘Clegyr Boia, St Davids (Pemb.): excavation in 1943’, Arch. Camb., 102, 20–47.Google Scholar
Williams, J., 1974. ‘Hardingstone, Briar Hill’, Northants. Archaeol., 9, 84.Google Scholar
Willock, E. H., 1936. ‘A Neolithic site on Haldon’, Proc. Dev. Arch. Explor. Soc., 2, 244–63.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. R., 1975. “Causewayed camps' and ‘interrupted ditch systems’”, Antiquity, 49, 178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. and Linton, D. L., 1933. ‘The loam terrains of south-east England and their relation to its early history’, Antiquity, 7, 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar