Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:22:45.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between Mountains and Sea: a Reconsideration of the Neolithic Monuments of South-west Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Vicki Cummings
Vicki Cummings
Affiliation:
School of History & Archaeology, Cardiff University, PO Box 909, Cardiff CF10 3XU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For many years the chambered tombs of south-west Scotland were considered important in understanding the origins of monumentality in Britain. In particular scholars focused on the classification of these monuments in order to understand how ideas about the Neolithic may have spread along and across the Irish Sea. However, the classification of these monuments may be rather more problematic than was once imagined. Among other things, the excavation of a number of them has revealed complex and diverse construction sequences. This paper presents the results of an examination of the landscape settings of the chambered tombs in south-west Scotland. It suggests that a landscape approach can assist in our understanding of the classification and use of these monuments. In addition, the setting of sites within the landscape can also inform us about the nature of the Neolithic in this region of Scotland.

Résumé

On a estimé pendant de nombreuses années que les tombes à couloir avaient un rôle important à jouer dans la compréhension des origines du mégalithisme en Grande-Bretagne. Les érudits se concentrèrent en particulier sur la classification de ces monuments afin de comprendre comment des idées néolithiques avaient pu se propager le long et au-delà de la mer d'Irlande. Cependant, la classification de ces monuments risque d'être bien plus problématique qu'on ne l'avait imaginé à un moment. Entre autres choses, l'excavation d'un certain nombre de ces monuments a révélé des séquences de construction diverses et complexes. Cette étude présente les résultats d'un examen de la situation des tombes à couloir dans le paysage du sudouest de l'Ecosse. On suggère qu'une approche par le biais du paysage peut nous aider à comprendre cette classification et l'usage fait de ces monuments. De plus, la situation des sites dans le paysage peut également nous renseigner sur la nature du néolithique dans cette région de l'Ecosse.

Resúmen

Durante muchos años se ha considerado que las tumbas megalíticas a cámara del suroeste de Escocia son importantes para comprender el desa los orígenes del fenómeno megalítico en Gran Bretaña. En particular, los estudiosos se concentraron en la clasificación de estos monumentos para entender los mecanismos de difusión de ideas en el neolítico a lo largo y a través del mar de Irlanda. Sin embargo, la clasificación de estos monumentos podría resultar bastante más problemática de lo que alguna vez podíamos imaginar. Entre otras cosas, la excavación de un número de estos monumentos ha revelado unas secuencias de construcción complejas y diversas. Este trabajo presenta los resultados de un examen de la posición en el paisaje de las tumbas megalíticas en el suroeste de Escocia. En él se sugiere que un enfoque que preste atención al paisaje puede ayudarnos a entender la clasificación y uso de estos monumentos. Además, el emplazamiento de estos sitos en el paisaje puede ser también una fuente de información sobre la naturaleza del neolítico en esta región de Escocia.

Zusammenfassung

Seit vielen Jahren werden die Kammergräber Südwestschottlands als wichtig für das Verständnis des Ursprungs von Monumentalität in Britannien erachtet. Die Forscher konzentrierten sich vor allem auf die Klassifikation dieser Monumente um zu verstehen, wie sich Vorstellungen vom Neolithikum entlang der Irischen See und über diese hinweg verbreitet haben mögen. Jedoch scheint die Klassifikation dieser Monumente deutlich problematischer zu sein als angenommen. Hierfür spricht unter anderem die Entdeckung komplexer und variabler Bauabfolgen bei den Ausgrabungen einer Reihe dieser Monumente. Dieser Artikel stellt die Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung der Kulturlandschaft der Kammergräber in Südwestschottland vor. Er geht davon aus, dass ein Landschaftsansatz das Verständnis der Klassifikation und des Gebrauchs dieser Monumente fördern kann. Darüber hinaus kann die Platzierung der Monumente innerhalb der Landschaft uns auch Hinweise auf die Natur des Neolithikums in diesem Teil Schottlands geben.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 68 , 2002 , pp. 125 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ashmore, W. & Knapp, B. 1999. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualized, ideational. In Ashmore, W. & Knapp, B. (eds), Archaeologies of Landscape: contemporary perspectives, 1–30. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Barnatt, J. 1989. Stone Circles of Britain. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 215Google Scholar
Bender, B. 1993. Introduction: landscape – meaning and action. In Bender, B. (ed.), Landscape: politics and perspectives, 1–17. Oxford: BergGoogle Scholar
Bergh, S. 1995. Landscape of the Monuments: a study of the passage tombs in the Cúil Irra region, Co. Sligo, Ireland. Stockholm: Riksantikvärieambetet Arkeologiska undesökningarGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M. 1995. The resurrection of the house amongst the Zafirmaniry of Madagascar. In Carsten, J. & Hugh-Jones, S. (eds), About the House; Levi-Strauss and beyond, 52–71. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1993. Altering the Earth. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1997. Rock Art and the Prehistory of Atlantic Europe: signing the land. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1998. The Significance of Monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Burl, A. 1995. A Guide to the Stone Circles of Britain, Ireland and Brittany. Yale: University PressGoogle Scholar
Burrow, S. 1997. The Neolithic Culture of the Isle of Man: a study of the sites and pottery. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 263Google Scholar
Burrow, S. 1999. The Ronaldsway pottery of the Isle of Man: a study of production, decoration, and use. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 65, 125–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1940. Prehistoric Communities of the British Isles. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Collins, A.P.E. 1976. Dooey's Cairn, Ballymacaldrack, County Antrim. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 39, 1–12Google Scholar
Cooney, G. 2000a. Coping with death, changing the landscape: people, place and histories in the Irish Neolithic. In Ritchie, A. (ed.), Neolithic Orkney in its European context, 247–58. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Cooney, G. 2000b. Landscapes of Neolithic Ireland. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Coope, G. & Garrad, L. 1988. The petrological identification of stone implements from the Isle of Man. In Clough, T.H. McK & Cummins, W. (eds), Stone Axe Studies Volume 2, 67–70. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 67Google Scholar
Corcoran, J.X.W.P. 1960. The Carlingford culture. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 26, 98–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, J.X.W.P. 1969a. The Cotswold-Severn group. 2. Discussion. In Powell, T.G.E., Corcoran, J.X.W.P., Lynch, F. & Scott, J.G.Megalithic Enquiries in the West of Britain, 72–104. Liverpool: University PressGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, J.X.W.P. 1969b. Excavation of two chambered cairns at Mid Gleniron Farm, Glenluce Wigtownshire. Transactions of the Dumfries and Galloway Natural History & Antiquarian Society 46, 31–90Google Scholar
Cormack, W. 1970. A Mesolithic site at Barsalloch, Wigtownshire. Transactions of the Dumfries and Galloway Natural History & Antiquarian Society 47, 63–80Google Scholar
Cormack, W. F. & Coles, J. 1968. A Mesolithic site at Low Clone, Wigtownshire. Transactions of the Dumfries and Galloway Natural History & Antiquarian Society 45, 44–72Google Scholar
Cummings, V. 2000a. Myth, memory and metaphor: the significance of place, space and the landscape in Mesolithic Pembrokeshire. In Young, R. (ed.), Mesolithic Lifeways: current research from Britain and Ireland, 87–95. Leicester: Leicester Archaeological MonographGoogle Scholar
Cummings, V. 2000b. The world in a spin: representing the Neolithic landscapes of South Uist. Internet Archaeology 8, http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue8/cummings_toc.html.Google Scholar
Cummings, V. 2001. Landscapes in Transition? Exploring the Origins of Monumentally in South-west Wales and South-west Scotland. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cardiff UniversityGoogle Scholar
Cummings, V. forthcoming. Mesolithic world-views of the landscape in western Britain. In Larsson, L. (ed.), Proceedings of the Mesolithic 2000 conference, Stockholm. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Cummings, V., Jones, A. & Watson, A. 2002. In between places: axial symmetry and divided space in the monuments of the Black Mountains, south-east Wales. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 12(1), 57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curle, A. 1930. Examination of a chambered cairn by the Water of Deugh, Stewartry of Kirkcudbright. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 64, 272–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, G.E. 1962. The megalith builders. In Piggott, S. (ed.), The Prehistoric Peoples of Scotland, 39–70. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Darvill, T. 2000. Neolithic Mann in context. In Ritchie, A. (ed.), Neolithic Orkney in its European context, 371–85. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. 1988. The evocative symbolism of trees. In Cosgrove, D. & Daniels, S. (eds), The Iconography of Landscape, 32–42. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
de Valera, R. 1960. The court cairns of Ireland. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 60, 9–140Google Scholar
Edwards, D. 1922. Excavations of Drannandow. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 57, 56–65Google Scholar
Edwards, K. 1996. The contribution of Tom Affleck to the study of the Mesolithic of southwest Scotland. In Pollard, T. & Morrison, A. (eds), The Early Prehistory of Scotland, 108–22. Edinburgh: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, K., Ansell, M. & Carter, B. 1983. New Mesolithic sites in south-west Scotland and their importance as indicators of inland penetration. Transactions of the Dumfries and Galloway Natural History & Antiquarian Society 58, 9–15Google Scholar
Eogan, G. 1986. Knowth and the Passage tombs of Ireland. London: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
Evans, E.E. 1938. Doey's Cairn, Dunloy, County Antrim. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 1, 59–78Google Scholar
Fleming, A. 1999. Phenomenology and the megaliths of Wales: a dreaming too far? Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18, 119–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. 1983. Land and Society in Neolithic Orkney. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 117Google Scholar
Fraser, S. 1998. The public forum and the space between: the materiality of social strategy in the Irish Neolithic. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 64, 203–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, P. & Pierpoint, S. 1980. Port Charlotte chambered cairn, Islay: an interim note. Glasgow Archaeological Journal 7, 113–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwell, B. 1998. The Ballynahatty complex. In Gibson, A. & Simpson, D.D.A. (eds), Prehistoric Ritual and Religion: essays in honour of Aubrey Burl, 32–44. Stroud: SuttonGoogle Scholar
Henshall, A. 1963. The Chambered Tombs of Scotland, volume one. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Henshall, A. 1972. The Chambered Tombs of Scotland, volume two. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Henshall, A. 1974. Scottish chambered tombs and long mounds. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), British Prehistory: a new outline, 137–63. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. 1995. Landscape: between place and space. In Hirsch, E. & O'Hanlon, M. (eds), The Anthropology of Landscape: perspectives on place and space, 1–29. Oxford: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, I. 1988. Megaliths: space, time and landscape – a view from the Clyde. Scottish Archaeological Review 5, 41–56Google Scholar
Hughes, I. 1991. Solway and Clyde: some comments. Scottish Archaeological Review 8, 33–4Google Scholar
Jardine, W. 1975. Chronology of the Holocene marine transgression and regression in south-west Scotland. Boreas 4, 173–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. 1999. Local colour: megalithic architecture and colour symbolism in Neolithic Arran. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18:4, 339–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, T. 1990. Ecological community and species attributes in Yolngu religious symbolism. In Willis, R. (ed.), Signifying Animals: human meaning in the natural world, 85–102. London: Unwin HymanGoogle Scholar
Kinnes, I. 1985. Circumstance not context: the Neolithic of Scotland as seen from outside. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 115, 15–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnes, I. 1992a. Balnagowan and after: the context of non-megalithic mortuary sites in Scotland. In Sharpies, N. & Sheridan, A. (eds), Vessels for the Ancestors, 83–103. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Kinnes, I. 1992b. Non-megalithic Long Barrows and Allied Structures in the British Neolithic. London: British MuseumGoogle Scholar
Masters, L. 1973. The Lochhill long cairn. Antiquity 47, 96–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, L. 1981a. Chambered tombs and non-megalithic barrows in Britain. In Evans, J., Cunliffe, B.W., Renfrew, C. (eds), Antiquity and Man, 161–76. London: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
Masters, L. 1981b. The Druid's Grave, Kyle and Carrick district, Strathclyde region: the rediscovery of a chambered tomb. Transactions of the Dumfries and Galloway Natural History & Antiquarian Society 56, 10–17Google Scholar
Morris, R. 1979. The Prehistoric Rock Art of Galloway and the Isle of Man. Poole: BlandfordGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. 1991. Megaliths again – a view from the Solway. Scottish Archaeological Review 8, 26–32Google Scholar
Murray, J. 1992. The Bargrennan group of chambered cairns: circumstance and context. In Sharpies, N. & Sheridan, A. (eds), Vessels for the Ancestors, 33–48. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. 1994. The Role of Monuments in the Neolithic of the South of Scotland. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Nash, G. (ed.) 1997. Semiotics of Landscape: archaeology of mind. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S661Google Scholar
Ovsyannikov, O. & Terebikhin, N. 1990. Sacred space in the culture of the Arctic regions. In Carmichael, D., Hubert, J., Reeves, B. & Schande, A. (eds), Sacred Sites, Sacred Places, 44–81. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. & Ramilisonina, . 1998. Stonehenge for the ancestors: the stones pass on the message. Antiquity 72, 308–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S. 1954. The Neolithic Cultures of the British Isles. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S. & Powell, T.G.E. 1949. The excavation of three Neolithic chambered tombs in Galloway. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 83, 103–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, T.G.E. 1969. The Neolithic in the west of Europe and megalithic sepulture: some points and problems. In Powell, T.G.E., Corcoran, J.X.W.P., Lynch, F. & Scott, J.G.Megalithic Enquiries in the West of Britain, 247–72. Liverpool: University PressGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1973a. Before Civilization. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1973b. Monuments, mobilization and social organization in Neolithic Wessex. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), Explanations of Culture Change – Models in Prehistory, 539–58. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1974. British prehistory: changing configurations. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), British Prehistory: a new outline, 1–40. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Richards, C. 1992. Doorways to another world: the Orkney-Cromarty chambered tombs. In Sharpies, N. & Sheridan, A. (eds), Vessels for the Ancestors, 62–76. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Richards, C. 1996a. Henges and water: towards an elemental understanding of monumentality and landscape in late Neolithic Britain. Journal of Material Culture 2, 313–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, C. 1996b. Monuments as landscape: creating the centre of the world in late Neolithic Orkney. World Archaeology 28(2), 190–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, M. 2000. A new look at the stable isotope evidence for the Mesolithic/Neolithic transition in coastal Europe. Unpublished paper given at the Mesolithic 2000 conference, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Saville, A. 1994. Exploitation of lithic resources for stone tools in earlier prehistoric Scotland. In Ashton, N. & David, A. (eds), Stories in Stone, 57–70. London: Lithic Studies SocietyGoogle Scholar
Saville, A. 1999. A cache of flint axeheads and other flint artefacts from Auchenhoan, near Campbeltown, Kintyre, Scotland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 65, 83–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulting, R. 1998a. Slighting the sea: stable isotope evidence for the transition to farming in northwestern Europe. Documenta Praehistorica 25, 203–18Google Scholar
Schulting, R. 1998b. Slighting the sea: the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition in northwest Europe. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Reading UniversityGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. 1969. The Clyde cairns of Scotland. In Powell, T.G.E., Corcoran, J.X.W.P., Lynch, F. & Scott, J.G., Megalithic Enquiries in the West of Britain, 175–222. Liverpool: University PressGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. 1992. Mortuary structures and megaliths. In Sharpies, N. & Sheridan, A. (eds), Vessels for the Ancestors, 104–19. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Sharpies, N. 1985. Individual and community: the changing role of megaliths in the Orcadian Neolithic. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 51, 59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, J. A. 1986. Porcellanite artefacts: a new survey. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 49, 19–32Google Scholar
Sheridan, J. A. 2000. Achnacreebeag and its French connections: vive the ‘Auld Alliance’. In Henderson, J. (ed.), The Prehistory and Early History of Atlantic Europe, 1–15. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S861Google Scholar
Sheridan, J.A., Cooney, G. & Grogan, E. 1992. Stone axe studies in Ireland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 389–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. & Lynch, F. 1987. Trefignath and Dindryfol: the excavation of two megalithic tombs in Anglesey. Bangor: Cambrian Archaeological AssociationGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1993. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In Bender, B. (ed.), Landscape: politics and perspectives, 19–48. Oxford: BergGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1998a. Holm, Dumfries: excavations 1998. Interimreport. http://www.arch.soton.ac.uk/Research/Dunragit/Holm98.htm.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1998b. Holywood cursus complex project 1997: interim report. Southampton: Southampton Interim ReportGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1998c. Pict's Knowe, Holywood and Holm. Current Archaeology 160, 149–60Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1999a. Excavations at Dunragit, Dumfries and Galloway, 1999. Interimreport. http://www.arch.soton.ac.uk/Research/Dunragit/Dunragit99.htm.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1999b. Understanding the Neolithic. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 2001. Neolithic enclosures: reflections on excavation in Wales and Scotland. In Darvill, T. & Thomas, J. (eds), Neolithic Enclosures in Atlantic Northwest Europe, 132–43. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford: BergGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. & Bennett, W. 2001. An archaeology of supernatural places: the case of west Penwith. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7, 335–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterman, D. 1965. The court cairn at Annaghmare, Co. Armagh. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 28, 3–46Google Scholar
Watson, A. 2000. Encircled Space: the experience of stone circles and henges in the British Neolithic. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Reading UniversityGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. 1997. Moving on and moving around: Neolithic settlement mobility. In Topping, P. (ed.), Neolithic Landscapes, 15–22. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar