Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2014
It may well seem presumptuous to attempt a fresh analysis of the Late Bronze Age in the Iberian peninsula, after the numerous contributions which the subject has received in recent years from Spanish archaeologists, and in view of the fact that the Civil War prevented the writer, when Maclver student in Iberian Archaeology, from visiting Spain at all. In fact he would not have dared to make such an analysis, if the recent output of well illustrated books and articles by Spanish archaeologists had not made study from a distance somewhat less hazardous. But the itinerary which political conditions in 1936–8 imposed on him—Portugal first, then south-western France and finally the Rhône basin—at least showed him an aspect of the Late Bronze Age in south-western Europe which is perhaps less obvious to archaeologists who look from Madrid and Barcelona with eyes trained in Central Europe.
Long ago Louis Siret was impressed by the typological lacuna between the copper and bronze implements of early forms in the Iberian peninsula and those which appeared to represent the second and last phase of the local bronze industry. He drew what most archaeologists now recognize to be the right conclusion, namely, that the Early Bronze Age industry of El Argar stagnated and was replaced at a relatively late date by an industry, which had passed through the earlier stages of its development elsewhere, but soon took on a strongly local character. In his recently enunciated Esquema Paletnológico de la Peninsula Iberica Professor Santa Olalla has taken account of this new conception.
page 128 note 1 Questions de Chronologie et d'Ethnographie Jbériques, pp. 420 ff.
page 128 note 2 2nd Edition, Seminario de Historia Primitiva del Hombre, Madrid, 1946.
page 128 note 3 Bosch-Gimpera, P., La Formación de los Pueblos de España, Mexico, 1945, pp. 102 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 128 note 4 Bosch-Gimpera, , Two Celtic Waves in Spain, Oxford, 1939Google Scholar.
page 130 note 1 See Appendix, p. 154.
page 130 note 2 Bulletino di Paletnologia Italiana, XLV, p. 218Google Scholar, pls. IX, X.
page 130 note 3 l.c., pl. X, 3; Ampurias, II, p. 105Google Scholar, fig. 23.
page 130 note 4 ib., p. 349, fig. 130.
page 130 note 5 Ant. Journ., 1939, p. 390Google Scholar, Pl. LXXXI; Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, 1933, p. 104Google Scholar, pl. IX).
page 130 note 6 ib., pp. 352 ff.
page 130 note 7 Bull. Soc. Pol. Morbihan, 1913, pp. 17 ff.Google Scholar, t.à.p.
page 133 note 1 Ebert, , Reallexikon, IV, pp. 344 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 133 note 2 Actas y Memorias de la Sociedad Española de Antropología, Etnografia y Prehistoria, 1934, pp. 223 ffGoogle Scholar. and Anuario de Prehistoria Madrileña, 1933–1935, pp. 73 ffGoogle Scholar. and 187 ff.
page 133 note 3 Ampurias, 1, pp. 138 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 133 note 4 e.g. Bosch-Gimpera, Two Celtic Waves; Olalla, Santa, Esquema, p. 68Google Scholar.
page 133 note 5 Del Castillo, Cultura del Vaso Campaniforme, Pls. XXX-XXXI (lower layer). Pls. XXXII–III (upper layer).
page 133 note 6 l.c., pp. 53, 62, Pls. IV–V.
page 134 note 1 l.c., pp. 344 ff.
page 134 note 2 Bulletino di Paletnologia Italiana, XLV, p. 218Google Scholar, pl. IX.
page 134 note 3 Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 1948, pp. 158 ff.Google Scholar, fig. 5.
page 134 note 4 Savory. l.c., p. 159, fig. 5.
page 134 note 5 p. 140 below and Ampurias, VI, p. 122Google Scholar.
page 134 note 6 Arch. Camb., 1941, pp. 148 fGoogle Scholar, figs. 3 and 6.
page 135 note 1 Ampurias, II, pp. 85 ff.Google Scholar, pl. VI.
page 135 note 2 Actas y Memorias de la Sociedad Española de Antropologia, Etnologia y Prehistoria, XVII, p. 163Google Scholar.
page 135 note 3 Memoria 110a de la Junta Superior de Excavaciones, 1929, pls. XI–XXXI.
page 135 note 4 Homenageni a Martins Sarmento, pp. 272 ff.; Trabalhos da Sociedade Portuguesa de Antropologia, VIII, 1935Google Scholar.
page 135 note 5 The material is in the museum at Vilanova da Gaia, Oporto.
page 138 note 1 Ampurias, II, pp. 85 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 138 note 2 Actas y Memorias de la Sociedad Española de Antropología, Etnología y Prehistoria, 1947, pp. 158 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 140 note 1 l.c., pl. XVIII 1–3.
page 140 note 2 Ampurias, V, pp. 260 ff.Google Scholar, Pl. 1 a.
page 140 note 3 Memoria 101a de la Junta Superior de Excavaciones, 1928.
page 140 note 4 Ampurias, VII–VIII, pp. 115 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 140 note 5 Ampurias, V, pp. 260 ff.Google Scholar, VI, pp. 97 ff.; VII-VIII, pp. 115 ff.
page 140 note 6 Vilaseca, S., Acta Arqueologica Hispanica, 1Google Scholar.
page 140 note 7 Santa Olalla, Esquema, pl. XXXI.
page 140 note 8 l.c., p. 99.
page 141 note 1 S. G. Salas, El Castro de Yecla, pl. XIX.
page 141 note 2 Ampurias, II, p. 140Google Scholar, fig. 60.
page 141 note 3 Ampurias, VII–VIII, pp. 157 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 141 note 4 Revue Archéologique, 4s., XIX (1912)Google Scholar; Gallia, I and IV; and Peyniau, , Découvertes Archéologiques dans le Pays de Buch (Gascony)Google Scholar; Morel, , Sépultures Tumulaires de la Région de Freyssinel, pp. 59 ff.Google Scholar; Héléna, , Les Origines de Narbonne, pp. 115 ff.Google Scholar; Gallia, IV, p. 331 (Languedoc)Google Scholar.
page 141 note 5 e.g. in Lozére, see Morel, l.c.
page 144 note 1 Bol. Real. Ac. Gallega, XVI, pp. 3 ffGoogle Scholar.