Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:34:07.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Presidential Address

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Get access

Extract

Let me congratulate you on the formation of this Society. It is high time that here in England we should begin to draw together, in one district at any rate, those who are interesting themselves in the absorbing but difficult study of the early ages of the human race before the dawn of history.

There can be no question but that of late years our country has dropped behind some of its neighbours in the attention paid to the subject, and it is time that we began to wake up. Forty years ago we were in the forefront. Evans was producing his immortal work on the “Ancient Stone Implements of Great Britain.” Christy, in collaboration with his great French confrere Lartet, was carrying out the investigations in the cave deposits of Dordogne which weie the principal foundation for the generalisations of Gabriel de Mortillet, that, with many additions due to French workers, hold their own to-day. Lartet and Christy's work was summed up in the important volume of “Reliquiae Aquitanicae,” published in 1875. Pengelley was carrying on his masterly investigation of the deposits in Kent's Cavern at Torquay; whilst Boyd Dawkins was, with others, digging in Hie caves of Derbyshire and Yorkshire, and proving the existence thus far North of the cave-men of Palaeolithic age, hitherto associated chiefly with the Dordogne district.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 13 note * Since this address was given, but while it was being finally prepared for the press, comes the remarkable article by M. l'Abbé Breuil in the number of “L'Anthropologie” for July and August, 1910, on pseudoeoliths from eocene gravels. The same logical fallacy runs through this article. Far be it from me to assert or to deny the possible existence of eocene man, but M. l'Abbé Breuil seems to me to fall very far short of a convincing proof that all the chipped flints in the gravel in question owed their origin to the single cause he invokes, viz., to the weight of the superincumbent beds. Mr. Moir's article on “Sub-crag Man,” in the present number of our Proceedings, comes in very àpropos in this interesting and important discussion.