Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:22:33.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Flaking and Flake Characteristics of a Pre-Red Crag Rostro-Carinate Flint Implement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Get access

Extract

It is now some considerable time since the attention of the archæological world was directed to the discovery of a series of flint implements of a peculiar and novel type to which Sir Ray Lankester gave the descriptive name rostro-carinate. These particular implements, as their name implies, bear, in their anterior region, a marked resemblance to the beak of an accipitrine bird, and also to the prow of a boat, the boat being turned keel upwards. Both Sir Ray Lankester and the author have, from time to time, published papers on these specimens (1), and the latter has lately put forward reasons for believing that the rostro-carinate was the ancestral form of, and gradually developed into, the well-known Chellian palæolithic implements of rhomboidal section (2). Since the first discovery of these beak-like flaked flints, and the spreading abroad of a knowledge of their characteristics, a number of similar specimens have been found in parts of England other than Suffolk and Norfolk, where they were first discovered, and it may be said that the fact of their occurrence over a very wide area is established. The author has seen and examined rostro-carinate flint implements from Warren Hill, Suffolk; the Thames and Lea Valleys (3); Lakenheath, Suffolk (4); Savernake, Wiltshire (5); Selsey Bill, Sussex; Kent's Cavern; the North of Ireland; France and Egypt (6). Dr. Peake has also described and figured rostro-carinate implements found by him in Oxfordshire (7). It must not be imagined, however, that all the specimens from the aforementioned places are of the same age, for it is clear that the “fashion” of making rostrocarinates, though very much in vogue in Pliocene and early Pleistocene times, was not confined solely to these periods, but occurs sporadically in later cultures. And this is in accord with what we know of the occurrence of other types of flint implements.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LIST OF REFERENCES

(1). Moir, J. Reid.— “The flint implements of sub-Crag man.” “Proc. Prehist. Soc. of East Anglia,” Vol. I., Part I, pp. 1743,Google Scholar
On the further discoveries of flint implements beneath the base of the Red Crag of Suffolk.” “Proc. Prehist. Soc. of East Anglia,” Vol. I., Part I., pp. 1231.Google Scholar
SirLankester, E. Ray.— “On the discovery of a novel type of flint implements.” “Phil. Trans., Series B.,” Vol. CCII., pp. 283336.Google Scholar
(2). Moir, J. Reid.— “On the evolution of the earliest palaDoliths from the rostro-carinate implements.” “Jour. Royal Anth. Inst.,” Vol. XLVI., January to June, 1916, pp. 197220.Google Scholar
“The relationship of the most ancient flint implements to the later river-drift palseoliths.” “Science Progress,” No. 45, July, 1917, pp. 8396. “Nature,” December 27th, 1917, beingthe abstract of a paper read before the Royal Society.Google Scholar
(3). Moir, J. Reid.— “On the evolution of the earliest palæoliths from the rostro-carinate implements.” “Jour. Roy. Anth. Inst.,” Vol. XLVI., January to June, pp. 197220.Google Scholar
(4). SirLankester, E. Ray.— “On the discovery of a novel type of flint implements.” “Phil. Trans., Series B,” Vol. CCII., pp. 283336.Google Scholar
(5). Moir, J. Reid.— “Nature.” December 27th, 1917.Google Scholar
(6). Moir, J. Reid.— “Some flint implements of rostro-carinate form from Egypt.” “Man,” Vol. XVIII., No. I., pp. 36.Google Scholar
(7). Peake, A. E.— “A prehistoric site at Kimble, S. Bucks.” “Proc. Prehist. Soc. of East Anglia.” Vol. II., Part III., pp. 437458.Google Scholar
(8). SirLankester, E. Ray.— “Description of the Test Specimen of the rostro-carinate industry found beneath the Norwich Crag.” “Roy. Anth. Inst., Occasional Papers,” No. 4, 1914.Google Scholar
(9). Moir, J. Reid.— “The making of a rostro-carinate flint implement.” “Nature,” Nov. 21st, 1912, p. 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
On the evolution of the earliest palæoliths from the rostro-carinate implements” “Journ. Roy. Anth. Inst.,” Vol. XLVI., January to June, 1916, pp. 197220.Google Scholar
(10). Moir, J. Reid.— “The natural fracture of flint and its bearing upon rudimentary flint implements.” “Proc. Prehist. Soc. of East Anglia,” Vol. I., part II., pp. 171184.Google Scholar
Some details of flint fracture,” “Proc. Prehist. Soc. of East Anglia,” Vol. I., Part IV., pp. 442445.Google Scholar
(11). Moir, J. Reid.— “On the further discoveries of flint implements beneath the base of the Red Crag of Suffolk.” “Proc. Prehist. Soc. of East Anglia,” Vol. II., Part I., pp. 1231.Google Scholar
(12). Moir, J. Reid.— “The natural fracture of flint and its bearing upon rudimentary flint implements.” “Proc. Prehist. Soc. of East Anglia,” Vol. I., Part II., pp. 171184.Google Scholar
Some details of flint fracture.” “Proc. Prehist. Soc. of East Anglia,” Vol. I., Part IV., pp. 442445.Google Scholar
“Flint fracture and flint implements.” “Science Progress,” No. 41, July, 1916, pp. 3750.Google Scholar