No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Early Settlement at Runcton Holme, Norfolk
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2013
Extract
The antiquities here described came to light in the course of commercial gravel digging, but though we lack stratigraphical information they appear to be of sufficient importance in themselves to be worthy of accurate record. It is entirely due to the efforts and care of Mr. Ivan Thatcher, of King's Lynn, that they were recovered at all and we would like to thank him for the great trouble he has taken to see that as much as possible became available for study. Through his generosity the greater part of the Beaker pottery and also the figured sherds of the Early Iron Age and Romano-British periods are now in the University Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Cambridge. Messrs.F. B. and G. W. Gorbould, the lessees of the pit, have co-operated patiently in the preservation of Antiquities from the site, and Mr. J. R. Gorboud has also been very helpful. We have also to thank Miss Feetham for placing a Beaker (No. 2) on deposit in the same museum. Mr. Cockle of Lynn, kindly allowed the jet bead to be drawn. Finally we have to thank Mr. L. C. G. Clarke, F.S.A., and Miss O' Reilly of the Cambridge Museum for granting facilities for studying the objects in their charge.
Runcton Holme is situated some six miles due south of King's Lynn and about a mile to the east of the river Ouse. The exact position of the site is shown by Fig. 1. It consists of a low gravel promontory averaging about 20 feet above O.D. (Newlyn) and overlooking a vast expanse of Fenland. The marginal character of the site is illustrated by the fact that, but for the embanking of the Ouse, high spring tides would approach it quite closely. There appear to have been two main periods of early settlement on the site, Peterborough-Beaker and Early Iron Age-Romano-British, with an interval roughly speaking of a millenium when, so far as we can tell, it was abandoned. Whether this gap is a real one and whether in which case it was due to some natural cause, we cannot on the evidence before us decide. It will, however, be instructive to observe whether other sites discovered in the future on this gravel edge reveal a similar break in human occupation. The objects dating from the first occupation are briefly described in this paper, while the later occupation which accounts for the bulk of the archaeological material is dealt with by Mr. Christopher Hawkes, F.S.A. , of the British Museum.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1933
References
page 199 note 1 Thus the highest recorded tide at Denver Sluice is 17.51 feet O.D. (Liverpool) or 16.26 feet O.D. (Newlyn).
page 200 note 1 Antiquity, III, (1929) 283 ff.Google Scholar
page 200 note 2 Cunnington, M. E., The Pottery from the Long Barrow at West Kennet, Devizes, 1927Google Scholar.
page 200 note 3 Excavations in Cranborne Chase, IV, Pl. 294Google Scholar, Fig. 3.
page 201 note 1 It will be observed that the restoration of the decoration is not accurate in some details. Thus the restored triangles immediately above the greatest diameter of the pot are represented wrongly as cross hatched.
page 201 note 2 Archaeologia, LXII, p. 338Google Scholar, Fig. 5, etc.