Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:34:29.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of herbal supplements and nutritional supplements in the UK: what do we know about their pattern of usage?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2007

M. R. Ritchie*
Affiliation:
The Herbal Medicine Research Unit, School of Life Sciences, Napier University, Edinburgh EH9 2TB, UK
*
Corresponding author: Dr Margaret R. Ritchie, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within the last decade there has been a dramatic increase in the sale and use of herbal supplements and food supplements by Western populations and within the UK. This increased usage has coincided with a resurgence of interest in nutritional therapy and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies, such as herbal medicine, naturopathy and homeopathy, in which therapists may provide dietary advice and advocate the use of food or herbal supplements. The rise in the use of CAM therapies by the UK population can be attributed to several factors, including: promotion via health programmes and the media; a change in public attitudes; training of more nutritional and CAM therapists as a result of the increased availability of courses; a greater use of CAM and food and herbal supplements, particularly by patients with cancer. The aim of the present paper is to identify the pattern of usage of food and herbal supplements in the UK.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2007

Abbreviation:
CAM

complementary and alternative medicine

Over the last 10 years there has been a substantial rise in the use of herbal supplements and food supplements by Western populations and those living in the UK(Reference Craig1). Evidence of this increase in the UK is reflected in sales of herbal remedies, which have increased from £27×106 in 1991 to £38×106 by 1996(Reference Mintel2). This increased usage has coincided with a resurgence of interest in nutritional therapy and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies, such as herbal medicine, naturopathy and homeopathy, in which therapists may provide dietary advice and advocate the use of food or herbal supplements.

Factors that influence the pattern of usage of food and herbal supplements may include fashion trends, media and politics, affluence, friends and family, the type of disease, education, geography and public opinion. The prevalence of CAM in recent literature represents a level of health consumer activity that is substantial; for example, it has been reported that 25% of the UK population and 50–70% of the populations in France and Germany use CAM(Reference Fisher and Ward3). It can be assumed that patients who use CAM are more likely to demonstrate increased usage of herbal and nutritional supplements.

The current popularity of the use of CAM may be increasing as a result of increased interest in the use of therapies that are perceived as more ‘traditional’. Within the UK the most popular types of CAM are herbal medicine and homeopathy, probably because of their association with plant products(4). Nutrition has been associated with health and healing from as far back as 400BC when Hippocrates identified a relationship between food and health(Reference Hippocrates5) and advocated that ‘Food be medicine and medicine be food’. Herbal medicine may be regarded as traditional; its use has been reported as being as early as 2800BC(Reference Fleming6).

Promotion via health programmes and the media

More recently, programmes that have raised public awareness about nutrition have included school-based initiatives such as the Scottish Executive's ‘Hungry for Success’ campaign(7), which involves a whole-school approach to school meals in Scotland.

While political initiatives can increase public awareness about health issues, including nutrition (a direct consequence of which can be increased use of food supplements), the role of the media can also have a substantial impact on public behaviour. The media appear to favour CAM therapies, and several recent articles have promoted the role of plant compounds and traditional therapies in health care, highlighting, for example, the use of herbal remedies such as bog myrtle (Myrica gale)(Reference Smith8) and the use of Chinese medicine in cancer therapy(9). Media reports emphasising some of the side effects of drug treatments, such as hormone-replacement therapy increasing the risk of ovarian cancer(Reference Moss10) and breast cancer(Reference Womersley11), may encourage more of the population to seek the use of CAM therapies or herbal alternatives.

Celebrity behaviour may also affect the pattern of supplement use by the general public. In a collection of contemporary accounts of celebrity use of CAM from articles published during 2005 and 2006, a total of thirty-eight celebrities are quoted as using a variety of therapies including homoeopathy, acupuncture and ayurveda(Reference Ernst and Pittler12). The authors suggest that some consumers use CAM in order to imitate their idols.

Changes in public attitudes

Increases in general affluence and improvements in living standards have resulted in a greater investment in health care and healthcare products by the UK population. The National Health Service costs are £74×109/year, which includes a budget of £10×109 for expenditure on drugs. In addition, consumers spend £10×109 on medicines and private health care and, interestingly, approximately £1.6×109/year on CAM(Reference Ernst and White13). The willingness of the general public to invest in CAM and related supplements is reflected in the substantial increase in sales of herbal remedies between 1991 and 1996(Reference Mintel2). Within the UK it is estimated that spending on CAM will increase by 50% every 5 years(Reference Thomas, Nicoll and Coleman14). The increase in popularity and use of herbal supplements was evidenced further by the report of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society(15). The evidence presented to the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology demonstrates a 50% increase in sales of herbal products between 1994 and 1998(4).

The prevalence of CAM in recent literature represents a level of health consumer activity that is substantial; for example, it has been reported that 20% of the UK population have used CAM(Reference Ernst16) with an average expenditure of £14.00 per month. While a smaller percentage of the population in the UK uses CAM as compared with populations in France and Germany(Reference Fisher and Ward3), the percentage within the UK is increasing annually, as is the number of individuals using supplements.

Therapy use among specific patient groups

There is increasing use of CAM among children(Reference Ernst and Cassileth17), which may be attributable to a greater desire by parents to minimise the amount of drugs to which children are exposed, or a greater parental awareness of CAM therapies that may be beneficial for children.

Patients who suffer from cancer are more likely to choose CAM(Reference Scott18, Reference Shen, Anderson, Albert, Wenger, Glaspy, Cole and Shekelle19); indeed, it has been suggested(Reference Ernst and Cassileth17, Reference Richardson, Sanders, Palmer, Greisinger and Singletary20) that 32–70% of patients with cancer use CAM. It can be assumed that these patients are also more likely to use considerable amounts of food and herbal supplements. A survey has reported that in 1998 70% of hospitals in England offered one or more CAM therapies to patients, especially those with cancer(Reference Scott18). Another group who may be more inclined to use CAM and demonstrate an increase in the use of supplements are patients suffering from hepatitis C. There is an active hepatitis C programme in Ireland that offers support to patients suffering from hepatitis C, some of whom may be co-infected with HIV. Patients participating in support groups are more likely to use CAM and supplementation (M Ritchie, unpublished results).

Data collected during the 1994 Canadian National Population Health Study, have identified a group of individuals who are more likely to use CAM. It is not surprising to note that this group tends to contain more females, those who are younger to middle-aged, affluent and more educated(21). A similar trend would also be expected in the UK. While patients with cancer tend to be greater users of CAM(Reference Scott18, Reference Shen, Anderson, Albert, Wenger, Glaspy, Cole and Shekelle19) and of herbal and food supplements, females suffering from breast cancer are among some of the highest users of CAM(Reference Richardson, Sanders, Palmer, Greisinger and Singletary20, Reference Rees22).

Research on nutrition and phytochemicals

Research and education within universities and colleges of further education have resulted in increased public awareness about the potential effects of nutrition and phytochemicals. In addition to phytochemicals, plants contain ≥12 000 natural chemicals(Reference Mazur and Adlercreutz23, Reference Mazur and Adlercreutz24). There are about 400 potentially-useful plant compounds currently under investigation via phase I, phase II and phase III trials. At least 4000 flavones have been identified(Reference Mazur and Adlercreutz23). One serving of vegetables contains >100 different phytochemicals(Reference Surh25). Databases of the phytochemical content of a variety of foods have been published(Reference Ritchie, Cummings, Morton, Steel, Bolton-Smith and Riches26).

The emphasis on disease prevention(Reference Cummings and Bingham27) has been another method of raising public awareness about the importance of nutrition.

Specialist training programmes

The increased use of CAM therapies by the UK population may also be a result of the greater availability of specialist training courses (one professional training programme for medical herbalists in 1991 has increased to seven institutions currently offering BSc degrees in herbal medicine), and therefore more qualified nutritional and CAM therapists. There are approximately sixty-one complementary medicine courses in universities in the UK, which include nutritional therapy, homeopathy, herbal medicine and naturopathy.

Interestingly, in 2000 there were approximately 50 000 CAM practitioners of whom 10 000 were registered(Reference Mills and Budd28). Since then the number of practitioners has increased and statutory registration will ensure more practitioners will be registered. The rise in the number of practitioners as a result of more courses and more registered practitioners is likely to increase the use by the general public of CAM and herbal and food supplements. This trend may be further enhanced by an increase in the number of UK general practices offering CAM services; in 1995 40% of general practices offered a CAM service as compared with 50% in 2001(Reference Thomas, Nicoll and Coleman14).

Role of the internet

The internet and relative ease with which individuals can access information on an extensive number of topics has increased further the interest in and use of food and herbal supplements. Although various studies have claimed that 36–55% of all internet users have accessed medical information(Reference Baker, Wagner, Singer and Bundorf29), what is noteworthy is evidence that 40% of patients with breast cancer in Canada and the US have used the internet to obtain information about the disease and its treatment(Reference Fogel, Albert, Schnabel, Ditkoff and Neugut30). It can be assumed that a similar pattern of internet use can be demonstrated within the UK. Such motivated patients have already been reported to be more likely to use CAM and food and herbal supplements(Reference Scott18, Reference Shen, Anderson, Albert, Wenger, Glaspy, Cole and Shekelle19). This increased usage may be a result (in part) of the amount of information readily available on the internet.

The internet also provides a considerable amount of information about CAM. An American study has reported that 48% of those seeking information about CAM had used the internet(Reference Baker, Wagner, Singer and Bundorf29). Once again, this pattern may be similar in the UK.

The consequence of increasing availability of information about CAM and food and herbal supplements via the internet, via books (including self-help books) and self-help groups may be partly responsible for a scenario reported in a Canadian population study. In 1998 it was reported that 7% of those given a conventional prescription substituted it with a natural product(31, Reference Che and Chen32). There appears to be no published information to suggest that this percentage is different in the UK, or indeed that it has changed since the report was published.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the substantial increase in the use of CAM, food supplements and herbal supplements within the UK is attributable to a variety of factors including education, media, health-promoting programmes, affluence, fashion trends, the type of disease, geography and ultimately public opinion. Patients who are more likely to use CAM and take food or herbal supplements tend to wish to have a choice in their health care. Affluent patients also tend to opt for CAM as a method of treatment. Such patients may also be more likely to seek out their own information and question authority. An attraction of CAM and the use of supplements is that they are perceived by some patients to be safe and traditional. Such patients may be more reluctant to use drugs or medicines. These patients may be dissatisfied or disappointed with previous experiences of drugs or medicines, or they may prefer to use a different approach to healing and health, i.e. they wish to substitute the ‘low-touch, high-tech’ approach of conventional medicine for the ‘low-tech, high-touch’ approach of CAM.

Recipients of health care see themselves as consumers with an increased capacity and desire to be involved in decision making. Currently, consumers are less likely to assume a passive role in health care and consequently demand more information about conventional and complementary medicine. Public opinion regarding the use and practise of CAM and the use of supplements is also likely to be influenced by the requirement for all CAM practitioners to be registered. This factor may increase public confidence in CAM and CAM practitioners. A further consequence may be increased usage of food and herbal supplements.

Finally, public opinion has a profound affect on the use of CAM and food and herbal supplements. As a result of the availability of more university courses in CAM, the increased availability of information about CAM and food and herbal supplements and a general public demanding to be more involved in making informed decisions regarding their health, the use of supplements has changed over the last decade and is likely to increase. It is also likely that usage of supplements will be a factor that needs to be addressed during patient interviews.

References

1.Craig, WJ (1999) Health promoting properties of common herbs. Am J Clin Nutr 70, 491S499S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Mintel, (2005) Complementary Medicine – UK. London: Mintel International Group Ltd.Google Scholar
3.Fisher, P & Ward, A (1994) Medicine in Europe: Complementary medicine in Europe. Br Med J 309, 107111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.House of Lords Committee on Science and Technology (2000) Complementary and Alternative Medicine. House of Lords Committee on Science and Technology Sixth Report (Session 1999–00). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
5.Hippocrates, (1972) The Genuine Works of Hippocrates (translated from the Greek by F Adams). Huntington, NY: Robert E. Krueger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
6.Fleming, LW (1999) A medical bouquet: poppies, cinchona and willow. Scottish Medical Journal 44, 176179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Expert Panel on School Meals (2002) Hungry for success – a whole school approach to school meals in Scotland. A consultation document by the Expert Panel on School Meals. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations/education/hfsc-00.aspGoogle Scholar
8.Smith, C (2007) Herb beloved of beer-swilling Vikings (and sensitive ladies) makes comeback. The Scotsman 5 February issue; available at http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=186612007Google Scholar
9.The Scotsman (2007) Chinese medicine helps in chemotherapy treatment. The Scotsman 18 April issue; available at http://news.scotsman.com/health.cfm?id=594282007Google Scholar
10.Moss, L (2007) Women on HRT ‘are 20% more likely to get cancer’. The Scotsman 19 April issue; available at http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=115&id=600742007Google Scholar
11.Womersley, T (2003) Hormone therapy doubles cancer risk. The Scotsman 8 August issue; available at http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm/id=861352003Google Scholar
12.Ernst, E & Pittler, MH (2006) Celebrity based medicine. Med J Aust 185, 680681.Google Scholar
13.Ernst, E & White, A (2000) The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK. Complement Ther Med 8, 3236.Google Scholar
14.Thomas, KJ, Nicoll, JP & Coleman, P (2001) Use and expenditure for complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complement Ther Med 9, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (1999) Report on complementary and alternative medicine. Response to House of Lords Committee on Science and Technology Subcommittee III. http://www.rpsgb.org.uk/pdfs/scireportcompmedapp.pdfGoogle Scholar
16.Ernst, E (2000) The role of complementary and alternative medicine. Br Med J 321, 11331135.Google Scholar
17.Ernst, E & Cassileth, BR (1998) The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer. Cancer 83, 777782.Google Scholar
18.Scott, JA (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with cancer: A UK survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs 9, 131137.Google Scholar
19.Shen, J, Anderson, R, Albert, PS, Wenger, N, Glaspy, J, Cole, M & Shekelle, P (2002) Use of complementary/alternative therapies by women with advanced-stage breast cancer. BMC Complement Altern Med 2, 17.Google Scholar
20.Richardson, MA, Sanders, T, Palmer, JL, Greisinger, A & Singletary, SE (2000) Complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology. J Clin Oncol 18, 25052514.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (1996) National Population Health Survey. Public Use Microdata File User Documentation. Ottawa, Ont.: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
22.Rees, RW (2000) Prevalence of complementary therapy use by women with breast cancer; a population–based survey. Eur J Cancer 36, 13591364.Google Scholar
23.Mazur, W & Adlercreutz, H (1998) Natural and anthropogenic environmental oestrogens: the scientific basis for risk assessment. Naturally occurring oestrogens in food. Pure Appl Chem 70, 17591776.Google Scholar
24.Mazur, W & Adlercreutz, H (2000) Overview of naturally occurring endocrine – active substances in the human diet in relation to human health. Nutrition 16, 654687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Surh, Y (2003) Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals. Nat Rev Cancer 3, 768780.Google Scholar
26.Ritchie, MR, Cummings, JH, Morton, MS, Steel, CM, Bolton-Smith, C & Riches, AC (2006) A newly constructed and validated isoflavone database for the assessment of total genistein and daidzein intake. Br J Nutr 95, 204213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Cummings, JH & Bingham, SA (1998) Diet and the prevention of cancer. Br Med J 317, 16361640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Mills, S & Budd, S (2000) Professional Organisation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United Kingdom 2000: A Second Report to the Department of Health. Exeter, Devon: Centre for Complementary Health Studies, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
29.Baker, L, Wagner, TH, Singer, S & Bundorf, MK (2003) Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 289, 24002406.Google Scholar
30.Fogel, J, Albert, SM, Schnabel, F, Ditkoff, BA & Neugut, AI (2002) Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer. J Med Internet Res 4, E9.Google Scholar
31.Statistics Canada (2000) National Population Health Survey Public Use Microdata File User's Guide – Household Component. CDRom 82M0009XCB. Ottawa, Ont.: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
32.Che, J & Chen, J (2001) Food insecurity in Canadian households. Health Rep 12, 1122.Google ScholarPubMed