Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T00:18:05.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Undernutrition levels in Scottish older-adult population: a secondary data analysis of the Scottish Health Survey 2021

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2024

D. Morecroft
Affiliation:
The Rowett Institute, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
D. R. Crabtree
Affiliation:
The Rowett Institute, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
A. M. Johnstone
Affiliation:
The Rowett Institute, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The proportion of the UK population over 65 years old is predicted to increase from 18.7% to 26% by 2066(1). However, healthy life expectancy (HLE) and disability free life expectancy (DLE) are decreasing(2, 3), which is particularly concerning in Scotland which also has the lowest overall life expectancy(4). Diet is a major modifiable factor in healthy aging(5) and should be a target to address declining HLE and DLE, but nutrient deficiencies in over 65s in Scotland are poorly understood. This study aimed to understand the presence and extent of inadequate intake of protein, fibre, vitamins, and minerals within over 60 year olds in Scotland.

Secondary data analysis of the Scottish Health Survey 2021(6) was performed. Dietary data of older adults (≥ 60 years old, n = 1344) were analysed for protein, fibre, and micronutrient (from food sources) inadequacies, defined as percentage below estimated average requirement, reference nutrient intake or adequate intake(7, 8). Wald Z-test was used to analyse inadequacy between males and females, and urban and rural populations. Differences between Scottish index of multiple deprivation (SIMD) levels (1 [most deprived] to 5 [least deprived]) were analysed using χ2 test and cellwise sub-analysis(9) with Bonferroni corrections.

The percentage of over 60s that had inadequate nutrient intake was highest for vitamin D (97%), fibre (93%), selenium (90%), potassium (79%) and Zinc (65%). Compared to males, females were at a greater risk of undernutrition in 18 of the 25 nutrients analysed, of which 11 were significant (p<0.05). Compared to rural populations, urban populations were at a greater risk of undernutrition in 22 of 25 nutrients analysed, of which 10 were significant. People in SIMD 1 were at a greater risk of undernutrition in 20 of 25 nutrients analysed, of which 14 were significant. 40% of over 60s had inadequate protein intake. Risk of inadequate protein intake was greatest for people in SIMD 1 (56%, p<0.001). 24% of over 60s had inadequate folate intake which was significantly higher in females than males (28% and 18%, respectively; p<.001), urban than rural (26% and 19%, respectively; p<.01), and in SIMD1 (36%; p<.001). Inadequate fibre intake was significantly higher in females than males (95% and 91% respectively, p<.01), and urban than rural (95% and 89%, respectively, p<.001). 26% of over 60s had inadequate calcium intake. Inadequate calcium intake was significantly higher in females than males (25% and 17%, respectively; p<.001).

These data highlight a considerable undernutrition risk, both overall and within specific nutrients important for healthy aging, in Scotland’s older adult population. Those in SIMD 1, females, and urban dwelling demographics being particularly vulnerable. Although the extent of potential health implications, are dependent on key aspects such as nutrient absorption and utilisation.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Office for National Statistics (2018) Living longer: how our population is changing and why it matters, pp. 24. [Available at :https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/ageing/articles/livinglongerhowourpopulationischangingandwhyitmatters/2018-08-13]Google Scholar
Salomon, J, Wang, H, Freeman, M et al. (2012) Lancet, 380(9859), pp. 21442162.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61690-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2022) Health state life expectancies, UK: 2018 to 2020, pp 2–12. [Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthandlifeexpectancies/bulletins/healthstatelifeexpectanciesuk/2018to2020]Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2021) National life tables – life expectancy in the UK: 2018 to 2020, pp. 38. [Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectanci es/bulletins/nationallifetablesunitedkingdom/2018to2020]Google Scholar
Dorrington, N, Fallaize, R, Hobbs, D et al. (2020) J Nutr, 150(9), pp. 22452256.10.1093/jn/nxaa153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britwistle, S, Deakin, E, Whitford, R et al. (2022) Scottish Health Survey 2021: Volume 1: Main Report. Google Scholar
Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2015) SACN Carbohydrates and Health Report, pp. 195.Google Scholar
Committee on Medical Aspects if Food Policy (1991) Dietary reference values for food energy and nutrients for the United Kingdom, pp. 95191.Google Scholar
Beasly, T, Schumacker, R (1995) J Exp Educ, 64(1), pp. 7993.10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797CrossRefGoogle Scholar