Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:28:03.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematic review of published interventions aiming to increase vegetable intakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

KM Appleton
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
A Hemingway
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
L Saulais
Affiliation:
Institut Paul Bocuse, Ecully, France
C Dinnella
Affiliation:
University of Firenze, Florence, Italy
E Monteleone
Affiliation:
University of Firenze, Florence, Italy
L Depezay
Affiliation:
Bonduelle, Villeneuve D'Ascq, France
D Morizet
Affiliation:
Bonduelle, Villeneuve D'Ascq, France
FJA Perez-Cueto
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
A Bevan
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
H Hartwell
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

The health benefits of a high fruit and vegetable consumption are well known and considerable current work attempts to improve intakes(Reference Woodside, Young and McKinley1). Fruits and vegetables, however, are separate food groups, that tend to be consumed differently, and tend to be consumed or avoided as a result of different determinants(Reference Glasson, Chapman and James2, Reference Trudeau and Kristal3). Increasing work also suggests health benefits from a high consumption specifically of vegetables, and low vegetable intakes across Western countries, but fruit and vegetable interventions typically tend to have more success for fruit intakes than for those of vegetables(e.g.4). This study aimed to systematically review the published literature for all studies reporting an intervention to increase intakes of vegetables as a specific food group.

Three databases - PubMed, PsychInfo and Medline were searched over all years of records until April 2015, using with the terms ‘vegetable’ and ‘vegetables’ in the ‘title’. All searches were conducted, and all titles and abstracts screened for relevance by two independent review authors (KMA, AH or HH). Studies were included in the review if they involved an intervention designed primarily to increase vegetable intakes as a specific and distinct food group, and if they intended to change behaviour – vegetable selection, purchasing, or vegetable consumption. We made no attempt to assess study quality, or to combine interventions, e.g. through meta-analysis.

Our searches identified 77 studies, detailing 140 interventions. Interventions aimed to use or change hedonic factors, such as taste, liking and familiarity (n = 72), use or change environmental factors (n = 39), use or change cognitive factors (n = 19), or used a combination of strategies (n = 10). A total of 133 (81 %) interventions were conducted in children. Of the 140 interventions, 116 (83 %) interventions reported increased vegetable selection and/or consumption to some degree. The majority of effects, however, seem small and inconsistent. Greater percent success was found from environmental, educational and multi-component interventions. Publication bias is also likely in this new area of research, and long term effects and cost-effectiveness were rarely considered.

Limited work is currently available assessing the impact of behavioural interventions for increasing vegetable intakes, and further work is required. Interventions should be developed based on the underlying determinants of poor vegetable consumption, and should include long-term and cost-effectiveness assessments. Certain population groups – adolescents, adults, older people and individuals living on a low income are also largely absent from the current list of tried interventions. Further work is clearly needed, and a focus on long-term benefits and sustained behaviour change is required.

References

1.Woodside, JV, Young, IS, McKinley, MC. Fruits and vegetables: measuring intake and encouraging increased consumption. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013, 72:236–45.Google Scholar
2.Glasson, C, Chapman, K, James, E. Fruit and vegetables should be targeted separately in health promotion programmes: differences in consumption levels, barriers, knowledge and stages of readiness for change. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14:694701.10.1017/S1368980010001643Google Scholar
3.Trudeau, E, Kristal, AR, Patterson RE. Demographic and psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable intakes differ. Implications for dietary interventions. JADA. 1998, 98:1412–17.10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00319-8Google Scholar
4.Neville, CE, McKinley, MC, Draffin, CR, et al. Participating in a fruit and vegetable intervention trial improves longer term fruit and vegetable consumption and barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption: a follow-up of the ADIT study. Int J Behav Nutr Physical Activity, 2015, 12:158.10.1186/s12966-015-0311-4Google Scholar