Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:18:45.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival following gastrostomy insertion: are there differences in mortality according to referral indication?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2012

M. Kurien ,
J. S. Leeds ,
H. E. Robson ,
G. James ,
B. Hoeroldt ,
K. Dear ,
K. Kapur ,
J. Grant ,
M. E. McAlindon  and
D. S. Sanders
M. Kurien
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
J. S. Leeds
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
H. E. Robson
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
G. James
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster, UK
B. Hoeroldt
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Rotherham District General Hospital, Rotherham, UK
K. Dear
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Chesterfield Royal Hospital, Chesterfield, UK
K. Kapur
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Barnsley District General Hospital, Barnsley, UK
J. Grant
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
M. E. McAlindon
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
D. S. Sanders
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 70 , Issue OCE5: Malnutrition Matters, Joint BAPEN and Nutrition Society Meeting, 29–30 November 2011, Harrogate , 2011 , E310
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Previous studies have demonstrated that certain subgroups of patients have a worse prognosis following gastrostomy insertion (e.g. Dementia). However, these studies have often been retrospective and sample sizes have been small. We wished to examine survival following gastrostomy insertion with particular reference to the referral indication.

Gastrostomy insertions were examined from six hospitals in South Yorkshire and Derbyshire between January 2004 and September 2010. Data was collected prospectively from two centres (n=1004) and from four centres retrospectively (n=679). Age, gender, referral indication, comorbidity, biochemical profile and whether they were alive at 30 days was recorded for each case. Referral indication was divided into five subcategories; dysphagic stroke, neurological, nasopharyngeal cancer, cognitive impairment and other. Analysis for factors associated with death at 30 days was performed.

1651 patients were included in the study and the lowest 30-day mortality was found in the nasopharyngeal cancer cohort at 36/568 (6.3%). With respect to the other referral indications, 30-day mortality was 2/14 (14.3%, OR 2.5, 0.5–11.4, p=ns) in cognitive impairment, 91/488 (18.6%, OR 3.4, 2.3–5.1, p<0.001) in dysphagic stroke, 36/324 (11.1%, OR 1.8, 1.1–3.0, p=0.012) in neurological disease and 28/257 (10.9%, OR 1.8, 1.1–3.0, p=0.024) in the other category. Mortality at 30 days was also associated with increasing age >60 (OR 3.1, 2.1–4.6, p<0.001), reducing serum albumin (p<0.001), cardiac comorbidity (OR 2.1, 1.3–3.4, p=0.0023), renal comorbidity (OR 2.1, 1.3–3.4, p=0.004) and intercurrent infection (OR 3.0, 1.7–5.1, p<0.001). At multivariate analysis only age and albumin were independent predictors of death at 30 days (both p<0.01).

This is the largest UK dataset to assess outcomes following gastrostomy insertion. Indication for gastrostomy does have a bearing on mortality at 30 days with the lowest rates being found in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. Our observations regarding mortality in these subgroups may be informative for clinicians, patients and relatives when making decisions around gastrostomy insertion.