Ghrelin

One of the hormones targeting the ARC is the orexigenic gastrointestinal hormone ghrelin⁽ Reference Kojima, Hosoda and Date ^{15 )}. Plasma levels of ghrelin are modulated by the nutritional state. During fasting and shortly before meals circulating ghrelin concentrations are elevated, while feeding or nutrient intake reduce blood-ghrelin levels⁽ Reference Tschop, Smiley and Heiman ^{16 –} Reference Shiiya, Nakazato and Mizuta ^{18 )}. Various electrophysiological and immunohistological studies characterised ghrelin's effects on neuronal activity of ARC neurons that have been suggested to represent target cells for ghrelin in the brain⁽ Reference Traebert, Riediger and Whitebread ^{19 –} Reference Wang, Saint-Pierre and Tache ^{22 )}. Ghrelin binds to the growth hormone secretagogue receptor that is highly abundant in the ARC⁽ Reference Guan, Yu and Palyha ^{23 )}. The growth hormone secretagogue receptor is predominantly expressed in NPY neurons (94% co-localisation), while it is found in only 8% of POMC neurons⁽ Reference Willesen, Kristensen and Romer ^{24 )}. Ghrelin exerts opposite effects to leptin on the activity of ARC neurons. Ghrelin or growth hormone secretagogue receptor agonists excite leptin-inhibited NPY neurons via a direct postsynaptic effect⁽ Reference Traebert, Riediger and Whitebread ^{19 ,} Reference Hewson, Viltart and McKenzie ^{25 –} Reference Tung, Hewson and Dickson ^{27 )}. In addition to this action, ghrelin indirectly inhibits neurons of the lateral ARC, where POMC neurons are located⁽ Reference Riediger, Traebert and Schmid ^{20 ,} Reference Cowley, Smith and Diano ^{28 )}. The excitatory effect of ghrelin on ARC neurons and the NPYergic phenotype of these cells have been confirmed in vivo by immunohistochemical studies using c-Fos as a marker for neuronal activation⁽ Reference Wang, Saint-Pierre and Tache ^{22 ,} Reference Dickson and Luckman ^{29 )}.

Whether ghrelin can be considered a physiological signal in the control of energy homoeostasis has not yet been confirmed based on the general criteria that have been suggested to define a physiological relevance⁽ Reference Geary ^{30 )}. Owing to the weak consequences of ghrelin antagonism for feeding behaviour or body weight phenotype and because of the ineffectiveness of physiological ghrelin doses to produce feeding or body weight effects, the physiological relevance of ghrelin has not yet been fully established⁽ Reference Kirchner, Heppner and Tschop ^{31 )}. Based on the leptin counter-regulatory action of ghrelin, antagonism of ghrelin signalling has been proposed as a therapeutic approach against obesity. However, the role of ghrelin in the pathogenesis of obesity is not clear. Ghrelin levels in obese human subjects are lower than under normal weight conditions⁽ Reference Cummings, Weigle and Frayo ^{32 )} limiting the usefulness and success of ghrelin antagonism as an anti-obesity strategy⁽ Reference Kirchner, Heppner and Tschop ^{31 )}. Interestingly, weight loss in obese subjects seems to be associated with an increase in ghrelin levels suggesting that a blockade of ghrelin action might facilitate the body weight reducing effect of other therapeutic interventions⁽ Reference Cummings, Weigle and Frayo ^{32 )}. Notably, there is cumulating evidence for a role of ghrelin in reward mechanisms that involve extra-hypothalamic pathways originating in the ventral tegmental area⁽ Reference Dickson, Egecioglu and Landgren ^{33 )}. The potential of pharmacological ghrelin-dependent approaches with respect to this mechanism has not yet been sufficiently explored in clinical studies.

Peptide YY/glucagon-like peptide 1

The two gut hormones PYY and GLP-1 act on ARC neurons. They have received special attention in the context of energy homoeostasis and as potential targets for the treatment of overweight. Both hormones might contribute to weight loss after gastric bypass surgery because Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients have increased GLP-1 and PYY levels and blockade of gastrointestinal hormone release (including GLP-1 and PYY) by the somatostatin analogue octreotide led to increased appetite⁽ Reference Borg, le Roux and Ghatei ^{34 –} Reference le Roux, Welbourn and Werling ^{36 )}. A specific role for PYY is suggested by the absence of weight loss in PYY knockout mice subjected to gastrointestinal bypass surgery⁽ Reference Chandarana, Gelegen and Karra ^{37 )}.

PYY and PYY(3–36) are two biologically active peptides arising from endocrine L-cells of the ileum and colon in response to food intake⁽ Reference Grandt, Schimiczek and Beglinger ^{38 )}. Although PYY binds to several subtypes of Y receptors, PYY(3–36) exhibits relative specificity for the Y2 receptor⁽ Reference Dumont, Fournier and St-Pierre ^{39 )}. Both PYY isoforms inhibit food intake after peripheral administration; but PYY(3–36) appears to be more potent possibly due to its specificity to the Y2 receptor that is decisive for the anorexigenic response⁽ Reference Degen, Oesch and Casanova ^{40 ,} Reference Sloth, Holst and Flint ^{41 )}. However, the minimal doses that were required to suppress food intake in these studies were supraphysiological when compared with meal-induced changes of total PYY blood levels. Therefore, the question whether PYY(3–36) acts as a physiological satiating signal is controversial. Direct site-specific injections of PYY(3–36) identified the ARC as possible central target structure⁽ Reference Batterham, Cowley and Small ^{42 )}. With respect to the electrophysiological effects of PYY(3–36) in the ARC, conflicting data exist in the literature. In mice, PYY(3–36) has been demonstrated to indirectly (presynaptically) excite phenotypically identified POMC neurons⁽ Reference Batterham, Cowley and Small ^{42 )}, while another electrophysiological study demonstrated direct postsynaptic inhibitions in POMC neurons of mice⁽ Reference Ghamari-Langroudi, Colmers and Cone ^{43 )}. Among others, the reasons for these seemingly contradictory findings have not yet been identified, but might be related to experimental and technical differences concerning the slice preparation and selection of cells⁽ Reference Ghamari-Langroudi, Colmers and Cone ^{43 )}. In rats, full-length PYY exerts direct inhibitory effects on ghrelin-exited ARC neurons (Fig. 1) suggesting that the NPYergic system is also affected by PYY signalling⁽ Reference Riediger, Bothe and Becskei ^{44 )}. This is consistent with the demonstration that PYY(3–36) inhibits NPY release from ARC explants in addition to stimulating a α-melanocyte stimulating hormone response⁽ Reference Batterham, Cowley and Small ^{42 )}.

Fig. 1. Continuous rate meter recording of a spontaneously active neuron from the medial arcuate nucleus of the rat. Consecutive superfusions of ghrelin and the anorectic hormone peptide YY (PYY) at the indicated times caused opposite effects on neuronal activity. While ghrelin induced a strong excitatory response, PYY effectively decreased the discharge rate. Reproduced with permission (published in Riediger et al. ⁽ Reference Riediger, Bothe and Becskei ^{44 )}).

Basal and postprandial PYY(3–36) levels are decreased in obese human subjects and rodents⁽ Reference Batterham, Cohen and Ellis ^{45 )}. The absence of PYY(3–36) resistance in obese subjects is in favour of using PYY agonists as anti-obesity drugs. Chronic peripheral administration of PYY(3–36) decreases body weight in different species including rhesus macaques⁽ Reference Batterham, Cowley and Small ^{42 ,} Reference Adams, Lei and Jodka ^{46 ,} Reference Koegler, Enriori and Billes ^{47 )}. Whether PYY agonists can be therapeutically used in human subjects to reduce body weight awaits further evaluation. Interestingly, PYY seems to synergise with other hormones or hormone agonists affecting the control of energy balance and glucose homoeostasis, including the GLP-1 agonist exendin-4 and the pancreatic hormone amylin⁽ Reference Talsania, Anini and Siu ^{48 ,} Reference Roth, Coffey and Jodka ^{49 )}. The neuronal correlates of these synergies are unknown.

Similar to PYY, GLP-1 is released in response to food intake from gastrointestinal L-cells⁽ Reference Orskov, Wettergren and Holst ^{50 ,} Reference Kreymann, Williams and Ghatei ^{51 )}. GLP-1 plays an important role in glucose homoeostasis (incretin) and gastrointestinal function⁽ Reference Holst ^{52 )}. In addition to its peripheral expression, GLP-1 is a neuropeptide expressed in a discrete population of enteroceptive neurons located in the brainstem⁽ Reference Larsen, Tang-Christensen and Holst ^{53 )}. It binds to the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) that is also activated by the agonist exendin-4, a peptide that has been isolated from the saliva of the lizard Heloderma suspectum. The truncated form of exendin (9–39) (also termed exendin-9) acts as a competitive antagonist at the GLP-1R. The ARC, and other hypothalamic and brainstem structures, including the paraventricular nucleus and the AP, show high GLP-1R expression⁽ Reference Merchenthaler, Lane and Shughrue ^{54 ,} Reference Alvarez, Roncero and Chowen ^{55 )}. Central and peripheral injection GLP-1R agonists decrease food intake in rodents⁽ Reference Turton, O'Shea and Gunn ^{56 –} Reference Reidelberger, Haver and Apenteng ^{59 )}. Furthermore, numerous studies have demonstrated a GLP-1-mediated reduction in energy intake in human subjects⁽ Reference Verdich, Flint and Gutzwiller ^{60 )}. Similar to ghrelin and PYY, it has not yet been confirmed that endogenous GLP-1 physiologically controls food intake.

The neuronal mechanisms mediating the action of GLP-1 on food intake have not yet been clearly identified, which might be due to the fact that different pathways seem to be activated depending on the experimental conditions, particularly the route of administration and the potency of the stimulus. While subdiaphragmatic deafferentation blocked the anorexigenic effect of hepatic portal vein GLP-1 infusion, subdiaphragmatic deafferentation did not blunt the feeding suppressive effect of GLP-1 infused into the vena cava⁽ Reference Ruttimann, Arnold and Hillebrand ^{61 )}. In contrast, the effect of the long-acting GLP-1 agonist exendin-4 was not blocked in rats with subdiaphragmatic deafferentation⁽ Reference Punjabi, Arnold and Geary ^{62 )}. There is some evidence that the ARC represents a target site not only for GLP-1 but also for the structurally related hormone oxyntomodulin (OXM), which is co-secreted with GLP-1 and exerts an anorexigenic effect via the GLP-1R after central injection⁽ Reference Le Quellec, Kervran and Blache ^{63 ,} Reference Baggio, Huang and Brown ^{64 )}. GLP-1R activation by intra-arcuate injection of OXM decreased food intake and the OXM-mediated suppression of intraperitoneal OXM administration was blocked by injection of the GLP-1R antagonist exendin(9–39)⁽ Reference Dakin, Small and Batterham ^{58 )}. Another study did not observe a feeding suppressive effect after intra-arcuate GLP-1 injection, but hepatic glucose production was reduced under these conditions⁽ Reference Sandoval, Bagnol and Woods ^{65 )}. However, GLP-1 consistently reduced feeding after site-specific injection into the paraventricular nucleus⁽ Reference Sandoval, Bagnol and Woods ^{65 ,} Reference Dakin, Gunn and Small ^{66 )}.

The effects of GLP-1 and OXM on neuronal activity in the ARC are similar. In rats, both hormones induced excitatory responses in ghrelin-inhibited cells⁽ Reference Riediger, Eisele and Scheel ^{67 )} (see example in Fig. 2) suggesting a stimulation of POMC signalling, which is consistent with the high expression of the GLP-1R in POMC neurons⁽ Reference Sandoval, Bagnol and Woods ^{65 )}. GLP-1 and OXM induced heterogeneous excitatory and inhibitory effects in ghrelin-excited ARC neurons, but the functional and neurochemical phenotype of these cells have not yet been identified. The absence of GLP-1R expression in NPY neurons seems to exclude the NPY system as a primary target for GLP-1 in the ARC. Despite the existing in vivo and in vitro evidence for a potential role of ARC-dependent GLP-1 signalling in energy and glucose homoeostasis further support for a physiological role of endogenous GLP-1R ligands acting via hypothalamic circuits needs to be established. Although beneficial effects on body weight have been reported for anti-diabetic GLP-1 agonists⁽ Reference Klonoff, Buse and Nielsen ^{68 –} Reference Vilsboll, Christensen and Junker ^{70 )}, moderate effectiveness and undesired side effects limit the potential of these drugs at least as a mono-therapy against obesity.

Fig. 2. Representative recording showing the excitatory effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) on a ghrelin-inhibited neuron of the arcuate nucleus. Reproduced with permission (published in Riediger et al.⁽ Reference Riediger, Eisele and Scheel ^{67 )}.

Feeding and nutrient-related effects on neuronal function

Numerous studies have confirmed the reciprocal regulation of NPY and POMC gene expression in response to alterations in energy intake⁽ Reference Schwartz, Woods and Porte ^{71 )}. Fasting not only leads to alterations in neuropeptide expression but also to alterations in neuronal activity. Food deprivation for 24 h elicits an activation of ARC neurons in mice as reflected by an increase in c-Fos expression⁽ Reference Wang, Martinez and Barrachina ^{72 –} Reference Mistry, Helferich and Romsos ^{74 )}. Refeeding of 12 h food-deprived mice completely reverses the fasting-induced ARC activation (Fig. 3) indicating that feeding-related signals exert a strong inhibitory effect on ARC neurons that are activated under negative energy balance⁽ Reference Riediger, Bothe and Becskei ^{44 ,} Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 )}. Hence, ARC neurons appear to respond to negative and positive changes in energy intake. As demonstrated by phenotyping studies, fasting-induced ARC activation specifically occurs in NPY neurons, but not in POMC neurons under these conditions⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 ,} Reference Coppola, Liu and Andrews ^{76 )}. While this observation suggests increased hypothalamic NPY signalling as a result of fasting, it does not exclude a parallel inhibition of POMC neurons in the ARC. The induction of a fasting-induced ARC activation has also been demonstrated in rats, although considerably longer periods of food deprivation (3 d) are typically required for an immunohistochemically detectable response in this species, at least when c-Fos is used as a marker. Interestingly, there seems to be a shift of neuronal activation from the NPY system in the fasted state to the melanocortin system following refeeding⁽ Reference Sanchez, Singru and Acharya ^{77 ,} Reference Singru, Sanchez and Fekete ^{78 )}. This response is consistent with the function of the NPY system to promote energy intake under negative energy balance and with the counter-regulatory function of the POMC system to limit energy intake.

Fig. 3. Refeeding with chow completely reversed the fasting-induced c-Fos expression in the arcuate nucleus (ARC). Representative ARC sections immunostained for c-Fos of 14-h fasted (A), chow-refed (B) and ad libitum chow-fed (C) mice. Bar charts show the quantitative results of c-Fos expression (D). a,b Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0·05). 3 V: 3rd ventricle. Scale bar: 100 μm. Reproduced with permission (published in Becskei et al.) ⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 )}.

Feeding of palatable non-energy diet (NED; vanilla-flavoured cellulose) with or without selective nutrient supplementation has proven to be a useful approach to explore the role of diet-derived nutrients in feeding-related modulation of neuronal ARC activity. Mice receiving NED for 12 h instead of standard chow exhibit a strong c-Fos expression in the ARC that is only slightly lower than in 12 h fasted animals⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 )}. The same is true for fasted mice that were refed with NED. Therefore, nutrient-independent stimuli associated with feeding activity (e.g. gustatory, oropharyngeal cues and gastric distension) appear to exert a minor, but significant influence on the ARC because they only weakly counteract the stimulation of ARC activation triggered by short-term energy deprivation. When refeeding with NED that was selectively supplemented with each of the different macronutrients (carbohydrates, protein or fat), a stronger reversal of fasting-induced ARC activation was observed than that following refeeding with non-supplemented NED⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 )}. When the intake of each nutrient was matched to specific nutrient intake of chow-fed animals, the carbohydrates were more effective than protein and fat. However, increasing the protein content in the diet or refeeding with pure fat (lard) resulted in a similar reversal of fasting-induced c-Fos expression as observed for refeeding with carbohydrate. Therefore, the relative contribution of each macronutrient to the inhibition of ARC activity in this experimental setting appeared to depend on the amount of intake. Whether isoenergetic intakes of the different macronutrients are equipotent to reverse fasting-induced ARC activation has not yet been investigated.

The mechanism underlying the fasting and feeding-related effects on neuronal activity in the ARC are likely to involve not only direct effects of metabolites but also indirect actions mediated by gastrointestinal hormones. ARC neurons have been shown to respond to glucose in excitatory and inhibitory ways⁽ Reference Wang, Liu and Hentges ^{79 )}. Phenotypically identified NPY neurons of mice and rats decrease their firing rate with increasing glucose concentrations (glucose-inhibited cells)⁽ Reference Fioramonti, Contie and Song ^{80 ,} Reference Muroya, Yada and Shioda ^{81 )}. Conversely, POMC neurons have been demonstrated to be glucose-excited because they decrease their discharge rate when the extracellular glucose concentration is decreased⁽ Reference Claret, Smith and Batterham ^{82 ,} Reference Parton, Ye and Coppari ^{83 )}. The intracellular mechanisms transducing changes in the glucose concentration into altered neuronal activity are well understood for glucose-excited neurons, while the molecular correlates of inhibitory glucose signalling are less clear. Glucose sensitivity in glucose-excited neurons has obvious parallels to glucose responsiveness of pancreatic β-cells, in which glucose metabolism leads to increased ATP:ADP ratios. As a consequence ATP induces a closure of the Kir6.2 pore-forming subunit of the ATP-sensitive K⁺ channel, leading to a depolarisation of the cell. Genetic manipulations that cause a loss of function of Kir6.2 subunit are associated with a loss of glucose responsiveness in hypothalamic neurons, including POMC neurons of the ARC⁽ Reference Parton, Ye and Coppari ^{83 ,} Reference Miki, Liss and Minami ^{84 )}. Although the ATP-sensitive K⁺ channel is required for the glucose sensitivity of glucose-excited neurons, it is also expressed in glucose-insensitive cells suggesting that other molecular transducers are decisive for neuronal glucose responsiveness. One of these transducers is the enzyme glucokinase, the rate-limiting enzyme for glucose metabolism in glucose sensitive neurons⁽ Reference Levin, Routh and Kang ^{85 )}. Another enzyme that seems to function as a master switch for intracellular metabolic pathways including glucose metabolism is the enzyme adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK responds to changes in the ADP:ATP ratio and induces counter-regulatory metabolic responses through a variety of downstream targets⁽ Reference Kahn, Alquier and Carling ^{86 )}. Hypothalamic AMPK activity in the ARC and other hypothalamic structures is inhibited not only by leptin and insulin but also by refeeding in fasted mice and by intraperitoneal and intracerebroventricular glucose administration⁽ Reference Minokoshi, Alquier and Furukawa ^{87 )}. Genetic manipulation that results in constitutive hypothalamic AMPK activity was associated with increased body weight, while reduced AMPK activity resulted in reduced body weight. These effects were partly attributed to changes in food intake⁽ Reference Minokoshi, Alquier and Furukawa ^{87 )}. Genetic disruption of AMPK in POMC and NPY neurons was paralleled by a loss of glucose responsiveness of these cells in the ARC supporting of a role of AMPK in glucose sensing⁽ Reference Claret, Smith and Batterham ^{82 )}. In line with the well-established glucose sensitivity of ARC neurons, an increase in circulating glucose after intraperitoneal glucose administration reversed the fasting-induced ARC activation to a similar degree as refeeding⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{88 )}. These studies do not exclude indirect hormonal or vagal afferent signalling mechanisms that might be engaged in parallel to a direct action of glucose on ARC neurons.

Not only glucose but also hypothalamic fatty acid signalling contributes to the control of energy balance and glucose homoeostasis because intracerebroventricular infusion of oleic acid inhibits food intake and hepatic glucose production⁽ Reference Morgan, Obici and Rossetti ^{89 ,} Reference Obici, Feng and Morgan ^{90 )}. Besides other hypothalamic structures, the ARC has been identified as a fatty acid responsive area⁽ Reference Wang, Cruciani-Guglielmacci and Migrenne ^{91 )}. Lipid sensitivity has been demonstrated for POMC neurons that were inhibited by oleic acid⁽ Reference Jo, Su and Gutierrez-Juarez ^{92 )}. In analogy to the importance of intracellular glucose metabolism, intracellular lipid metabolism has been linked to altered neuronal function and to changes in food intake and body weight. Pharmacological blockade fatty acid synthase (FAS) pathway by central or peripheral injection of the FAS inhibitor C75 inhibited feeding and reduced body weight in mice⁽ Reference Loftus, Jaworsky and Frehywot ^{93 )}. Among other hypothalamic sites, FAS is expressed in NPY neurons of the ARC⁽ Reference Kim, Miller and Landree ^{94 )}. Peripherally applied C75 prevented the fasting induced c-Fos expression in the medial ARC and in hypothalamic downstream targets of the ARC supporting a role of lipid signalling in fasting-induced ARC activation⁽ Reference Miller, Ronnett and Moran ^{95 )}. Different intracellular mechanisms have been proposed to mediate the effects of FAS inhibition on energy homoeostasis. These mechanisms include an increase in the FAS substrate malonyl CoA, which represents an intracellular metabolic signal inhibiting food intake and body weight. This view is consistent with the development of obesity and increased food intake when malonyl CoA degradation in the mediobasal hypothalamus is enhanced by overexpression of the enzyme malonyl CoA decarboxylase⁽ Reference He, Lam and Obici ^{96 )}. A regulatory function for cellular lipid sensing has also been postulated for the enzyme carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 that controls long-chain fatty acid transport into the mitochondria. Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of hypothamalic carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 reduced food intake and glucose production⁽ Reference Obici, Feng and Arduini ^{97 )}. Despite the cumulating evidence for a role of hypothalamic lipid sensing further confirmation is required for the physiological relevance of these processes in the context of feeding-related or metabolically induced changes in circulating mediators involved in lipid signalling.

Similar to lipid signalling a role of hypothalamic amino acid signalling in the control of food intake and body weight has emerged. The serine-threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions as nutrient sensor implicated in cell growth and proliferation⁽ Reference Jacinto and Hall ^{98 )}. Particularly branched amino acids such as leucine activate the mTOR pathway. Components of the mTOR pathway have been detected in 90 and 45% of ARC NPY and POMC neurons, respectively⁽ Reference Cota, Proulx and Smith ^{99 )}. In analogy to the changes of neuronal activity in the ARC as a result of fasting and refeeding, activity of the mTOR pathway in the ARC is down-regulated in the fasted state, while it increases in response to refeeding. Both intracerebroventricular and site-specific injection of leucine into the mediobasal hypothalamus inhibited food intake⁽ Reference Cota, Proulx and Smith ^{99 ,} Reference Blouet, Jo and Li ^{100 )}. POMC neurons of the ARC increase their electrical activity in response to stimulation with leucine, which is consistent with in vivo studies demonstrating a melanocortin receptor involvement in the anorexigenic effect of mediobasal hypothalamic leucin injection⁽ Reference Blouet, Jo and Li ^{100 )}.

Fasting and the ingestion of each of the single macronutrients lead to hormonal responses adjusting energy homoeostasis and gastrointestinal function to the metabolic and digestive requirements of the body. Some attempts have been made to explore the involvement of hormones in the feeding-related changes in ARC activity. Based on the increase in ghrelin levels under fasting conditions, ghrelin might contribute to the fasting-induced ARC activation in mice. In rats, neutralisation of ghrelin by a site-specific injection of anti-ghrelin Ig into the ARC attenuated food intake in fasted animals during refeeding⁽ Reference Bagnasco, Tulipano and Melis ^{101 )}. An alternative approach to neutralise ghrelin is the use of an L-RNA-based hormone antagonist, a so-called Spiegelmer, that specifically binds and inactivates the bioactive form of ghrelin⁽ Reference Helmling, Maasch and Eulberg ^{102 ,} Reference Kobelt, Helmling and Stengel ^{103 )}. Owing to its long-lasting action a single intravenous infusion of the anti-ghrelin Spiegelmer NOX-B11-3 blocked the c-Fos response in the ARC of ad libitum fed mice induced by exogenous ghrelin injected peripherally 12 h after administration of the antagonist⁽ Reference Becskei, Bilik and Klussmann ^{21 )}. In the same study, ghrelin antagonism did not significantly attenuate the fasting-induced c-Fos response in the ARC suggesting that endogenous ghrelin is not necessary for the activation of the ARC under these experimental conditions.

Among the feeding-related hormones that are likely to act via the ARC, ghrelin is the only hormone that increases during fasting. Not only increases but also decreases in hormone levels are likely to reflect alterations in energy homoeostasis and metabolism. One experimental approach to investigate this consists in the compensation of decreased hormone levels by exogenous administration of the respective hormone. Superimposed to the well-described differences in leptin levels related to body adiposity, leptin plasma levels decrease considerably (5-fold) in fasted v. ad libitum fed lean mice⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 )}. Preventing the fasting-induced decrease in leptin by repeated low-dose leptin injections during the fasting period markedly attenuated the c-Fos expression of in the ARC of food-deprived mice (Fig. 4)⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{104 )}. Despite the limitation of this approach to precisely mimic physiological leptin levels by exogenous leptin administration, this finding supports the contribution of decreased leptin signalling to fasting-induced ARC activation. Studies in leptin deficient ob/ob mice seem to complement these findings because fasting-induced ARC activation is exaggerated in ob/ob mice compared with wild-type littermates⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{104 )}. Together these studies underscore that leptin signalling has an important impact on the ARC in the context of feeding-related modulation of ARC neurons.

Fig. 4. Effect of exogenous leptin-induced hyperleptinaemia during fasting on arcuate nucleus (ARC) activation in lean mice. Representative ARC sections immunostained for c-Fos of young lean mice treated with saline or leptin every 3 h during a 14-h food-deprivation period. Leptin treatment significantly increased the leptin plasma concentration and attenuated the fasting-induced c-Fos expression in the ARC (**P < 0·01 for both effects). 3 V: 3rd ventricle. Scale bar: 100 μm. Reproduced with permission (published in Becskei et al.)⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{104 )}.

Using the fasting/refeeding paradigm the possible involvement of other hormones in feeding-related changes of ARC activity has been studied. Similar to the ineffectiveness of an acute leptin treatment to reverse fasting-induced ARC activation, insulin did not attenuate c-Fos expression in fasted animals regardless of whether a glucose-lowering dose of insulin was used or a dose that did not produce a reduction in blood glucose⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 )}. Besides insulin the anorexigenic hormones PYY, amylin and cholecystokinin (CCK) were tested for their ability to reverse fasting-induced c-Fos expression in the ARC. Only PPY, but not amylin or CCK attenuated the stimulation of ARC neurons in food-deprived mice⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 ,} Reference Riediger, Michel and Becskei ^{105 )}. The lack of effectiveness was probably not due to ineffective doses, because in the same animals both amylin and CCK elicited c-Fos expression in the AP and the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), respectively. As amylin and CCK primarily act via the brainstem (see later) and because the ARC is considered as a target site for PYY, these findings are consistent with the presumed central signalling mechanisms for these hormones. Despite the failure of CCK and amylin to reverse fasting-induced ARC activation, at least CCK partially prevented ghrelin-induced c-Fos expression in the ARC in ad libitum fed mice⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{75 )} indicating some CCK-dependent inhibitory input to the ARC. Collectively, these findings suggest diverse roles for the investigated hormones in feeding-related changes of neuronal function in the ARC. However, the use of knockout models or specific hormone antagonists is required to confirm the relevance of endogenous hormone actions.

Altered neuronal arcuate nucleus responses in obese rodent models

Obesity is associated with hormonal and metabolic perturbations, including hyperleptinaemia, hyperinsulinaemia, leptin and insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and hyperglycaemia and others⁽ Reference Heymsfield, Greenberg and Fujioka ^{12 ,} Reference Halaas, Boozer and Blair-West ^{106 ,} Reference Bjorntorp ^{107 )}. In rodent models of diet-induced obesity (DIO) neuronal to responsiveness of ARC neurons to leptin is disrupted. DIO mice show a reduced phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), a marker for leptin receptor activation⁽ Reference Munzberg, Flier and Bjorbaek ^{108 ,} Reference Gamber, Huo and Ha ^{109 )}. Furthermore, the leptin-dependent release of NPY and α-melanocyte stimulating hormone⁽ Reference Enriori, Evans and Sinnayah ^{110 )} is decreased. As recently demonstrated, obesity also seems to be associated with ghrelin resistance in the ARC because peripheral or central ghrelin injection did not induce food intake and ARC activation in DIO mice⁽ Reference Briggs, Enriori and Lemus ^{111 )}. Moreover, ghrelin failed to induce the release of NPY and agouti gene-related peptide in hypothalamic explants from DIO mice in this study. Not only hormonal resistance but also impaired responsiveness of the ARC to metabolic stimuli has been described⁽ Reference Levin, Govek and Dunn-Meynell ^{112 )}.

It has been demonstrated in different obesity models that obese mice show blunted neuronal responses of the ARC to alterations in energy intake. Age-related obese (late-onset obesity) and DIO mice show completely absent or a strongly attenuated fasting-induced activation of NPY neurons in the ARC depending on the duration of food deprivation (12 h or 24 h, respectively). The blunted responses in these animals were not due to age per se or due to high-fat diet feeding because age-matched controls and diet-resistant lean controls showed intense fasting-induced c-Fos responses in the ARC⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{104 ,} Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{113 )}. The absence of fasting-induced ARC activation was associated with the absence of refeeding hyperphagia that only occurred in lean mice after fasting but not in late-onset obesity mice. The blunted ARC activation in these hyperleptinaemic obesity models contrasts with the exaggerated fasting response in the ARC of obese leptin-deficient ob/ob mice⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{113 )}. Measurements of metabolic (blood glucose and lipids) and hormonal parameters (insulin, ghrelin and leptin) were conducted in fasted and ad libitum fed obese mice and in respective lean controls⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{104 ,} Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{113 )}. Among these parameters, the only factor that consistently predicted the altered neuronal responses across the different obesity models was leptin because neuronal ARC activation is enhanced under leptin deficiency, prevented by exogenous leptin and blunted under hyperleptinaemia. However, the idea that obesity-related hyperleptinaemia prevents the response of the ARC to fasting is challenged by well-described leptin resistance in hyperleptinaemic obesity. Factors that limit central effectiveness of circulating leptin involve reduced transport across the blood–brain barrier, increased intracellular inhibition of leptin-signalling and reduced leptin receptor expression. Each of these factors are affected by feeding in a way that promotes leptin responsiveness under fasting conditions. Fasting increases the rate of leptin transport into the brain⁽ Reference Banks and Farrell ^{114 ,} Reference Banks, Coon and Robinson ^{115 )}, reduces intracellular leptin-antagonistic signalling⁽ Reference Baskin, Breininger and Schwartz ^{116 ,} Reference Morrison, White and Wang ^{117 )} and increases leptin receptor expression⁽ Reference Baskin, Seeley and Kuijper ^{118 )} and leptin binding to the receptor⁽ Reference Baskin, Breininger and Bonigut ^{119 )}. Hence, leptin responsiveness is dynamic and linked to the feeding status. In line with this assumption, fasting not only increases the leptin-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in lean mice but also in late-onset obesity mice that did not show a significant STAT3 response in the ad libitum fed state⁽ Reference Becskei, Lutz and Riediger ^{104 )}. Consequently, the combination of increased leptin levels and increased leptin responsiveness might prevent the activation of ARC neurons under negative energy balance. Together, these findings suggest that dynamic changes in leptin sensitivity under hyperleptinaemia might interfere with the receptive function of the ARC for stimuli reflecting short-term excursions in energy intake.

Area postrema-mediated effects of amylin on food intake

The AP has been identified as a target structure for the anorexigenic hormone amylin, which is widely accepted to contribute to the physiological control of food intake. Amylin is co-secreted with insulin from pancreatic β-cells in response to meal-related stimuli⁽ Reference Young ^{125 )}. Amylin reduces food intake at near physiological doses via a reduction of meal size⁽ Reference Lutz, Del Prete and Scharrer ^{126 –} Reference Arnelo, Reidelberger and Adrian ^{128 )}. Amylin antagonism not only blocks the anorexigenic effect of exogenous amylin but also increases food intake, supporting a physiological role of endogenous amylin in energy intake⁽ Reference Reidelberger, Haver and Arnelo ^{129 )}. Numerous studies provided evidence that the AP mediates amylin's suppressive effect on food intake. While vagal afferents are not required for amylin's anorexigenic action⁽ Reference Lutz, Del Prete and Scharrer ^{130 )}, APX blocks feeding inhibitory action of amylin⁽ Reference Lutz, Mollet and Rushing ^{131 –} Reference Mack, Soares and Wilson ^{133 )}.

The effects of amylin on neuronal function in the AP and the transmission of amylin signalling to other brain structures involved in the control of energy homoeostasis are well established. The amylin receptor consists of a functional complex of the calcitonin receptor and so-called receptor activity modifying proteins (receptor activity modifying protein 1 and receptor activity modifying protein 3)⁽ Reference Christopoulos, Perry and Morfis ^{134 )}. The calcitonin receptor is densely expressed in the AP⁽ Reference Becskei, Riediger and Zund ^{135 )}, where receptor activity modifying protein 3 gene expression has also been described⁽ Reference Barth, Riediger and Lutz ^{136 )}. In electrophysiological studies, amylin exerted strong excitatory effects in 44% of the recorded spontaneously active AP neurons⁽ Reference Riediger, Schmid and Lutz ^{137 )}. These effects were blocked by the amylin receptor antagonist AC187 and appeared to be mediated by the intracellular second messenger cyclic GMP. The excitatory action of amylin on AP neurons is in line with studies demonstrating an amylin-induced c-Fos expression in the AP⁽ Reference Riediger, Schmid and Lutz ^{137 ,} Reference Rowland, Crews and Gentry ^{138 )}. Not only exogenous but also feeding-related endogenous amylin activates AP neurons because refeeding of fasted rats triggered a c-Fos response in the AP that was attenuated by amylin antagonism⁽ Reference Riediger, Zuend and Becskei ^{139 )}. About 50% of neurons showing amylin-induced c-Fos are noradrenergic and specific neurotoxic lesion of these cells blunted amylin's feeding inhibitory action⁽ Reference Potes, Turek and Cole ^{140 )}.

Interaction of amylin and nutrient signalling

Glucose

In support of the afore-mentioned evidence for a role of the AP as central glucose sensor, electrophysiological studies identified glucose-responsive neurons in the AP⁽ Reference Funahashi and Adachi ^{141 )}. These studies were extended by the demonstration that amylin-sensitive neurons in the AP are specifically excited by glucose (Fig. 5), whereas amylin-insensitive neurons are unresponsive to changes in the ambient glucose concentration⁽ Reference Riediger, Schmid and Lutz ^{142 )}. Based on the importance of amylin-sensitive AP neurons for the physiological control of feeding behaviour, these findings further support a role of the AP in the metabolic control of food intake. The AP is not the only glucose sensitive structure in the brainstem, but it is located in a brainstem area where local injection of 5-thio-glucose induced the strongest glucoprivic feeding responses⁽ Reference Ritter, Dinh and Zhang ^{143 )}.

Fig. 5. Co-sensitivity of an area postrema (AP) neuron to glucose and amylin. Decreasing the glucose concentration in the superfusion solution from the standard concentration of 10 mM to 2, 4 and 6 mM during the indicated time caused concentration-dependent decreases of the spontaneous discharge rate. Superfusion of amylin elicited a strong excitatory effect. Reproduced with permission (published in Riediger et al.⁽ Reference Riediger, Schmid and Lutz ^{142 )}).

The glucose sensitivity of the AP has also been postulated as a protective mechanism against excursions in blood glucose values. Hypoglycaemia induces a counter-regulatory increase in the rate of gastric emptying⁽ Reference Schvarcz, Palmer and Aman ^{144 )} that compensates the decreased blood glucose via increased gastrointestinal nutrient absorption. This mechanism interferes with hormonal and pharmacological effects that delay gastric emptying because glucose appears to be a permissive factor. Amylin potently inhibits gastric emptying via an AP-dependent action, which is overridden by hypoglycaemia⁽ Reference Gedulin and Young ^{145 )}. Our group recently demonstrated a similar permissive effect of glucose for amylin's feeding suppressive effect because amylin failed to significantly inhibit feeding under hypoglycemic conditions (C Neuner-Boyle, unpublished results). The inhibitory effect of the amylin agonist pramlintide on gastric emptying is an important therapeutic mechanism to lower postprandial glucose levels in diabetic patients. As treatment-induced hypoglycaemia is a severe risk in diabetic patients, the permissive effect of glucose on gastric emptying is considered as a fail-safe mechanism that overrides the anti-diabetic action of amylin agonism under hypoglycaemic conditions (see⁽ Reference Young ^{146 ,} Reference Young ^{147 )} for review).

Protein

Amylin's satiating and effect and amylin-induced AP activation are modulated by diet-derived macronutrients, in particular by protein. An influence of diet-derived nutrients on amylin signalling was inferred from the observation that amylin-induced activation of the AP is stronger in fasted v. ad libitum fed rats and also in rats that received nutrient-deficient NED⁽ Reference Michel, Becskei and Erguven ^{148 )}. Selective supplementation of NED with protein but not with glucose or fat strongly attenuated the amylin-induced AP activation suggesting that protein counteracts anorexigenic amylin signalling. In light of the well-established satiating action of protein this assumption appeared unexpected, but it was confirmed by feeding studies in which amylin failed to inhibit protein supplemented NED (Fig. 6)⁽ Reference Michel, Becskei and Erguven ^{148 )}. The inhibitory effect of diet-derived protein on amylin action has been corroborated by immunohistological and feeding studies using isoenergetic diets of different protein content. Amylin more potently decreased intake of 1 and 8% protein chow than standard chow containing 18% protein. Similarly, amylin-induced c-Fos expression was higher in rats receiving less protein⁽ Reference Züger, Forster and Lutz ^{149 )}. These effects were not secondary to altered energy intake that was similar across the experimental groups. While blood glucose levels were also similar, blood amino acid levels decreased in rats fed low-protein diet suggesting that circulating amino acids might contribute the protein-dependent attenuation of amylin-induced AP activation. Pre-treatment of rats with an intraperitoneal administration of a mixed amino acid solution also attenuated amylin's c-Fos response in the AP, which supports this hypothesis⁽ Reference Züger, Forster and Lutz ^{149 )}. However, the exact neuronal mechanism underlying the protein-dependent modulation of amylin signalling remains to be identified. The relationship between reduced amylin-responsiveness and protein intake might bear both physiological and therapeutic implications. Amylin's function in the control of nutrient and energy intake might be adapted to the nutrient composition of the diet. At least under undisturbed energy homoeostasis protein is metabolically less important than carbohydrate or fat, which might suggest that amylin's contribution to the overall control of energy intake is stronger when the intake of protein relative to glucose or fat is low. Another mutually not exclusive implication might consist of an AP-sensitising effect produced by short-term reduction of food intake or food availability in a protein-dependent manner, pre-adapting AP responsiveness to a higher level in the pre-prandial state before meal onset. In addition to the possible physiological relevance, the effectiveness of pharmacological approaches based on amylin agonism might be influenced in a nutrient-dependent way.

Fig. 6. Effect of amylin (5 μg/kg s.c.) on food intake in rats kept on different test diets (NED, non-energy diet, vanilla-flavoured cellulose) for 24 h prior to injection. Bars represent group means and sem (n12). *P < 0·05 and ***P < 0·001, significantly different from respective control (saline) group (paired Student t test). Modified and reproduced with permission (published in Michel et al.⁽ Reference Michel, Becskei and Erguven ^{148 )}).

Hormonal interactions involving area postrema and brainstem mechanisms

The dorsal vagal complex is a site of convergence for vagal and blood-borne signals controlling food intake. Brainstem structures including amylin-sensitive sites are reciprocally interconnected with hypothalamic and extra-hypothalamic areas involved in energy homoeostasis⁽ Reference Potes, Lutz and Riediger ^{154 )}. For some hormones known to act via the brainstem synergistic effects have been described, although the existence of a synergy is not always based on equal criteria in the literature. Synergy is often inferred from the observation that the effect of two combined stimuli is higher than the sum of the effects when each stimulus is applied alone. Sophisticated statistical models (e.g. isobolographic analysis) have been used to detect and describe synergistic actions. Several synergistic effects have been demonstrated for amylin in combination with other hormones⁽ Reference Roth, Trevaskis and Turek ^{155 )}. In addition to the synergy between amylin and CCK mentioned earlier, there is a synergistic effect of amylin and leptin to reduce body weight in obese and lean subjects⁽ Reference Roth, Roland and Cole ^{3 ,} Reference Turek, Trevaskis and Levin ^{4 )}. Several neuronal mechanisms have been associated with the synergy between amylin and leptin. Amylin seems to enhance neuronal leptin responsiveness as reflected by the reversal of the blunted STAT3 response to leptin in the ventromedial hypothalamus. Amylin also affects leptin signalling in the brainstem because amylin knockout mice tend to show reduced leptin-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in the NTS, and pre-treating leptin-resistant DIO rats with amylin increased leptin-dependent STAT3 signalling in the AP⁽ Reference Roth, Roland and Cole ^{3 ,} Reference Turek, Trevaskis and Levin ^{4 )}.

Anorexigenic synergy has also been reported for amylin and PYY(3–36), whereas body weight reduction was additive⁽ Reference Roth, Coffey and Jodka ^{49 )}. The neuronal correlate of this anorexigenic synergy has not yet been identified. While the AP was not required for PYY(3–36)-induced suppression of feeding in one study⁽ Reference Baraboi, Michel and Smith ^{156 ,} Reference Cox and Randich ^{157 )}, another study suggested an involvement of the AP in the PYY-dependent effects on gastric acid secretion⁽ Reference Deng, Guarita and Pedroso ^{158 )}. Binding sites for PYY of the Y receptor family are abundant in the AP⁽ Reference Dumont, Fournier and St-Pierre ^{159 –} Reference Dumont, Moyse and Fournier ^{161 )}. Interestingly, a dose of full-length PYY that did not trigger a c-Fos response in the AP alone, increased amylin-induced c-Fos expression in the AP⁽ Reference Riediger, Michel and Becskei ^{105 )} suggesting a possible interaction between amylin and PYY in the AP.

A recent study conducted in non-human primates demonstrated anorexigenic synergy between the potent amylin receptor agonist salmon calcitonin and the GLP-1R agonist exendin-4⁽ Reference Bello, Kemm and Ofeldt ^{162 )}. The mechanism underlying this synergy also remains to be identified. There is evidence that GLP-1 inhibits feeding via an AP-dependent effect after hepatic portal vein infusion⁽ Reference Pacheco-López, Punjabi and Graber ^{163 )}. However, the anorexigenic effect of exendin-4 is not blocked in APX rats⁽ Reference Baraboi, Smith and Ferguson ^{164 )}. Although amylin and GLP-1 activate AP neurons, these hormones seem to have different target cells in the AP. Similar to the aversive stimulus lithium chloride, GLP-1 and exendin-4 almost exclusively activate AP neurons that do not express the calcitonin receptor, which is considered as a marker for the primary target cells for amylin in the AP⁽ Reference Züger, Forster and Lutz ^{149 )}. The functional implication of this dissociation has not yet been specifically investigated. GLP-1R-mediated activation of the AP has been linked to the induction of aversion⁽ Reference Thiele, Seeley and D'Alessio ^{165 )}. Therefore, it is particularly important to exclude aversive mechanisms in approaches based on GLP-1R activation.