Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:19:50.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulse-rich diets and risk of cardiovascular diseases: findings from the UK Biobank prospective study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2024

O.A Olotu
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition
Y Kaimila
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition The University of Malawi, P.O Box 280, Zomba, Malawi
M.E Clegg
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health
K.G Jackson
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health Institute for Cardiovascular Metabolic Research, Harry Nursten Building, Whiteknights, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK
J.A Lovegrove
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health Institute for Cardiovascular Metabolic Research, Harry Nursten Building, Whiteknights, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including ischemic heart diseases (IHD) and stroke, are a leading cause of death globally and significantly impact quality of life(1). Current guidance suggests increasing the consumption of pulses rich in fibre and iron, to reduce CVD risk(2). However, longterm observational studies investigating pulse consumption and CVD incidence are limited(3). In the current analysis, the UK Biobank, a prospective cohort study of over 500,000 UK adults was used to investigate the association between pulse consumption and CVD incidence(4).

A total of 119,914 (males: 51,540 and females: 68,374) participants with ≥ two 24-hour dietary recalls, not pregnant and free from CVD at baseline were included. Total CVD was defined as IHD and cerebrovascular diseases. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the incidence of CVD by pulse consumption, reported as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pulse consumption was modelled as a categorical variable with non-consumers (0g/day, n = 76,531) and 3 tertiles (T) of pulse intake T1 (1-20.4g/day, n = 14,785); T2 (20.5-40g/day, n = 14,015); T3 (40.5-360g/day, n = 14,583). The fully adjusted model was controlled for sex, age, dietary energy, region, ethnicity, smoking status, physical activity level, education, income, employment, body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake, supplement use, processed red meat intake, sodium intake and trans-fatty acids intake, family history of stroke, heart disease and diabetes, insulin use, blood pressure or cholesterol-lowering medication use. The analysis was performed in STATA 18.

The cohort had a mean ± SD age of 55.9 ± 7.8 years, BMI of 26.6 ± 4.5 kg/m2 and pulse intake of 13.2 ± 24.3 g/day. There were 8,937 incidences of CVD after a mean follow-up of 12.4 years. Compared with non-consumers, pulse intake was not significantly associated with the incidence of total CVD, T1 (HR: 0.95, CI: 0.89–1.01),T2 (HR: 0.98, CI: 0.92–1.05), T3 (HR: 0.97; CI: 0.91–1.04).

In conclusion, pulse-rich diets were not significantly associated with a lower total CVD incidence in middle-aged adults participating in the UK Biobank compared to non-consumers. Further work will model the replacement of red and processed meat with pulses on CVD incidence and mortality.

Funding was received from BBSRC (BB/W017946) for the project “Raising the Pulse: Systems analysis of the environmental, nutritional and health balance of staple foods”. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number [101928].

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Kyu, HH, Abate, D, Abate, KH et al. (2018) Lancet 392 (10159), 1859–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becerra-Tomás, N, Papandreou, C, & Salas-Salvadó, J (2019) Adv Nutr 10, 437S450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, P, Leong, D, McKee, M et al. (2017) Circ Res 121 (6), 677694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohns, TJ, Sudlow, C, Allen, NE et al. (2019) Eur Heart J 40 (14), 11581166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar