Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:47:45.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perceived barriers to healthy eating: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

J. Lara
Affiliation:
Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine; Newcastle University. Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and Vitality. Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK Department of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Ellison Building Room A324, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK
V. Yong
Affiliation:
Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine; Newcastle University. Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and Vitality. Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK
J.C. Mathers
Affiliation:
Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine; Newcastle University. Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and Vitality. Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Strong evidence indicates that lifestyle behaviours including poor diet, smoking, low physical activity, high alcohol consumption, or high body mass index (BMI), are strongly associated with health in adults. Together, these behaviours are associated with four-fold increases in total mortality in men and women and make a substantial contribution to the global burden of disabilityReference Khaw, Wareham, Bingham, Welch, Luben and Day1. Identifying and addressing perceived barriers to healthy eating (PBHE) is a critical step in developing effective dietary interventions to promote health in adulthoodReference Mathers2, Reference Lara, McCrum and Mathers3. A critical analysis of the evidence in this area will be valuable in developing interventions targeting healthier eating patterns.

We undertook a systematic review of studies evaluating PBHE among adults >18 years. The protocol for the review was registered with PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42015027946). A search of three databases 1) OVID Medline 2) Embase and 3) Scopus, until October 2015 produced 2091 papers. After abstract and full paper screening, 92 papers published between 1996 and 2015 met our inclusion criteria. Most were cross-sectional studies (n = 88), while only 4 reported intervention studies. Participants in these studies were adults mean age for studies ranging from 23·8 years to 74·8 years. A total of 215 terms related to PBHE were identified. The number of PBHE in individual studies ranged from 1 to 21. A card sorting task involving 3 pairs of volunteers was undertaken to develop logical categories of PBHE.

Few studies investigated facilitators of healthy eating helping to overcome these PBHE; this is an area that requires further investigation. The results of this study have important implications for researchers interested in behaviour change. The PBHE identified can inform the design of tailored, or personalised, interventions for adults Reference Celis-Morales, Lara and Mathers4.

References

1.Khaw, KT, Wareham, N, Bingham, S, Welch, A, Luben, R, Day, N. PLoS Med 2008; 5:E152.Google Scholar
2.Mathers, JC. Br J Nutr 2015; 113 Suppl:S18–22.10.1017/S0007114514003237Google Scholar
3.Lara, J, McCrum, LA, Mathers, JC. Maturitas 2014; 79:292298.10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.003Google Scholar
4.Celis-Morales, C, Lara, J, Mathers, JC. Proc Nutr Soc 2015; 74: 130138.10.1017/S0029665114001633Google Scholar