Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:26:14.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microbes of nutritional importance in the alimentary tract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

R. E. Hungate
R. E. Hungate
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on ‘Nutritional Implications of Microbial Action in the Non-Ruminal Alimentary Tract’
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1984

References

Benemann, J. R. (1973). Science 181, 164–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, L. R. (1926). Quarterly Review of Biology 1, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S., Laurie, J. I., Bailey, J. E. & Holdgate, S. A. (1976). Journal of General Microbiology 95, 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1938). Ecology 19, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1941). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 34, 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1942). Biological Bulletin 83, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1943). Biological Bulletin 84, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1944). Proceedings of the Texas Academy of Science 27, 91–98.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1946). Journal of Bacteriology 51, 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1955). In Biochemistry and Physiology of Protozoa, pp. 195–197 [Hutner, S. and Lwoff, A., editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and Its Microbes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1975). Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 6, 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. (1981). Australian Veterinary Journal 57, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, R. A. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odelson, D. A. & Breznak, J. A. (1983). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 45, 1602–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potrikus, C. J. & Breznak, J. A. (1980). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 40, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. G. B. & Bernard, F. R. (1980). Science 208, 609–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakata, T. & Englehardt, W. V. (1981). Cell Tissue Research 219, 629–635.Google Scholar
Salyers, A. (1979). In Dietary Fibre: Chemistry and Nutrition, pp. 193–201 [Inglett, G. E. and Falkehag, S. I., editors]. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salyers, A., West, S., Vercellotti, J. R. & Wilkins, T. D. (1977). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 34, 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visek, W. J. (1978). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, Suppl., 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, C. L. & Babish, E. (1980). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 39, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woehler, F. (1824). Tiedemann und Treviranus Zeitschrift 1, 125–128, 290–317.Google Scholar
Yamin, M. (1981). Science 211, 58–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar