Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:35:16.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right – Corrigendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , November 2010 , pp. 660
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

In the Abstract

When ‘restricted’ fluid regimens were compared with ‘standard or liberal’ fluid regimens, there was no difference in post-operative complication rates (risk ratio 0·96 (95% CI 0·56, 1·65), P=0·89) or length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) −1·77 (95% CI −4·36, 0·81) d, P=0·18).

Should read

When ‘restricted’ fluid regimens were compared with ‘standard or liberal’ fluid regimens, there was no difference in post-operative complication rates (risk ratio 0·83 (95% CI 0·49, 1·39, P=0·47) or length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) −1·77 (95% CI −4·36, 0·81) d, P=0·18).

Fig. 3 on page 493 is replaced by new Fig. 3.

References

Varadhan, KK & Lobo, DN (2010) A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc 69, 488–498. doi:10.1017/S0029665110001734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed