Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:08:42.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms contributing to lactose and sucrose-induced postprandial lipaemia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2024

J. Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
S. Carter
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
B. Spellanzon
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
L. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
E. Johnson
Affiliation:
Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
F. Koumanov
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
J. A. Betts
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
D. Thompson
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
L. Hodson
Affiliation:
Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fructose-containing sugars can exaggerate postprandial lipaemia and stimulate hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) when compared to glucose-based carbohydrates(1). Galactose has recently been shown to increase postprandial lipaemia compared to glucose(2), but mechanisms remain uncharacterised. The aim of this study was to assess the effect and mechanisms of lactose-induced lipaemia.

Twenty-four non-obese adults (12 male and 12 female) completed three trials in a randomised, crossover design (28 ± 7-day washout). During trials, participants consumed test drinks containing 50 g fat with 100 g of carbohydrate. The control carbohydrate was a glucose polymer (maltodextrin), the experimental carbohydrate was galactose-containing carbohydrate (lactose) and the active comparator was fructose-containing carbohydrate (sucrose). Hepatic DNL was assessed by the 2H2O method and [U-13C]-palmitate was added to the test drink to trace the fate of the ingested fat. Blood and breath samples were taken to determine plasma metabolite and hormone concentrations, in addition to plasma and breath 2H and 13C enrichments. Data were converted into incremental under the curve (iAUC) and were checked for normality by visual inspection of residuals. Differences between trials were assessed by one-way ANOVA. Where a main effect of trial was detected, post- hoc t-tests were performed to determine which trials differed from lactose according to the principle of closed-loop testing.

The plasma triacylglycerol iAUC (mean ± SD) in response to maltodextrin was 51 ± 68 mmol/L*360 min. Following lactose ingestion, plasma triacylglycerol iAUC increased to 98 ± 88 mmol/L*360 min (p<0.001 vs maltodextrin), which was comparable to sucrose [90 ± 95 mmol/L*360 min (p=0.41 vs lactose)]. Hepatic DNL in response to maltodextrin was 6.6 ± 3.0%. Following ingestion of lactose, hepatic DNL increased to 12.4 ± 6.9% (p=0.02 vs maltodextrin), which was comparable to sucrose [12.2 ± 6.9% (p=0.96 vs lactose)]. Exhaled 13CO2 in response to maltodextrin was 10.4 ± 4.1 mmol/kgFFM*360 min. Following ingestion of lactose, exhaled 13CO2 was 8.8 ± 4.9 mmol/kgFFM*360 min (p=0.09 vs maltodextrin), which was lower than sucrose [11.1 ± 3.9 mmol/kgFFM*360 min (p=0.01 vs lactose)].

These data are consistent with the hypothesis that hepatic de novo lipogenesis contributes to both lactose and sucrose-induced lipaemia and provide a rationale to investigate the longer-term effects of lactose and sucrose on metabolism.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Chong MF, Fielding BA & Frayn KN (2007) Am J Clin Nutr 85, 1511–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins J, Simpson A, Betts JA et al. (2020) J Nutr 150, 1765–1772.Google Scholar