Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T18:32:13.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Macronutrient intake in overweight adults with chronic spinal cord injury – analysis before and after dietetic intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2012

S. S. Wong*
Affiliation:
National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury Centre of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, University College London Hospital, Aylesbury
L. Spillman
Affiliation:
National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury
A. Graham
Affiliation:
National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury
G. Grimble
Affiliation:
Centre of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, University College London Hospital, Aylesbury
A. Forbes
Affiliation:
Centre of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, University College London Hospital, Aylesbury
*
Correspondence : Samford Wong, email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Approximately 40,000 British people currently live with spinal cord injury (SCI)(1) and up to 60% are estimated to be overweight or obese(Reference Gupta, White and Sandford2). This study aims (i) to describe the macronutrient intake in a sample of adults with SCI before they attend a weight management clinic with reference to the UK Reference Nutrient Intake,(3) and (ii) to determine if there is any difference after dietetic interventions (analysis by paired t-test). Thirty-two chronic SCI adults (52.4±11.5 years; body mass index (BMI): 32.9±4.7 kg/m2; 41% female) macronutrient intake were analysed at baseline and follow-up by 7-day food diary (Table). Intake of the following macronutrients was reduced significantly after dietetic intervention: energy (1,647 kcal v. 1,353 kcal, p=0.029), total fat (62.1 g v. 48.3 g, p=0.005), saturated fatty acids (20.1 g v. 15.8 g, p=0.001) and alcohol (6.87 g v. 2.86 g, p=0.003). Both males and females were however found to consume more sugar and protein than the RNI. There was a lower intake of dietary fibre than in the RNI. Energy intake appeared to be 15% less than the estimated needs (Henry's approach(Reference Henry4)v. 7-day food diary intake: 8.9 MJ/d v. 7.65 MJ/d, p<0.01). The present study shows that simple dietetic intervention can improve the quality of the patient's diet, and there is some evidence that nutrient imbalance in SCI patients relative to the RNI can also be improved. Current guidance on nutritional requirement may be important overestimates for the SCI population. Despite energy intakes at lower than estimated needs the SCI population experiences damaging weight gain. To prevent obesity, we tentatively propose a reduction of 15% of total energy need provision from that proposed by standard predictive equations for individuals with SCI. In order to determine the optimal nutritional requirements in this specific high risk group of patients, further research, measuring energy expenditure and nutrient intake, is warranted.

SCI: Spinal cord injury group; RNI: Reference Nutrient Intake3; SFA: Saturated fatty acid; MUFA: Mono-saturated fatty acid; PUFA: Poly-saturated fatty acid.

References

1.Spinal Injury Association (2009) http://www.spinal.co.uk/page/Some-basic-facts-about-SCI assessed 8th February 2010.Google Scholar
2.Gupta, N, White, K & Sandford, P (2006) Spinal Cord 44, 9294.Google Scholar
3.Department of Health (1991) Dietary Reference Values of Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 41. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
4.Henry, CJK (2005) Public Health Nutr 8, 11331152.Google Scholar