Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:23:19.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Diet, Environment and other Factors on Experimental Liver Necrosis in the Rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

J. M. Naftalin
J. M. Naftalin
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Nutrtion and the Liver
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , September 1954 , pp. 120 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1954

References

Afbell, M. R. & Beveridge, J. M. R. (1949). Canad. J. Res. 27, sect. E, p. 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, M. R. & Beveridge, J. M. R. (1951). Arch. Path. 52, 428.Google Scholar
Dam, H. (1953). Experientia, Suppl. 1, p. 195.Google Scholar
Gillman, J., Gilbert, C., Gillman, T. & Spence, I. (1952). Amer. J. dig. dis. 19, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goettsch, M. (1948). Arch. Biochem. 19, 349.Google Scholar
Goettsch, M. (1949). Arch. Biochem. 21, 289.Google Scholar
Goettsch, M. (1951). J. Nutr. 4, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
György, P. & Goldblatt, H. (1939). J. exp. Med. 70, 185.Google Scholar
György, P. & Goldblatt, H. (1949). J. exp. Med. 89, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
György, P. & Goldblatt, H. (1951). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 76, 124.Google Scholar
György, P., Rose, C. S., Tomarelli, R. M. & Goldblatt, H. (1950). J. Nutr. 41, 265.Google Scholar
Himsworth, H. P. & Glynn, L. E. (1944–1945). Clin. Sci. 5, 93.Google Scholar
Himsworth, H. P. & Lindan, O. (1949). Nature Lond., 163, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, A. & Fink, H. (1943). Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 278, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hove, E. L., Copeland, D. H. & Salmon, W. D. (1949). J. Nutr. 39, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindan, O.(1951). Brit. J. exp. Path. 32, 471.Google Scholar
Lindan, O.& Himsworth, H. P. (1950). Brzt. J. exp. Path. 31, 651.Google Scholar
Lindan, O.& Work, E. (1951 a). Biochem. J. 48, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindan, O.& Work, E. (1951 b). Biochem. J. 48, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. R. & Beveridge, J. M. R. (1952). J. Nutr. 47, 41.Google Scholar
Naftalin, J. M. (1951). J. Path. Bact. 63, 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naftalin, J. M. (1952). Lancet, 263, 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naftalin, J. M. (1954 a). Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 57, 862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naftalin, J. M. (1954 b). Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 57, 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naftalin, J. M. (1954 c). J. Path. Bact. 67, 335.Google Scholar
Schwarz, K. (1944). Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 281, 101.Google Scholar
Schwarz, K. (1948). Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 283, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, K. (1951). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 78, 852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, K. (1952). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 80, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, H. C. & Merrill, A. T. (1925). J. biol. Chem. 63, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahi, P. N. (1949). Arch. Path. 47, 119.Google Scholar
Weichselbaum, T. E. (1935). Quart.J. exp. Physiol. 25, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar