Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:20:46.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How and why ultra-processed foods harm human health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2023

Renata Bertazzi Levy Open the ORCID record for Renata Bertazzi Levy [Opens in a new window] ,
Mayra Figueiredo Barata ,
Maria Alvim Leite  and
Giovanna Calixto Andrade
Renata Bertazzi Levy*
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Department, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ave. Dr Arnaldo, 455, Zip Code: 01246-903, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Center for Epidemiological Studies in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo (Nupens/USP), Ave. Dr Arnaldo, 715, Zip Code: 01246-90, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Mayra Figueiredo Barata
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Department, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ave. Dr Arnaldo, 455, Zip Code: 01246-903, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Center for Epidemiological Studies in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo (Nupens/USP), Ave. Dr Arnaldo, 715, Zip Code: 01246-90, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Maria Alvim Leite
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Department, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ave. Dr Arnaldo, 455, Zip Code: 01246-903, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Center for Epidemiological Studies in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo (Nupens/USP), Ave. Dr Arnaldo, 715, Zip Code: 01246-90, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Giovanna Calixto Andrade
Affiliation:
Center for Epidemiological Studies in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo (Nupens/USP), Ave. Dr Arnaldo, 715, Zip Code: 01246-90, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Renata Bertazzi Levy, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The analysis of food using a perspective centred on nutrients seems inadequate for understanding the dietary transition and its impact on the growth of obesity and chronic diseases. Industrial food processing is now proposed as the key to explain the relationship between food and health. The NOVA food classification considers the degree and the purpose of food processing, which includes physical, biological and chemical processes used after foods are separated from nature, and before being consumed or prepared as dishes and meals. NOVA has four food groups: (1) unprocessed and minimally processed foods; (2) processed culinary ingredients; (3) processed foods and (4) ultra-processed foods, which are formulations made mostly or entirely from substances derived from group 1 foods and additives, with little if any intact group 1 food. Many investigations linking high ultra-processed food consumption with deterioration of diets and adverse health outcomes are reinforced by prospective studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. There are various plausible explanations of why diets high in ultra-processed foods are harmful. Their production and consumption continue to rise worldwide. Efficient and effective public policies and actions that reduce production and consumption of ultra-processed products are needed, to protect human health now and in future.

Keywords

Ultra-processed foodsFood processingNOVAHuman health
Type
Conference on ‘Architecture of food: Processing, structure and health’
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , February 2024 , pp. 1 - 8
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

NOVA background

Since the 1980s the dietary patterns of the Brazilian population have been monitored, based on family budget surveys carried out by the official Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. In 2009 a new analysis showed that purchases of staple foods such as rice, beans, meat and milk, and also culinary ingredients such as sugar, oils, fats and salt had decreased during the period 1987–2009, while purchases of soft drinks, ready-to-eat meals, sausages, industrialised cakes, pies and cookies had increased(Reference Martins, Levy and Claro1) (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Changes in food purchases by the Brazilian population (1987–2009). It shows that purchases of staple foods such as rice, beans, meat and milk, and also culinary ingredients such as sugar, oils, fats and salt had decreased during the period 1987–2009, while purchases of soft drinks, ready-to-eat meals, sausages, industrialised cakes, pies and cookies had increased.

The substantial decline in culinary ingredients was striking. Conventionally, recommendations are to avoid them, because salt aside they are very high in dietary energy and are nutritionally unbalanced or depleted. Also impressive was that ready-to-consume foods were displacing long-established food patterns based on meals. The decrease in culinary ingredients showed that families were cutting down on cooking and instead buying and consuming industrialised foods(Reference Martins, Levy and Claro1).

It was apparent that analysis of food in terms of its nutrients was inadequate, and it seemed likely that industrial food processing would better explain the relationship between food and health(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Moubarac2, Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Lawrence3).

All foods are processed in some way, except for some fruits and vegetables. All others have been processed. So, it does not make sense to just divide processed and unprocessed foods. Various processes are innocuous and contribute to a healthy and sustainable diet. For instance, food preservation maintains societies(Reference Ludwig4). The NOVA food classification, which was first published in 2010(Reference Monteiro, Levy and Claro5), was the result of these research studies and reflections. After being refined through data analysis and discussions, an updated version was included in the 2014 edition of the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population(6).

The NOVA food classification

Food processing, as identified by NOVA (which is not an acronym), includes the physical, biological and chemical processes used after foods are separated from nature, and before being consumed or prepared as dishes and meals(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Moubarac2). NOVA has four food groups divided by the nature, extent and purpose of industrial processing. See Table 1(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Moubarac2).

Table 1. NOVA food groups: definition and examples

A practical way to identify ultra-processed foods is to look for their markers in lists of ingredients. Markers include the presence of substances never or rarely used in kitchens. These include hydrolysed proteins, soya protein isolate, gluten, casein, whey protein, ‘mechanically separated meat’, fructose, high-fructose maize syrup, ‘fruit juice concentrate’, invert sugar, maltodextrin, dextrose, lactose, soluble or insoluble fibre, hydrogenated or interesterified oil; and also, other sources of protein, carbohydrate or fat which are neither foods from NOVA group 1 or group 3, nor culinary ingredients from NOVA group 2. One or more of these food substances usually identifies a product as ultra-processed(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy7).

Markers also include the presence of classes of additives other than preservatives. These are at the end of lists of ingredients. Many have cosmetic functions. They include flavours, flavour enhancers, colours, emulsifiers, emulsifying salts, sweeteners, thickeners, and anti-foaming, bulking, carbonating, foaming, gelling and glazing agents. The presence in the list of ingredients of one or more of these types of additives also usually identifies a product as ultra-processed(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy7).

Ultra-processed foods, diets and diseases

Impact on diet quality

The main metric used to identify ultra-processed food consumption patterns is the percentage of ultra-processed food in diets, in calories or in grams. This information has been published using data from national surveys in several countries(Reference Juul, Parekh and Martinez-Steele8–Reference Liu, Steele and Li17). There is a large variation of ultra-processed food consumption between countries, from less than 16 % of the total energy in Colombia(Reference Parra, Da Costa-Louzada and Moubarac14) up to 57 and 58 % in the UK and USA, respectively(Reference Rauber, Louzada and Steele15,Reference Martínez Steele, Popkin and Swinburn18) .

There are some publications regarding ultra-processed trends. Brazil(Reference Levy, Andrade and da Cruz16) and Mexico(Reference Marrón-Ponce, Tolentino-Mayo and Hernández-F12), for instance, have a long series of budget surveys. These countries had a low-ultra-processed food consumption in the 1980s and 1990s and now they are both close to 20 % of the total energy. In Mexico, the ultra-processed food consumption increased from 10 % in 1984 up to 23 % in 2016(Reference Marrón-Ponce, Tolentino-Mayo and Hernández-F12). In Brazil, the consumption of ultra-processed foods was 10 % of the total energy of diets in 1987–1988 and it reached 21 % in 2018. In high-income countries such as Canada(Reference Moubarac, Batal and Martins19) and Spain(Reference Latasa, Louzada and Martinez Steele20), these publications show a solid increase over time in Canada(Reference Moubarac, Batal and Martins19), from 24 % in 1939 to 55 % in 2001. And a very large increase, from 10 to almost 30 % in 20 years, in Spain(Reference Latasa, Louzada and Martinez Steele20).

In the USA, consumption is very high, and reached 67 % of the total energy in children in 2017–2018(Reference Juul, Parekh and Martinez-Steele8,Reference Wang, Martínez Steele and Du21) . In the UK, data from the period 2008–2019 show a decrease in consumption of soft drinks, sausages and margarine, but an increase in biscuits, salty snacks and ready-to-eat meals(Reference Madruga, Steele and Reynolds22). Overall, ultra-processed foods intake is about 56 % of total energy(Reference Madruga, Steele and Reynolds22).

Data from Euromonitor, the world's leading provider of strategic market research reporting, show that ultra-processed foods and drinks sales are growing almost everywhere. During the period 2006–2019, in Australasia and North America, and Western Europe sales of ultra-processed foods increased from 128 kg/per capita to 134 kg/per capita and from 106 kg/per capita to 115 kg/per capita, respectively. There are regions where ultra-processed sales are still comparatively low, such as Africa and Asia. Regions with lower consumption show a higher increase rate(Reference Baker, Machado and Santos23).

A systematic review of the impact of ultra-processed food on diet quality, including a meta-analysis, with data from 13 countries, shows that an increase in consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with a decline of the overall dietary nutrient profile(Reference Martini, Godos and Bonaccio24). The higher the ultra-processed food intake, the higher the energy intake, and that of saturated fats and free sugars, and the lower the intake of fibre, protein and potassium(Reference Martini, Godos and Bonaccio24). Also, the higher the ultra-processed foods consumption, the lower the consumption of vegetables and fruits(Reference Martini, Godos and Bonaccio24).

Impact on diseases

Investigations from many countries link high ultra-processed food consumption with greater risk of disorders, diseases and premature death. Cohort studies have found links with obesity and adiposity outcomes, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, hyperuricaemia, CVD, breast, ovarian, brain and overall cancer, non-alcoholic cirrhosis, Crohn's disease, chronic renal failure, depression, cognitive decline, dementia and all-cause mortality(Reference Moradi, Entezari and Mohammadi25–Reference Zhang, Gan and Ye39).

These are reinforced by at least forty-one prospective studies, and eleven systematic reviews and meta-analyses. For adiposity, a recent meta-analysis comparing the highest and lowest consumption quartile of ultra-processed food was 1⋅55 for obesity, 1⋅36 for overweight and 1⋅41 for abdominal obesity(Reference Moradi, Entezari and Mohammadi25). For this outcome, as well as prospective studies and systematic reviews with meta-analyses(Reference Moradi, Entezari and Mohammadi25), there is a randomised clinical trial(Reference Hall, Ayuketah and Brychta40).

Twenty adults were confined at a clinical centre, randomised into two groups, to consume, ad libitum, either an ultra-processed food diet or a non-ultra-processed food diet for 2 weeks. They exchanged their diets after this period. Both groups had meals which contained the same amount of energy, macronutrients, sugar, sodium and fibre. When participants were on the ultra-processed food diet, they ate about 500 calories more every day, in relation to the day they were on the non-ultra-processed diet. They gained an average of almost 1 kg after the week they were on the ultra-processed food diet and lost the same amount after the week they were on the unprocessed food diet. This showed that high ultra-processed food diets cause higher energy intake and weight gain(Reference Hall, Ayuketah and Brychta40).

Type 2 diabetes has been investigated by prospective cohort studies in France(Reference Srour, Fezeu and Kesse-Guyot41), UK(Reference Levy, Rauber and Chang42), Spain(Reference Llavero-Valero, Escalada-San Martín and Martínez-González43) and the Netherlands(Reference Duan, Vinke and Navis44). Meta-analysis found that each 10 % increase in ultra-processed food intake (kJ/day) was associated with a 15 % higher risk of type 2 diabetes(Reference Moradi, Kermani and Bagheri37).

A meta-analysis published in 2022 using nine observational studies showed that a higher ultra-processed food consumption increased by 23 % the risk of hypertension, comparing highest and lowest categories of ultra-processed foods consumption(Reference Wang, Du and Huang38).

For CVD, a meta-analysis evaluated the association between ultra-processed food and CVD incidence and mortality. A higher intake of ultra-processed food was associated with a 29 % increased risk of CVD incidence and mortality and a 34 % increased risk of cerebrovascular disease incidence and mortality(Reference Pagliai, Dinu and Madarena27).

Ultra-processed food has been associated with all-cause mortality in prospective cohorts conducted in the USA, Spain, France and Italy. Meta-analysis showed that ultra-processed foods consumption increased all-cause mortality by 21 % comparing highest and lowest categories of ultra-processed foods consumption(Reference Suksatan, Moradi and Naeini36).

Reasons for harm

There are many reasons why ultra-processed foods are problematic. Usually, they are convenient, practical and portable, generally designed to be consumed anywhere – in front of television or a computer, in the workplace or walking or driving –, and dispense with the use of plates and cutlery(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy7). Most of the time, they are sold as snacks, drinks or ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat meals. So, they displace freshly prepared meals based on natural or minimally processed foods. Some studies showed that portion sizes as served in fast-food outlets have increased significantly in recent decades(Reference Piernas and Popkin45) and a direct association of bigger portions with total energy intake and weight gain was found(Reference Steenhuis and Vermeer46,Reference Albar, Alwan and Evans47) .

The set of these unfavourable extrinsic characteristics of ultra-processed foods is further amplified by aggressive and sophisticated marketing. It changes social norms, especially among the most vulnerable consumers, such as children(Reference Mallarino, Gómez and González-Zapata48). Many marketing strategies for these products rely on unsubstantiated health claims. In low- and middle-income countries, advertising quickly penetrates emerging markets(Reference Lobstein, Jackson-Leach and Moodie49).

Also, there are various plausible biological reasons why ultra-processed foods increase the risk of disease. One is the negative impact of the consumption of ultra-processed foods on diet quality(Reference Martini, Godos and Bonaccio24). Although, studies adjusted for intake of total fat, sugar and sodium(Reference Moradi, Entezari and Mohammadi25) still show associations with disorders and diseases, so other characteristics of ultra-processed foods besides dietary profile are evidently harmful to health.

Thus, evidence showed that consumption of large amounts of ultra-processed foods lead to lower water intake(Reference Marchese, Livingstone and Woods50) and higher intake of food additives(Reference Dunford, Miles and Popkin51). Some additives such as artificial sweeteners, emulsifiers and colourings, evidently harm gut microbiota(Reference Zinöcker and Lindseth52). Furthermore, additives combined with fat, salt and sugar create hyperpalatable foods which may be addictive and so consumed excessively(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy7).

In addition, ultra-processing damages or destroys the whole food structure (its matrix). This evidently adversely affects food absorption and bioaccessibility and inflames gut microbiota(Reference Zinöcker and Lindseth52). It also destroys the phytochemicals in food(Reference Steele and Monteiro53).

The packages of ultra-processed food contain plastic molecules, such as phytates and bisphenols(Reference Buckley, Kim and Wong54). A study identified that bisphenol A promotes insulin resistance and oxidative stress(Reference Zhang, Huang and Zhuang55). Also, processing using intense heat and extrusion can create acrolein and acrylamide that have been linked to oxidative stress and insulin resistance(Reference Zhang, Huang and Zhuang55).

Other factors, such as increased glycaemic response, reduced satiety and thermic effect(Reference Fardet56), also plausibly explain why ultra-processed foods increase the risk of various disorders and diseases and premature death.

Public policies and actions

Public health policies and actions designed to reduce consumption of ultra-processed food, or else of fatty, sugary and/or salty foods that are usually ultra-processed, are in place in a number of countries(57).

The ‘golden rule’ of the official Brazilian dietary guidelines is ‘Always prefer natural or minimally processed foods and freshly made dishes and meals to ultra-processed foods’(6). These guidelines also consider the cultural, social and environmental aspects involved in food choices.

In Brazil, the National School Feeding Program offers free school meals to all students in public schools (primary, middle and high school). It regulates processed and ultra-processed food to a maximum of 20 % of the total budgets, prohibits ultra-processed foods in any form to children up to 3 years of age and also prohibits soft drinks, chocolate, candies, cookies, cakes with toppings or fillings and powdered food to all children(58).

Other countries have recommended less ultra-processed food or less food that is in effect ultra-processed in their official guidelines. These include France, Israel, Chile, Uruguay and Ecuador(59–63).

The Pan-American Health Organization Nutritional Profile Model recommends front-of-package warning labels on processed and ultra-processed foods with high amounts of sugar, sweeteners, fat and/or sodium. It also recommends fiscal policies and restriction of sales and advertising(64). Chile, Mexico, Uruguay, Peru, Brazil and Ecuador have implemented front-of-package labels warning of high content of sugar, saturated fat and sodium(58,65–Reference Reyes, Garmendia and Olivares69) . In Mexico, the labels also warn about non-nutrient components, such as sweeteners(65). Chile has also regulated marketing on food packaging. Products with warning labels cannot carry promotional strategies such as cartoon characters(Reference Reyes, Garmendia and Olivares69).

In Brazil, food corporations have impeded regulation(Reference Mialon and Da Silva Gomes70–Reference Pereira, Gomes and Carvalho73). The current Brazilian front-of-package labels include only added sugar, saturated fat and sodium with more flexible cut-off points, and use a warning in the form of a magnifying glass, in reduced size compared to other Latin American countries(Reference Mialon and Da Silva Gomes70).

Various countries restrict advertising of poor nutritional quality products during children's programmes and/or during programmes with a high audience of children and adolescents(74–76). More general policies have so far only been established in Portugal, where the advertising of products with poor nutritional quality on websites, social networks and mobile applications for children under sixteen is forbidden(77).

Fiscal policies are implemented in some countries. Currently more than forty countries have taxed sugary drinks(78), which has reduced their consumption. In Chile and Mexico, fiscal policies implemented with other measures (such as marketing regulation and front-of-package warning labels) decreased the sales of sugary drinks by 24 and 7⋅6 % in 2 years, respectively(Reference Taillie, Reyes and Colchero79,Reference Arantxa Cochero, Rivera-Dommarco and Popkin80) .

So far, few public policies have been directed specifically at ultra-processed food, and worldwide their production, sales and consumption continue to increase(Reference Baker, Machado and Santos23,Reference Vandevijvere, Jaacks and Monteiro81) . The biggest obstacle to public policies and actions to reduce the consumption of ultra-processed foods is corporate influence on policy decision-taking and implementation(Reference Mialon and Da Silva Gomes70–Reference Mialon, Cediel and Jaime72). This strategy includes lobbying policy makers; stressing the economic importance of corporations; promoting deregulation; shaping the evidence on diet and health; financial incentives and establishing relationships with the media. Corporate interests' conflict with those of public health, and corporate representatives should be excluded from policy discussions and decisions(Reference Mialon and Da Silva Gomes70).

Conclusion

We believe that there is already enough high-quality evidence to state that ultra-processed foods are harmful. Efficient and effective local, national and international public policies and actions that will reduce production and consumption of these products are needed, to protect human health now and in future, and that of the living and physical world. Above all, what is needed is concerted political will that engages citizens, social movements, health professionals, the media, policy-makers in government at all levels and the food industry as a whole.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Geoffrey Cannon for the manuscript review, language editing and suggestions.

Financial Support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Authorship

R. B. L. contributed to the conception and design of the article, writing of the manuscript and approved its publication. M. F. B., M. A. L. and G. C. A. contributed to the design of the article, writing and critical review of the manuscript and approved its publication.

References

Martins, APB, Levy, RB, Claro, RM et al. (2013) Increased contribution of ultra-processed food products in the Brazilian diet (1987–2009). Rev Saude Publica 47, 656–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Moubarac, JC et al. (2018) The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr 21, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Lawrence, M et al. (2019) Ultra-Processed Foods, Diet Quality, and Health Using the NOVA Classification System. Rome, FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/ca5644en/ca5644en.pdf (accessed February 2023).Google Scholar
Ludwig, DS (2011) Technology, diet, and the burden of chronic disease. J Am Med Assoc 305, 1352–1353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, CA, Levy, RB, Claro, RM et al. (2010) A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing. Cad Saude Publica 26, 2039–2049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (2014) Guia alimentar para a população brasileira. 2a edição; Guia alimentar para a população. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 156 p.Google Scholar
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Levy, RB et al. (2019) Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr 22, 936–941.Google Scholar
Juul, F, Parekh, N, Martinez-Steele, E et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food consumption among US adults from 2001 to 2018. Am J Clin Nutr 115, 211–221. Available at https://doi.org/101.093/ajcn/nqab305 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cediel, G, Reyes, M, Da Costa Louzada, ML et al. (2018) Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the Chilean diet (2010). Public Health Nutr 21, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwell, B, Villamor, E, Mora-Plazas, M et al. (2018) Processed and ultra-processed foods are associated with lower-quality nutrient profiles in children from Colombia. Public Health Nutr 21, 142–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da Costa Louzada, ML, Ricardo, CZ, Steele, EM et al. (2018) The share of ultra-processed foods determines the overall nutritional quality of diets in Brazil. Public Health Nutr 21, 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrón-Ponce, JA, Tolentino-Mayo, L, Hernández-F, M et al. (2019) Trends in ultra-processed food purchases from 1984 to 2016 in Mexican households. Nutrients 11, 1–15.Google Scholar
Vandevijvere, S, De Ridder, K, Fiolet, T et al. (2019) Consumption of ultra-processed food products and diet quality among children, adolescents and adults in Belgium. Eur J Nutr 58, 3267–3278. Available at http://link.springer.com/101.007/s00394-018-1870-3 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parra, DC, Da Costa-Louzada, ML, Moubarac, JC et al. (2019) Association between ultra-processed food consumption and the nutrient profile of the Colombian diet in 2005. Salud Publica Mex 61, 147. Available at http://www.saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/article/view/9038 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauber, F, Louzada, MdC, Steele, EM et al. (2018) Ultra-processed food consumption and chronic non-communicable diseases-related dietary nutrient profile in the UK (2008–2014). Nutrients 10, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, RB, Andrade, GC, da Cruz, GL et al. (2022) Three decades of household food availability according to NOVA – Brazil, 1987–2018. Rev Saude Publica 56, 75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J, Steele, EM, Li, Y et al. (2022) Consumption of ultraprocessed foods and diet quality among U.S. children and adults. Am J Prev Med 62, 252–264. Available at https://doi.org/101.016/j.amepre.20210.80.14 (accessed February 2023).Google ScholarPubMed
Martínez Steele, E, Popkin, BM, Swinburn, B et al. (2017) The share of ultra-processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. Popul Health Metr 15, 6. Available at http://pophealthmetrics.biomedcentral.com/articles/101.186/s12963-017-0119-3 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moubarac, JC, Batal, M, Martins, APB et al. (2014) Processed and ultra-processed food products: consumption trends in Canada from 1938 to 2011. Can J Diet Pract Res 75, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latasa, P, Louzada, MLDC, Martinez Steele, E et al. (2018) Added sugars and ultra-processed foods in Spanish households (1990–2010). Eur J Clin Nutr 72, 1404–1412. Available at http://doi.org/101.038/s41430-017-0039-0 (accessed February 2023).Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, L, Martínez Steele, E, Du, M et al. (2021) Trends in consumption of ultraprocessed foods among US youths aged 2–19 years, 1999–2018. J Am Med Assoc 326, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madruga, M, Steele, EM, Reynolds, C et al. (2023) Trends in food consumption according to the degree of food processing among the UK population over 11 years. Br J Nutr 130, 476–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P, Machado, P, Santos, T et al. (2020) Ultra-processed foods and the nutrition transition: global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers. Obes Rev 21, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martini, D, Godos, J, Bonaccio, M et al. (2021) Ultra-processed foods and nutritional dietary profile: a meta-analysis of nationally representative samples. Nutrients 13, 3390. Available at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3390 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moradi, S, Entezari, MH, Mohammadi, H et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food consumption and adult obesity risk: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 63, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konieczna, J, Morey, M, Abete, I et al. (2021) Contribution of ultra-processed foods in visceral fat deposition and other adiposity indicators: prospective analysis nested in the PREDIMED-Plus trial. Clin Nutr 40, 4290–4300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagliai, G, Dinu, M, Madarena, MP et al. (2021) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 125, 308–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiolet, T, Srour, B, Sellem, L et al. (2018) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. Br Med J 360, 1–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, L, Du, M, Wang, K et al. (2022) Association of ultra-processed food consumption with colorectal cancer risk among men and women: results from three prospective US cohort studies. Br Med J 378, e068921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S, Gan, S, Zhang, Q et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food consumption and the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Tianjin chronic low-grade systemic inflammation and health cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 51, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, CH, Khandpur, N, Rossato, SL et al. (2022) Ultra-processed foods and risk of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: a prospective cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 20, 1323–1337. Available at https://doi.org/101.016/j.cgh.20210.80.31 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rey-García, J, Donat-Vargas, C, Sandoval-Insausti, H et al. (2021) Ultra-processed food consumption is associated with renal function decline in older adults: a prospective cohort study. Nutrients 13, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adjibade, M, Julia, C, Allès, B et al. (2019) Prospective association between ultra-processed food consumption and incident depressive symptoms in the French NutriNet-Santé cohort. BMC Med 17, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H, Li, S, Yang, H et al. (2022) Association of ultraprocessed food consumption with risk of dementia. Neurology 99, 1056–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomes Gonçalves, N, Vidal Ferreira, N, Khandpur, N et al. (2022) Association between consumption of ultraprocessed foods and cognitive decline. JAMA Neurol 80, 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suksatan, W, Moradi, S, Naeini, F et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food consumption and adult mortality risk: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of 207,291 participants. Nutrients 14, 1–17.Google Scholar
Moradi, S, Kermani, MAH, Bagheri, R et al. (2021) Ultra-processed food consumption and adult diabetes risk: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Nutrients 13, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M, Du, X, Huang, W et al. (2022) Ultra-processed foods consumption increases the risk of hypertension in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 35, 892–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, T, Gan, S, Ye, M et al. (2021) Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and hyperuricemia: TCLSIH prospective cohort study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 31, 1993–2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, KD, Ayuketah, A, Brychta, R et al. (2019) Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell Metab 30, 67–77. Available at https://doi.org/101.016/j.cmet.20190.50.08 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srour, B, Fezeu, LK, Kesse-Guyot, E et al. (2019) Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes among participants of the NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. JAMA Intern Med 180, 283. Available at https://doi.org/101.001/jamainternmed.20195.942 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, RB, Rauber, F, Chang, K et al. (2021) Ultra-processed food consumption and type 2 diabetes incidence: a prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr 40, 3608–3614. Available at https://doi.org/101.016/j.clnu.20201.20.18 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llavero-Valero, M, Escalada-San Martín, J, Martínez-González, MA et al. (2021) Ultra-processed foods and type-2 diabetes risk in the SUN project: a prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr 40, 2817–2824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duan, MJ, Vinke, PC, Navis, G et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food and incident type 2 diabetes: studying the underlying consumption patterns to unravel the health effects of this heterogeneous food category in the prospective lifelines cohort. BMC Med 20, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piernas, C & Popkin, B (2011) Food portion patterns and trends among U.S. children and the relationship to total eating. J Nutr 141, 1159–1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steenhuis, IHM & Vermeer, WM (2009) Portion size: review and framework for interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys 6, 58–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albar, SA, Alwan, NA, Evans, CEL et al. (2014) Is there an association between food portion size and BMI among British adolescents? Br J Nutr 112, 841–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallarino, C, Gómez, LF, González-Zapata, L et al. (2013) Advertising of ultra-processed foods and beverages: children as a vulnerable population. Rev Saude Publica 47, 1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobstein, T, Jackson-Leach, R, Moodie, ML et al. (2013) Child and adolescent obesity: part of a bigger picture. Lancet 385, 2510–2520. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593763/pdf/nihms724468.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchese, L, Livingstone, KM, Woods, JL et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food consumption, socio-demographics and diet quality in Australian adults. Public Health Nutr 25, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunford, EK, Miles, DR & Popkin, B (2023) Food additives in ultra-processed packaged foods: an examination of US household grocery store purchases. J Acad Nutr Diet 123, 889–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinöcker, MK & Lindseth, IA (2018) The Western diet–microbiome–host interaction and its role in metabolic disease. Nutrients 10, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, EM & Monteiro, CA (2017) Association between dietary share of ultra-processed foods and urinary concentrations of phytoestrogens in the US. Nutrients 9, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, JP, Kim, H, Wong, E et al. (2019) Ultra-processed food consumption and exposure to phthalates and bisphenols in the US national health and nutrition examination survey, 2013–2014. Environ Int 131, 1050–1057. Available at https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160412019317416 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, Huang, M, Zhuang, P et al. (2018) Exposure to acrylamide and the risk of cardiovascular diseases in the national health and nutrition examination survey 2003–2006. Environ Int 117, 154–163. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412017322183 (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fardet, A. (2016) Minimally processed foods are more satiating and less hyperglycemic than ultra-processed foods: a preliminary study with 98 ready-to-eat foods. Food Funct 7, 2338–2346. Available at http://doi.org/101.039/C6FO00107F (accessed February 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNC. University of North Carolina (2020) Global Food Research Program. Available at https://globalfoodresearchprogram.web.unc.edu/ (accessed February 2023).Google Scholar
Brasil (2020) Resolução no 6, de 8 de maio de 2020, sobre o atendimento da alimentação escolar aos alunos da educação básica no âmbito do Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar – PNAE. Diário Oficial da União.Google Scholar
France (2019) Recommendations concerning diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour for adults. Santé publique, 62. Available at www.santepubliquefrance.fr (accessed May 2023).Google Scholar
Israel (2019) Nutritional Recommendations: The Israeli Ministry of Health. Jerusalem: Ministry of Health, 29. Available at https://health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/dietaryguidelinesEN.pdf (accessed May 2023).Google Scholar
Ecuador (2020) Documento Técnico de las Guías Alimentarias Basadas en Alimentos (GABA) del Ecuador. Quito: Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador y la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura, 1–240. Available at https://doi.org/104.060/ca9928es (accessed May 2023).Google Scholar
Chile (2022) Guías alimentarias para Chile. Chile: Ministerio de Salud Subsecretaría de Salud Pública División de Políticas Públicas Saludables y Promoción Departamento de Nutrición y Alimentos 2, 108.Google Scholar
Uruguay (2016) Guía Alimentaria para la Población Uruguaya. Montevideo: Ministerio de SALUD. Depto de Comunicación y Salud, 52.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2015) Nutrient Profile Model. vol. 32. Washington, DC: PAHO.Google Scholar
Mexico (2020) Modificación a la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-051-SCFI/SSA1-2010, Especificaciones generales de etiquetado para alimentos y bebidas no alcohólicas preenvasados (Amendment to Official Mexican Standard NOM-051-SCFI/SSA1-2010, General labelling specifications. Ciudad de México: Diario Oficial de la Federacion.Google Scholar
Uruguay (2018) Reglamento técnicos MERCOSUR contenidos en la Resolución de Grupo Mercado Común no 45/17 de 19 de diciembre de 2017, sus modificativas y reglamentarias. Montevideo: Ministerio de Salud Pública.Google Scholar
Peru (2018) Aprueban Manual de Advertencias Publicitarias en el marco de lo establecido en la Ley No 30021, Ley de promoción de la alimentación saludable para niños, niñas y adolescentes, y su Reglamento aprobado por Decreto Supremo No 017-2017-SA. Diario Oficial El Peruano.Google Scholar
Ecuador (2018) Ministerio de Salud Pública. Reglamento sanitario sustitutivo de etiquetado de alimentos procesados para el consumo humano, No 00005103. Registro Oficial. Ministerio de Salud Pública 318, 1–9.Google Scholar
Reyes, M, Garmendia, ML, Olivares, S et al. (2019) Development of the Chilean front-of-package food warning label. BMC Public Health 19, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mialon, M & Da Silva Gomes, F (2019) Public health and the ultra-processed food and drink products industry: corporate political activity of major transnationals in Latin America and the Caribbean. Public Health Nutr 22, 1898–1908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mialon, M, Khandpur, N, Amaral, L et al. (2021) Arguments used by trade associations during the early development of a new front-of-pack nutrition labelling system in Brazil. Public Health Nutr 24, 766–774. Available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980020003596/type/journal_article (accessed May 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mialon, M, Cediel, G, Jaime, PC et al. (2021) A consistent stakeholder management process can guarantee the ‘social license to operate’: mapping the political strategies of the food industry in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 37, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, TN, Gomes, FDS, Carvalho, CMP et al. (2022) Regulatory measures for the protection of adequate and healthy diet in Brazil: a 20-year analysis. Cad Saude Publica 37, e00153120. Available at http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102311X2021001305008&tlng=t (accessed May 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadcasting Authority Ireland (2013) BAI Children's Commercial Communications Code. 1–25.Google Scholar
France (2016) LOI no 2016-1771 du 20 décembre 2016 relative à la suppression de la publicité commerciale dans les programmes jeunesse de la télévision publique. J Off Répub Fr, Texte 1 sur 179.Google Scholar
The UK Code of Broadcast Advertising (2010) The BCAP Code. London: UK Code Broadcast Advert.Google Scholar
Portugal. Portugal Code (2019) Proposed amendments to the Marketing Code, establishing restrictions on the marketing of certain food and beverage products directed at minors. [Internet]. Lisbon: Government of Portugal. Available at http://app.parlamento.pt/webutils/docs/doc.pdf?path=6148523063446f764c3246795a5868774d546f334e7a67774c336470626d6c7561574e7059585270646d467a4c31684a53556b76644756346447397a4c334271624445794d43315953556c4a4c6d527659773d3d&fich=pjl120-XIII.doc&Inline=true (accessed February 2023).Google Scholar
Global Food Research Program (2020) Sugary drink taxes around the world. Available at https://globalfoodresearchprogram.web.unc.edu/ (accessed February 2023).Google Scholar
Taillie, LS, Reyes, M, Colchero, MA et al. (2020) An evaluation of Chile's law of food labeling and advertising on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: a before-and-after study. PLoS Med 17, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arantxa Cochero, M, Rivera-Dommarco, J, Popkin, BM et al. (2017) In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff 36, 564–571.Google Scholar
Vandevijvere, S, Jaacks, LM, Monteiro, CA et al. (2019) Global trends in ultraprocessed food and drink product sales and their association with adult body mass index trajectories. Obes Rev 20, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Changes in food purchases by the Brazilian population (1987–2009). It shows that purchases of staple foods such as rice, beans, meat and milk, and also culinary ingredients such as sugar, oils, fats and salt had decreased during the period 1987–2009, while purchases of soft drinks, ready-to-eat meals, sausages, industrialised cakes, pies and cookies had increased.

Figure 1

Table 1. NOVA food groups: definition and examples