Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:47:25.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food biotechnology: food industry, nutrition and public health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Milly Ryan-Harshman
Milly Ryan-Harshman
Affiliation:
FEAST Enterprises, Food and Technology Consulting, 947 Oshawa Boulevard North, Oshawa, Ontario LIG 5V7, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on ‘Food industry, nutrition and public health’
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , November 1997 , pp. 845 - 854
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1997

References

REFERENCES

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (1993). Biotechnology in Agriculture General Information. Ottawa: Biotechnology Strategies and Coordination Office.Google Scholar
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (1997). Regulations for Environmental Safety Assessments. Ottawa: Biotechnology Strategies and Coordination Office.Google Scholar
Ames, B. N. & Gold, L. S. (1995). The causes and prevention of cancer: The role of environment. In The True State of the Planet, pp. 141–176 [Bailey, R., editor]. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
American Dietetic Association (1993). Position of the American Dietetic Association: Biotechnology and the future of food. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 93, 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Medical Association (1991). Biotechnology and the American agricultural industry. Journal of the American Medical Association 265, 1429–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, D. E. (1992). Bovine somatotropin: Review of an emerging animal technology. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 3432–3450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, J. L., McBride, B. W., Block, E., Glim, D. R. & Kennelly, J. J. (1994). A review of bovine growth hormone. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74, 167–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C. C. (1991). Food security from the consumer's perspective: An agenda for the 1990s. Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association 52, 83–88.Google Scholar
Canadian Dietetic Association (1991). Hunger and food security in Canada: Official position of the Canadian Dietetic Association. Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association 52, 139.Google Scholar
Canadian Dietetic Association (1995). The Canadian Dietetic Association Biotechnology Committee opinion paper on biotechnology and food. Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association 56, 63–67.Google Scholar
Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario (1995). Biotechnology and Creation Stewardship: Report on Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario Workshop. Woodbridge, ON: Touchstone Public Affairs and Communications Consulting.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (1996). Maximum occupancy. American Demographics 18, 44–51.Google Scholar
Congress of the United States (1991). U.S. Dairy Industry at a Crossroad: Biotechnology and Policy Choices. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
Council For Agricultural Science and Technology (1994). Labeling of Food-plant Biotechnology Products: Issue Paper. Ames, Iowa: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Daughaday, W. H. & Barbano, D.M. (1990). Bovine somatotropin supplementation of dairy cows: Is the milk safe? Journal of the American Medical Association 264, 1003–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degrandts, S. (1996). Biotech food safety diagnostics: Big benefits, big business. Agri-food Research in Ontario 19, 51.Google Scholar
Duvick, D. & Crouch, M. (1992). Is biotechnology compatible with sustainable agriculture? Ag Bioethics Forum. Ames. Iowa: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Erickson, M. D. & Frey, N. (1994). Property-enhanced oils in food applications. Food Technology 48, 63–68.Google Scholar
Etherton, T. D., Kris-Etherton, P. M. & Mills, E. W. (1993). Recombinant bovine and porcine somatotropin: Safety and benefits of these biotechnologies. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 93, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (1996). FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Biotechnology and Food Safety. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Greenpeace International (1996). Not Ready for Roundup: A Critique of Monsanto's Risk Evaluation. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M. W. (1996). Toward rapid on-line detection of pathogens for food processing. Agri-Food Research in Ontario 19, 53.Google Scholar
Gussow, J. D. & Akabas, S. (1993). Are we really fixing up the food supply? Journal of the American Dietetic Association 93, 1300–1304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review 75, 66–76.Google Scholar
Health Canada (1994 a) Guidelines for the Safety Assessment of Novel Foods, vol 1. Ottawa: Food Directorate, Health Protection Branch.Google Scholar
Health Canada (1994 b). Guidelines for Safety Assessment of Novel Foods, vol. 2. Ottawa: Food Directorate, Health Protection Branch.Google Scholar
Hoban, T. J. (1996). Trends in consumer acceptance and awareness of biotechnology. Joumal of Food Distribution Research 27, 1–10.Google Scholar
Hofmann, C., Vanderbruggen, H., Hofte, H., Van Rie, J., Jansens, S. & Van Mellaert, H. (1988). Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins is correlated with the presence of high-affinity binding sites in the brush border membrane of target insect midguts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 85, 7844–7848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson Institute (1991). In Global Food Progress 1991: A Report from Hudson Institute's Center for Global Food Issues [Avery, D. T., editor]. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hudson Institute.Google Scholar
Institute of Food Technologists Office of Scientific Public Affairs (1988). The risk/benefit concept as applied to food: A scientific status summary by the Institute of Food Technologists' Expert Panel on Food Safety & Nutrition. Food Technology 42, 119–126.Google Scholar
Juskevich, J. C. & Guyer, C. G. (1990). Bovine growth hormone: Human food safety evaluation. Science 24, 875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kareiva, P. & Parker, I. (1994). Environmental Risk of Genetically Engineered Organisms and Key Regulatory Issues. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S. (1994). Health management of dairy herds treated with bovine somatotropin. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 204, 116–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mepham, T. B. (1992). Public health implications of bovine somatotropin use in dairying: discussion paper. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 85, 736–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestle, M. (1996). Allergies to transgenic foods-questions of policy (Editorial). New England Journal of Medicine 334, 726–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institutes of Health (1991). NIH technology assessment conference statement on bovine somatotropin. Journal of the American Medical Association 265, 1423–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlee, J. A., Taylor, S. L., Townsend, J. A., Thomas, L. A. & Bush, R. K. (1996). Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. New England Journal of Medicine 334, 688–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, P. (1995). Dietary shifts and implications for US agriculture. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 61, Suppl., 1390S–1396S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Optima Consultants in Applied Social Research (1994). Understanding the Consumer Interest in the New Biotechnology Industry: Study Findings. Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
Province of British Columbia (1991). Food Choice and Disclosure Act. Victoria: Queen's Printer for British Columbia.Google Scholar
Slaney, A. C., Robbins, H. L. & English, L. (1992). Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin CrylllA: An analysis of toxicity in Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) and Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi barber. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 22, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. E. (1993). Food demands of the emerging consumer: the role of modern food technology in meeting that challenge. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58, Suppl., 307S–312S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somerville, C. R. (1993). Future prospects for genetic modification of the composition of edible oils from higher plants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58, Suppl., 270S–275S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Lay Panel of the UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology (1994). Final Report. London: Science Museum.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (1996). US Dairy Product Highlights 1991 Through 1995. Washington DC: USDA, Industry Affairs.Google Scholar
United States Federal Government (1994). Use of Bovine Somatotropin (BST) in the United States: Its Potential Effects. Washington, DC: Executive Branch.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (1992). Another Look: National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water Wells, Phase 2 Report, EPA 570-9-91-020. Washington, DC: Govemment Printing Office.Google Scholar