Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:36:06.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food allergen avoidance: risk assessment for life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

M. Hazel Gowland*
Affiliation:
Allergy Action*, 23 Charmouth Road, St Albans AL1 4RS, UK
*
Corresponding author: Mrs Hazel Gowland, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The skills and knowledge required to carry out food allergen avoidance are becoming increasingly sophisticated. It is not enough to know the names of a handful of dishes which contain a known allergen as an ingredient. Many lifestyles now depend on food prepared away from the home. New product development has introduced a wide range of ingredients and dishes which are labour saving, exciting and innovative. Product traceability now depends on advanced technological support as it struggles to keep up with foods manufactured, prepared and served in ever more complex circumstances. Consumers are now faced with ‘a jungle of choices’. However, those individuals who need to avoid a known allergen, particularly in trace quantities, often find that the food choice deemed suitable is poor, and the information available inadequate or even dangerously misleading. There are two important groups for whom this situation is a major concern. Thousands of families with young children are forced to live with the possibility that everyday foods may be contaminated by a known allergen which could kill in minutes. They live on their nerves, reading every packet and resorting to hyperprotective childcare and vigilance. In addition, the youngest independent consumers, teenagers and those in their twenties, may have little first-hand experience of food preparation. They may be ill-equipped in food-allergen risk assessment. Sadly, those who die from anaphylaxis or allergen-triggered asthma are often in this age-group. Current initiatives to support consumers at risk include a recognised standard for manufacturers seeking to eliminate an allergen from their production, and the integration of food allergy into training for caterers and food standards enforcement professionals.

Type
Meeting Report
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2002

References

British Nutrition Foundation (2001). Teaching Food Safety CD Rom. London: British Nutrition Foundation.Google Scholar
Caterer and Hotelkeeper (2000) Editorial. Caterer and Hotelkeeper 14 September issue, 19.Google Scholar
Conran, S (1975) Superwoman. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.Google Scholar
Fulcrum Productions Ltd (2000). Can You Live Without ... Supermarkets? Channel Four Television Documentary, 20 October. London: Fulcrum Productions Ltd.Google Scholar
Hospitality Training Foundation (1994). Occupational Standards – National Vocational Qualifications/Scottish Vocational Qualifications for Chefs and Foodservice Staff from January 1995. London: Hospitality Training Foundation.Google Scholar
Huddart, G (2000) Hidden killers. Caterer and Hotelkeeper 14 September issue, 5054.Google Scholar
Knapman, P (2001) Nut allergy tragedy after Café Flo meal. Caterer and Hotelkeeper 22 March issue, 16.Google Scholar
Leitch, I, Blair, L & McDowell, D (2000) Dealing with allergy. Environmental Health Journal 108, 335339.Google Scholar
McCabe, M, Lyons, RA, Hodgson, P, Griffiths, G & Jones, R (2001) Correspondence. Lancet 357, 15311532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1997). Be Allergy Aware. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Primeau, M-N, Kagan, R, Joseph, L, Lim, H, Dufresne, C, Duffy, C, Prhcal, D & Clarke, A (2000) The psychological burden of peanut allergy as perceived by adults with peanut allergy and the parents of peanut allergic children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Allergy 30, 11351143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pumphrey, RSH (2000) Lessons for the management of anaphylaxis from a study of fatal reactions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Allergy 30, 11441150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK Government (1999) House of Commons debate for 24 June 1999. Point 43. Hansard. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Weale, S (2000) Shell shock. The Guardian (Weekend) 24 June issue, 2633.Google Scholar