Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:54:38.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Findings from the latest National Diet and Nutrition Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2007

Gillian Swan*
Affiliation:
Nutrition Division, Food Standards Agency, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK
*
Corresponding author: Gillian Swan, fax +44 20 7276 8906, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) of adults aged 19–64 years, carried out in 2000–1, is part of the NDNS programme, a series of cross-sectional surveys aiming to provide detailed quantitative information on the diet, nutritional status and related characteristics of the British population. The programme is split into four surveys of different population age-groups, conducted at approximately three-yearly intervals. In the survey of adults food consumption data were collected from 1724 respondents using a 7 d weighed-intake dietary record. Other components included: height, weight, waist and hip circumference and blood pressure measurements; a 24 h urine sample; a blood sample; a record of physical activity. Results have been published in four volumes covering food consumption, energy and macronutrient intakes, micronutrient intakes and nutritional status, including physical measurements and physical activity. The results have shown that, based on a comparison of nutrient intakes with the UK dietary reference values, adults in Britain are generally getting sufficient nutrients from their diets. However, younger adults (particularly women) and those in lower socio-economic groups are more likely to have low micronutrient intakes and lower levels of some nutritional status indices. The proportion of food energy derived from total fat has fallen since the last survey of this age-group in 1986–7 and is close to the dietary reference value, while the proportion of energy derived from saturated fatty acids and non-milk extrinsic sugars exceeds the dietary reference values. The prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased since 1986–7 and physical activity levels are low.

Type
Symposium on ‘Micronutrient interactions and public health’
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004

References

Blair, SN & Connelly, JC (1995) How much physical activity should we do? The case for moderate amounts and intensities of physical activity In Moving On: International Perspectives on Promoting Physical Activity, pp. 1834 [Killoran, AJ, Fenten, P and Caspersen, C, editors]. London: Health Education Authority.Google Scholar
British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association & British Hypertension Society (1998) Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, endorsed by British Diabetic Association. Heart 80, Suppl. 2,S1S29.Google Scholar
Dacie, JV & Lewis, SM (2001) Practical Haematology 9th ed. Edinburgh Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Department of HealthDepartment of Health (1991) Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 41. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of HealthDepartment of Health (1994) Nutritional Aspects of Cardiovascular Disease. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 46. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of HealthDepartment of Health (1996) Sensible Drinking – The Report of an Inter-departmental Working Group. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of HealthDepartment of Health (1998) Nutrition and Bone Health with Particular Reference to Calcium and Vitamin D. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 49. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of HealthDepartment of Health (2000) Folic Acid and the Prevention of Disease. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 50. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
epartment of HealthDepartment of Health (2002 a) Five a day programme. http://www.doh.gov.uk/fiveaday/Google Scholar
Department of HealthDepartment of Health (2002 b) Health Survey for England 2001. Summary of key findings. http://www.official-documents.co.uk/document/deps/doh/survey01/md/md.htmGoogle Scholar
Finch, S, Doyle, W, Lowe, C, Bates, CJ, Prentice, A, Smithers, G & Clarke, PC (1998) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: People Aged 65 Years and Over. Vol. 1:Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Food Standards AgencyFood Standards Agency (2004) Your daily diet. Meat, fish, eggs and pulses. http://www.food.gov.uk/healthiereating/dailydiet/meatfisheggs/Google Scholar
Gregory, J, Foster, K, Tyler, H & Wiseman, M (1990) The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Gregory, JR, Collins, DL, Davies, PSW, Hughes, JM & Clarke, PC (1995) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Children Aged 11/2 to 41/2 Years. Vol. 1: London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Gregory, J, Lowe, S, Bates, CJ, Prentice, A, Jackson, LV, Smithers, G, Wenlock, R & Farron, M (2000) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People Aged 4 to 18 Years. Vol. 1:Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Henderson, L, Gregory, J, Irving, K & Swan, G (2003 a) The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults Aged 19 to 64 Years. Vol. 2: Energy, Protein, Carbohydrate, Fat and Alcohol Intake. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Henderson, L, Gregory, J & Swan, G (2002) The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults Aged 19 to 64 Years. Vol. 1: Types and Quantities of Foods Consumed. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Henderson, L, Irving, K, Gregory, J, Bates, CJ, Prentice, A, Perks, J, Swan, G & Farron, M (2003 b) The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults Aged 19 to 64 Years. Vol. 3: Vitamin and Mineral Intake and Urinary Analytes. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2002) Feasibility study report: NDNS adults aged 19–64 years. In National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults Aged 19–64 Years. Technical Report. Appendix C; available at: http://www.food.gov.uk/science/101717/ndnsdocuments/ndnsappendices.Google Scholar
Ramsay, LE, Williams, B, Johnston, DG, MacGregor, GA, Poston, L, Potter, JF, Poulter, NR & Russell, G (1999) Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society. Journal of Human Hypertension 13, 569592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruston, D, Hoare, J, Henderson, L, Gregory, J, Bates, CJ, Prentice, A, Birch, M, Swan, G & Farron, M (2004) The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults Aged 19 to 64 Years. Vol. 4: Nutritional Status (Anthropometry and Blood Analytes) Blood Pressure and Physical Activity. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Sauberlich, HE (1971) Vitamin C status: methods and findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 24, 444454.Google Scholar
Sauberlich, HE, Skala, JH & Dowdy, RP (1974) Laboratory Tests for the Assessment of Nutritional Status. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Scientific, Advisory, Committee, on Nutrition (2003) Salt and Health. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Skinner, CJ & & Holmes, D (2002) The 2000–01 National Diet and Nutrition Survey of Adults aged 19–64 years: The impact of non-response. In National Diet and Nutrition Survey Adults Aged 19–64 Years. Appendix E; available at: http://www.food.gov.uk/science/101717/ndnsdocuments/ndnsappendices.Google Scholar
US, Department & of, Agriculture (1990) Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: USDA/HNIS.Google Scholar
World Health OrganizationWorld Health Organization (1972) Nutritional Anaemias. Technical Report SeriesGeneva:WHO.Google Scholar