Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:57:11.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of defective nutrition during pregnancy in farm livestock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

K. L. Blaxter
K. L. Blaxter
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Nutrition in Pregnancy
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 1957 , pp. 52 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1957

References

Asdell, S. A. (1952). Congr. int. Physiol. Réprod. anim. II. Copenhagen, 2, p. 7.Google Scholar
Bamicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G. & Grant, A. I. (1949). J. agric. Sci. 39, 4.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1944). J. agric. Sci. 34, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Unpublished.Google Scholar
Bonnier, G. (1946). K. LantbrAkad. Handl., Stockh., 85, 221.Google Scholar
Bonsma, J. C. (1949). J. agric. Sci. 39, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R., Clarke, P. M. & Mitchell, K. G. (1954–1955). J. agric. Sci. 45, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R. & Walker, D. M. (1949). J. agric. Sci. 39, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, I. L. & Flux, D. S. (1948). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 61.Google Scholar
Du Toit, P. J. & Bisschop, J. H. R. (1929). Rep. vet. Res. S. Afr. 15, 1059.Google Scholar
Ferguson, K. A., Carter, H. B. & Hardy, M. H. (1949). Aust.J. sci. Res. B, 2, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flux, D. S. (1950). J. agric. Sci. 40, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, A. H. H., Godden, W., Snook, L. C. & Thomson, W. (1938–1939). J. Physiol. 94, 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, A. H. H., Godden, W., Snook, L. C. & Thomson, W. (1939–1940). J. Physiol. 97, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J. C. & Thomson, W. (1954). Brit. agric. Bull. 6, 154.Google Scholar
Gill, J. C. & Thomson, W. (1954–1955). J. agric. Sci. 45, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. G. & Tribe, D. E. (1951). J. agric. Sci. 41, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracey, J. F. (1955). Vet. Rec. 67, 984.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1952). J. agric. Sci. 42, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1954–1955). J. agric. Sci. 45, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, F. T., McMeekan, C. P. & Wallace, L. R. (1948). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 60.Google Scholar
Lindner, H. R. & Ferguson, K. A. (1956). Nature, Lond., 177, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkelä, A. (1956). Suom. MaataZoust. Seur.Julk. 85, 1.Google Scholar
McTurk, R. (1843). Trans. Highl. ugric. Soc. Scot. 2nd ser. 8, 631.Google Scholar
Munro, J. (1955). J. agric. Sci. 46, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paloheimo, L. (1944). Suom. Maataloust. Seur-Julk. 56, 5.Google Scholar
Parry, H. B. (1955). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 52.Google Scholar
Parry, H. B. (1956). Nature, Lond., 177, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. S. (1956). J. agric. Sci. 47, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, K. C. & Leech, F. B. (1955). J. agric. Sci. 46, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. R. (1954). Report of the Department of Qealth for Scotland, 1953 [Cmd. 9107].Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M. & Thomson, W. (1948–1949). Brit.J. Nutr. 2, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verges, J. B. (1939). Yearb. Suffolk Sheep Soc. Ipswich.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. agric. Sci. 38, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1954–1955). J. agric. Sci. 45, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. M. (1954–1955). J. agric. Sci. 45, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, F. W. (1952). Brit. vet.J. 108, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, F. W. (1955). Vet. Rec. 67, 605.Google Scholar