Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T00:20:08.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength in community-dwelling postmenopausal Asian women: a scoping review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2024

C. Y. Kwan*
Affiliation:
School of Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Approximately 40% of the community-dwelling population aged over 65 experiences falls annually, leading to significant morbidity, immobility, and mortality, with reduced muscle strength identified as a major risk factor(1). In comparison to other ethnic populations, Asian older adults often demonstrate weaker muscle strength, with this decline accelerating notably in female Asian older adults as they age(2). Existing research indicates a correlation between vitamin D deficiency (circulating level of 25(OH)D below 50 nmol/L) and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults(3). Postmenopausal women, experiencing a decline in oestrogen, face an elevated risk of vitamin D deficiency(4). Notably, vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in Asian populations(5). However, the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in promoting muscle strength among community-dwelling postmenopausal Asian women has not been comprehensively investigated. This scoping review aims to provide an overview and synthesis of existing evidence in the literature concerning the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in enhancing muscle strength among community-dwelling postmenopausal Asian women.

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR recommendations(6). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2013 to 2023 were identified through searches conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central databases. Articles would be included if they: (i) were human RCTs with a cross-over or parallel design, (ii) included community-dwelling postmenopausal women, and (iii) investigated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength. The review excluded: (i) in vivo animal studies, in vitro cell research, case reports, and observational studies; (ii) studies investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation combined with other interventions, such as physical exercise, amino acid supplements, or other medication administration records like insulin or hormone therapy; and (iii) studies not in English. Following deduplication and relevance screening, five studies met the criteria, with Jadad scores (methodological quality assessment) of 1, 3, 5, 5, and 5, respectively.

Five RCTs involving a total of 872 subjects were reviewed(711). The three studies with Jadad scores of 5 indicated statistically significant and meaningful increases in muscle strength, measured by handgrip strength, with p-values <0.05 and effect sizes of 0.97, 1.75, and 3.83, respectively, indicating large effect sizes. The study with a Jadad score of 3 highlighted such increases only in the younger subgroup (<68 years old). Conversely, the study with a Jadad score of 1 suggested no significant changes in muscle strength.

In conclusion, this review suggests promising outcomes for vitamin D supplementation in enhancing muscle strength among postmenopausal Asian women. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency underscores potential health benefits, but heterogeneity in study designs, Jadad scores, and age subgroup responses necessitates cautious interpretation. Further high-quality research is imperative to elucidate optimal dosages and durations, ensuring a nuanced understanding of the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and muscle strength.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Cesari, M, Landi, F, Torre, S et al. (2002) J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57(11), 722726.10.1093/gerona/57.11.M722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y, Hwang, A, Liu, L et al. (2016) J Clin Gerontol Geriatr 7(2), 3743.10.1016/j.jcgg.2016.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspell, N, Laird, E, Healy, M et al. (2019) Clin Interv Aging 14, 17511761.10.2147/CIA.S222143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerchbaum, E (2014) Maturitas 79(1), 37. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Z, Pu, R, Li, N et al. (2023) Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 63(19), 36023611.10.1080/10408398.2021.1990850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tricco, AC, Lillie, E, Zarin, W et al. (2018) Ann Intern Med 169(7), 467473.10.7326/M18-0850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Q, Wu, X, Du, Y et al. (2018) Clin Interv Aging 13, 23672374.10.2147/CIA.S186199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, LH, Zhu, WJ, Liu, YJ et al. (2015) Acta Pharmacol Sin 36(9), 10651073.10.1038/aps.2015.55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hara, S, Kishimoto, KN, Okuno, H et al. (2013) Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92(2), 101110. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826ed991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setiati, S, Anugrahini, , Fransiska, JE et al. (2018) Geriatr Gerontol Int 18(3), 434440. 10.1111/ggi.13201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suebthawinkul, C, Panyakhamlerd, K, Yotnuengnit, P et al. (2018) Climacteric 21(5), 491497. 10.1080/13697137.2018.1480600CrossRefGoogle Scholar