Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:42:12.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of healthy dietary patterns on stress, mood, and mental health outcomes: A systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2024

James Brooks
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Bournemouth Gateway Building, St Paul’s Lane, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH8 8GP
Paul Fairbairn
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Bournemouth Gateway Building, St Paul’s Lane, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH8 8GP
Anna Mantzouratou
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Bournemouth Gateway Building, St Paul’s Lane, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH8 8GP
Leigh Chester
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Bournemouth Gateway Building, St Paul’s Lane, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH8 8GP
Fotini Tsofliou
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Bournemouth Gateway Building, St Paul’s Lane, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH8 8GP
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Chronic low-grade inflammation has been associated with poor mood states and reduced mental well-being, increasing the chances of comorbidities such as diabetes and mental illness (1). Inflammation and stress share a bi-directional relationship (2), impacting an individual’s mood and mental well-being. Whole food interventions such as the Mediterranean diet (MD) possess antiinflammatory properties and might offer protection for perceived stress and mood disorders (3). This systematic review investigated the effects of whole food interventions on stress, mood, and mental well-being.

The following databases were searched for studies published until the end of March 2024:

MEDLINE, CINAHL, Prospero, Web of Science, Cochrane Library (n = 6). Inclusion criteria were: (1) RCT; (2) mean participant age between 18 and 65 years; (3) measured one (or more) relevant outcomes e.g. stress, mood, or mental wellbeing; (4) whole food intervention. The Cochrane Risk of Bias v2 will be used to assess randomised controlled trials (RCT) (4).

The review identified 3,854 results in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines with fifteen meeting inclusion criteria. Backward citation searching yielded 8 studies. A total of twenty-three studies were included in this review. Seventeen applied whole food dietary intervention (WFDI) while six investigated supplementing the habitual i.e. adding nuts to diet (STH). Seventeen studies used WFDI: MD (n = 7), Nordic diet (n = 1), Ketogenic diet (n = 1), time-restricted eating (n = 1), a priori diets (n = 7). The remaining six STH studies supplemented with: nuts (n = 3), basil (n = 1), cacao (n = 1) and corn leaf (n = 1). Five studies reported positive changes in mood states i.e. vigor (p <.05). Two of these investigated the effects of a 10-day MD intervention compared to habitual diet, finding significant improvement in mood states (n = 4). Three studies measured mental well-being as an outcome with WFDI, MD (n = 1) and a priori diets (n = 2) reporting significance (p <.05) but demonstrating heterogenicity in measurement methods. Two studies were conducted with the outcome of stress with a WFDI, Mediterranean diet (n = 1) and a priori (n = 1). The findings reported to have a positive effect on reducing stress, when compared to baseline (p < .035). Four studies examined the effects of STH on mood states reporting positive significant change respectively: nut (n = 2), basil (n = 1), cacao (n = 1).

This systematic review is the first to examine the interaction of whole food intervention with stress, mood, and/or mental well-being. Our findings offer an insight to the interplay of different whole food interventions, whether entire diet or supplementation on the outlined outcomes in this review. The findings demonstrate heterogenicity of measurements which could be a factor in not establishing significance in some studies (n = 9). Other considerations of this review are the confounding variables that can influence stress, mood, and mental well-being such as physical activity, hydration, sleep quality.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Osimo, EF et al. (2019) Psychological medicine 49 (12), 19581970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maydych, V (2019) Front Neurosci 13, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Villegas, A (2013) et al. BMC medicine 11, 112.Google Scholar
A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. 2024 Available from: https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-toolrandomized-trials.Google Scholar