Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:08:38.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digestibility and balance in ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

F. W. Wainman
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on ‘Methods for Evaluating Feeds for Large Farm Animals’
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

Barsaul, C. S. & Talapatra, S. K. (1970). Indian Vet. J. 47, 348.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26, 86.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 283.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Br. J. Nutr. 10, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, L. S. (1970). Proceedings 1970 University fo Maryland Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, p. 52.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1954). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 5, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. L. (1958). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 28, 695.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. L. (1966). In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition [Abrams, J. T., editor]. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. L. (1967). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Hag, G. A. (1976). World Rev. Anim. Proc. 12, (3), 43.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1972). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 493.Google Scholar
Flatt, W. P., Van Soest, P. J., Sykes, J. F. & Moore, L. A. (1958). Proc. 1st Symp. Energy Metabolism (Copenhagen) p. 53, Statens Husdyrbrugsudvalg Copenhagen (EAAP Publ. no. 8).Google Scholar
French, M. H. (1940). J. agric. Sci. 30, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fibre Analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications) USDA Agriculture Handbook no. 379.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC, Blaxter, K. L. & Armstrong, D. G. (1958). Proc. 1st Symp. Energy Metabolism (Copenhagen) p. 157, Statens Husdyrbrugsudvalg Copenhagen (EAAP Publ. no. 8).Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1967). Aust. J. agric. Res. 18, 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. & Goodall, E. D. (1976). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 98A.Google Scholar
Klosterman, E. W. & Parker, C. F. (1976). Res. Bull. 1088, Ohio Ag. Res. & Dev. Centre.Google Scholar
Martin, A. K. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 325.Google Scholar
Owen, E. C. (1967). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullar, J. D. (1958). Proc. 1st Symp. Energy Metabolism (Copenhagen) p. 95, Statens Husdyrbrugsudvalg Copenhagen (EAAP Publ. no. 8).Google Scholar
Rowett Research Institute (1975). 1st Report of the Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. & Flatt, W. P. (1975). The Evaluation of Feeds through Digestibility Experiments. Athens: Univ. Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L. (1967). In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals. [Blaxter, K. L., Kielanowski, J. and Thorbek, G., editors]. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press (EAAP Pubnl. no. 12).Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L. (1972). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Dewey, P. J. S. & McDonald, M. S. (1976). In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals. [Vermorel, M., editor]. Clermont-Ferrand: de Busac G.. (EAAP Publ. no. 19).Google Scholar
Wye College Annual Report (1974). p. 43.Google Scholar