Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:19:45.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differences in bone health and bone biomarkers between exercising male protein supplement users and non-users

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2010

R. Warner
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Co. Waterford, Ireland
L. Doyle
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Co. Waterford, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Increasing protein intake through protein supplements is a growing practice amongst exercising individuals. However, there are varying reports in terms of the detrimental(Reference Ballard, Specker and Binkley1) and beneficial(Reference Manninen2) effects of protein on bone. The effect of high level protein supplementation on bone health in exercising individuals is relatively unexplored. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of variations in protein intake on bone health and bone biomarkers in exercising males.

Fifty non-supplement users (25.9±5.1 years) and 52 supplement users (25.4±4.9 years) were recruited.

The average length of time for supplement use was 33 months. All subjects completed a food diary for 3 d which was analysed using Comp EatTM. The net endogenous acid production (NEAP) was calculated by the method described by Remer et al. (Reference Remer, Dimitriou and Manz3). Protein content of supplements consumed was obtained from product labels. Effect of exercise on bone health was calculated using osteogenic index (OI). Bone health (bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC)) and percentage lean body mass (LBM) was measured using dual energy X-ray absorbtiometry (DEXA). Serum samples were analysed for osetocalcin (S-OC) and crosslaps (S-CTx) using commercially available ELISA kits. Urine was measured for pH using a digital urine analyzer with urinary calcium (U-Ca) and creatinine (U-Cr) levels being measured spectrophotemetrically. Independent samples t-test or Mann–Whitney U test (depending on data normality) were used to test for any differences between supplement users and non-users. There were no significant differences in the potential confounders of BMI, OI or percent LBM (P>0.05) between users and non-users.

a,b Means with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0.05).

Protein intake, NEAP and sulphur content of the diet were significantly greater in users than non-users. There were no significant differences in BMD, BMC, urine pH or calcium, serum osteocalcin or crosslaps between users and non-users. This study demonstrates that a protein supplementation of 33 months duration has no effect on bone health in exercising males.

We wish to acknowledge Technological Sector Research Strand I for funding this research.

References

1.Ballard, TL, Specker, BL, Binkley, TL et al. (2006) Bone 38, 898904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Manninen, AH (2006) Br J Sports Med 40, 900905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Remer, T, Dimitriou, T & Manz, F (2003) Am J Clin Nutr 77, 12551260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

a,b