No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Clinical assessment in primary care: professional cooperation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Symposium on ‘Nutritional assessment and surveillance: implications for food policy 2. Are we measuring what we intend to measure?’
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1996
References
Cupples, M. E. & McKnight, A. (1994). Randomised controlled trial of health promotion in general practice for patients at high cardiovascular risk. British Medical Journal
309, 993-996.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1994). Shaping a Healthier Future. A Strategy for Effective Healthcare in the 1990s.
Dublin: Stationery Office.
Google Scholar
Department of Health (1995a). A Health Promotion Strategy.
Dublin: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1995b). Recommendation for a Food and Nutrition Policy for Ireland.
Dublin: Department of Health.
Google Scholar
Family Heart Study Group (1994). Randomized controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study. British Medical Journal
308, 313-320.Google Scholar
Field, K., Thorogood, M., Silagy, C, Normand, C, O'Neill, C. & Muir, J. (1995). Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective? British Medical Journal
310, 1109-1112.Google Scholar
Grover, S. A., Lowensteyn, I., Esrey, K. L., Steinert, Y., Joseph, L. & Abrahamowicz, M. (1995). Do doctors accurately assess coronary risk in their patients?
British Medical Journal
310, 975-978.Google Scholar
Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group (1995). Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: final results of the OXCHECK Study. British Medical Journal
310, 1099-1104.Google Scholar
Irish Heart Foundation (1994). Happy Heart National Survey.
Dublin: Irish Heart Foundation.Google Scholar
Kilkenny Health Project (1992). A Pilot Programme for Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, 1985-1992. Kilkenny, Republic of Ireland: Health Promotion Unit, South Eastern Health Board.Google Scholar
Lindholm, L. H., Ekbom, T., Dash, C., Eriksson, M., Tibblin, G. & Schersten, B., on behalf of the CELL Study Group (1995). The impact of health care advice given in primary care on cardiovascular risk. British Medical Journal
310, 1105-1109.Google Scholar
Marteau, T. M., Kinmonth, A.-L., Pyke, S., Thompson, S. G.
(Family Heart Study Group) (1995). Readiness for lifestyle advice: self-assessments of coronary risk prior to screening in the British family heart study. British Journal of General Practice
45, 5-8.Google Scholar
Pyorala, K., De Backer, G., Graham, I., Poole-Wilson, P. & Wood, D., on behalf of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension (1994). Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. European Heart Journal
15, 1300-1331.Google Scholar
Silagy, C., Muir, J., Coulter, A., Thorogood, M. & Roe, L. (1993). Cardiovascular risk and attitudes to lifestyle: what do patients think?
British Medical Journal
306, 1657-1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toon, P. (1995). Editorial: Health checks in general practice – time to review their role. British Medical Journal
310, 1083-1084.Google Scholar
You have
Access