Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:56:11.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bioassay-guided isolation and purification of phytochemicals with anti-parasitic properties from Cissus ruspolii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2016

K. Tolossa
Affiliation:
Monogastric Science Research Centre, SRUC, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK
S.C. Fry
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK
S. Athanasiadou
Affiliation:
Disease Systems, SRUC, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
G.J. Loake
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK
J.G.M. Houdijk
Affiliation:
Monogastric Science Research Centre, SRUC, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Many smallholder farmers and pastoralists rely on their indigenous knowledge, practices and locally available plants to manage both human and livestock parasitic infections( Reference Tolossa 1 ). We previously identified in screening study that aqueous crude extract and its relatively late-eluting fractions from one of such plants, Cissus ruspolii, possess strong in vitro anthelmintic properties( Reference Tolossa 2 , Reference Tolossa 3 ). Thus, these fractions may contain phytochemicals with anti-parasitic properties. The objective of this study was to further isolate, purify and characterise anthelmintic phytochemicals from C. ruspolii.

A crude aqueous extract of C. ruspolii was prepared by maceration in de-ionized water for 72 hr at room temperature. This extract was fractionated on a Bio-Gel P-2 column chromatography using de-ionized water and fractions were bio-assayed in triplicate for egg hatch inhibition (EHI) using Teladorsagia circumcincta eggs as per guidelines for anthelmintic resistance testing( Reference Coles 4 ) to locate bio-active pools. Isolation and purification of phytochemicals from one of the active pools was carried out through Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography by solvent gradient elution, and were also bio-assayed in triplicate, using the chemical anthelmintic monepantel (Zolvix®; 0·1μg/mL) as a positive control. Further characterization of compounds was done using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) developed in BuOH: HOAc: H2O (4:1:1) and CHCl3: MeOH: HOAc (10:2:1) solvent systems with markers, stained with vanillin-H2SO4 and heated in an oven at 120°C for 30 minutes.

We observed highly significant and dose dependent EHI activities of three pools from the Bio-Gel P-2 fractionation (data not shown). The Sephadex LH-20 purified active compounds, which also showed strong and dose-dependent EHI activities (Figure 1); the highest concentration used for some of the components resulted in 100 % EHI. The TLC analyses of these pure compounds indicated that they are polar compounds with higher average retention factor (Rf = 0·553) in polar and acidic solvent system (Figure 2) than in relatively non-polar and acidic solvent system: chloroform- methanol-acetic acid (Rf = 0·194; data not shown).

Fig. 1. EHI assays of purified C. ruspolii compounds

Fig. 2. TLC profile in BuOH: HOAc: H2O (4:1:1)

Our data support the view that C. ruspolii has anti-parasitic properties and also validated its ethno-medical use. Moreover, these in vitro experiments provided preliminary screenings for efficacy of extracts, fractions and purified compounds. Purified samples obtained have been submitted for NMR and MS analysis for structure elucidation, which is expected to inform pending in vivo trials, underpin existing phytotherapy and potentially the development of novel anthelmintic drugs.

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from CIDLID, supported by DFID, BBSRC and SG (BB/H009299/1) and SRUC International Engagement Strategy.

References

1. Tolossa, K et al. (2013) J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 9, 32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Tolossa, K et al. (2015) Adv Anim Biosci 6, 92 Google Scholar
3. Tolossa, K et al. (2015) Adv Anim Biosci 6, 94 Google Scholar
4. Coles, GC et al. (2006) Vet Parasitol 136, 167185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. EHI assays of purified C. ruspolii compounds

Figure 1

Fig. 2. TLC profile in BuOH: HOAc: H2O (4:1:1)