Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:36:54.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An assessment of the Atkins diet on skeletal health in contrast to diets rich in alkaline-forming fruits and vegetables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2013

C. Huggett
Affiliation:
Department of nutrition and metabolism, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH
R. H. T. Gannon
Affiliation:
Department of health and nutrition, Nestlé research centre, Switzerland
H. Truby
Affiliation:
Department of nutrition and metabolism, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH
R. Hiscutt
Affiliation:
Department of nutrition and metabolism, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH
H. Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of nutrition and metabolism, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH
W. D. Fraser
Affiliation:
Faculty of medicine and health sciences, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, UK
S. A. Lanham-New
Affiliation:
Department of nutrition and metabolism, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

It has been suggested that the human skeleton plays an important role in acid-base balance( Reference Wachman and Bernstein 1 ) and that eating a diet plentiful in alkaline-forming foods, notably fruit and vegetables, may provide benefits for bone health( Reference Tucker 2 , Reference New3 , Reference Chen4 ). In contrast, a dietary pattern typical of Western societies that is insufficient in fruit and vegetables, but is high in acid-forming protein may present a mild metabolic acidosis and thus deleterious effects to skeletal health( Reference Remer 5 ).

The data used within this project were collected from an intervention study( Reference Gannon 6 ), which investigated the effects of subjects following either the Atkins diet, a weight-reduction diet high in fruit and vegetables (HFV) or a control diet: on markers of bone turnover (BTM) over 6 months, in 67 UK overweight men (BMI 27–40 kg/m2). Statistical analyses were performed for differences in diet and acidity (potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) using the protein: potassium algorithm), in association with BTMs, over time and between groups: free Pyridinoline relative to Creatine (fPYD/Creatine), free Deoxypridinoline relative to Creatine (fDPD/Creatine), serum C-telopeptides of collagen (CTx) and serum amino-terminal procollagen extension peptide (P1NP) were measured.

Both the Atkins and HFV diet groups experienced significant reductions in weight and a significant increase was seen over time for potassium intake for the HFV diet (P<0.030). Significant increases were observed in the Atkins group for PRAL and for NEAP (P<0.045 & P<0.043), while significant decreases were seen for the HFV diet respectively (P<0.034 & P<0.033) (see Fig. 1). A significant increase was demonstrated for CTx in both Atkins and HFV (P<0.012 & P<0.002) and a trend was seen concerning elevated CTx, for subjects with NEAP estimates 1sd above the mean (P<0.093) (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. NEAP estimates (mEq/d) (Paired t-tests).

Fig. 2. CTx (ng/ml) according to high or low NEAP (1sd above or below mean estimate).

The results confirmed that the Atkins diet is significantly more acidic than the HFV diet and this appeared to increase bone resorption. Conversely, HFV provides an alkaline diet, rich in potassium but it did not demonstrate reductions in bone resorption. The NEAP trend observed warrants further investigation as numbers were small; indeed future research may be able to establish if HFV offers benefits for bone-associated outcomes and thus osteoporosis prevention.

References

1. Wachman, & Bernstein, (1968) The Lancet. 291, 958959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Tucker, et al. (1999) Am J Clin Nutr. 69, 727736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. New, et al. (1997) Am J Clin Nutr. 65, 18311839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chen, et al. (2006) Brit J Nutr. 96, 745751.Google Scholar
5. Remer, et al. (2000) Semin Dialysis. 13, 221226.Google Scholar
6. Gannon, et al. (2007) Osteoporosis Int. 18, Suppl 3.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. NEAP estimates (mEq/d) (Paired t-tests).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. CTx (ng/ml) according to high or low NEAP (1sd above or below mean estimate).